Home Page Forums General Discussion Institute: Church History

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #204324
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The Institute class this year is covering Church History, I’m wondering if I should go with the questions I have regarding the History we don’t usually talk about or will this just disrupt the class.

    I’m part of a Singles Ward and while I’ve already taken all the Institute Classes, I’m considering attending, at least tonight for the 1st class to ask if the Instructor plans to stick to the manual or will include a little from Rough Stone Rolling or the works of Church Historians.

    Right now I feel stuck! I’m teaching Gospel Doctrine, & trying to make that a Spiritual Experience for those that attend, but I’m beyond frustrated with the lessons. This past week I was instructed to gloss over Plural Marriage and Polyandry for the sake or teaching Single’s to strive for Celestial Marriage.

    Sometimes I feel like a hypocrite because I have this calling, but find myself growing more Agnostic in my own faith.

    I’ve discussed this issue with my Bishop & he was understanding and helpful, he did not think I needed to be removed from this calling but will not issue me a Temple Recommend because I have doubts about Joseph Smith.

    The class I teach is full of great Members who participate & love the Gospel, & I love teaching them, but they are starting to ask questions, like why don’t we see you at the Temple on Ward Temple night.

    I would love to open up to my class & say this is where I’m at, this is what I think & believe but I fear I would be rejected and scorned by most of them.

    So I’m stuck! I have questions, I’d love to discuss the history more but I worry about doing so & damaging the image I have as a Teacher & weakening others faith.

    #222289
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Lots of folks are where you are. The biggest difference is most of them don’t have what it takes to come forward, admit it, and deal with it.

    Paul said to “prove all things and hold fast to that which is good” (or something like that)

    He didn’t admonish us to not question or to ignore our doubts IMHO.

    My unsolicited advice for someone is to “root it out”….search the anti-sites, study the apologists’ responses and pray for a knowledge of which, if any, is correct. Of course, there is an adversary that does not want us to do that. This adversary knows the promises that have been made to us regarding lacking knowledge.

    Concern over weakening others’ faith is legitimate. Concern over one’s image as a teacher….well….it’s not for me to judge but you probably can answer that one yourself. “Beware of pride” comes to mind. ;)

    Good luck on your journey…throw your doubts out there and someone can probably help you with them….sometimes it’s therapeutic just to write things down on paper (or blog screen) instead of mentally tossing them around.

    #222290
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi RebelProperty!

    Welcome to the site and welcome to the painful, but fruitful adventure. I have been on the site for about two weeks and have gained at least a bit of balance, at least now I don’t want to find all the Gospel Doctrine Manuals in British Columbia, put them in a pile, toss on gas and dance under the moon naked while they burn!!!!! 😈 😆

    I am in precisely the place where you are except that my class is a bit easier to live with. I have the Youth GD class in our ward and was parachuted in because the kids were eating up teachers at a furious pace (at least for our ward). I have an easier time because there are only 15 of them maximum and because of that size I can run the class as a seminar. I sit in the middle of the long side of the table and we all work togther, it has taken a bit but after 3 months we are getting into it.

    My blog, Youth Gospel Doctrine class here (http://www.youthgd.blogspot.com/) may be able to give you some ideas on how to approach the class with a bit more emphasis on engagement and spiritual development. I do follow the manual’s “purpose” for each lesson and use the suggested scriptures but that is about all that I take from the manual. I agree the lesson on eternal marriage was a real pain in the neck but I did manage to slide in information on polygamy as practiced in Nauvoo by the leaders, the context of the writing down of the revelation to try to convince Emma to accept plural marriage which meant that we got to talk a little bit about the fact that Joseph did indeed have plural wives at this stage and the general sense of unease, distrust and hatred of the Mormon in Nauvoo and how this was building up to the martyrdom. None of it was in your face, almost all of it was in response to questions but I admit we did spend most of the time on the Holy Spirit of Promise and what implications that had.

    So, in general I don’t think it would be fair to go to the Institute class and bring up too many issues, the instructor just won’t be ready for it likely and will feel threatened and I don’t think you will gain much help for your class. You might talk personally to the Institute teacher to see if they can help you frame your classes BUT many of us here have been stung when talking to other people in some level of authority about our issues. Think about it first.

    You can ask questions here as much as you want and people will share and help you and sometimes confuse you but that is to be expected. As a board this is about the friendliest place I have found, there is virtually no miserable, negative attacks, just a bunch of people struggling like you are.

