- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 1, 2013 at 7:55 pm #208014
Anonymous
GuestMy in-laws dropped by yesterday and I found myself preoccupied with thoughts of whether or not they were noticing that I don’t wear garments anymore. I wasn’t wearing anything that wouldn’t cover garments had I been wearing them, but for women the lines are noticeable no matter what you’re wearing over the top. Plus, I had my baby on my hip and he’s constantly pulling at the neck of my top and exposing my bra strap so I was worried about that. They didn’t say anything to make me think they noticed, but MIL and SIL did seem to make a point of rubbing my upper back (which I found a bit invasive of my personal space). Anyway, they probably didn’t notice anything and I’m just being paranoid. DH has even talked about wearing his garments when he goes to his parents house just to avoid the confrontation that he’s sure would occur if they should notice him not wearing them.
We haven’t given the in-laws any hints about our disaffection and I’m sure it will come up sometime in the near future. I’m not looking forward to that at all. Isn’t funny how we get in the habit of noticing what underwear each other is wearing? And then we make judgments or assumptions about people based on that? Well, you guys probably don’t because you’re wonderful
, but when I was TBM I did it all the time.
October 1, 2013 at 7:59 pm #274381Anonymous
GuestAny time someone makes a major change in their life, it’s natural to wonder how many people notice – and not wearing the garment is a major change for most Mormons. Some people will look; others won’t. Some will care; others won’t. The important thing, imo, is being comfortable with my own decisions and learning to let go of my concern for what other people think. It’s not easy, but it gets easier over time.
October 1, 2013 at 9:09 pm #274382Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:The important thing, imo, is being comfortable with my own decisions and learning to let go of my concern for what other people think. It’s not easy, but it gets easier over time.
That’s exactly what I’m working on Ray. Maybe it’s my personality or the way I was raised, but what other people think has always been important to me. Now that I’m working on worrying more about what I think and how I feel about things, I’m seeing just how ingrained that habit has become for me. Even down to the most personal of things such as choosing whether or not to wear the garments.October 1, 2013 at 9:14 pm #274383Anonymous
GuestYou have a good attitude, MayB. There is a balance of not caring what others think, and actually caring about others.
I don’t think it is easy to feel judged by others or feel they disapprove. But it seems to be part of life, and we have figure out how we will handle ourselves in those situations, because they’re likely to happen.
Have you and your husband talked about what you might say and how you might say it should it come up as a topic some day?
That might help, ya know…just prep for how you might handle it. But then maybe just let it go and hope it never becomes an issue.
Especially if you are loving and kind and they see your wonderful spirit…they might have less to worry about when they see you super happy, even if they disagree with something, they can still admire you for how you have a happy family, which should be most important.
October 1, 2013 at 9:41 pm #274384Anonymous
GuestOld-Timer wrote:Any time someone makes a major change in their life, it’s natural to wonder how many people notice – and not wearing the garment is a major change for most Mormons.
Some people will look; others won’t. Some will care; others won’t. The important thing, imo, is being comfortable with my own decisions and learning to let go of my concern for what other people think. It’s not easy, but it gets easier over time.
This.
:thumbup: group mentality is not as obvious when you are in the group(what ever group that is). Once outside the group things hardly noticeable become glaring obvious that it tends to lead to paranoia like thinking.It’s natural. But takes time to overcome.
Until I was schooled in propaganda techniques by a North Korean physiologist I wasn’t aware of many of the things active in even my own nation or tv, radio etc. now it’s glaringly obvious and hard not to notice.
But over time it works it’s way into normality so you aren’t thinking about it as much.
It helps to think about things as we are all christen of god trying to find our way no matter our creed or beliefs.
I could care less about everyone’s indivisible beliefs now. I used to a whole ton though.
But it has broken down over time to only really focusing in the 2 great commandments and fur filling the 2nd by for filling the first.
I think it’s obvious to my family and missionaries because they countless sky ask me to link church stuff and websites to influence my friends and I won’t.
