Home Page Forums General Discussion Manna, Milk and Honey

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208819
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I will try to be brief as I am not into writing long essay’s on my opinions but this thought has been nagging me for several weeks now. It stems from the feeling of being lead or pointed in directions I don’t necessarily want to go. For example a few years ago I changed directions in particular life goal to accept a calling that was far too time consuming for me but too many catch phrases were used to compel my decision. The result four years later is now that goal is so distant that it would take me another couple years to ramp up again. (That was another thread). The point is I feel the church controls our decisions and therefore life’s’ direction. I have to say that’s OK if that’s what you want. For many, the institution is primarily made up of people who define membership as making the church and all its responsibilities the center of life. (I believe that is what keeps many people from “joining” but that is another thread also). If you “make sacrifices”, “be obedient” and become truly NOTW you will “have what you need.” Now this is where my agony is, were the people who followed Moses able to think for themselves or after years of slavery were they too dependent on someone else providing for them .ie unable, unwilling to think and act for themselves but as long as they followed directions, they were given what they needed to live. And that’s all. We know they got tired of the same thing every day even though it was life sustaining and they didn’t have to work for it. I may be a little off in my understanding of the period but my point is how close are we to that type of order? I guess I feel very close or I wouldn’t ask. I feel my ambitions are discouraged if they in any way conflict with church expectations which pretty common.

    #284985
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I was thinking about this just this morning. Whomever, can change the flow in church. Presidencies are created by the top, but in those presidencies come different opinions, they decide who to call to the various callings, with the ok from the bishop. They decide what kinds of activities will happen, whether service oriented or not. So whatever calling you have under someone, means you are ensnared in their ideas and goals, or someone in the presidency. It might be wonderful, but then again it might not, and just busy work. But I guess that’s how all of life is. I guess it’s up to us to figure out if we want to give up a part of our lives for it.

    #284986
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Kipper wrote:

    Now this is where my agony is, were the people who followed Moses able to think for themselves or after years of slavery were they too dependent on someone else providing for them .ie unable, unwilling to think and act for themselves but as long as they followed directions, they were given what they needed to live. And that’s all. We know they got tired of the same thing every day even though it was life sustaining and they didn’t have to work for it. I may be a little off in my understanding of the period but my point is how close are we to that type of order? I guess I feel very close or I wouldn’t ask. I feel my ambitions are discouraged if they in any way conflict with church expectations which pretty common.

    Of course, service is a great thing. But I liked what I read in the David O. McKay biography – that he was attempting to shift the rhetoric from “Let them obey,” to “Let them grow.”

    #284987
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Kipper wrote:

    For many, the institution is primarily made up of people who define membership as making the church and all its responsibilities the center of life.


    I agree, and it’s one thing I think can cause strife… yet, just as you said in the sentence that immediately preceded this statement:

    Kipper wrote:

    I have to say that’s OK if that’s what you want.

    In other words… yeah… so what? Let it be that way for those that are OK with it. There was a time in my life when I was OK with it, and happily so. The Gospel, the Church, the people, all brought me a tremendous amount of Joy. As I’ve said many times here, I was far happier then than now.

    Kipper wrote:

    The point is I feel the church controls our decisions and therefore life’s’ direction.


    What do you mean “our decisions”? I agree that the Church can and does exhibit this behavior, but since I live my own life, it doesn’t affect me in that way. The Church doesn’t control me, my decisions or my life’s direction. If you feel like it does, then ask yourself if “that’s what you want.” If it is, fine… roll with it. If it’s not, then simply don’t let the Church control you. And, yes, I do mean “simply”. We human beings have a tendency to complicate ourselves into compromising our most basic priorities.

    #284988
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Kipper, I appreciate your struggle with this. I have seen similar post from you in the past.

    At the end of the day a few things need to be established with authority figures in your/our/ peoples lives.

