- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2010 at 4:54 am #205537
Anonymous
GuestA couple of weeks ago I posted about my feelings regarding my DH getting his recommend and many of you gave me some great stuff to ponder. Between then and now I had decided to just let things be for awhile and see how it felt to be without a TR. I was really at peace with that decision. Then today while I was in the midst of accompanying a group of ladies practising for a number on the Christmas program, the executive secretary put his arm around me and whispered, “Did you know your TR has expired.” YES I responded. “You can get an interview when you are finished here ” He said. I was so taken aback and in the middle of trying to accompany a group of singers that I agreed to the interview.
I was really upset and not sure how to proceed. I had been caught off-guard, unprepared for how I would handle the interview etc. The interview happened to be with the 1st counsellor, a long time friend and someone I find to be a bit NOM. He started filling out the recommend and I stopped him, saying that he may not be able to sign it so to wait. He was shocked and stammered a bit as he said that he would find out when the bishop could see me etc. When he came back into the room I told him that I wasn’t doing anything wrong I just couldn’t honestly answer some of the belief questions with a resounding yes. I asked him if he ever knew anyone who had a faith-crisis. He said, “oh you mean like last month when I was having serious doubts about my beliefs.” I gave a huge sigh of relief and asked him to go through the questions with me and we would talk about what I was going through.
We had a really good talk. He told me how he had a really difficult time understanding JS, polygamy and especially JS’s inability to handle his finances (this guy is a banker
) I’m sure there is more to his faith-crisis as he mentioned things that were happening with his kids that had him questioning leadership etc. I didn’t go into a lot of detail but was honest when he asked me certain questions. By the end of the interview, he said he felt good about giving me a recommend. He also asked me if he could share my thoughts with the bishop. I expressed reservations about that explaining how I didn’t trust the bishop but that I did trust him so if he felt that it would be best he had my permission. (I regret that a bit, I should have asked him to keep it between us.)
I’m upset at being pushed (and allowing myself to be pushed) into a situation I wanted to avoid but under the circumstances I think it went pretty well. Do they really keep track of recommends and pester people about them? (mine had only expired 12 days ago) It seems that way to me. And this particular executive secretary seems to be on to me. I found it to be a bit of a violation of my privacy and self-stewardship (If that is a word)
I’m a little worried about the consequences. Will the bishop call me in. I really don’t want to open up much to anyone in leadership. I have obvious authority issues
👿 Thanks for reading.
CANADA
December 13, 2010 at 5:10 am #237401Anonymous
GuestThe computer system has a report that they are supposed to generate showing who’s up for a recommend interview. But they never called me about renewing mine. I wouldn’t particularly object to an interview (I’m a chatty kind of fellow), but I’m fine without one too. December 13, 2010 at 3:47 pm #237402Anonymous
GuestEspecially now that the recommends are good for two years, it’s really easy to lose track of when they expire. Most members who have a temple recommend appreciate the reminder – and it’s critical to remember that. Notifying them a little in advance of or just after expiration can save them the embarrassment of showing up at the temple with an expired recommend or the stress of rushing around at the last minute trying to make special arrangements to renew it. What happened to you is a GREAT thing for most members; it just wasn’t for you. Again, it’s important to be able to see, understand and accept that. As to your own situation, I’m glad it turned out the way it did – except perhaps for the sharing with the Bishop. However, if the Counselor understands your concerns and felt good about signing your recommend – and if that counselor can share your concerns in the context of his own struggles – and if that can help the Bishop recognize and understand better those who struggle – and it that new understanding helps him be more understanding of and charitable toward members who are struggling – it might be a wonderful thing. Of course, it might not be, but I would try to not let the worry over something that might not happen rob you of the peace that can be there knowing you might have been or be part of helping someone learn and grow.
At the very least, you found someone else who seems to understand of whom you weren’t aware. That’s never a bad thing.
December 13, 2010 at 4:02 pm #237403Anonymous
GuestI know you felt anxiety getting caught off guard, but it sounds overall like a nice experience. It’s pretty cool knowing you have an understanding and sympathetic member of the bishopric. December 13, 2010 at 4:13 pm #237404Anonymous
GuestHi Canadiangirl! I take that all as good news — congrats! Yes, Ray is exactly right. A few years ago we were visiting family out of state – went to the temple for an important event, and my wife’s recommend had expired! She said “they always call me when it’s time!” She had no idea it had expired and was crushed at (almost) missing the event. Luckily the temple president was able to get our bishop on the phone and issue her a temporary.
