Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › The Church is the Same Wherever You Go – Except It’s Not
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 30, 2011 at 5:53 pm #206138
Anonymous
GuestNorbert wrote a good post over on BCC today that I really like. It’s short and simple, but I think it’s profound at a very basic, core level. I encourage everyone to read it and the comments (especially comment #18). Feel free to quote parts and discuss them here – or just the general topic. “A decade abroad” (
http://bycommonconsent.com/2011/08/30/a-decade-abroad/ )August 30, 2011 at 6:18 pm #245834Anonymous
GuestSo true… although (re the comments section) never refer to the Finns as Scandinavians (they don’t like it)… they don’t mind being called Nordic, but they’re not Scandinavians in their own eyes. Subtle difference. We definitely do not have a sauna night here, and our connections with BYU are fragmented. Very few people go to BYU from here, but one of my HTs is starting a course there just now.
Quote:Some differences are true for Mormons everywhere but the United States: very few of my ward members have attended BYU or a CES course, and even fewer have a relationship with any General Authority, past or present. We have no welfare farms, bishop’s storehouses, early morning seminary or church sports leagues. There is no Deseret Books or Meridian Magazine or food storage industry in Finnish. None of my fellow ward members have ancestors that crossed the plains or practiced polygamy. Pioneer Day passes without recognition. As a result, local Mormon culture has a different aspect, smaller and more compact in the lives of Mormons.
Virtually no one in the ward has these things, bar a few Americans. We do have early morning seminary, but no leagues, farms or storehouses. Deseret Books can be accessed via the net.
We do not have much of a secular Mormon culture here. No one’s really heard of Mormon novelists or musicians here.
The great trek west is of interest to me, but has no relevance to my family background.
Quote:It would be almost unheard of for one ward member to criticize another, for the way they dress or how their children behave, for instance.
This is more and more the case, although I do see women being told off for wearing short skirts or pants.
Quote:If American Mormonism is lurching toward normality, in most of the world it remains completely marginal.
I tend to disagree with this. It’s true of most of the world, but is it true of Polynesia, or parts of Canada and Mexico?
August 30, 2011 at 11:45 pm #245835Anonymous
GuestQuote:All I know is that McChurch is particularly strong in my area of the UK where we are under a particular facilities management that is so focused on McChurch that they are sending letters and turning up to berate local members in person for having “uncorrelated” furniture or artwork in ward buildings, even when the uncorrelated furniture is an antique piano that a member of the ward has generously donated for the relief society room and the uncorrelated artwork are pieces that have appeared in conference issues of the Ensign that local leaders have purchased to hang in their own ward buildings but they don’t appear on a particular list of correlated artwork that someone has approved for not disrupting a particular rigid corporate branding scheme
I can see why the McDonalds model would appear attractive for a way to structure the Church to men with corporate backgrounds because it is been a successful business international model for successful corporate branding and creating the sense in the customer that, amazingly, McDonalds is the same anywhere you go, whether in Red Square, Lima or Tokyo. My observation is that members are often seeking McChurch type elements as a source of comfort that the Church is the same everywhere and some particular aspect of Utah culture might be truly out of place and unnecessary in Kiev, Helsinki or Shanghai.
From a corporate perspective there are tradeoffs from having a tightly centrally controlled hierarchy. It can be appropriate particularly when regional leadership is inexperienced, untrustworthy, or both. It does help to create a recognizable brand. But it can also lead to some decisions that are enforced across the board that are unnecessary or even harmful in the local areas. This also makes the church very American in its cultural trappings which can also be a double edged sword as well. I think as the church matures globally a type of regional leadership model would be more flexible, with more decisions being made at the regional level as time moves forward. I had thought that perhaps the two Apostles being assigned to Chile and the Philippines some time ago might have been a step in that direction but now I don’t think so. (Even though the leadership hierarchy would still be very Utah centric, at least the Apostles assigned to these areas would gain familiarity with the particular needs of the local membership and have the clout to make necessary changes)
August 31, 2011 at 5:11 am #245836Anonymous
GuestI’m from the northwest and a few years back we were in Kanab for a few days visiting the parks. We went to sacrament meeting and while waiting for the meeting to start noticed that someone had forgotten to bring the bread and I thought to my self “the church really is the same everywhere”. August 31, 2011 at 5:41 am #245837Anonymous
GuestThis may be a thread jack of sorts, one of my favorite Mormon lifestyle stories happened in Kaui. My husband and I read about a road side flea market. It was located near a hiking trail. We decided to take a look. The location was deeply hidden past pineapple fields, but it existed. At the end of the road was cul-de-sac the vendors just opened the trunks of their cars or laid things on blankets in the road. As we looked around I noticed a Liahona magazine on the back dashboard of a car. I looked closer and it was the conference issue. Sitting on the ground weaving or whittling was a large happy Hawaiian man. He was leaning against a metal post with an official sign attached that read, “No loitering, bartering, or selling.” (Similar to a no parking sign). While I was standing there he looked up and smiled. My curiosity got the better of me and I pointed to the magazine and asked if he was a member. He beamed, nodded his head and said, “Yes I keep dat in de car. When its slow I read from the Brethren. I so love them.” It was the perfect oxy-moron. A man clearly disobeying the law with his holy scripture nearby. I grinned all the way back to our house.