    Set boundaries, no one has the right to break them. Authority figures are just there to help us. If they are insisting or guilt tripping then they have overstepped there bounds. You can’t set boundaries unless you polity call them on overstepping there bounds that you have set. Your life is what you want to make it. It’s not up to others to decide what life means or is to you. Establishing that the authority figures in your life have no control over you but are there to help if you ask for it. If that isn’t true then boundaries need to be set and you have to set them with what is healthy for you. Never expect/wish or assume it will take place unless you yourself set them yourself. Wishful thinking won’t help you establish a healthy life interaction with people. No one is there to exhort control over you because basically, no one has that right no matter hat their title. It’s only when you believe that that isn’t true that emotional trauma will set in as you internalize that unhealthy thinking. Establishing healthy relationships with authority in your life is a challenge if you have no existence in doing so.

    But it needs to take place. Practice and patience and courtesy without allowing others to overstep their bounds. Wish you the best but you need to try and exhort yourself if you want healthy change to happen.

    #284989
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Forgotten_Charity wrote:

    Kipper, I appreciate your struggle with this. I have seen similar post from you in the past.

    At the end of the day a few things need to be established with authority figures in your/our/ peoples lives.

    Set boundaries, no one has the right to break them. Authority figures are just there to help us. If they are insisting or guilt tripping then they have overstepped there bounds. You can’t set boundaries unless you polity call them on overstepping there bounds that you have set. Your life is what you want to make it. It’s not up to others to decide what life means or is to you. Establishing that the authority figures in your life have no control over you but are there to help if you ask for it. If that isn’t true then boundaries need to be set and you have to set them with what is healthy for you. Never expect/wish or assume it will take place unless you yourself set them yourself. Wishful thinking won’t help you establish a healthy life interaction with people. No one is there to exhort control over you because basically, no one has that right no matter hat their title. It’s only when you believe that that isn’t true that emotional trauma will set in as you internalize that unhealthy thinking. Establishing healthy relationships with authority in your life is a challenge if you have no existence in doing so.

    But it needs to take place. Practice and patience and courtesy without allowing others to overstep their bounds. Wish you the best but you need to try and exhort yourself if you want healthy change to happen.

    OON and FC, I appreciate your directness in your responses to me. One thing I will have to come to terms with is my perception to the reaction when I do set my boundaries. Since I was born in the church and went thru Jr. Sunday School and Primary it must be acknowledged that I with other kids my age were indoctrinated in many things including to always obey and follow. That lead very nicely into my Deacon and Teacher age where devotion and sacrifice were hammered home. Not easy to change that type of conditioning by yourself at any age. (Curious to know if you were converts or did you have the same experience.) No church from the age of sixteen due to family separation until I found my way back in my 30’s. When I was made an HP last year (in my late 50’s) I was counseled that as a HP when I was asked to do something it was expected to get done. I was told that by my bishop … I took that as senior membership responsibility. I can appreciate the ideals and goals of the local leadership but they have too much emotional leverage. Ok so I need to set boundaries from this point and move on. In the meantime I need to get over or live with the simmering anxiety caused by my particular and specific goals being derailed and it’s very unlikely I’ll have the opportunity again. I’ve recently sought out counseling but it’s impossible for someone to understand the dynamics of the church unless they have had some contact or education. Talking to those who have left the church is usually non productive. Talking to people in the church usually results in all the canned answers…fast, pray, sacrifice your worldly desires, magnify your callings, it will all work out. The only place for neutral understanding and even advice is here among faceless and voiceless friends.

    #284990
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I understand the plight kipper. Not your particular experience but that experience from my own experience and watching others. It’s what led me to champion against indoctrination through teachings and education, so others know if and when it is being used and how to counteract it if they don’t chose it. Before I could progress to a healthy standing in the church or family I had to first undergo a few specialist to un-indoctrinate and to reestablish independently. What I found was that though I love to serve others, obedience is often quite useless as a motivator for me. I do not know if it is for you.

