Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › When rules replace religion
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 12, 2011 at 11:51 pm #205883
Anonymous
GuestI Posted this at NOM. Interesting to see what the StayLDS’ers have to say.After enduring our latest HP lesson it is confirmed to me the church is dying. They handed out a the new little booklet on the family. Then proceeded to discuss how to give blessings, do ordinances, conduct family home evening, etc, etc. The whole jist of the lesson was not on the meaning of any of this but that they were done exactly right, that the proper words were used, that you were dressed appropriately, that no sinners were allowed to participate. So very little substance and so many rules.
I believe because there is so precious little revelation or new doctrine coming from on high the leaders tend to turn to more stringent rules as a sign of progression in the church. When rules replace religion I am afraid inspiration and creativity cease. When the procedure of giving a blessing is more important than what is said I think we are lost. When wearing a white shirt is a sign of your purity with little thought of what you are on the inside determines your position in the church, what hope is there.
I am not going to say the church is all bad. I find many aspects good that I like participating in. I also know I am nit picking to some degree here. But as far as a religion goes the church is withering on the vine. Opinion unless correlated is discouraged. Thought outside of the box is scary. Like I said I think this is inevitable of a church that claims so much and produces so little in the way revelation. Thinking of conference it was just platitudes and shallow promises by being obedient. We are living in the past with nothing of substance happening here and now. We are retreading everything we have and tightening the screws on creativity. It seems we are on a path to irrelevancy and mediocrity. It makes me sad.
_________________
April 13, 2011 at 1:21 am #242547Anonymous
GuestI hear you. This tendency with many of my brothers & sisters troubles me as well. But because I have the living spirit within me, I don’t see it quite so negatively. Granted, they probably won’t ask me to teach Gospel Doctrine to the Adults anytime soon after my year of teaching the D&C and Church history(2009), but I promise no one slept through my lessons. I was surprised, but even with members of the Stake Presidency attending a few times, and the bishop and/or his counselors being there regularly, I was never “spoken to” or asked to stop breaking my promise to stick to the manual.
I loved it.
People are a bit gun shy, though, of a real prophet cutting loose. I mean, consider Joseph. He scared the crap out of all sorts of reasonable people. Why? Because ultimately, religion and spirit are not rational. And that opens up a very touchy can of worms, especially in our day and age. OTOH, people aren’t really rational either — thus the match between people & their religions.
Rules are rational, reasonable, consistent, and so forth. But revelation? Hah. You sure you want that? Unfettered, it’s “Katy, bar the door!”
HiJolly
April 13, 2011 at 2:51 am #242548Anonymous
GuestCadence — it surprises me a bit that you have drawn the conclusion that the Church is dying. With your analytical side, I would think you would base conclusions of the statistics — overall decline in new membership, increases in less-activity, declining numbers of endowed members with TR’s, etcetera. On the other hand….I think it’s important to recognize that for some people, the rules and regs are a source of stability and comfort — they function well in those environments. However, the majority of us here, don’t. In fact, that may well be why we are here….too much structure, reprimands, however gentle for not “doing it by the book” don’t fit well with many of us.
When I joined the Church as a Young Adult, I didn’t have the self-knowledge to see that my personality and the way the Church conducts its business doesn’t meld very well. When I was younger, it didn’t matter much, because I didn’t have philosophy — but now – it’s glaringly clear that I married something with which I’m not naturally compatible.
I think it would interesting to post a similar question, more positively worded, on a TBM site to hear how they feel about all the rules and procedures. It would be interested in seeing their responses. I’m sure many of them would love them and feel very positive about them. Many for reasons they have been indoctrinated to believe, but many for other reasons.
April 13, 2011 at 3:58 am #242549Anonymous
GuestQuote:…
When rules replace religion I am afraid inspiration and creativity cease.When the procedure of giving a blessing is more important than what is said I think we are lost. When wearing a white shirt is a sign of your purity with little thought of what you are on the inside determines your position in the church, what hope is there….I am not going to say the church is all bad. I find many aspects good that I like participating in. I also know I am nit picking to some degree here. But as far as a religion goes the church is withering on the vine. Opinion unless correlated is discouraged. Thought outside of the box is scary.IMO Spock, you are absolutely correct about how rules are replacing our religion. Best post I’ve read in a long time. and really hits home to me — this is where my faith crisis is centered. It certainly appears to me that we are exactly what we mock and talk about when we teach about the Jews, the Isrealites and the pharisees. Have we become what we perceived was once our greatest threat?
