Home Page › Forums › Spiritual Stuff › Endowments today and a little argument.
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2011 at 4:32 pm #206159
Anonymous
GuestSo today I got in an argument with my mom about doing temple ordinances for the dead. I told her I didn’t understand why it was so important when it’s near impossible that all the temple worthy saints would ever be able to do ordinances for every single human ever to walk the earth. She said “Don’t you understand why Temple work is so important? Everyone needs to be given the chance.” She started spinning out mindless, almost program like, responses to ever point I tried to make. What about all the deceased that we don’t have records for? How can we do those ones? There has to be another way… But she won’t even consider the possibility. Like most of you on this forum, I see temple work as a symbolic thing… Am I wrong? It disturbs me that my parents are so black and white and narrow minded about these types of things. It’s hard to ever have a discussion about them. Well, I guess I’ll know a little more when I take my endowments out this afternoon. Keep me in your thoughts! September 16, 2011 at 5:02 pm #246043Anonymous
GuestThat’s wonderful you are going through today! Good luck! I hope it is as meaningful as it was for me when I first went through to get my endowments. Best advice my dad gave me…Don’t worry about the details or trying to remember everything told you, or what everything means…focus on the feeling you have in your heart while you are there. CandleLight25 wrote:I see temple work as a symbolic thing… Am I wrong?
I tend to agree with you that symbolism is what it is all about…but to say you are right and your parents are wrong is as black and white as what you are saying you are frustrated with them about. Accept their interpretation is “right” for them.
September 16, 2011 at 6:01 pm #246044Anonymous
GuestQuote:What about all the deceased that we don’t have records for? How can we do those ones? There has to be another way…
I have thought much about this…
My take –
* When Jesus visited “the spirits in prison”, it probably worked retroactively for just about everyone dead at that point.
* A lot of this is supposed to be sorted out in the Millenium…
I think there must be a third way for people who hear the message, but don’t have a proxy.
September 16, 2011 at 6:03 pm #246045Anonymous
GuestI have two comments — one from a traditional believer’s perspective, and then one from my own perspective, garnered from Brian Johnston, one of our moderators. The traditional believer’s perspective is that we will have the entire millenium to do work when a lot of people from all time periods will be resurrected and will therefore have knowledge of the gaps we are missing now. This will allow the work to go forward at an accelerated rate. Also, during that period, the scriptures say all things will be known, which I think includes family history information. So, the barriers we experience today won’t be as big of an issue. Plus, traditional believers just have faith that the things they have been told will work out somehow.
From my own perspective, I like what Brian said a while ago — you have to get to a place where you are at peace with the ideas that people in the Church have, even though you don’t agree with them or accept them fully. This will be especially true on your mission when you will be neck-deep in traditional, active members on a regular basis.
To extend this idea, I like to look at the beliefs of Church members the same way I looked at an Indian Funeral I attended. It was Hindu in nature, and entirely foreign to me, but I respected the customs and the feelings and immersed myself in it, without being judgmental — it was just the outgrowth of that group of people’s way of looking at the world that grew into acceptance amongst that nation. And, recognize there is significant diversity of opinion within that nature on cultural values, just as there is on the whole work for the dead concept within our Church. There were a couple things that made me uncomfortable about it, but I chose not to judge — just be part of it and observe, understand and support the people there in their quest for comfort and closure.
Also, recognize that raising contrarion ideas among traditional believers can be VERY threatening to them — particularly when they are family. For one, people get significant comfort from religion, and to call into question its foundations and underpinnings threatens that comfort. It is very threatening for some people to hear ideas that call into question their very faith, and all the behaviors and beliefs that have emanated from those central beliefs.
And for others in your family, they might feel it affects their salvation. My wife feels that without me, she will not go to the Celestial Kingdom, so my contrarion ideas are not only a threat to our homelife now,but to her very salvation. That is VERY threatening among spouses.
I am not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with any of these beliefs traditional believers have. I simply say that on these points of difference, one can sit back in the armchair and peace and look upon their beliefs with empathy, content in your confidence that their beliefs don’t have to be the only way to look at the issue. And second, that you are comfortable with your own way of looking at the situation. And third, recognizing how uncomfortable it will make others to share your contrarion ideas. So, out of respect for traditional believers and their peace, you keep it to yourself, and choose to ask questions to deepen understanding of why they believe so strongly, or simply get their opinion on matters related to the temple. Use the interactions to broaden your view of the world rather than to arrive at some agreement on what to believe.
And if you’re like me, then, afterwards go and share what you really think online!
September 16, 2011 at 7:33 pm #246046Anonymous
GuestHey Candlelight, I recall GBH saying that temples are monuments to our belief in the eternal nature of man. I find this answer to be masterful because it would satisfy both the perspective of your mom and your own perspective.
Not everyone is inclined to embrace the power of the symbolic in our lives:
Roy wrote:At my urging DW began reading “The Shack.” I had read the book and found it helpful and impactful at a hard time in my faith deconstruction. (There is a review of the book in the book review section) She was about 50 pages from the end and we began discussing some of the concepts in the book. It turns out that my wife had been reading the book as though it were a true story (or at least based on a true story). This is understandable because in the beginning of the book there is an intro or forward where it gives that impression. When I told her that it was fiction
she stopped reading the book! Later DW told me that she was actually really into the story line and would have experienced it as a dream or vision wherein God can be communicating. But now that she sees it as fiction (just something that somebody thought up) it is now seen as less reliable, As though the sub conscious mind is more in tune with God than the conscious mind.
