Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › A childs question nobody could answer.
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 21, 2013 at 10:25 am #207987
Anonymous
GuestMy daughter recently asked a question in Sunday school that neither I or anyone else could answer. The question was this “Can a poor man, (for example someone living in the third world) who cannot afford to pay tithing or who never had the opportunity to addend the temple enter the celestial kingdom and be with God?” September 21, 2013 at 11:31 am #273978Anonymous
GuestCertainly because in the Millennium it will all be sorted out and those who could not do things now can do the extra credit necessary to get a passing grade. But if you could do in now and do not,well then you are in a heap of trouble. September 21, 2013 at 3:20 pm #273979Anonymous
GuestYour daughter is a very thoughtful & perceptive young person. I like the story in the NT about the Widow’s mite.
Mark: 12:41-44
Luke: 21:1-4
I recently read “The Zealot-the life & times of Jesus of Nazareth” by Reza Aslan.
The best part of the book for me was the description about how the temple in Jerusalem operated at the time of Christ.
It was the economic center of the nation.
I don’t agree with all that he wrote, but the description of the temple & the role of making sacrifices & the role of the PH is worth
the price of the book.
September 21, 2013 at 4:55 pm #273980Anonymous
GuestAbsolutely. That is the core of our temple theology – that every person will be judged charitably and based only on their effort to live according to the dictates of their own conscience and their own ability. If that man did the best he could, he will inherit the Celestial Kingdom according to our theology – no matter the details of his life. That’s easier to accept for most members in the case of non-members and those who died without hearing about Jesus, the Christ, but it’s true even of members – active and inactive. There is no objective standard for the judgment, as much as we tend to want one. God, alone, is the judge – and we are told He judges based on the condition and intent of the heart.
September 21, 2013 at 6:23 pm #273981Anonymous
GuestThank you Ray and everyone else who took the time to answer this. My entire family and I are new to the church and have been troubled by the fact we had been taught that in order to enter the celestial kingdom and be together as a family in the presence of god they must do A,B,C etc. And that anyone who falls short for ANY reason (for example who doesn’t enter the temple) is excluded. I/we have a much clearer understanding now.
September 21, 2013 at 6:34 pm #273982Anonymous
GuestIt’s one of the central paradoxes of Mormon theology, Mike – the balance between motivating in this life and recognizing the complete lack of objective criteria when dealing with the dead. We do the best we can to encourage each other to do the best we can – but, in the end, we acknowledge it’s all in God’s hands in the end.
September 21, 2013 at 9:18 pm #273983Anonymous
GuestCadence wrote:Certainly because in the Millennium it will all be sorted out and those who could not do things now can do the extra credit necessary to get a passing grade. But if you could do in now and do not,well then you are in a heap of trouble.
I’m sorry, but this can’t be true. This seems to be the normal answer that TBM give and I can’t accept it. I can argue a bunch of “what-if” scenarios that would make this statement become confusing and hard to justify.If God does exist and pays attention to us (still undetermined by me), then he will be the judge and there is no amount of “doing” or “not doing” according to man that will “secure” or “not secure” someone into the Celestial Kingdom.
September 21, 2013 at 10:04 pm #273984Anonymous
GuestJazernorth wrote:Cadence wrote:Certainly because in the Millennium it will all be sorted out and those who could not do things now can do the extra credit necessary to get a passing grade. But if you could do in now and do not,well then you are in a heap of trouble.
I’m sorry, but this can’t be true. This seems to be the normal answer that TBM give and I can’t accept it. I can argue a bunch of “what-if” scenarios that would make this statement become confusing and hard to justify.If God does exist and pays attention to us (still undetermined by me), then he will be the judge and there is no amount of “doing” or “not doing” according to man that will “secure” or “not secure” someone into the Celestial Kingdom.
I have to say I tend to agree with you. I don’t believe the LDS teaching that people must “work their way into heaven” by paying dues, partaking in “borrowed” Masonic ceremony’s or donning Masonic underwear. It has to do with acceptance of Christ living his gospel, and trying to do more right than wrong. But that said, what do I know? After all I’m a new convert and admit I have much to learn.
September 21, 2013 at 10:29 pm #273985Anonymous
GuestI think it’s a bit unfair to say that Mormonism teaches that we work our way into heaven, even though too many members see it that way. Mormonism teaches that faith and works are a balance – that works alone won’t exalt anyone, but neither will work-less faith. Mormonism teaches that faith is a belief that motivates action – in the purest sense, the Biblical concept of fruits of the vine. Mormonism also teaches that works would be absolutely pointless without the Atonement. I think that last point is such an assumed given that it doesn’t get addressed nearly enough, but it absolutely is there in spades. As is the case with most things, the extremes are easier, so too many people gravitate to faith without works OR works without faith – but I think most members understand and would agree with what I just wrote, especially if I had a chance to explain it to them in more detail.
