Home Page Forums History and Doctrine Discussions Does the Catholic church still have the priesthood?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #205803
    amertune
    Guest

    When King Noah dismissed all of his father’s priests and called his own, they still had priesthood authority even though they were apostate. When Alma heard Abinadi preaching, he left the wicked priests and baptized people. From this story, it seems that priesthood authority can be passed on whether the people passing it on are worthy or not–whether they are preaching the truth or not.

    In the case of the Catholic church, they claim to have an unbroken chain of authority clear back to Jesus (through St Peter). Even if they had gradually apostatized, wouldn’t they still be able to pass on the priesthood just like King Noah’s priests?

    #241117
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have no problem with someone who believes that the Catholic Church has a form of the Priesthood – especially in how we view the Aaronic Priesthood.

    I certainly don’t believe in the strictest view of all Priesthood being lost from the earth in times of general apostasy – and I don’t believe the Melchizedek Priesthood was totally lost after Moses died, since our own scriptures say he was ordained by Jethro (his father-in-law, who was not an Israelite). There’s no reason, imo, to assume God hasn’t been calling (and “ordaining”) people throughout history of whom we simply don’t know (or about whose callings / ordinations we don’t know, even if we do know of the people themselves).

    #241118
    Anonymous
    Guest

    amertune wrote:

    Does the Catholic church still have the priesthood?

    Sure, why not.

    I know it’s not a popular idea in mormondom – but so what. I believe the priesthood, or the “authority” is spread wide throughout the world. I can’t imagine the gods only privileging 14 million people to have it and have the blessings of it, on a planet populated by 6 billion. That really doesn’t make sense to me.

    #241119
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I don’t think its chain is as unbroken as thy’d like to think. They are also not the original church for a number of reasons. The first three/four centuries of the Roman Catholic Church are clouded in mystery, and there is no evidence that Rome was ever intended to be the center of the church.

    #241120
    Anonymous
    Guest

    How about everyone or no one has the priesthood. I am pretty sure the priesthood is simply a mechanism men use to to say they have authority. I do not see any evidence that God bestows it on people. Not that this is all bad. I think in any organization you have to have an authority structure to function. I just do not think this is some kind of unseen force or power bestowed on someone receiving the priesthood.

    #241121
    Anonymous
    Guest

    amertune wrote:

    When King Noah dismissed all of his father’s priests and called his own, they still had priesthood authority even though they were apostate. When Alma heard Abinadi preaching, he left the wicked priests and baptized people. From this story, it seems that priesthood authority can be passed on whether the people passing it on are worthy or not–whether they are preaching the truth or not.

    In the case of the Catholic church, they claim to have an unbroken chain of authority clear back to Jesus (through St Peter). Even if they had gradually apostatized, wouldn’t they still be able to pass on the priesthood just like King Noah’s priests?

    I asked this same question of my institute teacher. His answer was that the apostacy in the time of King Noah was recent (a generation or less) and therefore there were still valid ordinations being performed. Another way to look at it in a traditional method would be that they may still have the priesthood but they lack the priesthood keys.

    #241122
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Cadence wrote:

    How about everyone or no one has the priesthood. I am pretty sure the priesthood is simply a mechanism men use to to say they have authority. I do not see any evidence that God bestows it on people. Not that this is all bad. I think in any organization you have to have an authority structure to function. I just do not think this is some kind of unseen force or power bestowed on someone receiving the priesthood.

    I think that’s a bit unfair. There is evidence of JS setting up RS as a kind of female priesthood.

    #241123
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SamBee wrote:

    Cadence wrote:

    How about everyone or no one has the priesthood. I am pretty sure the priesthood is simply a mechanism men use to to say they have authority. I do not see any evidence that God bestows it on people. Not that this is all bad. I think in any organization you have to have an authority structure to function. I just do not think this is some kind of unseen force or power bestowed on someone receiving the priesthood.

    I think that’s a bit unfair. There is evidence of JS setting up RS as a kind of female priesthood.

    Sorry I am missing your point?

    #241124
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    I am pretty sure the priesthood is simply a mechanism men use to to say they have authority.

