Home Page Forums Support Just Excommunicated.

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205034
    Anonymous
    Guest

    This is my first post, I am not sure what will become of this post, or me, but I am feeling the need to talk to someone who is anonymous. I hope you won’t judge me too harshly.

    I was excommunicated recently. I am not questioning my right to be excommunicated by the Church. Indeed, I see the potential blessings to have a fresh start. But I am still reeling from the flood of emotions. I was born in the Covenant and have been a member my entire life. I served a mission and have been married to my wife for over 30 years. We were sealed in the Temple over 25 years ago.

    Yes, I violated my Temple covenants. I made a bad mistake, and have confessed all to my Bishop and Stake President. One of the things I am the most troubled by right now is that during the “court of love” I was required to relate every sexual event in my life since I was 16. Elder Ballard in his oft-quoted talk says you should relate your sins in simple and general terms, but in my situation it was neither simple or general.

    During my confession my bishop made detailed notes, and when the Bishop and I met with the Stake President, the President had a copy of the Bishop’s notes and took his own notes as I related my confession again. During the High Council meeting, the Executive Secretary was busy taking notes also. What happens to all these notes? Does it become a permanent part of my Church records? Will I ever be able to over come this sin? Can I ever make it right again?

    #231039
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Sailor, in general, in cases of sexual misconduct, as long as the person is penitent and doesn’t have a history of covering up prior actions when they “confess”, Elder Ballard’s counsel should be followed – concise and general. That is the standard.

    As someone who has sat in counsels that deal with what you appear to be describing, I automatically have numerous questions that came to mind while reading your introduction – but I don’t think it’s proper for me to ask them here in open forum. If you are interested in talking with me about them, please send me a private message (PM when you log-in). I’m willing to ask you privately, but I can’t address the appropriateness of the questioning method until I ask my questions. (I’ve seen cases where such questioning is justified, so I just can’t say one way or the other.)

    What I will say publicly is that individual courts can be handled radically differently – but the notes from courts are not supposed to follow a person throughout their lives. Full repentance is supposed to be possible in these cases, and there should be no reason you can’t be reinstated / rebaptized at some point if you desire to have that happen with no lasting negative results. That is supposed to be the case.

    #231040
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Ouch! I don’t fancy that at all.

    I was going to ask about this. What specifically are the offenses that are ex-communicable, and what position does one have to be in to get it?

    Do only endowed people get it, or do you have to be in a leadership position?

    #231041
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SamBee – my BIL was excommunicated and he was not endowed, so it is possible. There really is some discretion at the local level based on personal circumstances. In short, there are two main categories: 1) serious antagonism of the church (BIL fit this), and 2) egregious sin that constitutes covenant-breaking (usually unrepentant sexual sin).

    #231042
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Sailor, I imagine you are hurting right now…and I’m sure your wife is to. My thoughts are with you two as you go through this difficult time.

    I would want to know what would happen to the notes as well. The whole process sounds humiliating and awful.

    #231043
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Sailor, I’m sure this is a hard time for you to hear this, but I promise life will get better for you!

    The excommunication process is difficult — for both sides. From a therapist perspective, it is quite demoralizing and humiliating…you have a bunch of men (that mostly really don’t want to be there..) doing their job and watching you eat crow!

    I understand the “court of love” process, and also see it from the historical perspective that it is an offshoot of the old church courts where the church WAS the law here in “Zion.” It has evolved since then, but much of the process remains the same wrt “justice.” And much of the process is designed to protect the church and its reputation.

    I have personal feelings that hope it will continue to evolve to a more loving process, instead of creating guilt and shame to the person. In the long run, we are our own worst enemy as it relates to “sin,” and (IMO) it should stay between the parties offended, and God. The shame one experiences often makes it more difficult to heal from the issue…and to ever be comfortable and confident to associate with the many people that end up knowing all the juicy details….

    But that’s just my oh so humble opinion…. ;)

    Maybe it will help to try to realize they are just doing a job they have accepted. The real healing process is between you, your wife/family, and God. Focus on that and I think you’ll do fine.

    Good luck!

    #231044
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Sailor,

    I realize that my ideas do not line up with everyone’s on this post – but for you, I will put my neck out there.

    I think no man has the right to judge who is worthy, and who is not, of eternity. Essentially, by excommunicating you, they are taking away your right to eternity. (Yes, you can “earn” your right back, but that’s a different post…)

    The idea that you need to confess your sins to any man is so Catholic I can’t get over it. When you are repenting, God (and whoever you hurt) are the only person(s) I believe you need to ask forgiveness from. The church is just an istitution of imperfect men.

    P.S. We are a confused hogpog of members, non-members, and goodness knows what. You are most welcome, and should consider all your thoughts, doubts, worries and hopes most safe and at home here.

    #231045
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was a stake executive secretary many moons ago (over 10) and the notes taken at disciplinary councils were kept in a hard copy in a file. I was asked to clean out the filing system and found stuff from 10 years previously, which I just left alone. The decision of the council eventually hits your membership record where it’ll be noted that you were excommunicated, and your membership record annotated.