August 31, 2011 at 5:59 am #245838Anonymous
GuestIt really does vary, even outside the US. For example, those I know from UK and Australia are actually much more likely to have met a GA personally than those I know in the US. I grew up in a ward in PA (where Mormons were as rare as hens’ teeth and pretty much everyone was first or second gen convert), and Pioneer Day was not celebrated until the one family with pioneer heritage pushed the issue (when she became Primary President). The rest of us were kind of “meh” about it. I consistently found that members who came to our PA ward from Utah wanted to colonize us to do things the way they were done in Utah, even when there was not a cultural fit. I also saw this in Spain on my mission. One of the elderly sister missionaries insisted that the RS women be taught to knit, even though we were in a tropical island climate. Now I’m in a very international ward in Asia. Our bishop specifically tells new members that Utah Mormonism is not “true” and to get with local culture. I couldn’t agree more.
August 31, 2011 at 6:16 am #245840Anonymous
GuestNow I’m in a very international ward in Asia. Our bishop specifically tells new members that Utah Mormonism is not “true” and to get with local culture. I couldn’t agree more. :thumbup: My mom was the Stake RS pres in her ward in California. More and more Asian families are living in their stake. As I understand it, correct me if I’m wrong, but in a typical Asian home the grandparents are the stay at home parents. They live with the family, and take over traditional parenting duties, getting homework complete, fixing dinner, etc. The parents both work at good jobs and provide the income. As each generation moves on this method is repeated. The present parents will someday be the stay at home leaders while their kids are breadwinners.
This cultural change really challenged the standard LDS vision, a great deal of the ward presidents were very concerned even agitated that the biological moms weren’t following the rules and staying home. My mom finally had to explain to the ward Presidents that the families were not in “violation” of any rules, but that they actually had a great system. Moreover the request for mothers to be home was so children could be nurtured – what better nurture than loving, able grandparents. I never heard if she got any flack for her take on it, but I agreed with it.
August 31, 2011 at 6:26 am #245841Anonymous
Guestmom3 – can’t speak for all Asian cultures, but live-in gparents is a norm (although the more westernized Asian countries are starting to move away from that), and for families of Chinese descent it is common that children are obligated from age 18 to pay the parents a monthly sum that is quite burdensome, even if the children are unemployed and the parents are wealthy! That practice would certainly cure the medicare/ medicaid debate in the US. Also, Asian countries (pretty much all of them) are far higher achievement cultures than western cultures (Europe especially!). There is incredible pressure on kids to perform academically, to consistently promote upward in their careers (higher title is very important), and to demonstrate their financial success through materialism (jewelry, cars, houses). So, I’m not really advocating the Asian way in saying all that! As an American, I like my work days to end after 10 hours or less, and I like $3 tee shirts from Target vs. a $100 designer tee. August 31, 2011 at 9:23 am #245839Anonymous
GuestThanks for the additional insights Hawkgrrl. I don’t know that my mom was advocating all of that either I believe her more supportive point in the process was fact that school age children had an adult family member at home to take the on the traditional stay at home parent role. And that though it wasn’t the direct biological mom, but a grandparent, the family was still abiding by the prophets encouragement “to be at the crossroads of their lives.” All the other details they may have learned in time. Again thanks for the adding to my understanding. August 31, 2011 at 2:36 pm #245842Anonymous
GuestIf you remove the burdensome aspects of the Asian way of doing things, I support that for certain parents. In my situation, my wife has worked for much of the time my kids were young. For us, I honestly feel it was the best thing. My daughter went to a phenomenal Montessori school/daycare and is wonderful in her organization, self-esteem and academic ability. She is no worse off having been in that school as soon as she was old enough — my wife never stayed home with her except when she was on maternity leave with my son. The second income was great for our marriage and feelings about staying together given some of the challenges in our relationship. Given a choice, I would do it all over that way again.
Also, my wife has great talents as an employee. Her employers always love her and she is very efficient and reliable.
At home, however, there are some gaps she admits. Things don’t get done, homework is a hassle, meals are a rare event, or I end up getting them for everyone, napping and movie-watching tend to be central activities. When she stays home I feel that our homelife isn’t much different than when she is working, except we have less commuting and less household income. In fact, it hurts our marriage because I don’t see the economic or even character/spiritual benefits in our children from making the second-income sacrifice.
In fact, she has admitted that if she had enough earning power, it might even be better if I stayed at home and raised our kids given my parenting abilities, which she says she admires
😳 (I’m blushing). In fact, I would even consider something like that provided I could use the time to also upgrade my education or skills for re-entry to the workforce.So, given my wife’s lack of passion for the stay-at-home rigors, as a family we are better off when she is in the workforce.
As you can see, I am NOT a proponent of these policies and statements which “paint everyone with the same brush”. My wife has gotten flack from women in the Ward about her going back to work a few months ago, with people saying “I was shocked
when I heard your wife went back to work”. Guess what — none of their business — they haven’t invested a whit of effort in understanding the dynamics of our family, our skills, or our relationship, so they are not qualified to pass judgment.
We are all different, and this often leads to decisions which seem wrong on the surface but which are right for the family.
August 31, 2011 at 5:07 pm #245843Anonymous
GuestThere are plenty of people like me out there who live the non-Utah life. I have met plenty of people from Utah and Idaho etc, but have never been to either. (Although I have been to the USA.) I’m completely clueless when it comes to American football, for example, I’ve never experienced the American housewife thing, and until returning to the church I don’t think I met another Mormon, bar in college and the odd missionary. I have, however, met one GA, and know others who have met past Presidents.
Quote:It really does vary, even outside the US.
Well, within my stake, it certainly does. Our ward is highly cosmopolitan and transient. The neighbouring wards… well, one suffers from an aging active membership, and another suffers from dryness, one of the others has a lot of young people, but is small. But the neighbouring wards are just about all white, and mostly contain people from my kind of background.
I went to an island ward a year or two back. Completely different experience. Priesthood was four people, excluding myself, few people visit. The youngsters leave in their late teens for work on the mainland.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.