    Let us know what you decide, we understand at least some of your frustration and pain and share it.

    #222291
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thank You for your response Bruce!

    My Bishop advised I only look into sites that are uplifting and prochurch, but I’ll be honest, I’ve been lurking on this board as well as a couple exmormon ones.

    You’re right that I shouldn’t worry too much about my image.. and for the most part I think I’m free of Pride, though I don’t want to embarrass myself, I’m more worried about people thinking that can’t trust their teachers to teach them correct doctrine without their own spin and I don’t want them to think that they can’t look to me as an example of someone who is striving to live their beliefs inspite of doubt.

    Maybe it just has to come down to, I can’t control what anyone else thinks, I just have to live the best life I can as I purse the answers I feel in such a desperate need of.

    #222292
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My only advice for the moment:

    Be very careful about lurking at sites where bitterness and scorn are the dominant emotions – almost like a toxic waste dump. As my grandfather used to say:

    Quote:

    It’s hard to swin in sh** without getting stinky.

    #222293
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Honestly, I would save certain questions for this forum (which is not anti at all). You won’t shock anyone here (I don’t think) and you’ll get a variety of takes on things. Plus, were all pretty committed to staying LDS (thus the website name LOL).

    Welcome! :)

    #222294
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree with just me.

    Have it out here on staylds.com. It’s clean, safe, and fun for the whole family!! Okay, maybe not the WHOLE family. You can definitely get it out of your system, and discover what works for you. And no one knows but you. And you know who. 😳

    #222295
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Yes, I have found the tenor on some sites to be very negative, so I don’t think seeking out anti sites is a good course of action. I’ve found this site to be much more positive, and we can handle the tough stuff!

    #222296
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I would keep in mind that as a teacher, you are called to provide that material with your talents and knowledge of things, so your personal style should be a part of your teaching, or they should not have called you to that through inspiration.

    Even so, it is not your class for you to work out ideas and topical discussions you want to cover, but it is a class full of people coming to be edified and taught spiritually. Those given charge to develop the manuals were the ones responsible to decide what level of detail to cover things in the curriculum, I don’t believe that responsibility was given to you when you were set apart to teach the material. The material covered should be presented at the level that is most beneficial for the class, and if you have needs greater than that, then seek out those topics and discussion on your own time (on sites like this where we have all come here for that purpose). The Teaching No Greater Call manual provides instruction on that approach, to keep in mind what will be of benefit to the students. Sometimes the content is less critical as the opportunity for the Spirit to teach everyone, and the teacher and the student are edified together.

    I do remember my favorite GD teacher was a lawyer from NY, who had a huge library and was friends with Bushman, and he knew his stuff. While he never brought RSR material specifically to class, there were times someone had a sincere question about polygamy or something, and he delicately could answer it honestly for them with a brief remark that kept the spirit of the meeting, but then get back to the material. I found that much more refreshing than some answer like, “well, we aren’t supposed to talk about that in this class, its not in the manual.” I think the stewardship is for the benefit of the students in the class.

    #222297
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Cut the institute teacher some slack. The teacher might be well informed on the various issues but would not be able … at risk of their job … to discuss them. Unfortunately, you are not likely to find much support/help on these issues in the official channels.

    Gut feeling, the church is well aware of John Dehlin’s works and this site and they must view it as an answer to their prayers! Of course they would never stand behind it openly, but that’s ok. I’d suggest you stick around here for support, and keep your thoughts/struggles to yourself in the official channels for a bit.

    #222298
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I completely agree with timpanogos!

    #222299
    Anonymous
    Guest

    RebelProperty wrote:

    My Bishop advised I only look into sites that are uplifting and prochurch, but I’ll be honest, I’ve been lurking on this board as well as a couple exmormon ones.

    :D :D :D

    I think I know what you meant. I smiled when I read this. We’re supposed to be pro-Church here. I hope we aren’t in the same category as ExMormon.org, hehe.

    #222300
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Valoel wrote:

    We’re supposed to be pro-Church here. I hope we aren’t in the same category as ExMormon.org, hehe.


    Not for me. I checked out some antimormon sites, and that drove me back to church…I didn’t want to be that angry and be like that, but I didn’t feel edified back at church either.

    I feel at home at this site…I can be honest and don’t have to be angry. :D

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.