- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 28, 2013 at 4:39 pm #208102
Anonymous
GuestSo this would be comical, but it is my reality. This was the text I received from my Bishop after I had expressed some concern about visiting a friend on an official “Rescue”visit. Let me also add that without sounding arrogant, I really do visit with lots of people and feel like I have been trusted in some confidences that other ward leaders have not. I have also kept these confidences. For me, the gospel is about the people, not the law-not how the majority of the people in my ward feel. I probably just outed myself. I wouldn’t be surprised if this current leadership has given a “spy” calling out. Such arrogant jerks. I am ticked right now, maybe someone can help me help me see this in a new light? Bishop: Sally needs continued support from the ward council right now. GodisLove
talk to Sally a lot. The last time we did a “visit” it became very awkward for quite awhile. I feel like it just got back to “normal”. I hate to mess that up. I will see how she responds when I call to make an appointment.Bishop: Thank you GodisLove. The Lord wants us to help and strengthen the Sally family. In response to that I have asked you and the YW pres to be the ones to do that tonight. Therefore, I know that nothing will be messed up by you sisters responding to the direction given through such a strong genealogy of priesthood channels (IE President Monson…to the rescue, Elder Perry through Elder Area Authority…the ward council is to minister to families by inviting them to come unto Christ, our ward council acting on this direction, and our bishop knowing who needs to be remembered and strengthened). Thank you for providing the ability for us to reach and lift in this way.
Sally is a friend who has some struggles that I know about, that the rest of the Ward Council does not. She does not like the current leadership and feels they do not listen to her(they don”t). She is not a fan of the whole “love bombing”. She mostly just needs to be left alone and not be judged.
This is kind of the last straw for me. I have had equally infuriating experiences with the current bishopric. I can’t even think straight to reply in anger. Any ideas? I have been very vocal and he is quite baffled by my lack of authority worship.
October 28, 2013 at 4:54 pm #275629Anonymous
Guest*SIGH*Honestly, some people just don’t get it in situations like this. They see the world the way they see the world, and it’s impossible for them to understand anything different. They sincerely want to help, but they have no freaking clue how to do so – and they don’t understand when their efforts don’t work, so they blame the person whose help they butchered. It’s incredibly frustrating, and it’s the negative side of the local leadership structure of the Church.
Frankly, I probably would call Sally in advance and let her know that you and the YW Pres have been asked to visit her. I would tell her that you are agreeing so that you can be the right buffer for her, to keep it from being totally awkward and obnoxious, since they will send someone else if you don’t go. I would say something similar to what I said above – that the leadership cares but just doesn’t have a clue. I would ask her to go along with the visit just to keep the peace and give some generic response to whatever the YW Pres asks. Then I would show up, chat as vaguely as possible, whisper a “Thanks” into her ear as you leave and continue your friendships with her.
October 28, 2013 at 5:09 pm #275630Anonymous
GuestHaving been in Sally’s position, I see how awkward this might be for you and her. I’m sorry your bishop has laid this on you along with the requisite guilt. I agree with Ray, some leaders, while sincere, just don’t get it. Many of us in the position of “needing” rescue don’t want to be rescued, and our issues are generally misunderstood by the leadership (Pres. Uchtdorf: “It’s not that simple”). On the other hand, I’m glad it’s you going to see Sally. Again, I agree with Ray, call ahead and warn her, express your love and concern, explain why you’re glad it’s you that thas been assigned. I might even help her make up an excuse why you can’t visit, but that’s really just kicking the can down the road. Try to make it as painless as possible for both of you.
Finally, make an appointment with the bishop and explain your concerns without violating Sally’s confidence if you feel comfortable doing so.
October 28, 2013 at 5:39 pm #275631Anonymous
GuestI have already been called into his office once for “questioning priesthood authority”. I have told him I didn’t feel comfortable sending missionaries to my non-member neighbors. He is putting me in my place as he sees it. I don’t feel guilt anymore though. I let that go a few years ago. I am just trying to stay myself in the ward. I feel like a fish swimming the opposite way of 400 though. Honestly the guy is so unsure of himself that he can’t remember what he said the week before. There is not talking to him and he defers to his counselor who is “in charge” of me whenever I ask a question of any kind. The two of them just feed off each others awesome opportunity to sit in front and preside over meetings. This is what they see as inspiring though and find testimony in. Those are quotes…not making that up. They are trying to do the best they can, it is just shocking to me that they are really that clueless.
