Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Old Scratch
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2010 at 12:18 am #205399
Anonymous
GuestI don’t want to freak anyone out, but I need to talk about you-know-who. As we all know, in the church Satan is regarded very much as a literal reality who has power to influence, whisper, control (some say), see and hear private actions, and so on. I have several issues with that, beyond the fanciful imagery, and rules about interacting (or rather, attempting not to) with he-who-must-not-be-named that we tend to encourage. Is this a model that works for the rest of you? I see it as metaphor run amok. And yes, I’m well aware that I have been mentioned in the scriptures.
September 30, 2010 at 1:44 am #235378Anonymous
Guestdoug wrote:I see it as metaphor run amok.
– agreed!
😈 😈 😈 (I may elaborate on my thoughts more later)
September 30, 2010 at 2:21 am #235379Anonymous
GuestSorry about the Harry Potter reference, by the way. I’ve been reading to my daughter. It has occurred to me, though, that there are a lot of parallels between Harry Potter-isms and … how can I say this? … some of the conceptions that we cherish in the church. I have meant to do a contrast/comparison, but I fear it would be taken (rightfully so, probably) as too far over the top. Don’t think I’ll go there just now.
September 30, 2010 at 2:32 am #235380Anonymous
Guestdoug wrote:Sorry about the Harry Potter reference, by the way. I’ve been reading to my daughter.
It has occurred to me, though, that there are a lot of parallels between Harry Potter-isms and … how can I say this? … some of the conceptions that we cherish in the church. I have meant to do a contrast/comparison, but I fear it would be taken (rightfully so, probably) as too far over the top. Don’t think I’ll go there just now.
Not at all. One thing I have found is that the LDS culture LOVES Harry Potter. At least from what I have experienced and heard. I don’t live in Mormondum – but I believe “the church” has embraced HP, haven’t they? I’ve seen a lot resistance within my Protestant circles -but Mormons eat the stuff up — just like they do with Tolken and CS Lewis. All three of these “worlds” work very well within the mormon parameters of the gospel and only take a nudge of the imagination to really speak spiritual “truths” to those who want to and are willing to listen.
Seriously, how much different is the HP chronicles and the Bible? The mythology is there, the symbolism is there, the prophecy is there, the opposition in all things is there, the savior/atonement is there….I think I would like to hear your comparison – but, not until you’re ready to write it.
Now, if you want to get some good TBM’s really worked up, bring up The Golden Compass in Sunday School this next week.
September 30, 2010 at 2:37 am #235381Anonymous
GuestOh yeah, forgot what I originally was going to say. The “Devil” as I understand it and teach it – IMO – is nothing more than a concept. He is inside each of us – and it is our task and obligation to figure him out, tame him, and use his “knowledge” and “experience” to better ourselves, and make this life a better place for our families and community.
doug wrote:I see it as metaphor run amok. And yes, I’m well aware that I have been mentioned in the scriptures.
Yep, and YEP!
September 30, 2010 at 2:51 am #235382Anonymous
GuestTo quote myself in anther thread, I like the concept and symbolism of the devil – as the opposition in all things to the concept and symbolism of the Savior. I can accept a literal or figurative Lucifer – but I don’t like many of the extrapolations that have grown up around the devil. Having said that, the Mormon take on Lucifer (one of us gone really bad) is the only one I’ve studied that I like.
September 30, 2010 at 2:57 am #235383Anonymous
Guestcwald wrote:The “Devil” as I understand it and teach it – IMO – is nothing more than a concept. He is inside each of us – and it is our task and obligation to figure him out, tame him, and use his “knowledge” and “experience” to better ourselves, and make this life a better place for our families and community.
I like that. And I was just listening to Donald Fagen
I.G.Y.(“… what a beautiful world this will be …”, etc) as I read it. September 30, 2010 at 2:58 am #235384Anonymous
GuestI take the composite average of all the near death stories I have ever read at face value. Based on that: There is an afterlife
- There is a Father/Mother/Source/Love/Light
- There are holy angels/spirits/people in the afterlife
- There is a hell/pit/darkness/loneliness/separation
- There are evil/captive/dark spirits
- There is no personal Great Evil Spirit
The evil spirit is in my heart.