They are happy we’re they are and I respect and love it. Please give me that same respect as well
As them as we want them to give us.
Love one another. That can be difficult at times with all that goes on let alone the 100s or thousands of others things we are supposedly asked it commanded to do or believe. I choose to make it more simple.
If they approach you ask for the same love and respect they would like or you have shown them.
Loving doesn’t include overbearing and seekers not its own.
If they are following that and gently remind them that it’s your path you are walking to make life happy or peaceful for you.
October 1, 2013 at 11:04 pm #274385Anonymous
GuestI too was raised to care what others think. And it is a balance. Also, I heard that women at BYU would intentionally run their hand over the knee area of guys in jeans to see if they had their garments on — to see if they were endowed and therefore, had served a mission (in most cases). I suspect your family was checking out whether your garments were on. It’s less about the underwear and more about what it says about your current orientation toward the church that makes them feel — bit of a shame we have to demonstrate our commitment that way – almost like the pharisees that wore those pieces of scripture in boxes on their heads (can’t remember the name of them — scholars, help).
At some point you’ll get the “I’m worried about you” speech. I have received it a few times from people when they have learned odds and sods about my own disaffection.
I deal with it by wearing garments when I’m in contexts people will care. I also get around it by wearing opaque clothing so you can’t see the “eternal smile” of the upper garment. You can get away with it for a while by indicating its laundry day and that is why you aren’t wearing them. At some point, they will probably find out or you will have to tell them.
If you’re like me, you’ll have already thought about possible paths the conversation will take, and will have well-prepared one-liners to share that achieve your objective in the situation.
Good luck!
SD
October 2, 2013 at 8:02 am #274386Anonymous
GuestMayB wrote:
Isn’t funny how we get in the habit of noticing what underwear each other is wearing?And then we make judgments or assumptions about people based on that?Well, you guys probably don’t because you’re wonderful , but when I was TBM
I did it all the time. So true.
October 2, 2013 at 4:44 pm #274387Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:almost like the pharisees that wore those pieces of scripture in boxes on their heads (can’t remember the name of them — scholars, help).
Phylacteries! But I’m not sure that it was just the Pharisees. Phylacteries are based on a literal interpretation of the scripture that says to keep the law close to our mind and heart. You might say that the important part is to internalize the principles of the law. I might counter, “Is it not better to comply with
boththe internal requirement and the external expression of that requirement. Baptism is an external sign of an inward commitment – does that make baptism any less significant.” Garments are the same. They are important for those to whom they have meaning and too often they are used as cultural markers of obedience. I’m not a great fan of circumcision, but at least that external sign wasn’t visible to others. I guess people would still be people…could you imagine the whisperings in the foyer about who was circumcised and who wasn’t. We would probably resort to something akin to hanging the marital sheet outside for the world to see (a reference to a practice to declare that the bride was a virgin prior to the wedding). For many it will never be enough to be internally virtuous. It must be known. October 2, 2013 at 4:59 pm #274388Anonymous
GuestMayB, There is nothing wrong with being concerned with how other people perceive you. That is natural, and in fact, important in social interaction. But I think it is important to separate out a couple of aspects of it.
1) It is important not to injure another because of our beliefs. 2) It is also important to own our beliefs and not modify the way we are because we are afraid of what others will say or think.
An example of #1 would be pulling out the beer when your inlaws come over and then berating them for not joining you in drinking, when you know that that is part of their faith.
An example of #2 would be if a person joins the LDS Church but still drinks beer when he is with his friends because he doesn’t want them to think he is weird, even though he now thinks of it as contrary to his faith. (I’m not saying there is anything wrong with drinking beer, but rather that it is wrong for a person to go against their convictions because of who else is in the room).
Often, in our particular situation as stayLDS people, we conflate the two because they are so intertwined. We give up #2 in order not to fail on #1. But to me it is essential to tease them apart. We need to make them separate issues. I mean, do you really want to live in fear of people seeing what kind of underwear you are wearing for the rest of your life?
