Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › King Gustav’s coffee experiment
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 11, 2012 at 2:41 pm #206460
Anonymous
GuestInteresting featured article on Wikipedia’s front page today: Quote:Gustav III of Sweden’s coffee experiment was a twin study ordered by the king to study the health effects of coffee. Although the authenticity of the event has been questioned,[1] the experiment, which was conducted in the second half of the 18th century, failed to prove that coffee was a dangerous beverage…
The king ordered the experiment to be conducted using two identical twins. Both of the twins had been tried for the crimes they had committed and condemned to death. Their sentences were commuted to life imprisonment on the condition that one of the twins drank 3 pots[1] of coffee, and the other drank the same amount of tea, every day for the rest of their lives
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_III_of_Sweden%27s_coffee_experiment February 11, 2012 at 4:54 pm #250150Anonymous
GuestSamBee wrote:Interesting featured article on Wikipedia’s front page today:
Quote:Gustav III of Sweden’s coffee experiment was a twin study ordered by the king to study the health effects of coffee. Although the authenticity of the event has been questioned,[1] the experiment, which was conducted in the second half of the 18th century, failed to prove that coffee was a dangerous beverage…
The king ordered the experiment to be conducted using two identical twins. Both of the twins had been tried for the crimes they had committed and condemned to death. Their sentences were commuted to life imprisonment on the condition that one of the twins drank 3 pots[1] of coffee, and the other drank the same amount of tea, every day for the rest of their lives
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustav_III_of_Sweden%27s_coffee_experiment
interesting… this happened before JS ever was born… and is yet another demonstration that the apologetics around the the WoW are fruitless. we all know this, but for the record:1. the word of wisdom was never meant to be commandment, but rather health advice.
2. the health advice was ‘hot drinks’, arguably about the bad effects of scalding hot liquids., not about the substances of coffee or tea.
3. coffee and tea were interpreted as the target because these were imports to utah, requiring what BY felt was frivolous expenditure of specie (real currency, money) detracting from money donations that were required to further the PEF (see Leonard Arrington). So the original reasons for upgrading the WoW to a commandment were about money.
4. the absolute strictures were further enhanced during prohibition, as a test of faith via obedience.
thus, the existential value of abstaining from coffee, tea and moderate consumption of mild drinks is completely about demonstrating obedience,
especially if such obedience makes no logical sense. it has become an outward symbol of a covenant. thus the ideas that coffee, tea, moderate drinking of beer and wine are bad for you are not true, not doctrine, and not eternal principles. it’s only current church policy to restrict them.
February 13, 2012 at 2:02 am #250151Anonymous
GuestWayfarer, what “scalding liquids” were they consuming when the WoW was revealed? February 13, 2012 at 2:40 am #250152Anonymous
Guestmormonheretic wrote:Wayfarer, what “scalding liquids” were they consuming when the WoW was revealed?
Why, coffee and tea, of course. Then later, postum….February 13, 2012 at 2:57 am #250153Anonymous
GuestSorry, I guess I’m slow. What did you mean?
Quote:2. the health advice was ‘hot drinks’, arguably about the bad effects of scalding hot liquids., not about the substances of coffee or tea.
February 13, 2012 at 3:39 am #250154Anonymous
GuestMH, in case wayfarer doesn’t check in for a while, I think it meant that it wasn’t the contents that were highlighted but just the temperature at which they were drunk. Iow, it’s only long afterward that caffeine entered into the justifications; originally “hot drinks” were designated as coffee and tea simply because those were pretty much the only drinks that were drunk hot by the general membership at the time. Based on the wording, iced tea would not be against the WofW, but hot chocolate (drank while it still was piping hot) would be.
February 13, 2012 at 3:08 pm #250155Anonymous
GuestHere’s a basic wikipedia article on Sylvester Graham. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sylvester_Graham That’s the environment the Word of Wisdom came out of.
