Home Page Forums History and Doctrine Discussions Deborah the Prophetess

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205482
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I just came across a really interesting quote from the Old Testament Student Manual, Lesson 22: Judges 1–12 , The Reign of the Judges, Part 1

    Deborah did not direct Israel in any official sense; she was a prophetess who possessed the spirit of prophecy, one of the gifts of the Spirit (see Revelation 19:10 ; Moroni 10:13 ; D&C 47:22 ). She was blessed with spiritual insight and leadership qualities that were not being put to use by any man. Barak would not lead an army against Jabin until Deborah promised to be present (see Judges 4:8–9 ).

    “No special ordination in the Priesthood is essential to man’s receiving the gift of prophecy; bearers of the Melchizedek Priesthood, Adam, Noah, Moses, and a multitude of others were prophets, but not more truly so than others who were specifically called to the Aaronic order, as exemplified in the instance of John the Baptist. The ministrations of Miriam and Deborah show that this gift may be possessed by women also.” (Talmage, Articles of Faith, pp. 228–29; see also Smith, Answers to Gospel Questions, 3:66.)

    Here is the link: http://institute.lds.org/manuals/old-testament-institute-student-manual-1/ot-in1-07-josh-judg-22.asp

    Anybody else surprised by this?

    #236702
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Maybe even Sariah and Abish. (Not Isabel)

    #236703
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m not surprised at all. In fact, there was a TV show years ago profiling a non-Mormon who claimed he had the gift of prophecy and foresaw some future events in the World History, and published them. Apparently, he was correct on a number of counts. I mentioned that I believed he was a small-p prophet to someone while I was waiting for a session to start in the temple and got hugely reprimanded.

    It’s not the kind of thing you say around traditional Mormons, unfortunately.

    Your scripture confirms that I think yes, many people have gifts of prophecy, but they aren’t necessarily spiritual leaders or don’t have any authority to direct a Church. But they do have gifts to predict or see the future.

    Also, there are certain people who have the gift of “being right all the time”. They are able to look at an uncertain, future situation and seem to know what the right thing is to do, considering all variables that will impact the situation in the future. This could also be called perfect judgment. I consider this to be a gift, which is akin to the gift of prophecy. This is because the gift allows them to foretell the impact of their actions now, on future events, or to predict how others will react in the future.

    I had one such manager. I was charged with coordinating the annual budget for the company, and the sales department didn’t come out with the sales forecast in a timely manner. I asked the departments to get started on their budgets anyway. All the other department managers balked and said there was nothing they could do until they had the sales forecast. The gifted department manager gave me his expense budget without any complain at all. I asked how he did it without a sales forecast.

    He described his “prophecy” of the future (my term, prophecy, not his). He put himself in the shoes of the sales manager. He knew business was terrible, and the sales would likely decline in the future, but knew the sales manager couldn’t produce a sales forecat that was lower than last year’s actual sales — he’d be fired if he did that. He also knew the sales manager would NOT come out with an outrageously higher sales forecast that put too much pressure on him to produce in the next year, given the terrible economic climate.

    So, this gifted department manager took last year’s actual sales, and upped it by a couple percent.

    The actual sales forecast came in a few days later, and it was within a few hundred thousand dollars of the gifted department manager’s own sales forecast arrived at through judgment. Given the total sales of the company, this was a miniscule difference which did NOT render his expense forecast/budget invalid in any way — we used it in our initial draft of the projected financial statements.

    I saw this as a gift of prophecy, as he predicted the future using judgment and high-level reasoning skills. I think these things are gifts, particularly since this particular department manager had no formal education, and had risen to his position (plant and operations manager) from sheer talent.

    So, the gift of prophecy exists in a number of different forms.

    #236704
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think that concept would not be shocking to people like Talmage who grew up in the pre-priesthood correlation era of the Church. They had a different view of what “priesthood” meant (not administrative and bureaucratic power), and the early church was full of spiritual manifestations such as prophecy, and by both sexes.

    Of course most members of the church today have a harder time wrapping their mind around it due to not knowing it was ever different. I have run into this all year in Sunday School as we talk about the Old Testament. There are always people in the class trying to figure out how the story we are reading fits into the contemporary modern church. It doesn’t. I bring that point up now and then, especially when it mentions multiple “prophets” in the land, for example.