    Obedience for the sake of obedience without questioning and asking ourselves if it’s online with our goals as well and morals is probably one of the worst inventions in human history. What really is worth teaching is Co-operation. As a positive trait it is a order of a magnitude greater and healthier. So I rewrite or rearrange talks and and communication to me personally with that in mind. If they insist on obedience then really they insist on wanting no help. It takes 2 people working together, doing the best that they can each acknowledging each other’s needs. If it’s not happening like that then it is unholy ruling. Progression can only be achieved through Co-operation not through obedience. With that on mind it may help you or not to look at it in that light. And approach the relationship in that level. Sacrificing of self is occasionally required to accomplish things but only if it stems from the inside out and bot because it is suggested or asked from the outside-in(which is inappropriate). By moral virtue and justice sacrifice must be reciprocated, meaning both parities have to come to an arrangement that is mutually beneficial. If a relationship becomes one-sided(regardless of what type or who) them it isn’t a relationship and a toxic relation instead. That’s when boundaries or moving away from it becomes paramount to maintain health. No one has the right regardless of authority to ask for you to put yourself at risk of physical or financial or emotional harm. That’s abuse of authority. Sometimes we have to ask ourselves if we are doing this. Other times we must ask ourselves if others are doing it to ourselves or people we know. Establishing healthy relationships and limiting or outright getting rid of toxic ones is crucial if someone wants to progress. They cannot progress while they are being drained. To progress people need energy and positive thinking and self searching.

    Anyways, I just wanted to let you know that you are not alone. Others are there in the background not calling attention to themselves. It is wonderful to serve, but it must be in ones own time and place doing what they themselves love to do with their strengths. It has the opposite effect if it is conditioned or forced, or feared. It’s lovely only when it Initiates from the inside out without being asked or coerced. Giving of ones self willingly without undo sacrifice(or asked sacrifice) to self. But at the right time and place which is the persons own call. Then it is beautiful, then it works wonders. But setting those boundaries is up to each person. People have a habit if asking and intentionally or unintentionally using people if they don’t set boundaries and continue to do so until they are set. The other party really sets good healthy boundaries in their own. So it is up to each to make others aware when they have crossed them in a polite way and in what way they are harming them by doing so. If they still continue, then the relationship became toxic and are a acting selfishly. Weather for their own interest or someone else’s. Let them know you would like to continue to help them when they are willing to listen and be respectful of your needs as well(Co-operation).

    Quote:

    On the other hand, if you give yourself over completely to taking care of others while ignoring your need to be valued and cared for, your marriage will wear out like a broken machine. Too many marriages lose the love that makes the whole project work. Resentments build up over time, undermining the best of intentions.

    Take note, because resentment is poison to love.

    And, if one person “wins” all the time, love loses.

    you can apply that to church “marriage” or church “relationship” as well. It hold equally true.

    #284991
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thanks FC. I wanted to comment on snippets but the whole post was very helpful. I want to be obedient, I love to serve, and I want to progress. I’ve let all those things escape my control. Not going to be easy to change but I am more aware of what I need to do.

    #284992
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Forgotten_Charity wrote:

    Curious to know if you were converts or did you have the same experience.


    Born and raised. Junior Sunday School, primary, Deacons, etc.

    Kipper wrote:

    I want to be obedient, I love to serve, and I want to progress. I’ve let all those things escape my control. Not going to be easy to change but I am more aware of what I need to do.


    “my control” … exactly. Even obedience, service, progression… these are all up to each of us, not to anyone else. Obedience is the big one. If we think of obedience as “obedience to the Church” then we are in for troubled times. If we, instead, think of it as following a discipline that we have chosen for ourselves, then it can be a great source of strength and satisfaction. I don’t want in any way to minimize what you are saying, because I’ve felt it too, but it’s easier and better than you think. The Church is not a mediator between us and ‘God’ or ‘spirituality’. Think of it as an aid, not as the Way. I think when I started to do that, new lights started to go on. It can be an exciting time, and we will be there with you.

    #284993
    Anonymous
    Guest

    On Own Now wrote:

    Obedience is the big one. If we think of obedience as “obedience to the Church” then we are in for troubled times.


    I guess that’s where I’m at. I’ve always thought (have been told) what leaders ask of me is directly from God. This is a fact of Church life and I still hear it a lot. This quote or something like it cuts deep:”We are not a church of volunteers…we are a church of assignments…” This could be catalyst for my fallout.

    On Own Now wrote:

    The Church is not a mediator between us and ‘God’ or ‘spirituality’. Think of it as an aid, not as the Way. I think when I started to do that, new lights started to go on. It can be an exciting time, and we will be there with you.


