Home Page Forums Support David Bednar’s Families vs. Chieko Okazaki’s familes

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #210158
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Last night I was reading Sanctuary by Chieko Okazaki and I ran across these lines. Enjoy.

    Quote:

    President Thomas S. Monson stressed this spiritual aspect of sanctuary when he described happy homes. “Happy homes come in a variety of appearances. Some feature large families with father, mother, brothers and sisters living together in a spirit of love. Others consist of a single parent with one or two children, while other homes have but one occupant.” He described a motto that his aunt used, “Choose your love; love your choice”

    Quote:

    “Home” and “family”, according to Elder L. Tom Perry, “must be interpreted to encompass the lives of the single Latter Day Saint, single LDS parents and their children, and married Saints who have no children.”

    Now from Chieko herself

    Quote:

    The important point is that there is not only one right way to create a home or to be a family Therefore there is not just one right way to make a sanctuary out of your home. Think about your home, the people who live there, and the activities that occur. Is there love? Is there holiness? Is there the happiness that betokens the Spirit of the Lord?

    Quote:

    Sometimes we think that we have to be sitting quietly in a meeting or engaged in prayer to feel the Spirit, and that reverence is the same thing is immobility. Not a bit of it! Look for signs of love and happiness as well as reverence and peace, and you’ll find the Spirit of Lord in them as well

    I know this isn’t a direct rebuttal to MGF’s but it seems much more happy, healthy and hopeful to me.

    #303982
    Anonymous
    Guest

    mom3 wrote:


    Last night I was reading Sanctuary by Chieko Okazaki and I ran across these lines. Enjoy.

    Quote:

    President Thomas S. Monson stressed this spiritual aspect of sanctuary when he described happy homes. “Happy homes come in a variety of appearances. Some feature large families with father, mother, brothers and sisters living together in a spirit of love. Others consist of a single parent with one or two children, while other homes have but one occupant.” He described a motto that his aunt used, “Choose your love; love your choice”

    Quote:

    “Home” and “family”, according to Elder L. Tom Perry, “must be interpreted to encompass the lives of the single Latter Day Saint, single LDS parents and their children, and married Saints who have no children.”

    Now from Chieko herself

    Quote:

    The important point is that there is not only one right way to create a home or to be a family Therefore there is not just one right way to make a sanctuary out of your home. Think about your home, the people who live there, and the activities that occur. Is there love? Is there holiness? Is there the happiness that betokens the Spirit of the Lord?

    Quote:

    Sometimes we think that we have to be sitting quietly in a meeting or engaged in prayer to feel the Spirit, and that reverence is the same thing is immobility. Not a bit of it! Look for signs of love and happiness as well as reverence and peace, and you’ll find the Spirit of Lord in them as well

    I know this isn’t a direct rebuttal to MGF’s but it seems much more happy, healthy and hopeful to me.

    I don’t know what MGF stands for….

    But I like the latter quotes better. They don’t focus on the composition of the family at all — they get to the heart of it. To the feelings that abide in a home. It removes family composition entirely and gets to the outcome.

    #303983
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Those are great quotes – and Sister Okazaki is one of my favorite church authorities.

    Everyone, if you haven’t read all of her books, start reading them. Seriously. It might be the best use of time you ever will do.

    #303984
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Wow – Nice quotes I posted. 😆

    Seriously – thanks for finding these.

    I can’t for the life of me figure out MGF’s. I have searched Bednar talks from that time but can’t make a match. I still concur with Chieko’s vision.

    #303985
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SilentDawning wrote:

    I don’t know what MGF stands for….

    MGF=Multi Generational Family. Bednar used it as part of a presentation in which he postulated that young people leaving the church was the result of poor gospel teaching in the home and that those with close ties to their grandparents, etc., were less likely to leave. It was part of the Sabbath training stuff. FWIW I beg to differ with him, especially on the first part.

    #303986
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DarkJedi wrote:


    SilentDawning wrote:

    I don’t know what MGF stands for….

    MGF=Multi Generational Family. Bednar used it as part of a presentation in which he postulated that young people leaving the church was the result of poor gospel teaching in the home and that those with close ties to their grandparents, etc., were less likely to leave. It was part of the Sabbath training stuff. FWIW I beg to differ with him, especially on the first part.

