• This topic is empty.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #204780
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’d like to propose that we clean up our archives a bit by going back through them and moving many of them to a holding area – similar to the parking lot for posts to discuss – where we can reactivate them, if necessary, but where they won’t clutter our currently searchable archives.

    I don’t know how many would end up being moved, but I’d like to cull through redundant posts and keep the one with the best discussion, for example – and make many of MWallace’s “interesting” stuff disappear – and do the same for most of the locked threads and other wacky stuff.

    What do you think? Brian, can you make another admin/mod category for threads we want to lock and hide – or even perhaps delete, in a few cases?

    #227873
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I would like to separate MWallace out from this, because I think we need to make a decision about her. I posted more in the thread about her:

    http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1096&p=13980#p13980

    We haven’t talked about the direction of content on the site in a few months. I confess that when we started this two years ago, I was more in line with Ray’s desire to compact topics and use the forums to build a library of thought on reconciliation strategy. That is an economic and efficient use of forum space, especially if we are focused on building an easy library of thought on reconciliation strategy.

    Here is where I have drifted away from that. A part of the service we provide in the forums is also a personal connection to some people. The ideas are great. The material is fantastic. But a lot of people out there are helped when someone connects with them as an individual — to say “hey, you aren’t crazy. I understand YOU in particular, and YOU are going to be OK.” There are people in their crisis of faith that feel nobody wants to touch them with a 10ft pole because of their toxic doubts, or their alternative thoughts. Part learning to integrate back into the Church and participate is on an emotional level, that someone out there understands them.

    To do that in an online forum seems to require that we allow those people to post their particular situation and feelings and get a response from one (many) of us in the community. We may have addressed a similar topic many times, but the magic in helping some people is their knowing that someone out there cares about them, enough to hear them and give a thoughtful response — a gift of time and emotional energy to them. That makes the forums more cluttered and harder to search. That is a “cost” in balancing the overall equation.

    I have been thinking about this a lot actually. What I would like to propose is a constant and ongoing process of distilling wisdom from our forum “think tank” to create documents (or multimedia presentations) to host in our “Additional Resources” library. This would include adding updates and new insights to the material as we discover new gems in our conversations. An example is the “What is Official Doctrine?” essay that is almost ready to publish. We have that conversation over and over in the forums. Once it is published, we can promote it and “market” the material all over the internet as content to help those in the struggle.

    I don’t want to lose the important mission goal of producing quality thought on reconciliation. I would also like to keep the forums with the feel of participation and as a welcoming community for those in their crisis, a place where people will listen to them and care.

    What do you all think? Everyone here volunteers their time to make the site happen.

    This site is a work that I feel proud of, like I am serving Heavenly Father with the talents He gave me, to be a real part of a solution instead of just sitting on the sidelines whining about how crappy the world is, or being an armchair quarterback. To be honest, it is also a form of religious therapy that helps ME stay in the Church with my own problems and doubts.

    #227874
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Brian – I tend to agree about the personal interaction, but I am wondering if we know how many lurkers we get – that would tell us how many would like to read the conversations without adding personal interactions.

    #227875
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree completely with the idea of taking concepts from the forum and writing a presentation of it for the library. I’ve been thinking about writing my own personal process of reconciliation (but we know how all my best intentions fit into my schedule).

    As far as lurkers, they may be more interested in the “library” section anyway …??

    People need to be validated on what they are thinking at the time – that’s what the forum is for and we know it may seem like a broken record for us at times.

    Again, today I’m a yes man. Yes, Yes, Yes… I agree, I think the same, you got it ! 😆 :D 😆

    #227876
    Anonymous
    Guest

    hawkgrrrl wrote:

    I am wondering if we know how many lurkers we get – that would tell us how many would like to read the conversations without adding personal interactions.

    I have stats going back to Feb 12th when the servers transferred. So far (13 days):

    Unique Visitors: 1,780 (averages to around 150 new people every day, does not include search bots)

    Number of Visits: 5,546 (avg 3.11 visits per visitor, so this takes the Unique Visitors and counts how many times they return)

    Pages: 38,239 (6.89 pages per visit)

    I can’t paste the table very good in the forums. I plan to export the stats and email it to you all at the end of every month. But a significant number of people spend 30 minutes or more at the site when they visit.

    15mn-30mn = 3.3 % of visits

    30mn-1h = 7.8 % of visits

    1h+ = 7.6 % of visits

    Looking at the daily logs, we are averaging a consistent 450 to 500 visits PER DAY.

    There are a significant number of lurkers and readers-only.

    The “How to Stay” article is very popular. So are searches looking for “Bushman”

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.