Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Sinning and Happy
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 27, 2012 at 5:35 pm #206885
Anonymous
GuestI posted an introduction elsewhere on the forum and couldn’t get back to respond enough before the thread burned itself out and got locked. Not a problem. I understand. I won’t expose the details, but let’s say that I’m doing something that the church clearly considers a sin, yet I don’t. I don’t believe that God has an issue with my actions, but if my priesthood leaders knew, they would cast me out or want me to be remorseful and repent. And I want to maintain the fellowship of the Church and the benefits of membership. Admittedly, many may think me disingenuous for wanting to walk this line. But I do want to be where I am, with no desire to change. As long as my secret remains a secret and as long as I’m content, what harm am I causing anyone by continuing to appear as a TBM?
July 27, 2012 at 5:48 pm #256561Anonymous
GuestOkay, I don’t know if your trollin’ or not, but I’ll make a simple statement: If you are content in deceiving the members of your ward and you only seek to appear as a TBM, plus you have no issues with your actions, then why are you even on this board?
:eh: July 27, 2012 at 6:04 pm #256563Anonymous
GuestCanucknuckle wrote:Okay, I don’t know if your trollin’ or not, but I’ll make a simple statement:
If you are content in deceiving the members of your ward and you only seek to appear as a TBM, plus you have no issues with your actions, then why are you even on this board?
:eh: Excellent point. I think I’m wondering that myself. Is it possible for me to be a troll but for me to not believe it myself?
Maybe I’m looking for someone more intelligent or more well spoken than myself to expose my thinking to me.
July 27, 2012 at 6:09 pm #256564Anonymous
GuestOK. Pretending that I don’t know the specific behavior being talked about, i’ll take another shot at it. ALL members do this on some level. Unless, I suppose, one constantly walked around announcing every “sin” to everyone in their ward. The difference seems to come down to severity of divergence from the expected norm.
I don’t practice the current, normally expected, cultural LDS definition of the Word of Wisdom. I don’t go around announcing that. So someone might mistake me for a “TBM” in that regard.
But on the other hand, I would most likely just tell someone if they asked me (I have done this). I would tell the Bishop if he asked. I don’t really care, and I also (like the OP is saying) don’t feel what I do is “sinful.” I can’t really think of any formal consequences that would happen to me either. I have chosen not to deal with having a TR. So they can’t take my TR away from me. I haven’t had one in almost a decade. So what would the church do to me? Nothing … The CHI explicitly states that violations of the WofW are not to be addressed with formal discipline. I’m already where they would put me.
To sum it up: everyone in the church is a sinner. Most sins won’t change your status in the community anyway. Some will.
[edit: deleted last line I wrote]
July 27, 2012 at 6:14 pm #256565Anonymous
GuestBTW, if we can keep it very generalized like this, I think this conversation might work. July 27, 2012 at 6:51 pm #256566Anonymous
GuestGood point. So if your “sin” were exposed, your formal church status wouldn’t change, but would your cultural status change and that of your children? I’m not really that concerned about the impact that exposure would have on my official status (which would likely be severe). But I’m concerned about what would be whispered about my children and how they may be ostracized. My youngest kids are too young and take things too literal. If I were to change my ways it would be only to protect them and to keep things simple with the neighbors who may not understand.
July 27, 2012 at 6:57 pm #256567Anonymous
GuestI like the idea of keeping it general so I will attempt to keep my ideas as broad as possible and ignore that I know what the behaviour in question is. I agree that many, if not all of us who strive to find a middle ground in the church, interpret sin and transgression in our own way. That is to say, we practice a form of buffet Mormonism, picking and choosing what we feel is best for us. I am most certainly included in this description. I believe we are justified in this as we are all give the right to choose and understand for ourselves. I believe this is one of the strongest and most important tenets of the Plan of Salvation.
I firmly and truly feel that if you choose to engage in something and you sincerely feel that it is not a sin or transgression, that is quiet literally your God given right. Personally, I don’t judge you for it no matter how small or large of transgression it is (unless it is directly impacting me).
That being said, we belong to an organization that has dictated what it believes are sins and has also dictated what their punishments or consequences are for these sins. So if we want to be part of this organization and continue to act as such then we must be willing to accept the consequence they have outlined. Their club, their rules.
