Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Doing what has been done on other worlds & Reincarnation
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 26, 2015 at 2:02 pm #209597
Anonymous
GuestSo last night as I was musing about the existence of God, which I do on a daily basis and have yet come to any conclusion, a thought popped in – what if JS, through his theology, was attempting to convey a cycle to us? (and I have not fleshed this out at all, so I realize this is only crazy Sunbelt’s ramblings from his very un-intelligent mind). Or in other words, JS seems to have arrived at a point in his theology where he believed that we as humans are eternal beings, have always been, and that we will always be. That God has done what we are doing. What if the idea that JS was attempting to explain, as convoluted as it came to him, is that our mortal experience is cyclical. That we choose a mortal experience, we then progress in further understanding throughout eons, reach enlightenment, and then after eons of enlightenment and world building, we get bored and beg for a mortal experience again and begin the cycle anew. Essentially reincarnation mormon style.
That sounded kind of fun to me, and something I thought I would throw out there and let you poke some holes in it.
-SBREd
February 26, 2015 at 2:51 pm #295975Anonymous
GuestI don’t think it’s so far fetched. I have pondered before on Joseph’s description of eternity as “one eternal round” and comparing it to a ring. I think the theology that we always have and always will exist is pretty clear. If science is right (and I think in this case it is), all matter that will ever exist already exists. I believe that can extend to that which is spiritual as well. And aren’t the ideas about “enlightenment” and “Nirvana” pretty equal to LDS theology about godhood? Deep stuff, fun to think about sometimes.
February 26, 2015 at 4:02 pm #295976Anonymous
GuestOur theology is WAY closer to Eastern ideas (Buddhism, particularly) than to mainstream Christian theology, in multiple ways. I love thinking about apostasy in terms of overarching theology more than structure, organization, authority, etc. Your questions are some of my favorite. The key is being able to look at things non-literally – and many people just can’t do that.
I’m not saying the literal is wrong or bad. I don’t know, ultimately, one way or another. I’m saying non-literal works better for me, especially in this kind of area.
February 26, 2015 at 4:52 pm #295977Anonymous
GuestThanks for sharing. The one that runs around inside my head from time to time, borrowing heavily on Mormon theology:
In the BoM people derive benefit from the atonement even before Christ was born. They speak of the event as if it were a done deal, something so sure it’s as if it already happened. Time comes out in the wash. People still looked forward to the event but still derived benefits from faith that the event would occur.
Now transfer that over to our theology of becoming kings and queens. Now people are only anointed to become such but time is immaterial. People might be able to derive benefits from a future event that hasn’t happened yet and a faith in that event can be so strong that we could even come to rely on those things as if it has already happened.
If the fate of humanity is to become god and god is the same today, yesterday, and forever we essentially already are gods.
Of course these days my definition of god is totally different. Maybe god is mortal. Maybe god isn’t omniscient or omnipotent. Maybe god is just some poor schlub that’s self aware but doesn’t quite know what to do about it.
February 26, 2015 at 5:07 pm #295978Anonymous
GuestI’d say the idea of reincarnation would take care of some problems. For example, the severely handicapped child that doesn’t need baptism, or will never marry, or will never experience being a parent. Or the child born in the jungles of the amazon and never hear of Christ and never experience living on earth with that view or all the blessings that we are promised when we covenant with God. Or the people abused or killed by the agency of others, depriving them of their intended experiences in life. We have tried to put a band aid on some of these situations in life, and say that temple work provides the opportunity for all to be set right, or that the millennium will be the time for some children to be raised on earth.
But to me, those don’t fully work as explanations. More often, it comes down to people saying we just don’t know, and god will set it right.
But if there is so much emphasis on the need for experience in this life, but we all just get only one shot at it, and there is so much injustice in this life…well…that could all just be corrected by having other chances to experience mortality. If we live for eternity…why only have one little tiny blip of a chance for mortality and that determines the rest of our existence??
I’m open to that idea of multiple chances on multiple planets. Let those in the CK that have figured some things out be gods to let those in TKs keep working on it until they figure things out or get their experiences, and even the 1/3 that lost their 1st estate keep getting chances as we work for the immortality and eternal life of man.
But it isn’t mormonism as we know it now.
February 26, 2015 at 5:19 pm #295979Anonymous
GuestThis one used to seem so simple when orthodoxy was comfortable for me. As I’ve grown, I find it more troubling. I believe in an afterlife. Beyond that I have chosen to let it go. I can’t find any ideals that answer all the questions I now have. So when my brain gets going, I honestly do “Turn it off” and “Let tomorrow take care of itself.” February 26, 2015 at 5:40 pm #295980Anonymous
GuestHeber13 wrote:I’d say the idea of reincarnation would take care of some problems.
Might drastically cut down how much work for the dead that needs to happen. We just need to have one of the lives of every entity to either get their work done themselves or via proxy.
It also would parallel lessons in the church – the same 70 lessons over and over your entire lifetime.
February 26, 2015 at 5:56 pm #295981Anonymous
Guest70 lessons? That did it, I’m coming to your ward to hear some fresh material. :angel: February 26, 2015 at 6:20 pm #295982Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:70 lessons? That did it, I’m coming to your ward to hear some fresh material.
