Home Page Forums Spiritual Stuff One True Church

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #206006
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have read on this site about buffet style Mormons (I have been one myself), taking what is good and that you can agree with or works for you and not embracing all that you may not agree with or believe in. I have not been able to make this work in my life and this is why…..We belong to a church that claims to be the one true church on the face of the earth, the one true church with the one and only way back to the presence of our Savior & Father in Heaven. In saying so I feel that I am required as a Latter Day Saint to be in agreement with ALL that is Doctrine that is promoted by our church. To be a member and say well I am choosing to stay but I don’t agree with temple work or polygomy or Joseph Smith or whatever make me feel so dishonest. Month after month in fast and testimony meeting I hear over and over again I know this church is true….I am searching for truth not convenience so how can one stay if truth is not what they find?

    #244515
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Journey3,

    You raise an important question, and a sticking point for many.

    Journey3 wrote:

    We belong to a church that claims to be the one true church on the face of the earth, the one true church with the one and only way back to the presence of our Savior & Father in Heaven.

    What if I allow the Church to claim that, and while on my personal journey, I honestly say that I do not know this to be true at this moment? But I believe in the Church, and want to align myself with it, while I continue to seek truth. Could I not still stay and be a part of the Church while I am striving in faith?

    Journey3 wrote:

    I am required as a Latter Day Saint to be in agreement with ALL that is Doctrine that is promoted by our church.

    Could I not say that I don’t know that ALL the Doctrine is true, but I hope to find out some day? Meanwhile, I wish to sit with the Saints and let the Church bless my life, and serve to help others, despite my lack of a sure knowledge. Do you think they would kick me out until I have a sure knowledge, and only then I could return?

    I think the Church invites us to believe what they claim. I do not think they require it. There must be a personal spiritual witness of what the Church claims, but they acknowledge that does not automatically happen, or suddenly happen. It often happens over long periods of time…to me, that allows for variation in knowledge and faith while in process. That allows for a faithful, cafeteria-style approach, IMO. Would you agree?

    #244516
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I don’t have any real time right now to find and link other posts that have addressed this issue (or comment directly on this one), but I would suggest looking through the archives. There are lots of interesting comments in multiple posts about it.

    #244517
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    What if I allow the Church to claim that, and while on my personal journey, I honestly say that I do not know this to be true at this moment? But I believe in the Church, and want to align myself with it, while I continue to seek truth. Could I not still stay and be a part of the Church while I am striving in faith?

    If you believe in the Church is that not the same as believing it is true? I am confused.


    Quote:

    I think the Church invites us to believe what they claim. I do not think they require it. There must be a personal spiritual witness of what the Church claims, but they acknowledge that does not automatically happen, or suddenly happen. It often happens over long periods of time…to me, that allows for variation in knowledge and faith while in process. That allows for a faithful, cafeteria-style approach, IMO. Would you agree?

    I don’t believe at all the the Church invites us to believe what they claim, it is expected that you do especially if you want to be a member in good standing, have a temple recommend, etc. It has been explained as simply as this to me, pray to know if Joseph Smith was a Prophet, if you believe he was then EVERYTHING else is true and should not be left to our personal interpretation.

    At this point I don’t believe he was for many different reasons, and while I do believe the church has some truth and some good in it that does not constitute me agreeing with it is the one True church on the face of the earth today. I absolutely believe this church has an ALL IN approach and because I do not have this it creates great confusion in my life. It has left me wondering…if my family were not LDS and my neighbors and my co-workers and my friends would I stop trying to manipulate the doctrine to my liking, would I get out of Middle Mormonism? In Hebrews the Lord himself warns of us being lukewarm. If we know the truth of the Doctrine and know exactly what the church is saying and we choose to ignore it anyway so we can keep our lives comfortable and never have to take a stand and be courageous how good is that?

    #244518
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Journey3 wrote:

    If you believe in the Church is that not the same as believing it is true? I am confused.

    No, it is not the same. In your original post, you were referring to the claims that the Church is the “one true church on the face of the earth, the one true church with the one and only way back to the presence of our Savior & Father in Heaven.”

    My response was to clarify that I may not believe that statement where I’m at in my life right now. However, I can still believe in the good I find in the Church and its teachings and lifestyle guidelines. In fact, the more I study, the less I really think that there is such a decisive demarcation of “one true church” … and no other church is true, or can help people return to God, or can include the power of God in the lives of its members. For most of my life, I just believed since I found truth and spirituality in the church, it was true. But I never went deeper into what that means to claim “it is true”, and I just assumed the church was claiming something I defined in my head, based on tradition or cultural affirmations. I am still studying and trying to grasp that concept…”what does true mean to me?” It is not as simple as it seemed to be when I was younger.

