Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Joseph Smith: The Hero
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 18, 2009 at 6:10 pm #204470
Anonymous
GuestSo I have been pondering Joseph Smith and how we view his life and contributions in the church. It has struck me that JS seems to be quickly approaching the quintessential hero. When I say “hero” I’m really thinking of a Campbellesque type hero. Here are some characteristics:
1. Died as a martyr
2. Represents what we are trying to become
3. Morally upright
4. Friendly
5. Loved everyone
6. Had a close relationship with God/The Spirit
7. Had strong faith
8. Made huge sacrifices (not just death) for what he believed
I’m sure there are many more characteristics. The point is, while Joseph, like anyone else had flaws and his life was far more nuanced than this, the church is not really interested in painting Joseph in this light. Rather, it seems like we are painting Joseph, like many prophets, as a hero, someone to be emulated and looked up to. As time marches on, JS will become less and less of a real tragically flawed person, and more like a god-like figure.
When viewed in this light, I find it easier to accept and talk about Joseph in the normal TBM way. I feel less compelled to point out every piece of reality that we are overlooking. The truth is, yes JS was tragically flawed, as are all of us, and all heroes. But I think that as JS becomes a part of our mythology, and based on our current method of aggrandizing him, he is really transcending flawed mystic, and approaching mythical hero.
Thoughts?
October 18, 2009 at 9:42 pm #224473Anonymous
GuestI was just about to start a thread titled, “Conflicted” when I saw your post. Just got back from church and the whole RS lesson was on the greatness of JS. The teacher handed out alot of quotes from different people who knew and had met JS for various sisters to read. They all painted a picture of JS as the most glorious man ever born. In fact, here is the quote I was given to read: Jesse N. Smith said, “The prophet was incomparabley the most God-like man I ever saw….I know that by nature he was incapable of lying and deceitfulness, possessing the greatest kindness and nobility of character. I felt when in his presence that he could read me through and through. I know he was all that he claimed to be.” After that, sisters were supposed to bear their own testimones of JS and we ended the meeting with singing “Praise to the Man.” At one time I would have believed all this and been in awe of what a great man he was. Today, I am terribly conflicted because of so many things I have read in church history etc, which shows to me that he may have been a fallen prophet that God took out rather than a martyr. I don’t know how to come to terms with these conflicts I have about the man. When people say wonderful things about a man or terrible things, we would consider the sources and their credibilities like in a court of law. A lot of followers of Christmatic leaders, like Jeff Warrens for example, and others, hold them up to be prophets and heros. I am so conflicted because I do love so many of the teachings JS taught and which make sense to me, but I cannot seem to reconcile what appears to be some really horrible things he did. So, how do I come to terms with this?
October 18, 2009 at 10:14 pm #224474Anonymous
GuestWhat I have been pondering recently is where is “Jesus Christ” in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? So much praise is given to Joseph Smith. What about Jesus Christ? I do not mean to offend anyone, but I would think people who know very little about the LDS Church would think the members worship Joseph Smith, not Jesus Christ. I think all the focus on Joseph Smith is what leads people to question whether or not Mormons are “Christians.” Joseph Smith is reported as saying:
“I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam… Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet.” (History of The Church 6:408–409.) These statements reported to have been made by Joseph Smith disturb me. I would agree that “This attitude strikes some as boastful, and unbecoming a prophet.”
As for me and my house, we worship and serve the Lord Jesus Christ.
