Redemption – and "Exercising Faith in the Redemption"

[NOTE: I have been posting my New Year’s Resolution posts here for quite some time each Saturday, but I want to add a caveat to this one – an addition to what I posted on my own blog. The wording of the post on my own blog is intended for the general audience who reads it, and many of those who read it are quite “traditional believing members”. Also, it is a fully public blog. Having said that, the general principle in this post is the same regardless of the wording or audience. I will say it a bit more explicitly here, but the central point of the post is that I believe “exercising faith in Jesus as the Redeemer” can apply whether one views “the Redemption” as literal or figurative – so the application of it individually (the exercise of faith in it) can vary greatly within any group of people. In essence, it boils down to worshiping according to the dictates of one’s own conscience – taking the concept and principle of “redemption” and applying it however it makes sense in one’s own mind, heart and life.]

As I contemplated the comments from my last New Year’s Resolution post, my mind was drawn to perhaps the group in all of our scriptures who exemplified best a belief in their Redeemer. I am speaking of the Anti-Nephi-Lehis – and I want to use the record we have of them to illustrate the core of what I have come to believe about how we can exercise faith in Jesus Christ as a “Redeemer” – differently, perhaps, than is taught typically.

In Alma 56:47-48, all we are told is that the mothers of the Stripling Warriors (the “sons of Helaman”) “taught” their sons that “if they did not doubt, God would deliver them.” From what, we are not told explicitly in the account itself.

We only assume it was from physical death in war because of the situation (war and their preservation from death in it) that caused them to relate it to Helaman. However, the first two-thirds of verse 47 make it clear that they were willing to die. I believe it is important that they appear to have accepted the possibility that they might die in combat – that they simply didn’t fear death. Given that, it is legitimate to look at the rest of the context and realize that there might be other legitimate meanings for the promise that, “God would deliver them.”

First, “they had been taught” – which might have been a one time occurrence as they were leaving home. However, it seems like these young men had been taught dedication and obedience and exactness all their lives. Individuals can change in an instant, but it is unlikely that 2,000 young men suddenly would become super-righteous and completely obedient overnight. It is much more likely that they had been taught that God would deliver them from anything that might threaten their spiritual, eternal well-being than that their mothers simply pulled them aside on the way out the door and promised them they wouldn’t be killed in the war.

Remember, those mothers had seen many of their friends (and perhaps some fathers and sons and husbands) slaughtered by other Lamanites – killed in the act of calling upon God even though they did not “doubt God”. They knew full well that God didn’t always deliver His faithful people from physical death, but they were convinced that He could deliver them from their natural, fallen, sinful and lost state – from spiritual death. (Alma 24:27 – “thus we see that the Lord worketh in many ways to the salvation of his people.”)

Alma 53: 20-21 makes it obvious that these young men had been taught all their lives the reward for perfect faithfulness, obedience and dedication – the same reward their own “pioneers” had received, even those who had been killed for their faith, valor and lack of doubt. I think it’s fairly safe to guess, as a parent myself, that their mothers reiterated what they had been taught all their lives as they were heading off to war (that, if they did not doubt, God would deliver them – no matter the physical outcome.)

Remember, this was Helaman who was reporting about these young men. He was as close to them as any Nephite – ever. Yet, apparently, he did not know the specifics about what their mothers had taught them until they told him about it. He had been there when the parents had decided to fight; he was the one who had talked them out of it by invoking their sacred promise; he had been chosen as their sons’ military leader, because they trusted him as a religious leader. He was intimately involved in the decision of their sons to fight in place of their parents. Perhaps “taught” simply can mean “told” – but I tend to believe that Helaman would have been there for the great send off when all the mothers collectively told all the sons that they would not die in battle – that he would have known about it and not have to be told after the fact.

(Having said all that, I do not discount the idea that the Lord promised the parents that He would preserve their sons in battle like He had promised Mosiah and Alma to preserve their sons on their missions to convert these very parents (a promise of which Helaman would have heard from his own father and understood intimately) – that is was couched in terms of, “You’ve sacrificed enough lives to follow me. I won’t require that you sacrifice your children.” Even if that really is all it was, that’s enough for me, since it makes it an incredibly powerful story of the rewards of deep and difficult sacrifice and dedication.)

I am not saying that my reading of this account is the correct view of the statement, “God would deliver them.” It simply might have been, “Stay valiant and none of you will be killed.” All I’m saying is that when you parse the text, there is more than one possible meaning for that phrase (”God would deliver them.”) – and, to me, the more comprehensive one I describe here is much more powerful and moving and inspiring in its applicability to me and my own battles. This is because “deliver” has much the same meaning as “redeem” – especially in the context of a story like the Sons of Helaman.

In a nutshell, this is my own testimony of exercising faith in Jesus Christ as Redeemer – that I try to live my life in such a way that it might be said of me, “God will deliver him.” I believe that has much more to do with how well I follow my conscience, my mind and my heart than how well I live a checklist of do’s and don’ts – even as I believe deeply in having a core list of fundamental do’s and don’ts. I believe most, if not all, of the list focus is swallowed up in the attitude of giving one’s heart to love God – and others as one’s self, and that striving to do those things allows all the laws and the prophets to hang comfortably on my heart.

I believe exercising faith in Jesus as Redeemer is more about living the type of life I believe he lived and wants me to live than about exact understanding of doctrine or philosophy or theology – as much as I absolutely love the study of those things. To me, exercising faith in Jesus as Redeemer means becoming like him – and the biggest aspect of that, perhaps, is nothing more than learning to see every person around me as valuable, important, worthy of love and, in the best sense of the ideal, a sibling and a fellow child of God.

At it’s most awe-inspiring, it is believing him when he says that he can take the weak, flawed, corrupted ME **and work with me** to turn me into a strong, flawless, incorruptible ME – that he loves me now just as much as he will love me then – that he sees me as redeemable and will, in actuality, “purchase” and “save” me.

How do you see “redemption” – and what does it mean to you to exercise faith in it?