    I was thinking you meant males rather than mankind here.

    #241125
    Anonymous
    Guest

    amertune wrote:

    When King Noah dismissed all of his father’s priests and called his own, they still had priesthood authority even though they were apostate. When Alma heard Abinadi preaching, he left the wicked priests and baptized people. From this story, it seems that priesthood authority can be passed on whether the people passing it on are worthy or not–whether they are preaching the truth or not.


    I think this is a good point and good reference to how things happened in the scriptures that we don’t question or create angst about…this was one way the priesthood authority was passed on. Regardless of whether it was one generation or several, this did happen and we have no problem with it.

    To me it supports the premise that things aren’t so cut and dry, or that the priesthood is either on the earth or its not, or that it is in one church (and no others) or it is not. Things have never been that cut and dry. Things just work their way through mortality, and God lets things happen, and sometimes even intervenes.

    I think there is a lot of God’s work being done by the Catholic church.

    #241126
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Heber13 wrote:


    To me it supports the premise that things aren’t so cut and dry, or that the priesthood is either on the earth or its not, or that it is in one church (and no others) or it is not. Things have never been that cut and dry. Things just work their way through mortality, and God lets things happen, and sometimes even intervenes.

    I think there is a lot of God’s work being done by the Catholic church.

    Absolutely.

    #241127
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think a form of priesthood exists wherever people have individually (and collectively) dedicated their life to serving a god. A priest or priestess is a person who serves their god in a functional way, their “agent” for action in this reality or realm.

    A good Catholic priest who serves God every day is a priest. A good Mormon Elder who serves God through serving others is a priest. A woman who dedicates and concecrates a portion of her life to serve is a priestess of God.

    I think God should care more about the walk than the talk, more about the charity than the authority.

    Who has more priesthood “power?” (power as in a force that causes action in the world) An agnostic, non-denominational woman who blesses her sick neighbor by dropping off dinner and folding her family’s laundry, or a man who has great faith and was officially ordained by the laying on of hands from a pedigreed chain of people; but sits around talking about plans to convert the whole world to the “truth?” (but never does anything)

    #241128
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Brian Johnston wrote:

    I think a form of priesthood exists wherever people have individually (and collectively) dedicated their life to serving a god. A priest or priestess is a person who serves their god in a functional way, their “agent” for action in this reality or realm.

    A good Catholic priest who serves God every day is a priest. A good Mormon Elder who serves God through serving others is a priest. A woman who dedicates and concecrates a portion of her life to serve is a priestess of God.

    I think God should care more about the walk than the talk, more about the charity than the authority.

    Yes, I agree Brian. 100%. But, you can’t say that in church. That is the kind of theology that will get a person in trouble. It’s a black and white issue as far as the LDS church is concerned, and I don’t think there can be any argument about it. That kind of thinking does not work in the LDS church today. That is the kind of “strategy” that one can only use to “personally” find a way to come to terms with the faith, and keep it to themselves.

    #241129
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In the early days of the church, up into the 20th century even, the women were encouraged to lay their hands on the head and bless and anoint each other before child bearing. They technically didn’t have the priesthood, yet they had “something” that allowed them to give “priesthood” blessings. Where did they get it from and what kind of authority does one need?

    I think Brian is right on — priesthood comes from god – not mormon leaders.

    #241130
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    you can’t say that in church

    Yes, you can – and I have done so more than once, in multiple wards and stakes, with nobody disagreeing with me. I say it carefully and pick my words carefully (by talking about “power of God” and not “Priesthood authority”), but I still say it. For example, I have said that Mother Teresa exercised the power of God and was a better Christian than a Stake President who doesn’t care about anything but statistics – and absolutely nobody has disagreed with me.

    Pres. Packer spoke not long ago about how the Church has done a better job of distributing the “authority” of the Priesthood than of distributing the “power” of the Priesthood, so even Boyd K. Packer agrees with Brian in theory – even if he wouldn’t frame it or phrase it in the same way as Brian did.

    In this case, it’s how we say it and what words we choose that make all the difference.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.