October 18, 2009 at 11:03 pm #224475Anonymous
GuestKalola, Thanks for replying. I have heard that quote too and did not like it, but don’t know what context it was used in. I don’t have a problem with praising or appreciating someone for good things, but you make a good point. I learned more about Christ the two years I attended the 7th Day Adventist church than I did 30 years in the lds church. Ellen G. White was seen as a prophetess in that church with special gifts but never as the focus of the church. I agree with you that Christ is my focus and I know there have been many articles about Christ in the Ensign and church lessons, but usually only on Christmas and Easter. The thing I can’t get past is Joseph Smith taking other mens wives while the men are still alive and the hell he put Emma through. When I am in Nauvoo or Salt Lake Temple square and see the statues of Joseph and Emma, I ask myself, “And where are the statues of the other wives? Are they not important? I also can’t understand why he would have the printing press burned and torn down just because the owner was printing about his polygamy and Joseph wanted the owners wife. I don’t understand how JS promised the people that their money would not fail if they put it in the bank he started. Just so many things confuse me as to how righteous he really was. I do know people are often a mixed bag and some of the greatest heros in history can have serious flaws and even make big mistakes at times. I just wish I could sort out the facts from the lies. October 18, 2009 at 11:05 pm #224476Anonymous
GuestI tell my daughters, my daughter-in-laws, and my granddaughters often, that ALL males are flawed. I think I have saved a couple of marriages. A few boyfriends have survived another day in dating my beautiful granddaughters. When we make Joseph Smith a “Hero”, when we restore the places he once lived as “Shrines”, we reduce the Grace/Glory of our Savior. The church has in the past kept things simple. I find great wisdom in that. I know times have changed, but our worship must evolve around God and Christ. My opinion only. October 18, 2009 at 11:34 pm #224477Anonymous
GuestYes, good points. Our worship must revolve around God and Christ. People often do get the wrong idea, this should be at the forefront. The role of Joseph Smith, as I believe Euhemerus is trying to illustrate, is a supporting one in bringing more people toward God and Christ. Anyone who has studied the history can see the flaws. In a religious context we simply recognize that this ideal that is portrayed is done to point people in the right direction. “Godly people help to move others toward God.”
I’m not saying I agree with everything the way it is portrayed 100% of the time. I’m just saying I think Eu has a point with this post. The purpose of church tends to bring out a certain view from a specific angle, it’s not all-encompassing. It is coming from the position of stage 3 directed at the position of stage 3. If we can go to church with its specific purpose in mind, I think our chances of coming away edified will be much greater.
So in summary maybe the question of “how righteous was he really?” should take a backseat, at least in our church setting, to “what did he do to point people toward God?”
Random thoughts only, not intended as authoritative.
October 19, 2009 at 1:03 am #224478Anonymous
GuestFwiw, I have never lived in a ward or stake where there was ANY question of who we worship. Our stake theme this year, from what appears to be a generally conservative, orthodox Stake Presidency, is, “Living a Christ-centered life”. ONE of the talks in Stake Conference today focused secondarily on the prophets, but ALL of them talked of becoming more Christ-like, the benefits of becoming more Christ-like, the place of the temple in becoming more Christ-like, the need to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ, etc.
I understand the idea that outsiders could sit in on A meeting (one, singular, solitary meeting here and there) and, with the right confluence of talks and hymns, leave thinking we revere Joseph more than Jesus – but for the life of me I can’t fathom anyone attending regularly and having any doubts whatsoever. I can’t fathom listening to General Conference and having any doubts whatsoever. I can’t fathom reading our canonized scriptures and having any doubts whatsoever.
I am being totally honest when I say I am close to baffled when I hear people say we appear to worship Joseph over Jesus. It just doesn’t ring true with anything I have experienced in the LDS Church over the last 40 years – in multiple countries, states, missions, stakes, wards and branches.
Yes, I agree that Joseph’s faults are glossed over too much sometimes, but “worship”? I just don’t see it.
October 19, 2009 at 1:10 am #224479Anonymous
GuestQuote:What I have been pondering recently is where is “Jesus Christ” in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? So much praise is given to Joseph Smith. What about Jesus Christ? I do not mean to offend anyone, but I would think people who know very little about the LDS Church would think the members worship Joseph Smith, not Jesus Christ. I think all the focus on Joseph Smith is what leads people to question whether or not Mormons are “Christians.”