    All I’ve got is anecdotal evidence, but I have a friend, and ex-Bishop of 10 years who has to inactive sons. He followed the book in his home. His sons want nothing to do with the church. On the other hand, I was light on gospel teaching at home, and strong on supporting my kids in what they wanted to do, while encouraging church participation. And I have one firmly active adult child and another one who is on the fence, but active, I guess at 14.

    The church is quick to blame individuals for any failings, and slow to look internally for its own problems.

    #303987
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I also only have anecdotal evidence SD, but it is similar to yours. I see families who were all in and who I know did all the gospel teaching they could with now inactive kids. It’s not all as black and white as it looks to Bednar.

    I didn’t mention that part of his thing was also the ordinances. It is a break in the ordinances (failure to be ordained an elder or marry in the temple, for example) that breaks MGFs. We all have to be connected through the temple and the only way for that to happen is if all of our children are endowed, sealed, etc., and then teach their children the same and they are endowed, sealed, etc. The break is the ordinances, the cause is poor gospel teaching by parents.

    I remember hearing the presentation and feeling really bad for those who I knew had tried their best being called failures.

    Their were a couple talks this past GC that Bednar could take to heart.

    #303988
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SilentDawning wrote:


    I don’t know what MGF stands for….

    I admit it, I immediately went to google to look it up, figuring I was missing something. I’ve got it narrowed down to something in Chinese food or something used in space telescopes.

    jk, I see the multi-generational families definition later in the thread.

    When it comes to defining families I like the option were a person gets to define a family rather than have a family defined for them. I don’t think there’s such a thing as a “typical” family anymore. Everyone’s family is going to be a little different. Rather than get hung up on what does and doesn’t make up a family maybe the focus should be exactly what was quoted: “Choose your love; love your choice.”

    I’m also missing something. Where does Elder Bednar fit in? His name is in the thread title but the quotes are from Chieko quoting others or from Chieko. Was it his recent GC address? I admit, I’ve forgotten his talk in its entirety, even though I listened to it. 😳

    #303989
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I got it last night while I was asleep. Elder Bednar gave a fireside and stressed this Multi Generational Family structure. I believe it was a YSA conference. Later the same statement was used (at least in my ward) during the keep the Sabbath Day Holy video push. Like SD and DJ – I knew then and know now plenty of non MGF families.

    Why I didn’t run comparative quotes is beyond me. It would have been nice to have the contrast.

    #303990
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Bednar’s Sabbath training video is here: https://www.lds.org/broadcasts/watch/general-conference-leadership-training/2015/04?lang=eng&vid=4775945487001” class=”bbcode_url”>https://www.lds.org/broadcasts/watch/general-conference-leadership-training/2015/04?lang=eng&vid=4775945487001

    It’s not all bad but it’s not all good either. This is where I first came across the MGF idea. It’s less than five minutes long. The zinger about weak gospel teaching in the home is at the end.

    #303991
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Weak gospel teaching in the homes is a direct result of home teaching not being done, which is a result of Priesthood leaders like bishops not teaching the ward members correctly.

    Of course, that is a reflection on the training they get from the Brethren.

    In short, it’s Bednar’s fault the youth are leaving.

    Why can’t we have women like Chieko in charge?

    #303992
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I know this is offensive to some, but I truly dread the day when Bednar becomes president.

    #303993
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Nice Jedi hand trick DJ.

    Heber, if my recollection is correct, that was my point. More Chieko less David.

    DJ. – I hear you. My list though is a bit longer, but he is on it. In my heart I want to believe they think they are helping. However, I remember watching the faces of parents who didn’t have the MGF’s just melt when the video was played.

    #303994
    Anonymous
    Guest

    A convert told me that he was told that “he would not truly understand what the church means unless he grows up in the church.”

    I believe what this well intentioned person meant to say is that there is much of our church that is a heritage church. Venerating our pioneer ancestors. being sealed together along with great great grandpappy. No empty chairs in the family type stuff.

    There are parts of the church experience that are promoted as the ideal and yet they are unreachable for people on the margins. Converts, part member families, non traditional families, etc.

    #303995
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Heber13 wrote:


    Why can’t we have women like Chieko in charge?


    Answer: Patriarchy

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 29 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.