Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Poll: Fewer people believe Bible is literal
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 11, 2014 at 9:16 pm #208693
Anonymous
GuestI heard this on the news yesterday and went and researched it. Here’s a link to the “State of the Bible” report: . It’s mildly interesting to look at.http://www.americanbible.org/features/state-of-the-bible-research-2014 ” class=”bbcode_url”> http://www.americanbible.org/features/state-of-the-bible-research-2014 April 11, 2014 at 9:27 pm #283526Anonymous
GuestI think it’s unfair to lump the Bible altogether. Can we really put injuctions about menstrual cycles in the same category as the psalms? Are Ezekiel’s visions literal? Not in the same way as other things. Are the parables literal? Even in Genesis, we find curious contrasts – creation stories, next to oral history, along with probable historical figures. The NT includes Herod (x2), Augustus, and Pilate, all of whom were real according to other sources – so it’s matter of how. Paul’s letters and Revelation are completely different fish again, and to each other. If we take the Ten Commandments literally, it is quite different from taking the Flood literally. And so on
April 12, 2014 at 2:42 am #283527Anonymous
GuestI find value in the bible when I view it as mythology. I find value in the Lord of the Rings.
I find value in the Star Wars Saga.
etc etc
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
April 13, 2014 at 12:00 pm #283528Anonymous
GuestBoth of you make good points and I agree with both. Indeed, the Bible is partly a description of historical events and even much of the myth is based upon actual historical events. April 13, 2014 at 3:21 pm #283529Anonymous
GuestInterestingly, the Book of Mormon includes a statement that it was written for a time when people would begin to deny the Bible. I find quite a few “small” things in the BofM fascinating, no matter one’s view of its historicity.
April 14, 2014 at 10:18 am #283530Anonymous
GuestThe Bible is not a book, it’s a library. It has different authors, different genres, was written over a number of centuries, in at least three different languages. Not all of it even claims to be literal – Joseph’s dream was not, nor is the poetry, the parables, the visions etc. The parables of Jesus are true, but not literal.
I don’t think LOTR is comparable – that is the product of one mind, one culture, although Tolkien did write in other languages occasionally.
As for Star Wars, enjoyable, but verges on the twee… I mean Ewoks, camp robots and Jar Jar Binks?
April 14, 2014 at 5:28 pm #283531Anonymous
Guest“Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view” rings as true to me as any scripture, Cadence. For me, it is scripture. Scripture does not come from the canonized books or living prophets alone, it can come from anywhere. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.