Home Page Forums General Discussion Covenants – Help

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205267
    Anonymous
    Guest

    So, I was cornered this week and agreed to teach the High Priest Lesson this coming Sunday. (My saying ‘no’ skills, like many Mormons, are sorely lacking.) The topic is covenants. As is usually the case, I am overthinking the lesson.

    I wondered if I could get some help and ideas. I am struggling a bit, because the Gospel Principles manual is SOOOOO basic. Also, I struggle with our covenants, in that, 1) I think that at eight years old, while we can differentiate between right and wrong, I don’t think we are really all the way there in understanding the scope of the covenants we are making at baptism and in established LDS families, it’s often not a free will commitment, 2) At least for the born and bred, five generation Mormons like me, I think the pressure from the families often drags us into the temple before we are ready to make the commitments there, and in many ways, the social pressure, doesn’t really leave us with a way out. Is a covenant under pressure really a covenant? Of course, I also struggle with the Masonic links, some of the issues tied to penalties in the old endowment, feminist issues relative to the endowment and the fact that many of the commitments are made to the church and not to God.

    Anyway, I’m looking for suggestions on how approach the lesson. So far, I did a little looking up of the etymology of the word covenant, which is quite interesting. From that, I can make some ties to the concept of testament (as in Old and New) and via the Hebrew terminology to the physical tokens of a covenant. The Hebrew word ‘Berith’ from which the translations to ‘covenant’ spring deal with cutting, as in the physical token of cutting the animal in OT sacrifices.

    Any other ideas would be appreciated. My HP Group is a fairly glum, non-participatory bunch, and many of them will be out of town this Sunday, hence, getting desperate enough to ask me. :)

    #233891
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have a few suggstions for teaching this to the HP Group. I find I have to teach the basics real quick just so I did it, and then branch off into some ideas that make them think. Also, there are ways of sidestepping those aspects of of the lesson you find hard to teach given the pressure to make covenants you’ve witnessed etcetera.

    As far as content goes — hit a couple basic ideas to start off with, and then consider the following questions to the HP Group:

    1. In your experience, what are common stumbling blocks that prevent people from keeping their covenants? (Let the class run on this track for a while, and have a couple acceptable reasons yourself.).

    2. How can we strengthen ouselves and others in keeping their covenants (again, have a couple ideas yourself, and let the class do most of the talking on this one).

    3. Consider presenting an interesting administratve perspective on covenants with this situation — which actually happened. You’re a mission president and a missionary approaches you regarding a lady who wants to be baptized. But she has Alzheimers disease. It’s a moderate to heavy case of it, so she’s not all there mentally. But her son is taking the lessons, and this elderly woman also accepted a baptismal invitation from the missionaries, and indicates she wants to be baptized. If you were the mission president, would this be the right thing to do?

    Ask the class to apply what they know about covenants, accountability, etcetera to explore the question. In your back pocket, to share after the discussion has run its course, is how a particular mission president resolved the situation. The class might be divided, some saying there is no need to make a covenant because the woman isn’t accountable. Some might say its downright wrong to baptized someone who isn’t all there mentally, and will take the “pushy missionaries going after numbers” approach. Others will think it should be done.

    The way this was resolved was to actually baptize the woman. Reasons given by the mission president:

    1 She had committed sin while she was of healthy mental capacity, which needed to be remitted.

    2. She would have the Gift of the HOly Ghost which is an outgrowth of baptismal related ordinances.

    3. She would be on the records of the Church, and would have access to Church resources and help.

    4. The Priesthood holders would be accountable if they didn’t baptize the woman and they should have; who are we, as priesthood leaders to judge who should be baptized and who shouldn’t when the situation is not crystal clear?

    If people disagree, you can pin it all on the mission president who made the decision, and comment on the need for inspiration in these situations…an easy way out in case the class backs you into a corner…..

    You can also comment on the “fulness of hte gospel” comment i the BoM preface I think it says the BOM contains the fulness of the gospel, or Joseph Smith said it does. But it doesnt’ contain the new and everlasting covenant of marriage, which is supposed to be te crowning ordinance of the full gospel. How does the BoM contain the fulness of the gospel when it doesnt’ contain all covenants in the gospel?

    You can have fun with this one, and have a few answers in your back pocket to relieve the confusion at the end of the discussion. People here might have some possible answers to that question.