I am not in a very good spot regarding my anger and I know I bring contention when I see them. I have been crapped on enough and not afraid to share my feelings. They both know that. I do credit StayLDS for helping say things in an appropriate, less angry way. I am working on distancing myself from them…getting released. What I feel so sad about is how many people they offend and these are
REALLYgood people. I had tried to be a help where I could as I feel like I understand some of these concerns more than the mainstream. October 28, 2013 at 6:21 pm #275632Anonymous
GuestMaybe you could anonymously (or not so anonymously) send him a copy of Pres. Uchtdorf’s talk appropriately highlighted. You sound assertive enough, and I think it is up to those of us who are assertive to make it known far and wide that a member of the first presidency did say in GC that thereis room for those of us who question and doubt, and that there is not only room but great opportunity for us to share our talents and abilities. In the church we are all volunteers and despite the controlling attitude some local leaders have, when it comes down to it it is only an attitude – they have no real control unless we let them control us. Appropriate assertiveness can convey that point. Out of all the commandments in the scriptures, there is no commandment for us to send missionaries to our neighbors (sharing the gospel does not equal sending the missionaries, sending the missionaries comes after sharing the gospel and when you are inspired that they are ready and/or they ask). Assertiveness can also point out unrighteous dominion. There are really some good scriptures abuot what bishops should be and do – none of them include that which you have described. I have been angry at church leaders, and in fact I have been angry at God. It’s best to wait until your anger subsides a bit. In the end, what is the bishop going to do to you? Give you a calling you dislike (that you don’t hgave to accept)? Pull your TR (at which time I would go straight to the SP)? Like Satan, in the end he can not harm you unless you let him.
October 28, 2013 at 6:48 pm #275633Anonymous
GuestDoes your Stake President know about the general situation and how many people are being hurt? Does the High Council representative for your ward know? Does anyone at the stake level know to whom the SP would listen? I know the issues in the general area where you live are . . . extensive, so I’m just asking if there might be someone else who can take the concern to the next level above your Bishop.
October 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm #275634Anonymous
GuestIt is such an awkward thing to have to go and have a “Rescue Misson.” First of all, if someone has been involved in the church for a while they know when they are being “rescued.” I’m sorry your Bishop wouldn’t listen to you that it was awkward last time and realize that you may have insights that he does not have. Maybe a blanket decision was made to go and visit those less active, and instead of paying attention to the individual he is just barreling right ahead with the “plan.” Do you think the person being visited would have the ability to say that they don’t want a visit right now? It is a tough position for you to be put in. I’m not sure if your Bishop knows how to back off.
Is the Y.W. president someone who might be understanding? If so, maybe you could explain the situation with her and agree to make it a quick visit and get out.
It shouldn’t be about statistics or checking a name off of the list, but about what really benefits the individual. I feel your frustration.
October 28, 2013 at 8:02 pm #275635Anonymous
GuestThe Bishop is fairly new. The SP is a good man and would understand what I am saying. He seems not to want to interfere. He also only has my view, the Bishop would have a very different view. I also think that he would probably just talk to the Bishop and it would go in one ear and come out an entirely different thing. I actually had a really weird opportunity to share with the SP an issue and he did understand what I was saying, but also told me that I may need to “train” these leaders and be patient. Our HC rep is a very, very good man. I have worked with him through my calling. He is in charge of primary. He has seen some things happen, but both the last Bishop and the current are very good at keeping things under control in the meeting he is in. They both then email or text instructions out of the meeting. I have had the HC back me up multiple times in a meeting and the Bishop says-good point. Not to me but to whatever was said by the HC. The SP wife gets our wacky ward, she lives in it. I can’t decide if he just thinks I am over emotional or exaggerate or completely disagrees. I am not sure who else to even say stuff to. I know several other WC members feel similar, but they don’t back me up until after the meeting. Everyone thinks I am just burnt out, which I guess I am, but I have been saying the same stuff for 3 years now.