    Have you read (or revisited lately) the How to Stay Article?

    http://staylds.com/docs/HowToStay.html” class=”bbcode_url”>http://staylds.com/docs/HowToStay.html

    I would suggest particular attention to the section:

    – Other Reasons to Stay: Some of the Doctrine

    – Move Past the “True/False” Binary World View

    and under the Temple Recommend Interview section, the part Titled:

    – The Brethren May Want to Be Inclusive Regarding Temple Attendance

    Follow the admonitions from the Book of Hebrews…don’t be lukewarm in your approach to answering the questions you have. Approach them with veracity, and humility, and open-mindedness. Be open to what the Spirit teaches you. Is that not how they teach us to find truth? How could they tell you that you are unwelcome in the church if you are following their teachings?

    Quote:

    The Lord has commanded, “Seek ye out of the best books words of wisdom; seek learning, even by study and also by faith” (D&C 88:118).

    #244519
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In your question

    Quote:

    what does true mean to me?

    The definition of truth is fact. To me on a personal level iI cannot support many of the facts about the LDS Church.

    I did read the How to Stay article and was saddened by it. At this point in my life I have felt like I know to much to stay but I don’t want to leave. The only reason for not wanting to leave was not having the courage to tell friends, family and co-workers…and FEAR. I keep hearing how the church could not possibly ask us to leave even when we acknowledge all of our questions and I suppose that is true, but what about my choice to stay or go that is all I am concerned with not whether or not I am asked to leave for I refuse to live in fear.

    There is a really clear bottom line here for me if I stay I am a Mormon, and in being a Mormon I am then a representative of the Church, taking upon myself it’s history, doctrines and teachings. The very saddest part to me is not hearing much about our relationship with the Lord but only with the Church, our Savior seems so lost in all of this while we struggle to do what is easiest, but maybe not what is best.

    #244520
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    The very saddest part to me is not hearing much about our relationship with the Lord but only with the Church, our Savior seems so lost in all of this while we struggle to do what is easiest, but maybe not what is best.

    I’m sorry to hear that is the case where you live. As I have said in other threads, it absolutely is not the case where I live – and I am grateful for that. The past two wards and stakes in which I’ve lived for the last 14 years have been focused on Christ in very obvious ways, and it’s wonderful when that happens. It’s not coincidental that missionary work has flourished in those wards and stakes.

    Often, “The Church” is much more the local organization than the global one – and this is a good example. Christ is the center of every General Conference and has been forever – but local units can vary radically. I wish that were not the case, but . . .

    #244521
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Journey3 – Being “buffet” or “Cafeteria” style anything is simply human nature. For example, what does “one true church” even mean? It means something different to each person. It could mean:

    – God personally directs it on a daily basis

    – God founded it, but people now run it

    – it’s the best one a person has found

    – it “works” for someone – they have spiritual experiences within the church

    If you listen closely at church, you will hear many different interpretations of what “one true church” means to people. You may even hear one that suits you.

    Going past that, though, one thing I hear in your introductory statement is something I see a lot in NOM and other places: people looking for their ‘soulmate’ church, the church that ‘fits’ them the best culturally and from a belief standpoint. I don’t think that’s a very useful approach, and I’ll tell you why with a parallel. People often look for a spouse who is a “soulmate,” but they find that marriage is hard work. There are incompatibilities, good days and bad days, and those pesky spouses actually have a mind of their own. There is no perfect match, only hard work to understand and grow within marriage. So it is in life, and even in church. That is my view.

    I also believe that most of our disaffection with the church is truly cultural when we strip away all of the noise. Sometimes we don’t accept the values of the group or the things they take for granted as assumptions. But in my travels in life, I would say that any thoughtful person should always be partly at odds with the cultural norms around them. As Americans (or citizens of whatever nation) we should be sufficiently critical of our culture to see what can be improved or what puts us at odds with other nations. Likewise with being a member of the church. We should be thoughtful enough to know where we have values that differ or where we dislike certain assumptions that are put forth. We don’t have to look for a schoolyard brawl over it – it’s just important for us to know our own minds and values individually. I don’t need to go to church in an echo chamber, and the LDS church certainly is not that for me. Listening to differing views and values can be edifying. It can help us solidify where we agree and where we disagree.

    #244522
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thank You and I do hear what you are saying. I guess for me it has come down to what is the Church saying by one true Church? What does it mean to the Church as a body, I would believe it to mean that they expect it’s members to be in agreement with the facts of the Doctrine and that is where I am stumped.

    I hear all the individuality, I do and I also believe that on some things such as temple recommend questions for example, they are clear, black and white you either agree or disagree, yes or no and that is what is expected of us. For those in middle land many may not have Temple recommends and why not because they are not in agreement with the questions asked or particular doctrine they do not believe it is true.