Perhaps even some of our prophets know this and are trying to do something about it – but our people WILL NOT LISTEN. Our people don’t want “the gospel” – they want “the law.” They want to be told what to do, how to behave, how to think and what to believe.”
And yeah — it is sad.
As far as the church “dying.” Maybe not physically speaking, but I think our culture is dying spiritually, and will continue to do so as long as they contintue to rely so heavily on the prophets to receive their revelation for them. MANY orthodox members think this is a sign of faithfulness and loyalty to the God. I find it to be little more than spiritual welfare.
April 13, 2011 at 5:12 am #242550Anonymous
GuestQuote:Perhaps even some of our prophets know this and are trying to do something about it – but our people WILL NOT LISTEN.
I believe the first part, since it’s being said constantly in General Conference lately, and I hope the last part will change. I’ve seen it changing in some wards and branches and not in others, so I do have hope – but I wish it was happening faster.
April 13, 2011 at 12:37 pm #242551Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:Cadence — it surprises me a bit that you have drawn the conclusion that the Church is dying. With your analytical side, I would think you would base conclusions of the statistics — overall decline in new membership, increases in less-activity, declining numbers of endowed members with TR’s, etcetera.
On the other hand….I think it’s important to recognize that for some people, the rules and regs are a source of stability and comfort — they function well in those environments. However, the majority of us here, don’t. In fact, that may well be why we are here….too much structure, reprimands, however gentle for not “doing it by the book” don’t fit well with many of us.
When I joined the Church as a Young Adult, I didn’t have the self-knowledge to see that my personality and the way the Church conducts its business doesn’t meld very well. When I was younger, it didn’t matter much, because I didn’t have philosophy — but now – it’s glaringly clear that I married something with which I’m not naturally compatible.
I think it would interesting to post a similar question, more positively worded, on a TBM site to hear how they feel about all the rules and procedures. It would be interested in seeing their responses. I’m sure many of them would love them and feel very positive about them. Many for reasons they have been indoctrinated to believe, but many for other reasons.
I should have been more clear. I did not mean to allude to the fact that the church was dying in the sense that it was shrinking and going away, but more to the fact it was dying as a dynamic institution. Its energy is fading to me. This does not immediately translate to less members although I think it is apparent that the rate of growth has at least slowed.
As far as how TBM would respond I would think they would not look at it as a bunch of rules but as divine guidance on how to live a better life. Which in the case of many of the rules that may be true. And many members are better for it. But like the Pharisees who cherished the obedience Law of Moses to exclusion of all else I think members are getting lost in the letter of the law and not the spirit. When obeying an arbitrary rule or or focusing on the words you say in a prayer as a sign of your righteousness I think we are lost in the wilderness. It is not their fault however because it is all they have. In the absence of real revelation, all they get is a steady drumbeat of obedience to the rules. How could the average TBM believe anything else. Of course that is my opinion.
April 13, 2011 at 1:43 pm #242552Anonymous
GuestI think this is an MBTI issue. Remember that for the SJs in the church (55% of the population at large, and even higher for church-goers), rules and regs are mother’s milk to them. This is “the stuff,” it’s what they go to receive. To the rest of us, it’s meh. We go to derive meaning and make a difference (NFs – 10% of world population) or to hear the mysteries of the universe expounded and gain personal wisdom (NTs – 5% of the world pop). I didn’t mention the SPs (35% of the world pop) because they’d rather be out having fun (“sinning” as the SJs would put it) than stuck at boring church. April 13, 2011 at 2:05 pm #242553Anonymous
Guestcwald wrote:Perhaps even some of our prophets know this and are trying to do something about it – but our people WILL NOT LISTEN.