    Support from somewhere is what I need along with advice because I don’t always have the right answers myself. I will definitely start looking for similar lights. I know life should not be this emotionally and consistently difficult.

    #284994
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints functions in large measure because of the unpaid volunteer ministry of its members. In fact, this lay ministry is one of the Church’s most defining characteristics. In thousands of local congregations or “wards” around the world, members voluntarily participate in “callings” or assignments that provide meaningful opportunities to serve one another. It is common for Church members to spend 5-10 hours a week serving in their callings. Some callings, such as a bishop, women’s Relief Society president, or stake president may require 15-30 hours per week.

    The lay leaders of a Latter-day Saint ward gather to discuss the welfare of the members of their congregation

    2011 Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved

    Callings in the Church are not sought after or campaigned for. Members are simply asked to be willing to accept assignments that come to them through Church leaders. These leaders seek inspiration through prayer about whom to call. Church members, for the most part, are willing to accept these callings.

    For example, a member may serve as the leader of several congregations totaling thousands of Church members for a period of time, and, after concluding that service, he may be asked to teach a youth Sunday school class for a few 15-year-olds in a local congregation. Service, in whatever capacity, is viewed as contributing to the well-being of fellow congregants and the broader community.

    Quote:

    Church Callings

    According to the Church’s official handbook of instructions, bishops and stake presidents should seek spiritual guidance and consider each member’s personal or family circumstances when determining who might serve in a particular calling.

    “Each calling should benefit the people who are served, the member, and the member’s family,” says the Church handbook. As Latter-day Saints participate in callings, they report feeling the joy that comes from serving others. They strongly believe in Christ’s statement that whosoever loses their life in service, “the same shall save it” (Luke 9:24).

    I do not see assignments anywhere there do you?

    http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/mormon-lay-ministry” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/article/mormon-lay-ministry

    I also see that they need to consider for the good of all involved. Not just church needs. It’s safe to say they are not acting according to the church public policy announcements the church has set forth.

    It’s really hard to make it more clear to all involved then that. It’s the requirement to consider the needs of all involved and if it is good for them and their families. Serving in a calling only later to find out it is hurting self or family is not inline ” Each calling should benefit the people who are served, the member, and the member’s family,”.

    Something to think about. I hope it helps.

    #284995
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It can suck when reality doesn’t match the ideal.

    #284996
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Kipper wrote:

    Think of it as an aid, not as the Way.

    This view probably helps me more than most others. Just as the Sabbath was made for man, and man was not made for the Sabbath, so I love to remind myself that the church was made for man and man was not made for the church. Unfortunately, we are more often taught that we are made to obey the church.

    Right now in my life, the church does not aid me. Maybe one day it will. I find my spirituality blossoming more without it. I just can’t shake the oppressive feeling I get just walking into church now. Taking the sacrament is probably one of the times that is truly personal for me. But the talks, the classes, the assignments…I just feel emotionally like I am in a room with no air flow. It is not worth it to me to pick through all of this to occasionally hear the inspirational talk. And I am not just talking about picking through boring or limited stuff. I am talking about having to endure shame-based ideas, conformity expectations, sexual rigidity, close-minded teachings about how to view other truths and religions, group-think, leader obedience, whitewashed primary teachings for my kids that I will have to keep undoing, etc. It’s not just about being patient while I participate in a group that has inspiration at times. It is about wading through harmful ideas in the name of doing service and seeking inspiration. The fact of the matter is, I can find opportunities for service and inspiration without the church and without the harmful ideas.

    And I fully recognize that it takes more motivation to be of service outside of church. It takes more effort to seek them out. But it is my goal and my desire to help the human race more. Frankly, so much of my service in the church was out of obedience and not because I was learning to have true charity. I trust God to show me how to be more charitable one step at a time, instead of beating myself up for not being as charitable as I should.

    #284997
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Forgotten_Charity wrote:

    Something to think about. I hope it helps.

    Yes it helps. It all helps. Thanks.

    #284998
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Old-Timer wrote:

    It can suck when reality doesn’t match the ideal.

    Agreed. Well intentioned good people, narrow views.

    Also, good summary thalmar.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.