I tend to agree that too many go to church to worship the church rather than to come to Christ. It seems a little short-sighted and defensive to me as well, and it happens a lot. There are a lot of cliches and stories that point to that – proving the truthfulness of the church rather than the divinity of Christ, giving evidence that prophets have real revelation rather than focusing on how we can develop our own relationship with Christ. I’m not sure why that is the case, but it seems to be pretty prevalent in the church.
When I was working on the post about Jesus and Buddhism, it struck me for the first time in a while that we really do have a lot of unique insight into the nature and character of Jesus through the BOM, D&C, and even POGP. The Mormon interpretation of Jesus is one we often take for granted, but if you try to stick to NT/OT only, you really miss out on a lot of nuances and interpretations that I find valuable that add quality to the picture of Jesus that develops. So, even though people are not really talking about the right things often, I was somewhat amazed at the contribution of those modern additions.
The quality I most admire in JS is his open-mindedness. He seemed to be willing to entertain just about any notion that came his way. There’s something to be said for not trying to be so controlling of life. Of course, on his heels, BY had to bat clean up a bit.
October 19, 2009 at 1:50 am #224480Anonymous
GuestI feel that one reason we tend to feel close to Joseph Smith is that he was an American. Even though he was a 19th century American, we can still relate to him in ways that are difficult to relate to life in Jesus’ time. Also, the records that we have of the prophets of old just don’t get into the details of their “humanness”…(if that’s a word). Do you think that Moses ever got cocky and made a boisterous comment? What would/did Abraham do about locals talking/printing smack regarding his polygamy? Etc, etc. There are, as you all know, some fairly good arguements that support the idea that JS actually occupies the office of Holy Ghost now.
Whether we view him as the most important person to live other than Jesus and a current member of the Godhead, or we view him as a fraud that happened to found a church that brings fullfillment to many, (or anywhere in between)….he is still a remarkable human being.
Personally, I would love to have met him.
IMHO the early prophets of this last dispensation acted like…well…prophets. They didn’t act like teleprompter-reading businessmen. A little more of that would be refreshing, at this point, IMHO.
Fundamentalist ramblings….
Ignore at will….
Yada, yada..
October 19, 2009 at 2:17 am #224481Anonymous
GuestSeven months ago, my HPGL came to my house. He asked what he could do to get me to priesthood meeting (I’m in the building every week, but teach family history through the second & third hour). I told him I’d be willing to attend, if he’d tell me in advance, the lesson was not about Joseph Smith. He agreed to my request. He understood my concerns, knowing of my convert background. To this date, he’s never approached to say the lesson is about any other topic. He smiles, he passes down the hall. I know what the study manual has been over the last two years. I can but refer to the 11th Article of Faith and keep on keeping on. I’m simple minded, I don’t ask much. October 19, 2009 at 2:27 am #224482Anonymous
GuestI wonder if Jacob ever felt like a teleprompter reader when compared to Nephi – or Aaron when compared to Ammon – or Harold B. Lee when compared to David O. McKay – or Bartholomew when compared to Paul – or Elder Wirthlin (one of my favorite apostles of all time) when compared to Elder Maxwell. What about Moses when compared to Aaron – his spokesman? What about Enoch the stutterer?
I think too often we pine for what we don’t have and undervalue what we do.Who have been the most “thus saith the Lord” forceful apostles in the last 50 years? Maybe Elder McConkie? Maybe Elder Packer? I think the more forceful one is, the more polarizing one tends to be – and that can be seen as a good OR bad thing, dependent largely on one’s own individual needs and the needs of the organization at the particular time. I think everyone here would embrace a “new Joseph” IF they agreed with what he said. If they didn’t . . . I wonder how many would start pining for a “new Pres. Hinckley”.
There is a really important lesson in that – and it focuses much more on us than it does on the prophets.