My suggestion is to solve this by the most straight-forward approach. IMO, you should tell your inlaws, or rather, your husband should tell your inlaws while you are in the room, that the two of you are no longer full believers. In order to address #1, above, you should do this in a way that focuses on what you do believe, not what you don’t, and you should give special attention to your desires to continue to be good people that would please God. And most importantly, you need to offer your full and unconditional support of their faith and beliefs. If you can do this, #2 will become much easier. Garments are not the issue, faith is. Get your faith out in the open, show that you are still good, treat everyone like you’d like to be treated, and garments will not be a topic of conversation.
I know this won’t be easy for you. It wasn’t easy for me, and I’m sure it wasn’t easy for most here. But I feel like it was the single most important step forward for me, and has done wonders for my sanity (literally).
October 2, 2013 at 8:25 pm #274389Anonymous
GuestRoy wrote:SilentDawning wrote:Garments . . . . are important for those to whom they have meaning and too often they are used as cultural markers of obedience. I’m not a great fan of circumcision, but at least that external sign wasn’t visible to others. I guess people would still be people…could you imagine the whisperings in the foyer about who was circumcised and who wasn’t. We would probably resort to something akin to hanging the marital sheet outside for the world to see (a reference to a practice to declare that the bride was a virgin prior to the wedding).
For many it will never be enough to be internally virtuous. It must be known.
It would be nice if we could be more honest about this. Garments AREN’T private, personal, etc. They are out there for all clued-in Mormons to see and often used to judge and categorize.
EDIT: Okay, I need to fix this. Of course, there is an extremely private and personal aspect to wearing garments. But what I mean to say is that whether you are wearing them is nearly 100% knowable by anyone who cares to know.
October 2, 2013 at 8:35 pm #274390Anonymous
GuestExactly Ann. Garments are used to immediately judge people, especially women. October 2, 2013 at 11:12 pm #274391Anonymous
GuestSomeone who is going to judge someone else based on wearing the garment is going to judge everyone – male or female. Just saying.
October 3, 2013 at 12:17 am #274392Anonymous
GuestI do agree that both males and females will be judged for not wearing garments. A women though will have a much greater stigma than a man as not only is she NOT wearing garments but heaven forbid she is now a walking sexual temptation to all men since knees and shoulders may be shown. You know the old “slut/modesty” judgments since that has become a very big reason for garmets for many TBMs. Protection from sexual thoughts. So yes I do feel and have seen in my own experience that the outcome and judgments for women vs men not wearing garments is different. As I have also heard on occasion TBM state that if a guy isn’t wearing his its because of “p@&$.” October 3, 2013 at 2:16 am #274393Anonymous
GuestOn the flip side, Dax, single women actually aren’t expected to have gone through the temple as much as the expectation is for single men, so single women aren’t expected as much to be wearing the garment in the first place – although that might change now that the missionary age has dropped and more young women are going on missions before getting married. October 3, 2013 at 7:16 am #274394Anonymous
GuestYou are correct Ray that guys do generally wear garments at a younger age though as you said that may be changing. I find it can be hard to tell if a guy has garments on especially if he does not wear the “eternal smile” type. For men they look like any undershirt many nonlds men wear daily. For women, even dressed completely modestly, garments outline still shows through unless wearing a very thick material. Beyond that though, I have heard often that if a guy isn’t wearing them he is hurting HIMself and HIS family only for the most part. If women are not wearing them, they have the potential to harm not only themselves but OTHER people by not keeping this particular rule. They may tempt men sexually with their clothing choices or be a bad example for the YW who will then perhaps resent garments and or tempt the YM with immodest dress. I’m not making this up. I had to sit through an entire relief society discussion that turned into “when lds women do not wear garments it is a danger to “all” of us women and the safety of our families.” I think it goes back to evolution and the threat of competion or as others have said the old “if I have to do it then you have to” mentality. It was a very weird conversation to sit through. Also I’m not trying to bash men in anyway here just trying to give MayB a heads up that the reaction of others to her husband not wearing garments could be very different than their reaction to her not wearing garments. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.