September 30, 2010 at 3:19 am #235385Anonymous
GuestI don’t know if there’s a literal person named Satan, or not — I just want to be good. September 30, 2010 at 5:47 am #235386Anonymous
GuestI’m really glad you brought this up. I use to believe in a literal Satan and “the devil made me do it” was a big part of my life. Those ideas are changing but I have no idea where they are going. I’m leaning towards a metaphor gone amok but C.S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters idea is so engrained in my mind that it is a tough paradigm to change. I kind of think that what I’ve been attributing to Satan is what I believe psychologist call our ego? That part of us that keeps us down, tells us we’re trash and sometimes leads us down the wrong path. I’m very interested in what everyone else thinks about this. September 30, 2010 at 2:02 pm #235387Anonymous
Guestcanadiangirl wrote:I’m really glad you brought this up. I use to believe in a literal Satan and “the devil made me do it” was a big part of my life. Those ideas are changing but I have no idea where they are going. I’m leaning towards a metaphor gone amok but C.S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters idea is so engrained in my mind that it is a tough paradigm to change. I kind of think that what I’ve been attributing to Satan is what I believe psychologist call our ego? That part of us that keeps us down, tells us we’re trash and sometimes leads us down the wrong path. I’m very interested in what everyone else thinks about this.
I’m pretty sure you’re on the right track. I’ll have to do some thinking about what the practical differences are, but to me the idea that ‘the enemy is us’, as opposed to the idea of an independent intelligence constantly leading us down forbidden paths, puts the responsibility where it ought to be. I suppose you could argue that there is no practical difference, i.e. that we are also being responsible if we’re constantly on the watch for Satan’s influences.
October 2, 2010 at 2:08 pm #235388Anonymous
GuestMy belief in a literal Satan is still alive and well. In my patriarchal blessing it cautioned me to know that Satan is real, and the idea of a literal being leading the underworld isn’t much of a stretch if you believe there is another literal being in charge of heaven. Where I deviate from TBM orthodoxy on this subject is the idea that there will be no sin during the millennium because Satan will be bound. I think we tend to give Satan way too much credit for our own failings.
October 2, 2010 at 10:16 pm #235389Anonymous
GuestI made (and subsequently deleted) a comment that would be difficult to interpret as anything other than insulting to those that believe in a literal Satan. Such was not my intent. I apologize. *Note to self to try better to follow good examples of others on the board. Especially late at night.* I am reminded of something I read in Gerald Lund’s book,
Hearing the Voice of the Lord — something or other. “A testimony is when you believe that what you know is true”. I puzzled over that one for a while and finally decided it was the dumbest thing I’d ever heard. Later, I decided that maybe there was some deeper meaning hidden there, intended or otherwise. Our beliefs are only as true as we choose to make them. A testimony is when our beliefs become real enough to provoke us to action. Maybe that’s what he meant. Anyway, like most things related to faith and religion, whether or not Satan is real in a literal sense is not subject to verification, so to speculate one way or the other is nothing more than that — speculation. I brought it up not because I’m going to change some fundamental behaviour based on the outcome, but out of idle curiousity. It’s a mere decoration in a house I am building. The model of the world that currently fits in my head leaves no room for such a being, though that could change.
This applies to all aspects of my faith. Does God exist? I choose to believe that the answer is ‘yes’. Does Satan exist? I choose to believe the idea of Satan is a metaphor. In my estimation, these things (and myriad others) are the best choices out of many that can both impel me towards spiritual improvement AND not leave my rational mind reeling. Since, as has been pointed out recently, no two people see things the same way, why should I expect any uniformity of belief? A big problem with the church for me is that I feel that uniformity of belief is expected (culturally, at least). Once one gets used to that idea it becomes easy to get into the habit of shooting down other people’s models out of self-preservation when they are (invariably) different than our own. Or, more often for me, seeking external validation for my interior decorating skills. Maybe a big part of being in stage 5 involves losing the craving for that validation.
In the meantime, I guess I’ll keep asking questions about things that don’t really matter.
October 2, 2010 at 10:28 pm #235390Anonymous
GuestSteve-hpias wrote:My belief in a literal Satan is still alive and well. In my patriarchal blessing it cautioned me to know that Satan is real, and the idea of a literal being leading the underworld isn’t much of a stretch if you believe there is another literal being in charge of heaven.
Where I deviate from TBM orthodoxy on this subject is the idea that there will be no sin during the millennium because Satan will be bound. I think we tend to give Satan way too much credit for our own failings.
I would add to this and say I think it maybe that even Satan could be redeemed. I’m a bit uncomfortable saying it but I think it’s possible.
October 2, 2010 at 10:59 pm #235391Anonymous
Guestdoug wrote:… I brought it up not because I’m going to change some fundamental behaviour based on the outcome, but out of idle curiousity. It’s a mere decoration in a house I am building. The model of the world that currently fits in my head leaves no room for such a being, though that could change….This applies to all aspects of my faith.
In the meantime, I guess I’ll keep asking questions about things that don’t really matter.
Please do. Many if not most of these issues really don’t mean much in the larger scheme of things, but they
certainlymean something on an individual basis and in the search for truth – and peace. I enjoy contemplating the unknown, knowing that no one really knows, and that most people will probably NEVER know in this life. It doesn’t mean that we should ignore. That’s just the way I am. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.