    I know I do not want to sit in church for the rest of my life only doing it for comfort or out of fear, I need it to mean more to me than…. that it has some truth and some good in it. I can’t stay because of the culture or because it is the easy thing to do.

    If I make the statement “I know this Church is true” than I better believe it, all of it. Will the Church ask us to leave if we are in disagreement with some things no, but it is not about that for me….It’s about me being true to God and to myself. I think it is sad commentary if we spend our whole lives in fear of letting our Bishop, our family or our spouse know that we have questions, and some serious questions.

    I also know that it is good to question and if I am in a place of questioning and I really do not have answers to some things that is fine, and we keep on searching. But what if I do have answers and have done lots of research and there are some things I will never be in agreement with? Am I truly doing the right thing by staying or am I just being afraid? I Also know I am the only one who can answer that question through prayer and careful consideration. Thank You again for your comments.

    #244523
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    I guess for me it has come down to what is the Church saying by one true Church? What does it mean to the Church as a body

    This is even difficult to ascertain as each of the Q12 has a slightly different spin on it.

    Quote:

    things such as temple recommend questions for example, they are clear, black and white you either agree or disagree, yes or no and that is what is expected of us

    Just because they are yes or no doesn’t make them clear or black & white. Your “yes” might be my “no.”

    Quote:

    I know I do not want to sit in church for the rest of my life only doing it for comfort or out of fear, I need it to mean more to me than…. that it has some truth and some good in it. I can’t stay because of the culture or because it is the easy thing to do.

    I certainly agree with this. The point of the site is to help people find better reasons to stay, not to convince them to stay without good reasons.

    Quote:

    It’s about me being true to God and to myself. I think it is sad commentary if we spend our whole lives in fear of letting our Bishop, our family or our spouse know that we have questions, and some serious questions.

    Totally agree. Acting out of fear never leads to happiness.

    Quote:

    But what if I do have answers and have done lots of research and there are some things I will never be in agreement with? Am I truly doing the right thing by staying or am I just being afraid?

    There are some things that we can never have a definitive answer to, but we can develop a strong opinion based on the evidence we have. But when you say things you will never be in agreement with, that is a cultural values split. There is no perfect cultural fit on values between an individual and a group, and never can be. I wouldn’t stay because you are afraid to leave, far from it, but I would evaluate the idea that your values have to be identical to the group’s in order to be in the group. That’s just not possible. Every person sitting in that church has different values from the group in one or more way, whether they know it or not. My own view is that it’s best to know it and not to care.

    #244524
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thanks, right now I guess I am just trying to deal with the all of the hurt and sadness that something I believed to be a certain way really isn’t the way I thought it was and to figure out if I can embrace what I have found it to be. I know I am not alone in feelings of sadness and anger, feeling like I was deceived, and I know that I am the one responsible for not knowing and looking at some things sooner. All the things I put on the shelf over the years and I feel like my shelf is broken and it all came tumbling down around me and sorting through it all is no easy or quick process.

    #244525
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    right now I guess I am just trying to deal with the all of the hurt and sadness that something I believed to be a certain way really isn’t the way I thought it was and to figure out if I can embrace what I have found it to be

    I think we all understand that. I sincerely hope we can help you do that and remain in or constructively engaged with the Church.

    I will try to find links to previous posts about the “One True Church” topic and get them to you, but in the meantime, you might want to look through the archived posts for a while and see if you can find some of them – or look for any other posts that might help in some way. There’s a lot here that might apply to your questions.

    As we say often here, just go slowly and give it time to develop and mature either way.

    #244526
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Journey,

    I sense you have identified the root of your situation, in recognizing the pain you feel for being let down.

    The fact it is so painful for you tells me it is something of great worth to you. Perhaps it is some consolation to know that many many others go through the same thing, and come out of it OK. I think you can come out of it more bitter and need to leave the church because it is just too much, but that is not the only way. You can also grow from it, if you choose to, and recommit to making the church work for you, even if you think about it slightly different than others (if you allow yourself to).

    I think the church would have collapsed a long time ago if it was all true or all false. I really do believe truth depends greatly on your point of view.

