Home Page Forums StayLDS Board Discussion [Moderators and Admins Only] Discussing the Church is NOT True

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #206585
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was really wanting to start a discussion thread on how some might feel the Church isn’t true, but share more ways that people cope with these thoughts. But I first thought maybe you all might have thoughts if this is not a good idea or not.

    Here is my thinking:

    – Many people may be going through their transitions and really feel the church is not what it claims to be, or maybe even out right they don’t believe it at all or that we can even know God exists.

    – Our site is OK with talking about these things, we don’t have to only talk positive things or defend the utility of church, regardless of the truth claims.

    – Some people may need practice talking or thinking through how to convey their thoughts on a board like ours that is safe, prior to trying to express it to close family members or their church leaders. In other words, we can practice saying, “Ya, I don’t think its true anymore, but I still love this and this and this about it. I’m not angry about it. I can respect others who still believe it.”

    – We might be able to support some people by openly recognizing their feelings about WoW, or Tithing, or Polygamy makes it legitimately hard to believe some of the claims by the church. They may need practice thinking through the cafeteria approach in their specific situation, not feel like they need to hold back their problems because they may get moderated on this board.

    – The goal and purpose is to focus on coping strategies, not the problems or the things they don’t believe. For example, one might no longer believe in revelation, that Joseph thought it up in his mind or “spiritual eyes”, and it shatters their prior belief the church is led by direct revelation from God to a prophet. Ok, let them say it openly…but now focus on what that means to the person, what they still choose to do about attending or finding other things they like or still believe, and not throw the baby out with the bath water.

    – Can we entice some lurkers to come forward, who may not trust they can open up yet?

    – The main goal: It is OK to say I don’t believe the church is true. You are safe here in saying it.

    What do you all think? Is this just inevitably going to go bad and become negative and bashing? Is that already being done sufficiently in Intros and the current threads?

    My idea of the first post would be this:

    Quote:

    TITLE: IT’S OK NOT TO BELIEVE IT ANYMORE

    In this forum, we share a variety of views. We like to use the analogy that the orchestra sounds better with variation of instruments to represent the discussions are deeper when there are a variety of thoughts and ideas. While we are open to hearing divergent views that may be difficult to express in church or at home, we want this forum to be a safe place to open up, not for the sake of being negative or just venting, but for the purpose of exploring how to deal with feelings we keep inside, or how we can share with others who may go through similar feelings that there are ways to cope and come out of the transitions in a healthy way.

    Perhaps some think the Church is not true. Perhaps some think God doesn’t exist, or maybe we just can’t really know for sure. I know there are some here who still believe the Church is true. So how can we discuss it all together? How can we practice discussing different views without just clamming up or starting to get offensive or defensive?

    It is OK to express those feelings. Let’s talk about them openly and responsibly. Let’s practice here, so we can do it successfully with those in our life around us.

    What are the biggest things that bother you about the church, and what do you do to make that a part of your experience and your family’s (if applicable) experience?

    Is there anyone out there willing to share their story that they just can no longer attend church, but they still believe some of the ideas at home or personally?

    Is there anyone out there that continues to go to church despite having doubts and serious concerns, but still finds it worthwhile and fulfilling to attend? Share some experiences with us if you can.

    Is there anyone out there that really cannot figure out how to make it work, and needs advice for whatever reason? Ask. Perhaps you aren’t as alone as you may feel about it.

    Has anyone gone through phases where they no longer thought they could believe anything about the church, but over time, has seen, that they actually do still believe, and have come back around to believing more (even if not all) then they thought they could? Please share.

    I just want to encourage any lurkers out there to feel comfortable coming forward. I want to encourage anyone with pent up feelings who may fear sharing things, even declarations they don’t believe the church is true, that we can talk about these things openly and with support to overcome them…not just vent about them.

    Who wants to go first?

    Any particular opposition from the moderators before I try this? Or is it unnecessary, or inappropriate? Have we already experimented in this and found it wasn’t helpful? What do you all think?

    #251841
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Personally I would rather support “it is okay to believe what you actually believe.” I see the whole black/white or true/false discussion as a flawed perspective. To borrow Brian’s quote — how do you determine a ham sandwich is NOT true? There IS truth taught in church. There are also skewed perspectives and some falsehoods – which is why we’re here to learn to see past.

    I understand how people at some point need to acknowledge to themselves that they no longer believe everything in the same way that they used to. Personally I think that can be supported in our purpose her with “it is okay to believe what you actually believe” — and I think we can point to doctrinal sources to support that position.

    my 2 cents.

