Home Page Forums General Discussion A believing perspective on women moving forward

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #208921
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I found this quite interesting. To be totally upfront, I got the link from our stake public affairs person (who also happens to be a member of the high council) who received it from the the area public affairs office. That gives it some more cred on the believing side of things. Agree with Kate Kelly and Ordain Women or not, I think this blog post gives a reasonable glimpse into how more believing (although in this case clearly an feminine advocate) members see the issues. As always, you can take it for whatever value you get from it.

    http://www.neylanmcbaine.com/2014/06/how-the-conversation-about-women-can-go-on.html” class=”bbcode_url”>http://www.neylanmcbaine.com/2014/06/how-the-conversation-about-women-can-go-on.html

    #286512
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I thought about posting Neylan’s piece here last night, but ran out of time. I agree it’s good to read different perspectives and try to understand and value them.

    #286513
    Anonymous
    Guest

    They have good points. The article prompted me to check out the first discussion. Yeah.

    1) They mention that they believe that OW wasn’t the sole impetus behind all the recent changes we’ve seen. I agree that it wasn’t the only driving factor but I think it was probably the primary driving factor.

    2) I felt the article was a little light in the suggestions on how to further the discussion department. It was essentially “be less confrontational.” If one side wields all the power it can be hard to get a dialogue going without being confrontational. Then there’s the perception angle, to some people any discussion at all on a taboo subject will be seen as confrontational regardless of the spirit in which it is delivered.

    To borrow a bit from the show that supplied me with my avatar:

    Quote:


    Fnog: No girl has the will of a warrior. You have the will of a housewife or, at best, the schoolmarm.

    Leela: That’s it. I’ll take you on right now.

    Fnog: Very well. But, you see, I have the will of the warrior. Therefore, the battle is already over. The winner? Me! [He laughs.] Rematch? You lose again! Had enough? I thought so!

    That’s probably how some people in the OW movement feel. Go the prescribed route of bringing up your concerns up with the bishop, your concerns are dismissed, then what do you do?

    Edit: And I see handily dismissing someone’s concerns, essentially cutting a dialogue short, to be a confrontational act. Both sides could use some practice at being non-confrontational.

    #286514
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I wasn’t a fan of Neylan’s piece. It feels to me like she is unnecessarily distancing herself from the OW crowd. I say unnecessarily because nobody ever thought she was part of them anyway. And let’s not forget that Kate Kelly IS a believer. She has never even experienced a faith crisis – well, until now that is.

    #286515
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Mom3, I don’t think McBaine wants to push any buttons – in one sense if Kelly and OW didn’t push buttons Kelly wouldn’t be where she is (facing discipline). I get your point (and frustration) that the current processes are slow and apparently not very productive and OW probably did speed things up by their tactics – but at what cost? If the cost is shutting down any dialogue out of fear or excessive dogmatism, then women are losing.

    #286516
    Anonymous
    Guest

    hawkgrrrl wrote:

    I wasn’t a fan of Neylan’s piece. It feels to me like she is unnecessarily distancing herself from the OW crowd. I say unnecessarily because nobody ever thought she was part of them anyway. And let’s not forget that Kate Kelly IS a believer. She has never even experienced a faith crisis – well, until now that is.

    Good point about Kelly being a believer. I was touched by her testimony in the Trib Talks interview. I do not question that she believes. Is there a reason for your “until now” addendum? Am I missing something?

    Also, just to point out, I’m not sure it was the discussion idea that got Kelly where she is. She was already on probation, it was just a matter of time. While I don’t think the discussions have helped the situation and probably did fuel the fire, I think the protests during conference are really what did her in.

    #286511
    Anonymous
    Guest

    nibbler wrote:

    And I see handily dismissing someone’s concerns, essentially cutting a dialogue short, to be a confrontational act. Both sides could use some practice at being non-confrontational.

    I agree.

    I don’t agree with OW’s tactics, but I am so far convinced of Kate Kelly’s faith and sincerity. My conversation this last weekend with someone who called KK an attention whore really broke my heart. As did the front end of sacrament meeting when the bishop called up several kids. He essentially congratulated the girls on having a birthday and explained to all assembled that the boys had been interviewed, found worthy and needed the hand-raised sustaining of his congregation to move forward in his duties. I haven’t been like some of the (mostly way younger than I) fMh posters who seem a little overwrought about the poor girls who don’t get the priesthood and how it wounds them for life. But if someone like me, a middle-aged, mild-mannered follower is waking up and saying, “The status quo? It’s not right,” I think the church needs to think about picking up the pace of change. My two cents. How I would love to see some girls helping with the sacrament.

    #286517
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    “Is there a reason for your “until now” addendum? Am I missing something?”

    She hasn’t expressed anything resembling a faith crisis, but being character-assassinated by church leadership would certainly be grounds for cognitive dissonance, no?

    #286518
    Anonymous
    Guest

    hawkgrrrl wrote:

    Quote:

    “Is there a reason for your “until now” addendum? Am I missing something?”

    She hasn’t expressed anything resembling a faith crisis, but being character-assassinated by church leadership would certainly be grounds for cognitive dissonance, no?

    Yes, definitely, and you and I both know people here who have experienced that. I just wasn’t sure if I had missed something else.

    #286519
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Dark Jedi – I am sure everyone is confused by your reply to my now non-existent comment.

    For everyone’s confusion. I deleted my comment. I didn’t like how I worded it. I did have a post.

    I don’t know how to explain what I observe with Neylan’s piece. From the history I have seen between Neylan and Kate Kelly – I see a girl fight here. It’s intense, it’s personal and it is leading to a halt in discussion. Both women have been bold in their statements, not just about their causes, but about each other. In their passions they have attracted supporters – and I sense this too adds to “issues” at hand. If I was the Mom watching this battle between two of my daughters, who both begin their response with words that tip the other person – I would be heartbroken. And as a women and spectator I am heartbroken.

    I think with each new development on this road, I find my self turning my back on all conversations surrounding women’s roles – and I know in my mind that isn’t the right response. But I don’t feel like I want to belong to either team.

    #286520
    Anonymous
    Guest

    This article makes me sad. I feel KK has thrown herself on the spear for all of us. No, she did not let us have a vote, that is true. But I really don’t believe many of the changes we are seeing would have been so quick in coming without OW’s actions. It’s sad it had to get to this. When you study the history of RS, it has been stripped down and down over the years, to where it just does not compare to the earlier organization. I yearn for the RS lessons to be turned back over the RS General Presidency and board. Women used to teach each other how to live the gospel in real life in RS. For converts, that is vital. Now it’s all about men’s voices and no real relation to the challenges sisters are facing in real life, especially our new convert sisters.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.