:angel:
I just remember hearing that when correlation was started they ended up with 70 index cards with 1 topic per page. As you can tell, I have not paid close attention at church all the time. Plus my last calling that I had for years kept me out of 2nd and 3rd hour blocks. I do miss that and I do attend most weeks. I will skip out if there are things like having a chat with a recent RM that I know had a hard mission wants to talk or someone I really need to coordinate with. But part of me actually wants to engage in class to both show I am “in” and at the same time nudge some boundaries or have people actually think at church.February 26, 2015 at 6:23 pm #295983Anonymous
GuestLookingHard wrote:the same 70 lessons over and over your entire lifetime.
Haha…good point…if we learn by repetition…why is reincarnation not in our doctrine?February 26, 2015 at 6:29 pm #295984Anonymous
GuestThat’s always been the hardest sell for me with respect to reincarnation. If you can’t retain any knowledge and experience what’s the point? Of course the same could be said of the preexistence/veil. SunbeltRed wrote:…we get bored and beg for a mortal experience again and begin the cycle anew…
That’s a good point. It would be pretty lame to be bored for eternity. Reset button to the rescue.
February 26, 2015 at 7:39 pm #295985Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:That’s always been the hardest sell for me with respect to reincarnation. If you can’t retain any knowledge and experience what’s the point? Of course the same could be said of the preexistence/veil.
SunbeltRed wrote:…we get bored and beg for a mortal experience again and begin the cycle anew…
That’s a good point. It would be pretty lame to be bored for eternity. Reset button to the rescue.
Makes me think of one of my good friends favorite saying, “The problem is they don’t have 10 years experience in their field, they have 10 years of making the same mistakes over and over and not learning from them.”February 26, 2015 at 7:41 pm #295986Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:That’s always been the hardest sell for me with respect to reincarnation. If you can’t retain any knowledge and experience what’s the point? Of course the same could be said of the preexistence/veil.
SunbeltRed wrote:…we get bored and beg for a mortal experience again and begin the cycle anew…
That’s a good point. It would be pretty lame to be bored for eternity. Reset button to the rescue.
Yeah, I think doing anything for eternity would get pretty boring and at some point we might wish to not exist anymore. Reincarnation to the rescue!
nibbler wrote:If the fate of humanity is to become god and god is the same today, yesterday, and forever we essentially already are gods.
Of course these days my definition of god is totally different. Maybe god is mortal. Maybe god isn’t omniscient or omnipotent. Maybe god is just some poor schlub that’s self aware but doesn’t quite know what to do about it.

I think that is what I was trying to get at, the idea that we are already Gods, and if we are what does that say about Gods in general (to the point of being a self-aware schlub
)?
John Dehlin posted a poem on FB by Carol Lynn Pearson this week which I really liked:
WITHIN
I read a map once
Saying the kingdom of God
Was within me
But I never trusted
Such unlikely ground.
I went out.
I scoured schools
And libraries
And chapels and temples
And other people’s eyes
And the skies and rocks,
And I found treasures
From the kingdom’s treasury
But not the kingdom.
Finally I came in quiet
For a rest
And turned on the light.
And there
Just like a surprise party
Was all the smiling royalty,
King, Queen, court.
People have been
Locked up for less, I know.
But I tell you
Something marvelous
Is bordered by this skin:
I am a castle
And the kingdom of God
Is within
February 27, 2015 at 12:47 am #295987Anonymous
GuestThere are at least two stories in the Gospels that show a belief in a pre-mortal existence and/or reincarnation: the story of the man born blind who was healed by Jesus and the answers to the question of whom others said Jesus was. Quote:1) The disciples asked who had sinned to cause the man to be born blind – the parent(s) or the man himself.
Think about it: If the man sinning had caused him to be BORN blind, that sin must have happened prior to his birth.
Jesus didn’t correct or condemn the question; he merely answered it differently than expected by say nobody had sinned to cause the blindness.
Quote:2) Jesus asked his disciples whom people said that he, Jesus, was.
Their answers included past prophets, including John, the Baptist (who had been killed shortly before that conversation).
Again, Jesus didn’t correct or condemn or dismiss the general framework of those answers; instead, he acknowledged them and asked Peter, “Whom do you say that I am?”
Finally, I have said this in at least one other thread in our archives about reincarnation, but the stages of development within Mormon theology (intelligence, spirit, mortal human, spirit, resurrected being – at the least) are evolutionary (since each is a different “substance” or “creation” or “adaptation” in some way) and could be seen as reincarnations.
February 27, 2015 at 4:25 pm #295988Anonymous
GuestDarkJedi wrote:I don’t think it’s so far fetched. I have pondered before on Joseph’s description of eternity as “one eternal round” and comparing it to a ring. I think the theology that we always have and always will exist is pretty clear. If science is right (and I think in this case it is), all matter that will ever exist already exists. I believe that can extend to that which is spiritual as well. And aren’t the ideas about “enlightenment” and “Nirvana” pretty equal to LDS theology about godhood?
Because nirvana is when a being ceases to exist in the conventional sense. We use that word as a synonym of Heaven in English (or grunge
) but it doesn’t mean that at all.
According to some Indian doctrines, we may have as many as 180,000 incarnations, maybe more, so I suspect actually getting away from this is understandable in that worldview.
Becoming a god is more akin to Buddhist ideas about bodhisattvas. Gods – both asuras and devas – in Buddhism are part of the wheel of life, and therefore trapped within existence until they reach Nirvana. (The monster you see wrapped around this wheel represents suffering (samsara) and pain (dukkha), which are associated with existence.)

[img]http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/boe/img/fig060.jpg [/img] -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.