Home Page › Forums › Spiritual Stuff › The Twilight Within Us
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2009 at 2:13 am #204230
Anonymous
GuestQuote:When we begin to awaken to the light of the soul, life takes on a new depth. The losses we have suffered, the delight and peace we have experienced, the beauty we have known, all things belong together in a profound way. One of the greatest treasures in the world is a contented heart. When we befriend the twilight side of the heart, we discover a surer tranquility where the darkness and the brightness of our lives dwell together. We gain the courage to search out where the real thresholds in life are, the vital frontiers, the parts of our life that we have not yet experienced. Beyond work, survival, relationships, even family, we become aware of our profound duty to our own life. Like the farmer in spring, we turn over a new furrow in the unlived field. We awaken our passion to live and are no longer afraid of the unknown, for even the darkest night has a core of twilight. We recover within us some of the native integrity that wild places enjoy outside.
We learn to befriend our complexity and see the dance of opposition within us not as a negative or destructive thing but as an invitation to a creative adventure.The true beauty of a person glimmers like a slow twilight where the full force of each color comes alive and yet blends with the others to create a new light. A person’s beauty is sophisticated and sacred and is far beyond image, appearance or personality. -John O’Donohue, “Beauty: The Invisible Embrace”
August 5, 2009 at 3:18 am #220956Anonymous
GuestAwesome. I have a borderline obsession with opposition. Thanks for sharing this! It might be appropriate to mention that 2 Nephi says there in opposition
inall things. The language of “compound in one” is also intriguing. 2 Nephi 2:11 For it must needs be, that there is an opposition in all things. If not so, my first-born in the wilderness, righteousness could not be brought to pass, neither wickedness, neither holiness nor misery, neither good nor bad. Wherefore, all things must needs be a compound in one; wherefore, if it should be one body it must needs remain as dead, having no life neither death, nor corruption nor incorruption, happiness nor misery, neither sense nor insensibility.
August 5, 2009 at 12:35 pm #220957Anonymous
Guest“All things” would include the Church, would it not? It also would include within each individual member. Perhaps the lack of struggle we crave so much isn’t a good thing in the long run – or even possible. Perhaps learning to be at peace with extrenal AND internal opposition is one of the great liberators of the Gospel (“Good News”) – the idea that the inherent turmoil that “must needs be” is unavoidable and reconciled (“atoned for”) already in the eternal scheme of things.
August 5, 2009 at 2:10 pm #220958Anonymous
GuestThanks for bringing in those scriptural references. I really had not thought of those in context to the paragraph I quoted. They fit good. We devour the beautiful and enticing fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. It is no longer on the tree, shining in appearance. Have we destroyed it? No. We took it inside ourselves. We digest it, and it is assimilated into our being, into every cell. The experience is described as the assimilation of opposites. In order to truly live, we must also die. In order to have joy, we must weep. It’s a tension of opposites that plays out like a fractal diagram expanding, creating a life experience. We can fear this. We can find beauty and wonderment in it.
I say we are on a hero’s adventure, not sitting in a study hall taking a pass/fail proficiency exam.
August 5, 2009 at 3:27 pm #220959Anonymous
GuestThis may be ridiculously self-serving but… I wrote this in another thread; I think it applies here too: I agree totally with the concept of detachment. This is the sweet spot of life. Staying present to enjoy life, even when it’s hard. Not caring about what has happened, not worrying about what is to come, not expecting anything from anyone, not accepting anything negative from others.
This may sound cold and inhumane but this is the spirit of detachment. And when done correctly, we are open to feel joy, spread joy better than any other way.
I think attachment is the paradox of existence. I’m not sure what role theology, philosophy plays in this, but I do sense that at Stage 6, a complete detachment of earthly “cares” is experienced, and the one can commune with/minister to other humans in a purely charitable sense. Partly because existence is stripped of paradox: all things happen for a reason and that reason is for the experience itself, the uniquely human experience that one would never get as another organism or as a human living in another time/space or even as a different contemporary human.
Experiences create meaning, rather than human minds creating/interpreting meaning from experience.
Now, THAT would be staying present!!
August 5, 2009 at 4:02 pm #220960Anonymous
Guestswimordie wrote:Now, THAT would be staying present!!