If you do get called in I have a couple suggestions. I was also called in when I was “fresh” in my crisis. The bishop was a great guy, said he was comfortable in discussing any question/topic. I appreciated much of what he said, things like “we are supposed to ask questions – you have done nothing wrong.”
But I declined to bring up any of the things that were really bothering me.I did not want to get into a discussion that would show how emotional I was on certain topics. I think our emotions on some of these things can be a very bad thing to display. When he asked me what issue troubled me the most I could have easily said something like “Why did Joseph marry Orson Hyde’s wife while Orson was away on his mission to the holy land?” but I knew there are no good answers — at least none that would have satisfied me. I did say “I am unsure about how literally to take some of the stories in the scriptures.” To which he responded “Jesus did teach in parables, didn’t he.” I also said I didn’t want to express something today that I might feel differently about in the future — I was just searching a lot of things out, I was not certain in much of anything. I think that was a great relief to the bishop. I think the greatest fears of a leader for this situation is having someone “flip” and adopt a new certainty that the church is completely false and evil. I didn’t express anything like that and the conversation was a good experience. He did ask some pointed questions: He asked how I felt about Jesus and the atonement. He asked what I thought about the recent baptism of my child (that I did perform when nobody knew of my questions). I simply tried to answer as positively as I could. I told him I saw those things as “good” and luckily the bishop being a great guy built upon any positive statement that I made and used it to effectively say “look at how much you DO believe!” I do feel very fortunate to have charitable leaders.
December 13, 2010 at 4:23 pm #237405Anonymous
GuestRay, Good points and yes it is a service for those who wouldn’t think twice about an interview. I was just a little unnerved by the whole thing. At this stage I seem hyper-sensitive to the actions of leadership so that is the reason for my questions about the process of renewal. I really do hope that some good will come of it. For now I’ll just try my best to take care of myself, set up some good boundaries and stick to them.
That is very good advice Orson thank you. You have expressed my concerns very well. I know my beliefs are fluid and I don’t want to be branded for saying something that in 6 months I might see differently. So vague expressions of questioning is a good way to approach it I think. What I said yesterday seemed to have a life of its own. I couldn’t really stop and think as my emotions were more in control but I think for the most part I didn’t get too crazy. The member of the bishopric did most of the talking.
Have a fantastic day everyone
CANADA
December 13, 2010 at 6:38 pm #237406Anonymous
GuestGlad it went well Candiangirl. We used to run off temple recommend-expiry reports regularly and for a while my HPGL secretary was in charge of calling people to remind them to get an interview. He was supposed to set up appointments with members of the Bishopric for people in the call, acting almost like an Exec Secretary to the counsellors. However, our HPGL secretary finally told me all he was willing to do was remind people, and not try to set up an appointment. Then he stopped the reminder phone calls altogether. I wonder how people at StayLDS would feel about getting a call from a secretary in the HPGL inviting them to set an appointment with a Bishop’s counselor for a TR interview?
December 13, 2010 at 6:49 pm #237407Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:I wonder how people at StayLDS would feel about getting a call from a secretary in the HPGL inviting them to set an appointment with a Bishop’s counselor for a TR interview?
I personally would thank them for the reminder, for taking the time to let me know. I would then tell them I will handle setting up any meetings myself, if needed. That in my mind acknowledges their efforts and avoids needing to get tangled up in a conversation with someone who doesn’t need to know, and probably doesn’t want to know. They’re just doing their job.
December 14, 2010 at 12:40 am #237408Anonymous
Guestcanadiangirl wrote:For now I’ll just try my best to take care of myself, set up some good boundaries and stick to them.
Well, I’m glad things went okay. I think this comment you made is a good approach to it all. I don’t like other people telling me that I need to meet with them or the bishop, so I understand the frustration it must have been. I’m also glad that you could pass the questions, and I’m jealous that you have a NOM in the bishopric. We need more of them.
December 17, 2010 at 12:17 pm #237409Anonymous
GuestThis is a rather tough one for me. I went without a TR for nearly a year, and then got it renewed so I could attend a relative’s wedding. I’ve only been back once since, and that was the first time the sexism in the endowment ceremony really bothered me. My TR expires in March, and I’ve decided to let it lapse once again. I believe I’m worthy to hold one, but I have zero desire to attend the temple right now. Interestingly, the last time I went in for an interview, no one called me to let me know it had expired, but when the SP counselor who interviewed me noticed I hadn’t had one in awhile, he gave me a guilt trip about how worthy members should always hold a TR regardless of how often they’re able to attend. I know they keep statistics on the number of TR holders in the stake, and my cynical side wondered if his concern was only about numbers. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.