While I think this is correct, there’s a reason for it. Ray has pointed out, aptly, a number of times that there seems to be a movement within the Q12 to be less mechanistic, more concerned about people, more balanced in our approach to service etcetera.
But then, out comes Costa’s talk last conference stressing the whole blind obedience concept all over again. So, there is not a consistent message. And usually, to change culture takes a concerted effort. It can’t just be talks –there has to be supporting policy, changes to the CHI, systems, Sunday School lesson manuals, and such.
I don’t see this breadth of change toward a kinder, gentler Church. All I see are a few Q12 members with more liberal ideas sharing them in conference — and the members at large don’t see the cultural values these Q12 might be trying to change (emphasis on MIGHT BE).
Personally, I don’t think you’ll see significant change until church assets and revenues like tithing is threatened due to negative membership and activity numbers. As we saw with plural marriage, and the FP letter on tithing in the 70’s, they tend to act firmly and effectively when there are practical operational reasons for the change, not as a conscious effort to improve the culture when membership growth, tithing and the operational health of the Church is not at risk.
April 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm #242554Anonymous
GuestCadence wrote:
…I did not mean to allude to the fact that the church was dying in the sense that it was shrinking and going away, but more to the fact it was dying as a dynamic institution. Its energy is fading to me.This does not immediately translate to less members although I think it is apparent that the rate of growth has at least slowed. As far as how TBM would respond I would think they would not look at it as a bunch of rules but as divine guidance on how to live a better life. Which in the case of many of the rules that may be true. And many members are better for it. But like the Pharisees who cherished the obedience Law of Moses to exclusion of all else
I think members are getting lost in the letter of the law and not the spirit. When obeying an arbitrary rule or or focusing on the words you say in a prayer as a sign of your righteousness I think we are lost in the wilderness.It is not their fault however because it is all they have. In the absence of real revelation, all they get is a steady drumbeat of obedience to the rules. How could the average TBM believe anything else. Of course that is my opinion. Yes yes yes. This is exactly what scares me about the LDS church. The
How to Stayarticle is right when it states that it is wrong to assume that folks like us don’t care about the church. I care a tremendous amount, in fact, I care too much, and when i see what is happening, it causes me just too much pain — it’s why I don’t know if I can stick it out. I hate seeing this kind of stuff and what is happening to so many of people. I appreciate this thread, because it really nails down the core of my faith crisis in a nutshell. Perhaps the one thing I might disagree with you Cadence, is that I put the blame squarely on the people – not the leaders. I honestly think the leaders “get it.” But the people just will not listen. Much like the story of the Isrealites in the wilderness, whether real or just myth, Moses wanted them to have the gospel – the higher law, and they CHOSE to keep the lesser law. They wanted the prophets to tell them how to behave and how to think. They wanted the spiritual welfare. I honestly believe we have done the exact same thing in this church. I’m not trying to be critical of the church – I’m just being honest and telling you how I personally see it. It’s really sad to me — that sacrament prayers and white shirts are so important to our tribe…. but…Hawk is right,
Hawkgirl’s description of personality types is right on. It only makes sense – for most folks, this church is great and does the job — it’s just us poor 15% of NTs and NFs that have a problem with it. That is why I have little hope in the church – I doubt they will ever do what needs to be done to make us feel welcome and make the church a valid pathway for us. I’m afraid for most of us in the long run, at least in my case, the church will cause more angst and pain, than good. If you are one of the NFs and NTs that can make it work – I give you all the respect in the world.
April 13, 2011 at 10:11 pm #242555Anonymous
GuestCwald said, “As far as the church “dying.” Maybe not physically speaking, but I think our culture is dying spiritually.” Yes and I feel like I am dying spiritually. This is a core issue for me as well. The LDS church isn’t giving me the things my soul is desiring. I want to learn more about compassion, kindness, loving unconditionally, forgiveness and how to be a woman of God. Like others have said recently I want to learn how to be a good person not a good mormon though they do overlap. I want to learn how to transcend my human qualities and understand how to live in harmony with the universe. I don’t just want rules to control the desires of my ego, I want to learn how to erase the ego and experience love. I’m a baby at all of this stuff but I do feel like the church is so afraid of other thoughts and ideas that they are blind to what could really bring us all joy.