October 19, 2009 at 2:46 am #224483Anonymous
Guesthawkgrrrl wrote:Quote:What I have been pondering recently is where is “Jesus Christ” in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? So much praise is given to Joseph Smith. What about Jesus Christ? I do not mean to offend anyone, but I would think people who know very little about the LDS Church would think the members worship Joseph Smith, not Jesus Christ. I think all the focus on Joseph Smith is what leads people to question whether or not Mormons are “Christians.”
I tend to agree that too many go to church to worship the church rather than to come to Christ. It seems a little short-sighted and defensive to me as well, and it happens a lot. There are a lot of cliches and stories that point to that – proving the truthfulness of the church rather than the divinity of Christ, giving evidence that prophets have real revelation rather than focusing on how we can develop our own relationship with Christ. I’m not sure why that is the case, but it seems to be pretty prevalent in the church.
When I was working on the post about Jesus and Buddhism, it struck me for the first time in a while that we really do have a lot of unique insight into the nature and character of Jesus through the BOM, D&C, and even POGP. The Mormon interpretation of Jesus is one we often take for granted, but if you try to stick to NT/OT only, you really miss out on a lot of nuances and interpretations that I find valuable that add quality to the picture of Jesus that develops. So, even though people are not really talking about the right things often, I was somewhat amazed at the contribution of those modern additions.
The quality I most admire in JS is his open-mindedness. He seemed to be willing to entertain just about any notion that came his way. There’s something to be said for not trying to be so controlling of life. Of course, on his heels, BY had to bat clean up a bit.
It seems to me that the church largely places itself between the members and the Godhead. The church acts as if it is a gatekeeper to God. The Church teaches that you must be in good-standing in the church in order to be in good-standing with God. It teaches that if you are not worthy of carrying a temple recommend, you are not worthy in the sight of God. And it seems that even in General Conference, when talks are about becoming more Christ-like, they are largely about following the Church’s rules and guidelines, rather than following what Christ really taught. I agree there is a lot of JS worship and current prophet worship and church worship. But I don’t think there is a lot of Christ worship.
Sometimes I think I need to go to a different cafeteria to get a good helping of Christ. The Mormon Cafeteria doesn’t seem to serve much Christ.
October 19, 2009 at 2:53 am #224484Anonymous
GuestMisterCurie, sincere question, asked simply to read your response: Is that how you felt about this last General Conference?
October 19, 2009 at 2:54 am #224485Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:MisterCurie, sincere question, asked simply to read your response:
Is that how you felt about this last General Conference?
Yes.
EDIT: But I admit that much of what I heard at General Conference could have been filtered and comprehended through my Stage 4 “Dark Night of the Soul” filter, and that my impressions from General Conference are in no way a reflection on what was actually said at GC. I freely admit that I may be over focusing on what bothers me in the church than what is good in the church. Which is why I come here. So that when it becomes a challenge to stay LDS, I can find support at StayLDS. I’m struggling right now.
EDIT2: And in my dark night of the soul, it actually doesn’t bother me that much that there is so much focus on JS, the modern prophet, the church, and little focus on Christ. I’m not sure there is that much about the historical Christ that should be focused on. When people talk about becoming Christ-like, I’m not sure we really have many examples of Christ doing whatever it is they think we need to do to become Christlike. It seems that many of the attributes of Christ are attributes of a mythical Christ and not the historical Christ. But again, as I said, I’m struggling right now.
October 19, 2009 at 3:01 am #224486Anonymous
GuestThanks. It really is fascinating how people can view the same things very differently. That is why I really like the Mormon concept of salvation and exaltation extending beyond the traditional restrictions of mainstream Christianity. There is a recognition in it, at what I see as its “pure” core, that allows for honest disagreement that will NOT derail our ultimate end. I realize many members don’t see it that way, but it’s what I love most about the way Mormonism focuses on Christ – extending his atonement / grace to cover (nearly) all of God’s children.
Anyway, thanks.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.