Absolutely! I served my mission in Japan (Buddhist mostly) where I first heard the term “detachment.” It was so contrary to my Mormon upbringing that it took years to grasp it. It is a beautiful concept. Eckhart Tolle’s work (Power of Now, The New Earth…) helped me further understand it, and you are so right on about how much peace and joy we have when we live the principle.
August 5, 2009 at 4:37 pm #220961Anonymous
GuestRix wrote:swimordie wrote:Now, THAT would be staying present!!
Absolutely! I served my mission in Japan (Buddhist mostly) where I first heard the term “detachment.” It was so contrary to my Mormon upbringing that it took years to grasp it. It is a beautiful concept. Eckhart Tolle’s work (Power of Now, The New Earth…) helped me further understand it, and you are so right on about how much peace and joy we have when we live the principle.
I think the ‘shadow’ side of detachment is that we become apathetic. Too many confuse the two, I think.HiJolly
August 5, 2009 at 4:48 pm #220962Anonymous
GuestHiJolly wrote:I think the ‘shadow’ side of detachment is that we become apathetic. Too many confuse the two, I think.
I think the act of detachment is the continued motivation. As per the OP, the “twilight” can only be reached through detachment.
And, it may be semantics, but detachment doesn’t have to mean “I don’t care about anything”, because, in a sense, that is not detachment. Someone who is suicidal gets to that point. That isn’t detachment because “not caring” is self-loathing/self-defeating. Detachment is the embracing of self at the expense of all things external. Detachment is valuing the “individual” existence to it’s maximum potential.
Now, there are times when detachment may look like inaction/apathy. Sometimes this is a necessary part of the detachment process, not the end-game.
Any confusion would come from a lack of understanding/experience. imo
August 5, 2009 at 5:33 pm #220963Anonymous
Guestswimordie wrote:And, it may be semantics, but detachment doesn’t have to mean “I don’t care about anything”, because, in a sense, that is not detachment. Someone who is suicidal gets to that point. That isn’t detachment because “not caring” is self-loathing/self-defeating. Detachment is the embracing of self at the expense of all things external. Detachment is valuing the “individual” existence to it’s maximum potential.
Now, there are times when detachment may look like inaction/apathy. Sometimes this is a necessary part of the detachment process, not the end-game.
Any confusion would come from a lack of understanding/experience. imo
I agree with you. I have seen Western people abandon Christianity and embrace Eastern concepts such as non-attachment, only to fall victim of not contexualizing the Eastern path properly in their Western lives. It is a risk.HiJolly
August 5, 2009 at 10:23 pm #220964Anonymous
Guest*loving this thread* In regards to the danger of apathy. If someone is fully living life for the experience and to experience joy, sorrow, etc, wouldn’t that avoid apathy? Wouldn’t that person see the purpose in experience?
Quote:We devour the beautiful and enticing fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. It is no longer on the tree, shining in appearance. Have we destroyed it? No. We took it inside ourselves. We digest it, and it is assimilated into our being, into every cell. The experience is described as the assimilation of opposites. In order to truly live, we must also die. In order to have joy, we must weep. It’s a tension of opposites that plays out like a fractal diagram expanding, creating a life experience. We can fear this. We can find beauty and wonderment in it.
I say we are on a hero’s adventure, not sitting in a study hall taking a pass/fail proficiency exam.
I absolutely love this, Valoel!!!!!!! I may steal it….
August 5, 2009 at 11:47 pm #220965Anonymous
Guestjust me wrote:*loving this thread*
In regards to the danger of apathy. If someone is fully living life for the experience and to experience joy, sorrow, etc, wouldn’t that avoid apathy? Wouldn’t that person see the purpose in experience?
Quote:We devour the beautiful and enticing fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. It is no longer on the tree, shining in appearance. Have we destroyed it? No. We took it inside ourselves. We digest it, and it is assimilated into our being, into every cell. The experience is described as the assimilation of opposites. In order to truly live, we must also die. In order to have joy, we must weep. It’s a tension of opposites that plays out like a fractal diagram expanding, creating a life experience. We can fear this. We can find beauty and wonderment in it.
I say we are on a hero’s adventure, not sitting in a study hall taking a pass/fail proficiency exam.
I absolutely love this, Valoel!!!!!!! I may steal it….

I like it too!