I get what Hawkgrrrl is saying but what does that mean for me. Do I continue to stay where I feel stifled and bored out of my mind or do I set myself free to explore the world? The way I’ve set up that question, the answer seems obvious to me but we all know it just isn’t that simple.
Great post Cadence. Thanks for the thoughts.
CG
April 13, 2011 at 11:19 pm #242556Anonymous
GuestQuote:Do I continue to stay where I feel stifled and bored out of my mind or do I set myself free to explore the world? The way I’ve set up that question, the answer seems obvious to me but we all know it just isn’t that simple.
Maybe the answer is to do both. Go to church for now for the social reasons, or to serve others, or to keep harmony, or whatever . . . but set yourself free and explore the world individually. I love doing that in my spare time, limited as it is – and it really is liberating. Compartmentalize and change expectations.
Honestly, once people realize they really are free mentally and spiritually to pursue enlightenment and personal growth outside of “The Church”, it helps a lot of them deal with lack of stimulation at church.
April 14, 2011 at 12:03 am #242557Anonymous
Guestcwald wrote:Cadence wrote:
…I dPerhaps the one thing I might disagree with you Cadence, is that I put the blame squarely on the people – not the leaders. I honestly think the leaders “get it.” But the people just will not listen. Much like the story of the Isrealites in the wilderness, whether real or just myth, Moses wanted them to have the gospel – the higher law, and they CHOSE to keep the lesser law. They wanted the prophets to tell them how to behave and how to think. They wanted the spiritual welfare. I honestly believe we have done the exact same thing in this church. I’m not trying to be critical of the church – I’m just being honest and telling you how I personally see it. It’s really sad to me — that sacrament prayers and white shirts are so important to our tribe…. but…Hawk is right,
I get that the members wont listen well when it makes them think outside their box, but like SD said in this thread it takes more than milk toast comments at general conference to steer the boat in a new directions. So yes I do blame the leaders as much as the members because they never just come out and say “hey quit with all the crappy rules” They just make subtle statements about living the spirit of the law, and other innocuous comments. When they do lay it on with emphasis it is about obeying some law. If you want real change you have to be forceful and in it for the long haul to see change. I just do not see that from the leaders. They may want change but they are not directing it.
April 14, 2011 at 12:18 am #242558Anonymous
GuestCase in point to what Cadence said. My wife is Primary President. She made a decision to deviate from the format of the Primary meeting because given late teachers and lack of commitment from a lot of them, junior primary kids were in their classrooms unsupervised for much of their lesson (4 out of 8 classes, she said, last week). She wanted to go back to the old format where junior and senior primary kids and teachers meet first for a grand opening, and THEN, there is dispersion to classes. This way she knows which teachers are present and which ones aren’t. She told the Bishop and the Stake Primary (her first mistake) AND THEN THE FIRESTORM CAME. Now she has a sit down meeting with all of them this week to go over the problem this week. She’s about had it with this, and so have I.
Let’s allow for local decision-making. Let’s allow for some local thinking on operational matters to fit our circumstances. Let’s not be so afraid of the Stake we aren’t willing to try anything different, which may well be effective.
April 14, 2011 at 12:30 am #242559Anonymous
GuestFwiw, Cadence, it’s hard to get more blunt than Pres. Uchtdorf was recently when he talked about rules getting in the way of the Gospel. I know there are some things about which this next statement doesn’t apply, but if the membership would listen and accept what the current apostles are saying about LOTS of things (like this) many of these issues would be much, much less prevelant.
April 14, 2011 at 1:31 am #242560Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:Fwiw, Cadence, it’s hard to get more blunt than Pres. Uchtdorf was recently when he talked about rules getting in the way of the Gospel.
I know there are some things about which this next statement doesn’t apply, but if the membership would listen and accept what the current apostles are saying about LOTS of things (like this) many of these issues would be much, much less prevelant.
I guess your definition of blunt is different than mine. Still seemed like a milk toast comment to me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.