    Regarding your misgivings — leave them out of the lesson — focus on those aspects of covenants that you CAN talk about without reservation, such as blessing you HAVE received from your covenants. For me, I’d talk about the faithfulness of my wife, how the eternal marriage helped our commitment. Also, an example of the baptismal covenant’s requierement that we bear each other’s burdens. I tell a story about a time when the Ward bore one of my burdens when my son was in the hospital.

    Focus on those topics you CAN talk about positively, with a view to uplifting the people there. If you think hard enough, there may well be a lot ot talk about .

    Hope this helps!

    #233892
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Awesome. Thanks!!

    #233893
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m mostly a simple fellow, I try to keep everything simple and not get caught up in splitting hairs.

    To me covenants are symbolic of my desire to improve myself, and to love my fellow men. I just don’t see any specific lines of any contract coming under scrutiny during some future intervew with the grand Father. I think it will be settled before any such interview could take place. Spirit and intent outweigh wording 1000 to 1 in my book, …and who’s intent? That’s right, YOURS.

    Nobody can put words into your mouth. When you participate with a group you tend to flow along its structure, but what you pick up along the way is entirely up to you.

    #233894
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I generally set the stage by talking about the ultimate objective of convenants – becoming godly. I focus on the (incorrect, imo) idea that we “bind” God by our promises – and that I disagree with the way that idea gets interpreted too often. I mention that I have NO problem with the idea that God has promised to bless us and help us become like Him, but the actual “binding” passage in the D&C makes it clear that God binds himself – that he promises absolutely to keep his word. We aren’t binding him in any way.

    That might be seen as hair-splitting by some, but it’s an important distinction to me. I don’t control God. Period. Full stop. My covenanting (promising to accept what he has asked of me) simply opens the doors for him to help me – or, for some people, simply is an acknowledgment that I have committed to do everything I am capable of doing to tackle “becoming” as the ultimate object of my existence and “endure to the end” in that commitment.

    I would suggest reading the following post from BCC, and the comments in the thread. There’s a lot to think about in it:

    “I the Lord Am Bound” (http://bycommonconsent.com/2009/10/25/i-the-lord-am-bound/)

    #233895
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Just wanted to post my gratitude. In addition to the ideas you guys gave me, I also did some etymology research on the word ‘covenant’ and came up with several layers of meaning to discuss; French, Latin, Greek, Hebrew. The Hebrew word is ‘berith’, meaning ‘to cut’, as in the ritual cutting of animals that took place in the temple as TOKENS of Mosaic Covenant. This tie in meaning led to quite a discussion.

    #233896
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think the root of that word is also related to circumcision, bris or brit or whatever it is in Hebrew.

    Not to be confused with covens of course.

    #233897
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I know this is a week late, but when I taught this lesson last week I went to great effort to keep the conversation away from specifics, and talked about the Abrahamic Covenant and “keeping the commandments.” I made a point that I did NOT want to define what those commandments meant, and that each individual needed to work that out personally. It worked for MOST of the class, but, like always, someone brought up home teaching as one of the specific commandments that is required to enter the Celestial kingdom (some talk by DOM about the five questions you will be asked at the pearly gates or something). Then it got out of control, and pretty soon there was a whole list of specific commandments on the board that is required to fulfill the Abrahamic covenant and receive exaltation in the CK, and of course WofW was number one – right on top of the list. Other commandments that our branch mormons consider to be vital part of their covenants:

    WoW *************** (this one seemed to be particularly important)

    10% Tithing to the church

    willing to live law of consecration

    temple marriage

    chastity – before and after marriage

    love thy neighbor

    home teaching

    regular church attendance

    support local leaders and the prophet

    🙄 🙄

    #233898
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Interesting. I had never really thought about what keeping the Abrahamic Covenant means.

    #233899
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It’s always interesting to listen to sincere people who have no clue about the historic nature of what they are discussing. It happens all the time, and religion is merely one of the topics that gets butchered. As a former history teacher, I cringe – but I’ve learned to do it internally.

    It’s just people being people, and I’m sure I’m guilty of it more often than I realize.

    #233900
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’ve just been reading in a book that in the early days of Utah, children were circumcised in the Endowment House. When did this stop?

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.