September 22, 2013 at 4:31 am #273986Anonymous
GuestI agree that the TBM answer would be that it will all be sorted out in the millennium. We could play all sorts of “what ifs.” Ray’s point about the atonement, however, validates all of that. I know it’s widely believed, even among members, that Mormons don’t believe in grace. But we absolutely do! The atonement is all about mercy and grace, and if God really is a loving and just god, all the good that anyone does will be taken into account. I think the danger comes in the opposite – those who could have done more but chose not to. For instance, in Mike’s OP, if that guy chose not to pay tithing and chose not to go the temple even though he could have, he is probably in more danger of a harsher judgement than the guy who couldn’t. Even then, however, in the end it’s going to be up to God, and I do believe all the facets of both justice and mercy will come into play – including for the guy who could have but didn’t. September 22, 2013 at 6:06 am #273987Anonymous
GuestHmmm. Perhaps I should clarify. My personal belief is that if a person is able to tithe they should, but tithing should be based on available funds after a person has paid their living expenses. I also think a person has a duty to serve the lord and his church in any way they can. I am a little dubious about going to the temple, but mainly because I feel Masonic rituals and incantations have little (if anything) to do with the lord. That said, I am basing my understanding of temple practices solely on information found in books and video posted to YouTube that mostly originates from disinchanted ex members of the church and is perhaps not the most reliable. I guess in a way as a new member I’m suffering from information overload? In my own case this situation is not helped by the fact that I work alongside three lay preachers from the evangelical church who have made it their mission to “save me” from Mormonism! However as I have told them, if I want to go to a rock concert and wave my arms in the air I would rather go and see Pink Floyd! September 22, 2013 at 6:12 am #273988Anonymous
GuestI don’t know about the church as “the church” and have had issues with some of it’s teachings. I took a financial class from Dave Ramsey’s FPU course and once I learned this perspective I had no issues paying tithing. I look at it as this church is just as good as any other and since my family attends it makes sense.
Here is the link:
http://www.daveramsey.com/article/daves-advice-on-tithing-and-giving/lifeandmoney_church/ Hopefully that helps as it isn’t a mormon thing but more of a bible thing.
September 22, 2013 at 6:16 am #273989Anonymous
GuestJazernorth wrote:I don’t know about the church as “the church” and have had issues with some of it’s teachings.
I took a financial class from Dave Ramsey’s FPU course and once I learned this perspective I had no issues paying tithing. I look at it as this church is just as good as any other and since my family attends it makes sense.
Here is the link:
http://www.daveramsey.com/article/daves-advice-on-tithing-and-giving/lifeandmoney_church/ Hopefully that helps as it isn’t a mormon thing but more of a bible thing.
Thanks Jazermorth, I will read this
September 22, 2013 at 7:08 pm #273990Anonymous
GuestQuote:Every person has a purpose in human life to learn from experiences given wherever they are in their progression. It must be a part of our faith that the people who are born in the deepest jungles in Africa, who will never hear the Gospel during this life, have as much purpose in their life to learn from their life experiences as we do; and that they will gain, thereby, an increase in light by so doing. And I tell you that it is simply true that faith in Christ is an eternally and universally valid principle and basis for knowing and experiencing truth and performing miracles. Faith in Christ is as valid a principle for Augustine as for President Hinckley and as operative in the day of Martin Luther as it was in the day of Joseph Smith. That’s our faith.
Now we may be called into question if somebody has a vision, for instance, of the Virgin Mary; because I don’t believe that the LDS believe that the Virgin Mary puts in many appearances. However I suggest that we look beyond what divides us and look to “inclusivism,” and that is, “What is it that they learned? What does their religious experience teach them?” Because God will adapt his message to any culture, and any means that He can, to increase the light of a person (see Alma 29:
.I love this concept particularly because it doesn’t mean that his (the jungle man’s) whole life was just a preamble to the truth. His life and experiences are as meaningful for his eternal progression as mine are for me. I also expect that I will be just as surprised as he might be by how things actually work on the other side of the veil. I think it would be appropriate that we should find ourselves, as brothers seperated for such a long time, on similar footing.
Old-Timer wrote:We do the best we can to encourage each other to do the best we can – but, in the end, we acknowledge it’s all in God’s hands in the end.
I agree with Ray. I only wish to point out that nobody does the best they can all the time – so even if the race was only against our own potential we would fail to measure up. What does the atonement mean to you? (hypothetical) Personally I don’t think that we do a very good job teaching this or emphasizing this in the institional church but on the individual level it can make ALL the difference. One person has everything but the atonement, another has nothing but the atonement. Ultimately the atonement is God’s to give, based on whatever criteria He chooses.
Thankfully it IS all in God’s hands. We can play the role of the elder brother and complain that the prodigal son wasted away his inheritance or we can rejoice in the love and mercy of our shared father.
September 22, 2013 at 10:29 pm #273991Anonymous
GuestWe were talking about repentance in Sunday School and in the HPG lesson, and I mentioned that I doubt anyone in the room was guilty of terrible, egregious, horrible, habitual sins – that all of us were normal, regular sinners, instead. That got a few chuckles, but everyone agreed. I think the vast majority of members would agree with me if I said it that way, and that they accept the need for an atonement, but, again, I think we take it as a given so much that we forget to talk enough about it in real terms – like openly admitting that all of us are normal, regular sinners. That causes problems, as it tends to make the atonement be simplified and taken a bit for granted – but, at the core, it means we teach that we really aren’t any different than the person in the original post, when it comes right down to it.
I wish we talked about it more often and openly, so it wouldn’t slip into our collective unconsciousness.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.