    #251842
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My main concern is that it not turn into a negative thread that asserts “the Church isn’t true” – since that, to me, is just the opposite end of the extremity spectrum.

    I personally like Orson’s focus – on figuring out what you believe with regard to “truth” and owning it in relative confidence (staying open to the possibility that even that will change with “further light and knowledge”).

    Also, we have a few threads already that deal with the main issue. I’ll try to find them and provide the links, so you can re-read them and see if there’s anything you want to take from them for a new thread.

    #251843
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In chronological order, here are a few threads to consider:

    “Spiritual Knowledge” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=67&hilit=not+true) – 11 comments

    “The church’s flaws make it true” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=377&hilit=not+true) – 12 comments

    “The phrase ‘I Know'” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=664&hilit=not+true) – 13 comments

    “If religion is man-made, is there a better way?” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=588&hilit=not+true) – 32 comments

    “Believing if the First Vision is flawed” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=826&hilit=not+true) – 41 comments

    “James’ Fowler’s Stages of Faith” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=826&hilit=not+true) – 81 comments

    “Joseph Smith: Prophet or Not” (http://forum.staylds.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=826&hilit=not+true) – 95 comments

    #251844
    Anonymous
    Guest

    You know, this has been a good exercise for me. I searched for the phrase “not true” and came up with almost 250 comments with that exact wording. I then looked at the intro excerpts of the first 100-ish of those comments, looking for which threads would be good to read for the topic, “Discussing the Church is NOT True”. I provided links to the ones that seemed like the best threads – but then I realized how many threads we have here that address that basic topic naturally as the conversation unfolds. Honestly, I hadn’t even gotten to the one I remember as being the most directly related when I had an epiphany and stopped what I was doing.

    What hit me is that I’m not sure I want one post and thread that deals with this topic explicitly. Why?

    What hit me is that we discuss this exact topic organically in so many threads that it might feel or be almost . . . counter-productive, I guess, to “force” or “shoehorn” the discussion into one thread. In the flow of conversations about lots of topics, we address this central topic almost constantly without ever having to “preach” it – and that works not just for those who participate here, but I think it probably also is FAR less threatening to readers who are more orthodox. In the case of those who have loved ones who are struggling and just want to understand those struggles, that lower perception of threat can be wonderfully soothing and even empowering; in the case of those who represent the LDS Church in some capacity as they read (and we do have regular readers who fit that description), that lower perception of threat is critical to our ability to do real but subtle outreach into the very structure of the Church. Honestly, I’m not sure if one of those audiences in more important than the other – but I know I don’t want to do something that would ratchet up the perceived threat level if doing so wouldn’t increase our effectiveness with those who are struggling.

    Thoughts? (especially since this is something that I’ve not considered in quite this way previously)

    #251845
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Cool insights Ray, and I agree. Besides the awareness that I have of how more traditional members view some phrases and have hot buttons – it is my preference to make the journey and surrounding issues as personal as possible. Where so many people say “the church isn’t what IT Claims to be” I would much rather hear “the church isn’t what I THOUGHT it should be.” Or some wording to explain a difference between personal expectations (even if those expectations were helped along by Mormon culture) and reality.

    I have strong feelings on that topic and think the mass of disaffected Mormons would receive much more compassion from the broader body of traditional members if they could adopt this type of phraseology. This one type of change could bring down so many walls and initiate conversations: “What did you think the church should be?”

    #251846
    Anonymous
    Guest

    These are really really really good thoughts. My thoughts were to give people practice saying and approaching it the right way. I like this and will think more about it. Thanks for the links and the thoughts!

    #251847
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It’s really good for us to provide a safe zone for people to practice talking these things through, including preparing them to have conversations with loved ones. That is a huge service we can provide.

    I think I side with what you guys said about not drawing too explicit a spotlight on this. We need to let people say they don’t believe certain things. But we also need to encourage them in the constructive and positive direction to consider what it is they DO believe.

    I am also very much into promoting the view that our problems stem from OUR personal assumptions and expectations we had about the Church. I think it helps mental health to take ownership and responsibility for our past beliefs. “The Church” is an abstract concept. It can not preach views, demand people take certain positions, or even speak at all. It’s a concept, not a person. We cloud the problem when we reify it and pretend it has views we must agree with or reject.

    People make assumptions that turn out wrong, or promote unhealthy viewpoints. People live the Gospel and fail at times. “The Church” does absolutely nothing, except exist as a label for a group of people who may or may not be right about different things in life.

    #251848
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree with Ray. There is a real tendency among the disaffected to want to bear their “untestimony”. To me, thats pretty counterproductive and only creates a reverse orthodoxy. Old Mormon habits die hard.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.