Home Page › Forums › StayLDS Board Discussion [Moderators and Admins Only] › McLay podcast
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 11, 2012 at 3:37 pm #206395
Anonymous
GuestAnyone else listen to the McLay podcast? The title really projects an image in my opinion that does not pan out. I thought “CES now ex-mo sounds like an ax to grind.” In the end I thought they sounded more like current active Mormons than most of the “ex” podcasts. You can’t help but see that they are such good people. I found myself growing more frustrated that they (and others) feel they are in a situation where they HAVE to “change trains” in their life to keep their integrity. I understand it, I’m just deeply saddened by the fact that it exists. When you step back and ask “who would need to completely exit their present life just because some of their ideas change?” it begins to sound super absurd.
It almost makes me want to write letters to the top church leadership and ask if something more couldn’t be done about this. Our members shouldn’t need to think this way. Their discussion in part 4 makes me think that a few small changes in some of the expressions we hear in church would help them feel more welcome in their struggles — along with some more significant changes in CES.
I also found the comment in part 4 (~24 min in) about Elder Perry “When are you going to join the church like the rest of us?” extremely interesting. I would love to have heard the actual comment, and learn Elder Perry’s real feelings on the subject.
on a side note she kept mentioning StayLDS, we must be known out there. At least that’s a positive.
January 11, 2012 at 10:20 pm #249348Anonymous
GuestI’ll have to check out that podcast, Orson. Thanks for bringing it up. Regarding the “have to change trains” fallacy, it makes me think that perhaps people can get complacent, or over time take for granted how much of what they believe still exists in the church, and only focus on the smaller portion that doesn’t. If they were to do something like a Venn Diagram with church teachings and personal beliefs, they might see more overlap then they realized.
I’ve often wondered if that is the same for life-long members or converts.
January 12, 2012 at 1:24 pm #249349Anonymous
GuestI’ve been listening to the interview too over the past couple days during my commute. It’s loooooooooooooong , so I haven’t finished yet. I am on part 4 of 5.
Their story is both dramatic and at the same time completely mundane and ordinary. Their story is no different on some level than those of thousands and thousands of other members who crash at full speed into the wall of faith crisis. In fact, I would say there are families out there that fare far worse. At least the McKlays as a couple were on the same page. That is quite rare, and a huge benefit to processing disaffection. They stayed a team and a couple. So I feel for them, but at the same time I also think “gee, you actually have it easy in some ways.”
It breaks my heart to say this, but I think they
didpretty much have to resign. 😥 x100Here’s why: They were in an all-or-nothing game of poker. They were painted into a corner by their involvement in CES. Take out the CES component, and they could have totally adjusted their diet in the Mormon cafeteria. The majority of members do that, whether conscious or not of what they are doing. I think it would have been far more messy trying to partially back away in order to get breathing room to process the crisis. And if they were going to leave CES and fall victim to the fallout, PR machine and blame game, they might as well control their story and exit on their own terms.
The value in their story IMO is more because they are so eloquent and willing to share. It’s a good, heartfelt interview that displays in detail the struggles of the “every man” in the Church that faces disaffection. I think the REAL value is the total mundane nature of their disaffection story. It’s everyone’s story, in a way.
I also think their former status in the church, and their kind way of describing the church after the fact make it a good version of the story. They are not foaming at the mouth, anti-mormon ranters. I think they come across as very reasonable, and positive about their experiences looking back.
January 12, 2012 at 3:17 pm #249350Anonymous
GuestBrian, I agree. I’m still part way through also, but had the same impressions so far. There is nothing special about their crisis (Polygamy, JS in RSR, feelings of betrayal). Very similar to lots of stories and I relate to their feelings. I guess the interesting component is that for teachers of CES, those right smack in the middle of the church teaching program…it shows two things:
1) those teaching the church are not hiding things or being dishonest…many are just unaware and too busy too investigate things that are of less interest to them because he focus on uplifting stories to be helping others about (and I think this probably exemplifies how many GAs are)
2) the church doesn’t seem to care to teach these things, even to their educators. If you want to learn, you’re on your own.
Besides that angle, it is a very familiar story, and unfortunate they didn’t talk more about his dad and how his dad is aware of almost all the same things but processes it in a way he remains faithful. It seems the McKlays sound most hurt by the surprise and feeling of betrayal since they dedicated their whole life to teaching the church, but still had to stumble upon hings themselves.
I liked he one point made by his father, that when dating you put your best foot forward, as does the church. But I wished they would have mentioned that when you start to commit, like marriage, it will cause relationship problems if things were buried, kept secret, and when you have to discover how bad the other foot is, it doesn’t make it easy to process.
January 12, 2012 at 3:34 pm #249351Anonymous
GuestGood point about the diagram Heber, I hadn’t thought about it in that way exactly, and I agree. I wish more people could see it that way. The problem is the either/or framework that so many have ingrained for so long. I do see your point about the poker game Brian, that is exactly what bothers me so much. I wish there was a way to change the game so all these people won’t see it as either/or. Like I first said here I think it could be a small(ish) attitude change in the church (granted larger for some members), and then a larger change with CES. I’m just dreaming here, spending my time mourning.
I agree the McLay story is somewhat mundane, but it does have added bite from the CES employment. Their desire to be honest as they know it has basically led to financial ruin.
Some days I just wish I could broadcast to all the church members I know the declarative question “we can be honest about our history can’t we?!! We can talk about Joseph’s many wives (young and wives of apostles alike), about his stone in the hat, about his drinking wine at Carthage and in the Kirtland Temple, about the Masonic similarities to the endowment, blood atonement, Adam-God, etc. etc. etc… We can talk about these things as faithful truth-loving members! Can’t we?!!?!
:sick: Heber13 wrote:
I liked he one point made by his father, that when dating you put your best foot forward, as does the church. But I wished they would have mentioned that when you start to commit, like marriage, it will cause relationship problems if things were buried, kept secret, and when you have to discover how bad the other foot is, it doesn’t make it easy to process.YES, YES, YES!!
January 13, 2012 at 5:59 am #249352Anonymous
GuestI just finished the podcast today. That Elder Perry comment is truly puzzling. I wish we could know what Perry meant. I am now an online instructor at BYU-Idaho. It’s been an interesting experience. I also teach at SLCC and UVU, and have taught at a few other colleges/universities. I can’t believe how much emphasis they put on bringing the spirit into your class and watching devotionals. I teach math, and looking ahead, there are some assignments on the Book of Mormon that I am curious how math is involved with. On the other hand, they really put an emphasis on being nice to students, and they have provided more teacher development training than any other schools, which is a good thing.
I’ve considered trying to publish some Mormon history in avenues like MHA, JWHA, or Sunstone. After listening to the McLays, I wonder how it would be received by BYU-Idaho. For example, I’d like to do some stuff on the priesthood ban, but I wonder if I should stay pseudonymous to avoid any employment problems. I’ve never attended a church school, so the culture at BYU-I is rather strange to me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.