    I would recommend reading Wendy Ulrich’s article on the FAIR website titled “‘Believest Thou…?’ Faith, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Psychology of Religious Experience?”

    http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2005_Faith_Cognitive_Dissonance_and_the_Psychology_of_Religious_Experience.html” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.fairlds.org/FAIR_Conferences/2005_Faith_Cognitive_Dissonance_and_the_Psychology_of_Religious_Experience.html

    One section reads:

    Quote:

    I am particularly interested in the impact of betrayal on religious belief, because it seems to be at the heart of matters that cause people the most grief about the Church. I have noticed that many of the people I have known who have left the Church did not do so because they believed too little, but because they believed too much. In their excessive idealism, they have held Church leaders or God to expectations which were inevitably disappointed, and they have felt betrayed. They have not believed God when He told them that ours is a lonely, dreary world where we will surely die, and they have chosen instead to believe another version of reality, one which claims that they can be protected from being molested, disappointed, or made afraid. They have been angry at God or other Church leaders for not keeping promises which God has not, in fact, made. I note with interest that of all the names for the Savior in holy writ, He is never called the Preventer. Agency is the plan, and this means that all of us, including Church leaders, learn by our mistakes and are subject to misinformation, blindness, hubris, and error. The old joke is too often true: In the Catholic church everyone says the pope is infallible but nobody believes it; and in the Mormon church everybody says the prophet is fallible but nobody believes it.

    When Christ asks the question of His remaining disciples, “will ye also go away?” it seems to be in recognition that they may be feeling betrayed or disillusioned by His words and requirements, as others were. Their response is not brimming with irrational enthusiasm. They seem to say, somewhat wistfully, as if recognizing that perhaps leaving would be an easier choice, “to whom, Lord, shall we go? Thou hast the words of eternal life.” We do not leave because we are blind to the challenges or brainwashed into commitment, but because we will have more cognitive dissonance, more to explain to ourselves, if we leave. We have found here things that we hold dear, that support and enrich our lives. We, like the reluctant disciples of old, have found here words of eternal life, which is to say that we have found knowledge of God and Jesus Christ, whom He has sent. These relationships, these pearls of great price, are worth the sacrifices and the disappointments and the askance looks of our friends who wonder what we could be thinking.

    The rest of the article talks about stages we seem to go through. I identified with those and it gave me much to think about, and realize I’m not the only one who has gone down this path, I didn’t just all of a sudden discover something no one else found in the decades that have passed since the organization of the church. While it may not be a new dilemma I am in, it is a personal one that I must determine how to get through and learn from it.

    The article also parallels marriage with church…as Hawkgrrrl has mentioned above. Those are some good things to consider. Or as Brian often says, “The Church is as true as a ham sandwich”.

    #244527
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Journey3 wrote:

    If you believe in the Church is that not the same as believing it is true? I am confused.

    Hi Journey3. I too have gone through pain and disappointment. Though my experience is unique to me, there have certainly been similarities between our two paths.

    I believe in you. I believe in me. I believe in God. I believe in the LDS Church. What does it mean when I say, “I believe in you”? How is that meaning different from when I say, “I believe in the Church”?

    Journey3 wrote:

    There is a really clear bottom line here for me if I stay I am a Mormon, and in being a Mormon I am then a representative of the Church, taking upon myself its history, doctrines and teachings.

    I can understand the frustration about only knowing “white-washed” history. When we learn some of the unsavory bits, it seems like the whole thing was a hoax. But that is not necessarily the case. We are part of a Legacy. Yes that Legacy is a mixed bag but isn’t that the way of life. My grandfather is a dairy farmer. He doesn’t always make it to church (too much work). He tends to curse at the @#%* cows. I read a story from my mother’s remembrance where he broke my Uncle’s arm in anger. I was named after this grandfather. I love him and believe him to be a good man despite his unsavory parts. I represent him and take upon myself the history and the Legacy. I may not have answers about angelic visitations and other things, but there is sufficient courage, love, and hope in the Legacy of the LDS Church to inspire me.

    Journey3 wrote:

    But what if I do have answers and have done lots of research and there are some things I will never be in agreement with?

    I assume you are talking about answers in the context of discovering the unsavory bits we were just talking about. I like to think on the answers of meaning. What does my life mean? What makes me of worth? These questions and others like them do not have black and white answers. I have found some answers for myself. I know them with such certainty that I believe the Holy Ghost is at work in implanting them into my soul. For me it hinges on knowing that Heavenly Father loves me, REALLY loves me. But I also recognize that others find truths in other ways and the answers they find may be different than my own. Because what I have is “true” and what they have differs from what I have, it would be easy to conclude that what they have is “false”. This would be a mistake.

    I hope you find the answers that you are looking for…or maybe you will find your meaning in the search. Maybe you will tarry with us for a while, we are happy to share the road. If you feel up to it, I would enjoy learning more about the path you have trodden. Could you post an introduction? Lastly, I really do believe in you. I didn’t just say that in the context of providing an example. Wherever your path may lead, I believe in you.

    #244528
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy, that was really well said. I particularly liked this part

    Quote:

    I was named after this grandfather. I love him and believe him to be a good man despite his unsavory parts. I represent him and take upon myself the history and the Legacy. I may not have answers about angelic visitations and other things, but there is sufficient courage, love, and hope in the Legacy of the LDS Church to inspire me.

    I agree 100%. There is truth and beauty in the church, in my opinion.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.