Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › Mountain Meadows is newest Natl Landmark
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 6, 2011 at 4:13 am #206030
Anonymous
GuestThe Deseret News reported that the U.S. Government designated Mountain Meadows as a national historic landmark last week. For those who don’t know, in September 1857, 120 immigrants were killed by Mormons at Mountain Meadows near Cedar City, Utah. Mormons tried to cover up the tragedy and blame it on the Indians. I have previously discussed the massacre here and here, if you’re interested in more detail. Families of the Fancher party along with the LDS Church worked together for the designation. The Deseret News article notes that there is a “plan [for] another event in September, during which a plaque noting the landmark designation may be unveiled.” Here is a link:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700148563/Mountain-Meadows-site-designated-as-national-historic-landmark.html ” class=”bbcode_url”> http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700148563/Mountain-Meadows-site-designated-as-national-historic-landmark.html Comments?
July 6, 2011 at 4:41 am #244701Anonymous
GuestI’m a little befuzzled about how the Church can whole-heartedly commemorate that event. Given their tendencies to focus only on the positive aspects of our history, I’m surprised they are willing to make it a National landmark. I’ve also never received a satisfactory answer about why there was so much mistrust of Mormons wherever they went, leading to reciprocal actions by the LDS people. July 6, 2011 at 6:04 am #244702Anonymous
GuestWell, I’m sure that the church, like everyone else, would rather it had never happened, or at least that the church had had no part in it. But things being what they are, politically the church really has no option other than to cooperate and try to put the best face on things as possible, which includes, apparently according to the wishes of other interested parties, honoring those who lost their lives by working towards achieving national landmark status for the site. I have been to St George more times than I can count, but have never taken the time to drive the 30 or so miles to visit Mountain Meadow. I really need to do that sometime.
July 6, 2011 at 1:29 pm #244703Anonymous
GuestI think this is a good thing. Events like MMM should be remembered. My only “complaint” (although that’s a bad word for how I actually feel) is that there is no national monument to the saints who were killed and died prior to and during the move to Utah. MMM didn’t happen in a vacuum, and any national recognition of it is incomplete without something else that remembers the background. (Oh, and MH, your links in the original comment didn’t take. You need to edit it to include them.)
July 7, 2011 at 5:47 am #244704Anonymous
GuestI think that this thread could fall into the category of the truth in history because it brings up the entire issue of historical memory and how we, as a nation and a people, decide how to remember that history. For instance, there is no monument to the Boston Massacre of 1770! You have to actually ask where did it take place? And they’ll point you to this area in the street and nothing commemorating it. Anyway, I think commemorating the MMM is kind of lame, even though I am a left-wing US historian who one might think otherwise that I would support it. I mean I don’t have a problem with it per se, but, yeah, where are the commemorations to the Mormons who were killed in other areas and eras? Is Carthage jail a National Monument? Maybe be it is but I doubt it. Then the question is, of course, should it be? I think with the Mormon Church, which is such a deeply rich cultural American movement, that probably things like it should be and/or that maybe many more should. Maybe the one good thing to come out of this move to turn MMM into a NM will result in more national recognition of the Mormon contribution to our history, esp of the Utah branch. Anyway, I am babbling but just love history and can’t seem to avoid getting involved in these discussions. And though no longer practicing I still love the church. Curt July 8, 2011 at 4:06 am #244705Anonymous
GuestSilent Dawning, I don’t think the church is “whole-heartedly” endorsing MMM as a monument, but they are “3/4-heartedly” doing it. I think the real pushers were the Fancher relatives, and the church was acquiescing to their wishes. The church owns the Carthage Jail; I don’t know what value the national government would add to that. The church gets to tell the story of Joseph’s martyrdom in the best light possible–I’m not sure national landmark status would do that. Haun’s Mill would be nice to have something more I think. I’ve only seen it from the film “Trouble in Zion” and it looks pretty sparse.
Ray, it looks like someone fixed the link–it’s working for me.
July 8, 2011 at 1:37 pm #244706Anonymous
GuestMH, I meant the line that says: Quote:I have previously discussed the massacre here and here.
July 11, 2011 at 8:49 pm #244707Anonymous
GuestI have a friend who is a distant relation to the Fancher party, in fact her last name is Fancher. Used to work with her, and one day I asked her opinion of the story…and come to find out their version is a bunch different than ours. She said their story is they were passing through the area, trying to get to California. The Fancher had a race horse and some prise cows, all of which oh suddenly got stolen. So the men of the party went to see if they could get any justice…which wasn’t going to happen so they wanted to get out of Utah ASAP, cause they felt something bad was going to happen.
thing is she said there were two parties one that skipped Utah, which was mostly family members who weren’t sick or had young kids, they took the longer route and were going to meet up in either California or Arizona with the second party of Fanchers. The first party went through Utah because it was the weaker party, and didn’t want to face Indians, thought the Mormons would be helpful and less of a threat…guess they got that wrong. Plus she said they all knew it wasn’t the Indians and knew it probably had more to do with the race horse than anything.
She did say the family didn’t hold any hard feelings anymore towards the church, but she said most still think Brigham knew about what was going on.
July 12, 2011 at 4:41 am #244708Anonymous
GuestInteresting Arwen. Here are the 2 links that were missing above:
http://www.mormonheretic.org/2010/03/11/war-and-prayer/ http://www.mormonheretic.org/2010/02/04/newell-bringhurst-discusses-the-mountain-meadows-massacre/ July 12, 2011 at 5:50 am #244709Anonymous
GuestI just completed a search that included all events in US history that are termed massacres for a comment on the Wheat & Tares post about this topic. Based on that search, I think MMM should be a National Landmark – but I also think Winter Quarters should be a National Landmark, along with some of the other massacres on the list I compiled. As horrible as MMM was, FAR more people died at Winter Quarters than at Mountain Meadows (AND any other non-war-related massacre in US history except the Word Trade Center bombings) – and neither MMM nor Winter Quarters should be forgotten, especially is one is commemorated as a National Landmark. July 12, 2011 at 5:04 pm #244710Anonymous
GuestBetter to deal with history than hide it. I don’t believe MMM was black and white at all.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.