He was a minister and prominent health reformer in the same general region as Joseph Smith. There was a strong temperance and health movement in that day, and a lot of it tied in religiously to sexual purity. They thought that “stimulating” foods might stimulate the libido and sap strength from the health.
In some ways, they did a lot of good in changing unhealthy dietary practices and in reforming food production (balancing diets, sanitation, and not putting crap like chalk in white bread to cut the costs). Most of the theory portions don’t stand up to modern day science though.
And yeah, “hot drinks” were about the temperature of the liquid. Some hardcore early Mormons wouldn’t eat their soup warm either.
February 13, 2012 at 6:05 pm #250156Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:MH, in case wayfarer doesn’t check in for a while, I think it meant that it wasn’t the contents that were highlighted but just the temperature at which they were drunk.
Correct, Ray and Brian clarified my answer.I am not always able to get online these days, as I am wayfaring for the next month or so…currently in a pub in London called “the grazing goat” enjoying a very mild drink made of barley and other grains…
😈 February 13, 2012 at 6:24 pm #250157Anonymous
Guestmormonheretic wrote:Sorry, I guess I’m slow. What did you mean?
Quote:2. the health advice was ‘hot drinks’, arguably about the bad effects of scalding hot liquids., not about the substances of coffee or tea.
So, given your depth of research (I am always impressed with your blog) I did a fact check. I cannot find a credible historical reference to the scalding liquids idea as the motivation. There is some discussion on rfm, but that hardly can be said to be credible. Recent health research shows an eight-fold increase in occurrence of throat cancer due to scalding hot tea. Other than that, excess caffeine can be harmful, but in normal quantities, there are no proven adverse effects from moderate consumption of coffee, tea, wine or beer.Thanks for keeping me honest.
February 13, 2012 at 7:58 pm #250158Anonymous
Guestwayfarer wrote:there are no proven adverse effects from moderate consumption of coffee, tea, wine or beer.
We get overly fascinated with our modern system of publishing experiments in science journals and all that. When it comes to those beverages in particular, we’re all witness to the largest experimental samples ever conducted with human beings. Billions and billions of people have consumed these over long periods of their life, for thousands of years.
We pretty much figured out what they do and don’t do by now… Everything else is some excuse to publish an article or win some grant money
🙂 February 13, 2012 at 10:49 pm #250159Anonymous
Guest…condemned to death or drink 3 pots coffee / day? If this was imposed on you and you were a faithful mormon (not saying you’re not…just playing a hypothetical game), Sambee, which would you choose?
🙂 February 13, 2012 at 10:54 pm #250160Anonymous
GuestFor me, it makes more sense if ice cream were on the list. (maybe it is…) Mike from Milton.
February 14, 2012 at 1:15 am #250161Anonymous
GuestQuote:…condemned to death or drink 3 pots coffee / day?
Quick death would be better than that type of constant Hell.
😈 February 14, 2012 at 2:35 am #250162Anonymous
GuestThanks Wayfarer. I haven’t done an in depth study of the history of the WoW; I guess I have always figured it referred to coffee and tea. I do have a CoC friend (FireTag at W&T), and he said they view the WoW more like you said. Many do drink coffee and tea, but simply wait until it has cooled. It seems like a strange justification to LDS members, but perhaps you are on to something there. As for caffeine, my wife was saddened to learn that drinking coffee can reduce your risk of Type 2 diabetes. See
http://health.msn.com/healthy-living/slideshow.aspx?cp-documentid=100283874&imageindex=6 February 15, 2012 at 4:59 pm #250163Anonymous
GuestHeber13 wrote:…condemned to death or drink 3 pots coffee / day?
If this was imposed on you and you were a faithful mormon (not saying you’re not…just playing a hypothetical game), Sambee, which would you choose?
🙂 I think most people would choose the coffee. But I have to admit, three POTS a day would be bad. I used to draw the line at four CUPS a day. I’d probably bribe the coffee maker to brew up a weak one.
I don’t think it’s worth dying for tea/coffee.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.