    #236705
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Pentacostalism is based on three gifts of the spirit, speaking in tongues, healing and prophecy. No reason to doubt that some have that gift. The problem is when prophecy is conflated with leadership and administration and people assume it’s all (in the LDS Church) and nothing outside in the rest of the world.

    #236706
    Anonymous
    Guest

    mormonheretic wrote:

    I just came across a really interesting quote from the Old Testament Student Manual…

    Deborah did not direct Israel in any official sense; she was a prophetess who possessed the spirit of prophecy, one of the gifts of the Spirit…She was blessed with spiritual insight and leadership qualities that were not being put to use by any man.

    “No special ordination in the Priesthood is essential to man’s receiving the gift of prophecy”

    …Anybody else surprised by this?

    No, it doesn’t surprise me at all that some women would be just as likely as men to be able to accurately prophesy future events sometimes; what surprises me is that the LDS Church has been able to get away with trying to claim that its leaders should be expected to consistently perform better than average in the prophecy department for so long when most of the evidence I see suggests otherwise. Even though I believe in prophecy, revelation, and divine intervention, I don’t believe at all in the idea that so much preference should automatically be given to a few men simply because they have been given a special title within an organization that represents less than 1% of all the people in the world.

    As far as I’m concerned Spencer W. Kimball, Ezra Taft Benson, Gordon B. Hinckley, and Thomas S. Monson have all demonstrated a general lack of inspiration and vision and have depended mostly on the traditions they have inherited for most of their teachings and decisions. Listen to what Gordon B. Hinckley had to say about revelation:

    Quote:

    Now we don’t need a lot of continuing revelation. We have a great, basic reservoir of revelation. But if a problem arises, as it does occasionally, a vexatious thing with which we have to deal, we go to the Lord in prayer. We discuss it as a First Presidency and as a Council of the Twelve Apostles. We pray about it and then comes the whisperings of a still small voice. And we know the direction we should take and we proceed accordingly.

    Seeing the fact that it took until 1978 for this process to reveal to them that racial discrimination is wrong just doesn’t make me very confident in their abilities as a reliable source of “revealed” truth. To me they look more like business men that have risen up through the ranks based on seniority and politics rather than any kind of legitimate prophets, seers, and revelators with special mystical abilities any more than me. Sure every organization needs leadership but some of this prophet hype seems like a bit much given their track record so far.

    #236707
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DA–do you have a source for that second quote?

    I’ve been interested lately in the role of prophets. I think it’s pretty clear from reading the scriptures that a prophet may or may not be a church leader. But I think the issue has become clouded b/c the membership of the church has gradually embraced an assumption that “Prophet” is an office in the church. Which, as far as I can tell, has never been taught.

    Does anyone know if there is doctrinal support for the idea of a Prophet of the Church? Or where this idea comes from? In the scriptures, the High Priest is usually a prophet, but I don’t think he is ever referred to as “The Prophet.”

    #236708
    Anonymous
    Guest

    allquieton wrote:

    DA–do you have a source for that second quote?

    I’ve been interested lately in the role of prophets. I think it’s pretty clear from reading the scriptures that a prophet may or may not be a church leader. But I think the issue has become clouded b/c the membership of the church has gradually embraced an assumption that “Prophet” is an office in the church. Which, as far as I can tell, has never been taught.

    This quote was from some Australian TV interview conducted by David Ransom. He also did some interesting interviews with Larry King, Mike Wallace (60 Minutes), Time Magazine, etc. Many of these answers in these interviews just left me feeling like he didn’t really know what all this means any more than I do and that he was just another man without any special wisdom or insight that you would expect out of someone that is supposed to speak directly for God. For example, he kept saying “I don’t know” and equivocating about different aspects of the Church’s history and doctrines.

    #236709
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Fwiw, I parsed the “I don’t know” statements in his interview, and they were NOT statements saying, “I don’t know the answer to that question.”

    I grew up in Utah hearing that phrase used in the way Pres. Hinckley used it in that interview, and all it means in context is, “I wouldn’t say ________.” (e.g., his most often quoted response was to the question about the first part of the couplet, “As man is, God once was.” He said, “I don’t know that we teach that.” In context, the best translation for those who aren’t used to hearing that phrase used that way is, “I wouldn’t say that we teach that” – or, “I don’t have personal knoweldge that we teach that.” Such a statement is 100% correct, since “we” (The LDS Church) don’t teach that part of that couplet currently. Like Adam/God, it has been dropped from active use and isn’t taught from the pulpit at all.)