    I don’t know what the annotation contained. However, it was necessary so if people move to a new ward, the Bishop there can make sure he doesn’t put people with say, child abuse history in Primary, for example.

    Or so he knows your status and doesn’t call you to a position until repentence is finished. I know the child abuse situation doesn’t apply in your case, but I share it so you know why some sins follow the person in their membership record annoation; this is to protect the innocent in some cases.

    I doubt if the hard copies travel with the membership record though.

    Now, there may be other systems in place with the upgrades to MLS system recently, but this is what I know, in case it helps.

    You might ask this question of the Stake President or your Bishop, and hope for a candid answer.

    #231046
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Cookie wrote:

    I think no man has the right to judge who is worthy, and who is not, of eternity. Essentially, by excommunicating you, they are taking away your right to eternity. (Yes, you can “earn” your right back, but that’s a different post…)

    The idea that you need to confess your sins to any man is so Catholic I can’t get over it. When you are repenting, God (and whoever you hurt) are the only person(s) I believe you need to ask forgiveness from. The church is just an istitution of imperfect men.

    Cookie, I ALMOST agree with you. I don’t think that “man” or the “church” has any right or power to “forgive” anyone of their sins at all. I believe that forgiveness and repentance is between the person, god, and any person who may have been hurt.

    I do understand that man and the church have a right to excommunicate those who they feel don’t meet the standards of the organization, (if it is a man made organization, than man should have the right to say who’s in and who’s out) and I guess that is where I may not fully agree with you – I don’t think being excommunicated from the “Mormon Church” has any “bearing” on ones’ eternity. It certainly will alter one’s pathway, on this planet, but I’m not sure what it’s repercussions will have in the next. I also understand that if there is a serious sexual sin involved (abuse/rape), that “the church” is absolutely responsible to protect others in the congregation, and they would need to know some history to do that, and in those cases I think “confession” is merited.

    I have no idea of your situation Sailor, I don’t know and I don’t need to know. I hope things will work out for you and that you will find peace and happiness regardless of your standing in the church. Best of luck friend.

    #231047
    Anonymous
    Guest

    As a note, the biggest reason why the Catholic Church is in serious trouble all over the world right now is not “just” that so many priests appear to have been abusive to children – but that those priests were shifted around and protected by the cardinals. Iow, they were not “excommunicated” and their “membership records” were not annotated (maybe), so their situations eventually were “forgotten” (in practical terms) and they were placed in new positions where they were free to continue to abuse children.

    The annotation for certain actions follows the person in their record (so that new leaders can judge more properly the actions if the person continues to do the exact same thing in a new location); the notes do not.

    #231048
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m never really all that clear why people in the courts sometimes think very specific details need to be noted and discussed. If someone admits to a sin, in general terms, that would cause the Church to want to distance themselves from the individual until it is resolved, that really is enough IMO. Like others already mentioned, this process to me is more administrative than spiritual. I can be both, but that doesn’t mean they are connected per se.

    It isn’t so much about forgiveness but the practicality of running a real world organization whose purpose is moral development of their members. A doctor, lawyer or accountant that violates the rules of their professional organization will get kicked out too. That doesn’t have much to do with making them a better professional in their academic discipline.

    Anyway, I think I am drifting off the focus of your target question. I don’t think the notes follow you around either. They should probably be destroyed after a period of time. It doesn’t seem like there is really a formalized document control policy that guides this specific type of information in the Church organization. My experience is that most people that might have access to it on the local level take their calling and responsibility for privacy seriously.

    #231049
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thank you all for your kind and supportive responses. President Kimball in the “Miracle of Forgiveness” makes a distinction between obtaining forgiveness from God and the Church. In my transgression, I offended four people or groups of people, First, God. I broke my covenant, and transgressed the law. Second, My Wife. She was a innocent victim and I violated her trust in me and our vows to each other. Third, My Family. They have a right to expect that the parent will set a good example, and show by right living how to navigate the perils of life. Fourth, The Church. By my actions, I brought discredit upon the body of the Church and treated my membership as something of little value.

    I have spent many, many weeks now enduring my own private hell as I work through my repentance with my God. I have found Him to be loving, with arms wide open, anxious and willing to forgive.

    I have confessed to my wife and she is a marvelous, compassionate person. While she is deeply hurt and trust is damaged, she too is willing to make a new start and forgive my transgressions.

    I have sat with each of my (all adult) children. I have expressed great sorrow for my behavior, and asked each of them to forgive. For some it is easier than others, but with the kids, I am working to demonstrate by my actions, my true repentance.

    Finally, I have confessed to the Church. Through the procedure which they have established. I didn’t try to make an end run, I didn’t shrink from the most difficult meeting of my life and now I feel that perhaps I am on the road to obtaining forgiveness from the Church.

    This process has been excruciating for me, and one of the many things that is troubling me now is the process. I am just not understanding the why of the process. Don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that I shouldn’t have been excommunicated. While I think it was a harsh decision, and uncalled for in my case, it was within the Stake President’s right and power to decide. I have faith in his inspiration, and look forward to a fresh start.