Anyway, it is a clear example of greater value being placed on “true” events. I even told DW that the BOM would still have value even if the characters never actually existed. To which she countered, “Ahhh – but they did exist.”
For everyone here at StayLDS and elsewhere in the LDS community that embrace symbolism as meaningful and powerful, there are many more on both sides of the spectrum who find the symbolism argument to be a weak cop-out (firm believers who say an ordinance must be done in a certain manner and the disillusioned that see all the ordinances as so much hand waving and hocus-pocus – both groups seem somewhat suspicious of those that espouse a more moderate approach).
GBSmith wrote:A number of years ago when I was at my lowest and was thinking of leaving the church, I was speaking to an Episcopal priest that had befriended me and told him that the LDS church believed that it was the only church with priesthood authority. Hearing that none of the blessings, baptisms, or confirmations that he’d done were recognized by God made it very personal. You can finesse it all you want about good people doing good works out there but it still comes down to believing the LDS Church is only one in the world that is true as regards being able to act for God.
Just as this Episcopal priest was disheartened to contemplate that his life’s work may not have been operating under divine sanction, there are many LDS persons that would lose the wind from their sails without the literalist worldview. If God doesn’t require priesthood to administer saving ordinances, then what is left? For many, symbolism would be a poor consolation prize.
In summary, I too find wisdom in Brian’s comment –
SilentDawning wrote:you have to get to a place where you are at peace with the ideas that people in the Church have, even though you don’t agree with them or accept them fully.
Or as Tom Haws put it:
Quote:“I must act to glorify the Father, and I must extend to you unending grace as you walk your own path.”
September 16, 2011 at 9:34 pm #246047Anonymous
GuestI see it all as symbolic – and, for me, that makes it EXPONENTIALLY more powerful. I’m not everyone else, however – so I reserve the right to honor and not try to change what works for someone else, since I want them to do that for me.
September 17, 2011 at 5:23 am #246048Anonymous
GuestThanks everyone for your advice and input. I’m happy to report that my first time through the temple was pretty successful. Sure, there were a few things that caught me off guard, but for the most part I really enjoyed it. The ceremony was no where near something that would have terrified me. I feel a little silly now for ever worrying about it. I’m glad I finally had the opportunity to experience if for myself. That said, I also have more questions now than I did before going through the temple. Not that that’s such a bad thing. I now have new material to study on sleepless nights 
Also, I see where you’re all coming from when you advise me not to challenge other’s beliefs. I guess I just get frustrated sometimes with my inability to have open conversation with my parents about these things. For example, tonight after the temple, my mother said something that sounded like material from the “Adam-God Theory.” When I mentioned it by name, she proceeded to tell me that she hadn’t even heard of the “Adam-God Theory” before…
😮 I thought my parents would’ve known for sure! Well, I wasn’t about to open that can of worms
🙄 so I held my tongue and changed the subject.September 17, 2011 at 6:49 am #246049Anonymous
GuestPerhaps over time there will be small opportunities here and there to discuss deeper topics with them. But as my therapist says…it’s all about Tact, Timing, and Dosage. Somethings can only be done in small doses to be digested.
Thanks for sharing.
September 17, 2011 at 12:07 pm #246050Anonymous
GuestI’m glad you had a good experience. Sometimes, mountains for some people really are molehills in disguise for others. People have allergic reactions to all kinds of different things, and the same is true of reactions to various types of food.
We might love something very much (and it might even be our favorite), but it would be silly to try to make someone else try it if they were allergic to it or would have some other type of negative reaction. Learning to celebrate differences, even ones that we don’t really understand or think are ideal (as long as they are not highly destructive of community), is very liberating – and it’s the type of Zion I envision.
September 17, 2011 at 2:02 pm #246051Anonymous
GuestI really like the connection between Mormon temple practices and ancestor worship in Eastern religions. There is something to be said for revering those who’ve come and gone before us. We don’t really talk about it as worship, but keeping those connections and seeing ourselves as part of an ongoing genetic line has powerful stuff to it. I do find it intriguing. As for your mom, parents often respond to the emotion they are sensing rather than the content of what you say. Perhaps she was freaked out by what she thought your intents were. I was surprised once when I made a negative remark about the temple to my mom (both she & my dad did a joint temple mission), and she totally agreed with me and then went off on some thing that bugged her. Apparently I come from a long line of ranters!
September 19, 2011 at 1:07 pm #246052Anonymous
GuestI don’t see it as ancestor worshipso much as honoring them. September 19, 2011 at 2:33 pm #246053Anonymous
GuestEastern religions call it ancestor worship, but it is really just revering and honoring their dead. It’s more similar than it is different from our focus on genealogy and proxy work in the temples. But it’s a unique thing to Mormonism within Christianity, which is kind of cool. There are quite a few closer parallels between Mormonism and Eastern religion than with most other Christian sects. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.