But what if they simply don’t know what you are choosing to do? Well I certainly don’t feel that we should broadcast our personal choices to the ward. I hate it when during F&T meetings people announce their righteousness or their transgressions. But if asked directly about something, I believe we should tell the truth and accept whatever formal or social consequences that follow … always.
For me, I don’t believe in keeping up appearances.
July 27, 2012 at 7:17 pm #256568Anonymous
GuestMikeM wrote:Good point. So if your “sin” were exposed, your formal church status wouldn’t change, but would your cultural status change and that of your children?
No. I don’t live in a high-density, culturally LDS area. I live outside Wash DC in a redneck/hipster town with several micro breweries and more artsy tattoo shops than I can believe is economically feasible. Mormons are a tiny religious minority. Straight-laced folks of all creeds are the odd man out in my neighborhood, culturally
July 27, 2012 at 7:38 pm #256562Anonymous
GuestI will speak from my perspective. I am attracted to StayLDS because the Church is my tribe and culture, yet I no longer accept some of the claims made by the church. Therefore, I have had to reappraise my views, and this site provides a sounding board for me to do so.
Most who come here and share don’t have a problem with the major commandments as God would describe them: stealing, dishonesty, murder, avarice, and adultery. I don’t think anyone questions the basics. Many will and do question LDS policies, such as certain interpretations of the Word of Wisdom and how to pay tithing. Most here have some trouble with the True Believing position, and question some or most of the truth claims of the church. Importantly, most who come into the middle way communities have less problems with the commandments than they do the true believing position.
MikeM, you are coming here not with challenges to the true believing position or truth claims, but rather, a desire to continue in both a position as a true believer in full fellowship with the LDS church, while wilfully in violation of certainly one of the most major commandments in the church. Adultery is not only a church commandment, but is and always has been a violation of every dispensation of the gospel. If there ever were an ‘eternal principle’ or ‘doctrine’ of the gospel — not committing adultery would be close to the top of the list.
As we come into disaffection, then things like discipline, authenticity, and integrity become, for me, very important. It is one thing, in my humble opinion, to interpret the Word of Wisdom liberally, especially given the lack of historical legitimacy to the specific proscriptions. It is entirely another to be in violation of the major doctrinal commandments, and proud of it. I just think it doesn’t compute: it’s not disciplined, not authentic, and to try to maintain membership while violating such a requirements is a stretch of integrity I cannot fathom.
I had suggested to the Mods in private email that your initial post appears like a troll, and my reason is that anyone in the church would fully know that adultery, whether approved by all involved or not, is completely out of keeping with the Church and Gospel commandments. It is not out of the realm of possibility that well meaning defenders of the LDS faith come onto sites like ours here and test to see if we, in the middle, are so absent a moral compass that we would accept any violation of Gospel or Church commandment. And from my point of view, the answer to such a test is a resounding NO. We who try to stayLDS while being in the middle recognize limits to how far the law of the church can or should be bent.
Just my take on the matter.
July 27, 2012 at 7:58 pm #256569Anonymous
GuestYou have a conscience. Use it, but don’t use this site to justify what pretty much all of us see as unjustifiable and egregious sin. July 27, 2012 at 9:15 pm #256572Anonymous
GuestIt looks like I’m the only one who doesn’t understand how far off the mark I am. It also looks like I didn’t understand well enough the discussion limits of the forum. I am sorry. If I’m still heading off track, feel free to delete me; I won’t try to return. I guess that “StayLDS” means something unique to those who have been here for a while. For me it means loving the meaning behind the doctrines and enjoying the fellowship of the Saints, while questioning one or two of the inherited old-testament behavioral limitations.
July 27, 2012 at 9:34 pm #256570Anonymous
GuestMikeM wrote:
I guess that “StayLDS” means something unique to those who have been here for a while. For me it means loving the meaning behind the doctrines and enjoying the fellowship of the Saints, whilequestioning one or two of the inherited old-testament behavioral limitations. :wtf: IMHO – adultery moves well beyond this.:wtf: Eating shellfish, not so much.
July 27, 2012 at 9:36 pm #256571Anonymous
GuestDon’t take a self-righteous, dismissive angle here. Everyone said you can stay involved socially, but none of believe you can be a regular member while living life as a sexual swinger. This probably isn’t the site for you, but don’t make it what it hasn’t been.
I’m locking this thread, as well.
-
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Sinning and Happy’ is closed to new replies.