    But the lurid recounting, the 2 hour cross examination the plumbing the depths of my soul seemed to be excessive to me and frankly has left me confused and just a little bitter toward the process.

    I am not sure I will EVER be able to feel clean in their presence. I think whenever I seem them at the store, the car-wash, or at Church, I will have a big red scarlet “X” on my forehead.

    It is only a matter of time before the whole ward will know what has happened, and probably all of the details to go along with it. And if they don’t know the details, the wagging tongues will make up events to fit the facts. I just don’t see how I can ever feel comfortable again even in my home ward. This is part of the reason, I would like to insure that the “notes” can someday be destroyed and will not follow me wherever I go for the rest of my life.

    #231050
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SamBee wrote:

    I was going to ask about this. What specifically are the offenses that are ex-communicable, and what position does one have to be in to get it? Do only endowed people get it, or do you have to be in a leadership position?

    SamBee, I am no expert on the rules and procedures, but as I understand it, the four levels of “punishment” are: 1, Informal Probation. 2, Formal Probation. 3, Disfellowshipped. 4, Excommunication. It is really up to the Bishop or Stake President as to which means of rehabilitation will be best for you. Of course being a Priesthood Holder, and Endowed makes the transgression more serious.

    #231051
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Sailor,

    I don’t know your full story (nor do I want to hear it! That’s not for me), but it does sound as if you have made a genuine effort to sort out your problems. That’s got to be worth something. Think of all the people who haven’t done this, and caused more pain by not telling their wives, speaking to their children, and agonizing over it. What you have done takes guts and decency. We all fall, but all to few few people try to sort it out as you have, and I respect you for it.

    If you want nastiness, try my grandmother, who told my mother about her adulterous affair with great glee. I don’t think my grandfather ever knew. I therefore have some reservations about sealing the two of them!!! You have not behaved in this way, you’ve admitted what you’ve done in a positive manner, and tried to set it right.

    I disagree with some of the stuff in “the Miracle of Forgiveness” (see my post elsewhere). I think it is a greater challenge to overcome sin when you’ve encountered it, than to lead a dull and uneventful life. I had to confess some stuff recently myself, and it’s not a pleasant experience. In my case, my main crime is fornication (if it was adultery, I wasn’t aware of it at the time, and I have no contact with the other party). Because I was inactive at the time, and not in a high calling, I think my penalties have been less severe. However, it does set me thinking as to whether or not I had helped someone violate their marriage vows.

    Quote:

    I am not sure I will EVER be able to feel clean in their presence. I think whenever I seem them at the store, the car-wash, or at Church, I will have a big red scarlet “X” on my forehead.

    It is only a matter of time before the whole ward will know what has happened, and probably all of the details to go along with it. And if they don’t know the details, the wagging tongues will make up events to fit the facts. I just don’t see how I can ever feel comfortable again even in my home ward. This is part of the reason, I would like to insure that the “notes” can someday be destroyed and will not follow me wherever I go for the rest of my life.

    If certain people continue to be completely judgemental towards you after all you have done, I wouldn’t consider them your friends. It might even be good to make a clean break and move somewhere else, if things get too uncomfortable.

    The one good thing is, that I believe that given time, people will grow bored with talking about it, and move on to something else. They’ve got their own problems too – vicious gossip being one of them.

    #231052
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It’s difficult hearing stories like yours. I know I don’t know all the details but I don’t think it is appropriate or helpful in any situation to force someone to humiliate themselves with divulging details of a sexual experience. I know someone who had this happen and one of the things he was required to talk about was his enjoyment of it. It was something that was a result of depression so maybe they felt justified asking that but I just think such intimate questions that go beyond basic details and information are just wrong and inappropriate. Like you this person also felt uncomfortable around those who had been involved in the council (which hadn’t pasted the Bishop level). Thankfully he did not feel judgement. In fact he felt a sense of pride they had in him for having progressed so much. I hope this can be the case with you.

    I would encourage you to inquire about the notes. Other than having a file saying you were ex-communicated and stating the reason why, I don’t think the other information shouldn’t be kept. I also think that you should even have a right to request to have the records or request they be destroyed. They may argue that they need it to read over when considering your re-baptism, if that is the route you decide to take. If they make that argument then you may want to push your right to see what has been written about you or at least prod them about confidentiality. Like it has been mentioned before not everyone on that council has the legal obligation to keep that information confidential. Most do anyways just out of duty and because they know it is expected of them. My DH has served in both a bishopric and HC. He never gave me any details of DC’s but he did have an other councillor who he was pretty sure the wife (who was the RP) got told most things but it probably didn’t go past her. Larger details are sometimes the things that leak out instead of the details . Unfortunately this is how most people keep those things confidential…”this is confidential so don’t tell anyone but….I heard this about so and so but don’t tell anyone because it’s confidential…Did you hear about so and so, I’m not really supposed to know so don’t tell anyone…” I think it is important to protect yourself.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.