Like others, I don’t see detachment as the same as apathy. In fact, quite the opposite. To me, in a way, detachment is the opposite of a few things…one being codependency, another is expectations. Codependency, if defined as “one’s well being is dependent on another’s behaviors,” can be very pathological. It leads to depression, sadness…and when combined with expectations, only leads to much disappointment. After all, we really only have control of our own life.
So detachment, from this perspective, may look selfish and self-absorbed, but is really a process of letting go of many things we were taught to attach to. That looks like apathy to those who don’t understand it.
August 6, 2009 at 5:22 am #220966Anonymous
GuestBeautiful insight, Rix!! But you didn’t finish it. You mentioned the two downers: co-dependency and expectations, but you mostly talked about co-dependency. How about expectations?
Thanks in advance for your response, I love your insight!
August 6, 2009 at 5:43 pm #220967Anonymous
GuestI am nothing more than a novice at this too, but I agree that detachment does not mean a lack of feeling (joy or sorrow). Quite the opposite! We should feel these as much as possible. Detachment to me is related to expectations. Expectations (and dependence) causes fear, that we might not get our desire at some point in the future. Detachment in the sense we are talking about is letting go of expectations. We do good for the experience of doing it, not so that we get something expected in return. We work on accepting things as they are, understanding things as they are, and experiencing what is truly real — the now. The future does not exist. The past is a memory that fades and morphs over time.
Detachment does not indicate a lack of living. It is super-living!
August 6, 2009 at 9:08 pm #220968Anonymous
GuestValoel wrote:I am nothing more than a novice at this too, but I agree that detachment does not mean a lack of feeling (joy or sorrow). Quite the opposite! We should feel these as much as possible.
Detachment to me is related to expectations. Expectations (and dependence) causes fear, that we might not get our desire at some point in the future. Detachment in the sense we are talking about is letting go of expectations. We do good for the experience of doing it, not so that we get something expected in return. We work on accepting things as they are, understanding things as they are, and experiencing what is truly real — the now. The future does not exist. The past is a memory that fades and morphs over time.
Detachment does not indicate a lack of living. It is super-living!
Actually, to respond to Swimordie, this post by Valoel is about what I would have said (if I didn’t get busy at work and had to cut it short!
😡 ) He said it well!I was raised with the emphasis on that ole scripture “for obedience to each commandment, there is a corresponding reward (or “blessing”). (of course paraphrasing….). I took it quite literally and it became a game of mathematics. If I paid my tithing, I expected financial “blessings.” If I fulfilled my callings, went to meetings, read my scriptures, etc., etc….I expected that life would generally go my way.
It didn’t (at least how I
expectedit too). So as I did the math, God was upside down with me. The paradigm was failing. So in my resentment, my life went to pot (from the world’s view). In my searching/recovery process I read and listened to gurus from all walks of life. I read books on the life of Ghandi, Buddha, many new thought teachers…all taught me much. Through all of it, I learned that what worked for me was to approach life with an attitude involving two simple principles:
1) I am responsible for everything in my life; and
2) I have no expectations of anybody else; anything I receive from others is a gift.
It changed my life. You can’t be a victim of anything with this approach. God, the Church, my friends, my parents, my spouse…were all doing the best they could with what they’d been given. There was no fault anywhere…nor blame. My life turned around in every sense of the word from there. When all there is is gratitude, there is no stress or worry.
I also changed my take on “love.” I don’t believe in “loving” the way many do. I don’t “love another” in the way where we would expect that if I give something, I get something back…or if I do something for “her,” she should do something for me. That is a set up for disaster! The only person I can “love” is myself. When I do that perfectly, I can share my love with others, but I expect nothing in return. I can commit all my romantic love to my wife, but I expect nothing, nor do I need anything, from her. We simply enjoy sharing our life experience with each other.
I think that is consistent with detachment. At least that’s what I try to live. I find that if I start to get upset about something…I have lost sight of one or both of the principles, and I replay it until I see it correctly. And I can honestly say my life is awesome today!
August 6, 2009 at 9:20 pm #220969Anonymous
GuestRix, you are right. You have been through great tribulation. You have overcome. Thanks for sharing, brother. You spoke the truth. I’m probably about 10 years behind you. Been through “to pot”, transcendence epiphany, and the gurus. Just barely finally getting it about love and about that personal evidence of bad feeling that I am seeing things in error. Wow! It’s great. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.