    That is exactly the meaning I heard when I first listened to the interview – and it was like listening to my own grandfather and those of his age in my community all over again. My dad picked up that phrasing and used it often, so I am well aware of it and actually use it myself occasionally when I want to be more gentle and soft than it would be to say, “No, that’s wrong.” (e.g., “I don’t know that your mother would approve of that.”)

    I’m not trying to dispute or prove anything about prophets with this comment, but I do think it’s important not to misinterpret what he actually said – and he never answered in a way that meant, “I don’t know the answer to that question.”

    #236710
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have no problem whatsoever with female or non-LDS prophets. I believe strongly they live now and have lived througout history.

    I just think too many members at all levels confuse the gift of prophecy with the role and office of apostles.

    #236711
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Speaking of President Hinckley’s interviews (I believe there was also one with the San Francisco Chronicle … ‘Musings of the Main Mormon’, or something like that), these were a big part of what ejected me from stage 3. Not that I didn’t like what I heard — on the contrary, I thought he was as honest and sincere as anyone I had ever heard at those levels of leadership. And when he described his experience with revelation, it was clear to me that it wasn’t at all that different from what I might expect to experience. So if I can get things totally wrong, so can anyone. Now some claim, when I point this out, that President Hinckley was simply making efforts not to cast his pearls before swine, but I don’t think so.

    #236712
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m not surprised that a woman can be a prophetess–I expected that. What I was surprised about was the Talmage quote, and that it is in a current LDS manual. I was blogging about Women Blessing the Sick until 1946 on my blog (see http://www.mormonheretic.org/2010/10/26/mormon-women-blessing-the-sick/ ). Bridget Jack Meyers did a presentation at Sunstone where she quoted the Gospel Doctrine Manual referring to Deborah as nothing more than a “righteous friend” when in reality there was more to the story. One of my commenters referred to the Talmage quote in the Institute manual. It does seem to me like the current climate of the church downplays the role of women.

    Over the past year, I’ve become good blogging friends with a Community of Christ (RLDS) member. I have watched the canonization of section 164 of their version of the D&C. Prophet/President Steven Veazey has made a large emphasis on making the RLDS a “prophetic people.” The Apostle Paul has told us to “covet to prophesy.” I really admire the CoC’s emphasis on trying to turn their people into a prophetic people, and I do think it is something the LDS church should do. We need to emphasize our spiritual gifts, not downplay them.

    I’m definitely a liberal when it comes to women utilizing their spiritual gifts, but it seems that the brethren aren’t so comfortable with this direction. I think it’s a shame. We should be a prophetic people (men and women) like Talmage, Brigham Young, and Joseph Smith recommended. (The funny thing is my wife is a conservative, and not interested in blessing the sick, with or without the priesthood.)

    #236713
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The Gospel Doctrine teacher this week made the comment that she is not a prophet and she was promptly corrected by a fellow who said, no, she was a prophet and could receive revelation relevant to her and those in her stewardship even if she didn’t have the authority to receive revelation for the church as a whole. I immediately thought of this thread. Didn’t really feel the need to add my thoughts as the other guy pretty much had it covered.

    #236714
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Actually you don’t even have to go back that far. Eliza Snow was referred to as a Prophetess, and her works still appear in the hymnal.

    #236715
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was a just thinking about starting a thread about Huldah, but this seems to be an appropriate place to tack it on to. I was just so surprised to learn about Huldah the prophetess when i was teaching the 9 year olds a week or so ago. I had heard of Deborah, and heard plenty of people try to say she wasn’t really a prophet, just a judge, or a righteous woman. But I’d never heard anyone mention Huldah before, which i think is tragic. she was most definitely a prophet, and clearly had authority, which you wouldn’t expect to see in a woman based on modern day church practies. Her story is found in 2 Kings 22:14-20. It would be so nice if RS spent time studying prophets like Deborah and Huldah, and encouraged women to perform blessings as they have in the past. Thats a sisterhood I could really enjoy being a part of!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 25 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.