Currently the WC does “Rescue” work every week. Different members of the WC go out in 2’s, each assigned a week and once a month the entire group. The Bishop assigns who goes where and what they would like discussed. All of this in on paper, no discussion about who goes where. This is what actually pushed me over the edge to ask for a release. I am all about chatting with people and get a long with most, but I won’t go “challenge” anyone or trick them with missionaries. I will respect their feelings and visit if they want. I also do this as part of my own calling in a casual, comfortable way. The “Rescue” was taught by our area authority and the Bishop takes this as prophecy and knows that nothing can stop us, only our lack of faith. Which I obviously have regarding this.
Sally has already said she doesn’t need visits to the Bishopric. She seriously has probably had 5 or 6 in the last 2 months. She even fed the missionaries and got a discussion. This is the 3rd friend/person that has asked me “WTH” and wondered if I could do anything. Back off is not in the vocabulary. The YW pres is a completely oppressed woman whose husband was the former bishop and she has learned in the last 20 years to be “presided” over in every sense of the word. The other person I get to visit with is the RS pres, who told me after a similar discussion that I should really just do what the Bishop says, “he is inspired”.
Ray…extensive is not a big enough word. I sit in meetings and wonder…where am I and did they just say that.
October 28, 2013 at 8:21 pm #275636Anonymous
GuestWow, I’m kind of at a loss then. Other then telling the woman to not answer her door. That is really just harrassment. It is a sure way to drive someone away from the church. And I am not surprised you are left shaking your head. 6 visits in two months is just kinda crazy. October 28, 2013 at 9:00 pm #275637Anonymous
GuestThis answer may not fit, but maybe it can help. I lived in a Stake that had 18 years of dictatorial, twisted leadership. I won’t go into details, only that from the moment we walked in we knew something was wrong. As I lived and served in the stake, I heard the mountains of hurt and complaints – no meeting was free from harm. However, I did begin to see something else – people bonding together. One by one, members covered members, wiped their tears, held their hearts and silently supported the needs. There was no other way. As I came up the ranks in leadership and sat at the table with these men, I learned a lot about them, their weaknesses and so on. Much like you know. What I also saw were the personal saviors among the members. You maybe that savior. Not just for Sally, but others. You alone can’t stop it, but your efforts maybe a balm you will never understand.
You may the Uchtdorf for this group. Though not as loud or visible. Your covenants are with God and Jesus Christ – Keep working with them – I sense you are doing much good in the world.
October 28, 2013 at 9:09 pm #275638Anonymous
GuestGodisLove, I wish I had some good advice or even a reasonably similar personal situation to share – I do not. The only thing that comes to my mind is a saying I have heard, “Those closest to the problem are the best equipped to deal with it.” I feel that however you decide to respond (both to the text and to the larger issue), it will be a good and helpful way to respond to a difficult situation. I have every confidence in your ability to act in a way that is right for you. I don’t imagine that you are going to “fix” the problem but then many problems in life don’t get “fixed.” God bless you! October 28, 2013 at 11:44 pm #275639Anonymous
GuestIf you know for sure that Sally does not want to be rescued right now I would just plan and simply tell the bishop that. Just tell him to back off because he is doing more harm than good. Leader don’t need yes men, they need honesty. Just my 2 cents. October 29, 2013 at 12:43 am #275640Anonymous
Guestchurch0333 wrote:If you know for sure that Sally does not want to be rescued right now I would just plan and simply tell the bishop that. Just tell him to back off because he is doing more harm than good. Leader don’t need yes men, they need honesty. Just my 2 cents.
This.
Do what is right, and let the consequences follow.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
October 29, 2013 at 1:45 am #275641Anonymous
Guestcwald wrote:church0333 wrote:If you know for sure that Sally does not want to be rescued right now I would just plan and simply tell the bishop that. Just tell him to back off because he is doing more harm than good. Leader don’t need yes men, they need honesty. Just my 2 cents.
This.
Do what is right, and let the consequences follow.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Better yet, have Sally tell them. I’ve never had any reservation about saying I didn’t want to be a project or someone’s assigned friend. Maybe Sally needs to make it clear where she stands.
October 29, 2013 at 1:52 am #275642Anonymous
GuestNormally, I would agree with church and cwald, but I know enough about the overall situation to be wary of that approach in this particular case. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.