Home Page Forums General Discussion Disputed poll shows LDS support for continuing revelation

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #210405
    Anonymous
    Guest

    This article was published a couple days ago in the Deseret News:

    http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865643813/Disputed-poll-shows-LDS-support-for-continuing-revelation.html?pg=all

    Although from a previous study, 90 percent of Mormons said they don’t believe that women should be ordained to the priesthood, this new study asked the question “If the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles were to receive a revelation allowing women to hold the priesthood, I would be…” More than 77 percent said that under that condition, they would support or strongly support female ordination.

    To me, I don’t think it matters what the question is. If the FP & Q12 received a revelation on anything, at least 77% would go along with it. I agree with this assessment:

    Quote:

    It’s no surprise, Skaggs said. All it shows is that Mormons would follow the faith’s prophet. In fact, the survey’s authors wrote that it is notable that “more devout Mormons were more opposed to the first ordination question, but also reported that they would be more supportive of a revelation from the leaders allowing women to be ordained than less devout Mormons.”

    For Skaggs, that proves Mormons would support the prophet and apostles if they received a revelation, but it says little about members’ feelings on ordination.

    #307082
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I would agree with that because I think that the definition of a prophet is behind why mormons think that way.

    Some will use that statistic to paint mormons as mindless drones.

    That’s a hateful judgment. And Immature, IMO.

    There are many intelligent and independent thinkers that have faith the prophet speaks for the Lord. That is more important than the issue being polled.

    I also believe that there are limits that reasonable mormons will go with that support of revelation. They will not blindly follow to the N-th degree.

    Continuing revelation is an important part of the faith. It should not be surprising Mormons are faithful to the prophet. Hypothetical extreme scenarios aside, it mostly works for most mormons.

    #307083
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I found it interesting that of the several women that I spoke to on this issue, they invariably said that they personally did not want the priesthood (even though they had no animosity to those that do). For a woman to say that they do not want to the priesthood is like saying that they personally are not power usurping egomaniacs. If a man were to say in seriousness that he likewise does not want the priesthood it would be like saying that he is a lazy shirker.

    I like to imagine interchanging the word priesthood for other things. What if these same women were saying that they personally do not want motherhood (or exaltation) even though they had no animosity towards those that do?

    #307084
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think it is different than motherhood, but I do think it is easy to say you are fine without the priesthood when you know you can’t have it. I wonder if the prophet said “all worthy people can have the priesthood” if those same women would pass on it.

    #307085
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:

    I found it interesting that of the several women that I spoke to on this issue, they invariably said that they personally did not want the priesthood (even though they had no animosity to those that do). For a woman to say that they do not want to the priesthood is like saying that they personally are not power usurping egomaniacs. If a man were to say in seriousness that he likewise does not want the priesthood it would be like saying that he is a lazy shirker.

    I like to imagine interchanging the word priesthood for other things. What if these same women were saying that they personally do not want motherhood (or exaltation) even though they had no animosity towards those that do?

    I would say, “that sounds like a cool group of girls. What ward are they in?” My question is does wanting the priesthood make a man a “power usurping egomaniac” too? It seems like there is a sense of goodness when a man wants the priesthood. I don’t think many members commit to the priesthood with the idea that they are going to be able to dominate women and wield the arm of their influence over their dominion. It’s really not about power. It is about service, work, and the love of God. It’s about responsibility and duty and an avenue to live one’s core values. Or is it? What exactly is the priesthood?

    LDS.ORG wrote:

    What is the priesthood?

    The priesthood is the eternal power and authority of our Heavenly Father. Through the priesthood, God created and governs the heavens and earth. Through this power He redeems and exalts His children. He gives worthy priesthood holders authority to administer ordinances of salvation. All of Heavenly Father’s children can qualify to receive these ordinances and access the power and blessings of the priesthood.

    Does this answer that question? The priesthood is power and authority. God uses the priesthood to save His children. What are ordinances and why are they necessary for salvation? And what is salvation anyway? It sounds like a sales pitch.

    LDS.ORG wrote:

    As used in Romans 10:9-10, the words “saved” and “salvation” signify a covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. Through this covenant relationship, followers of Christ are assured salvation from the eternal consequences of sin if they are obedient.

    So salvation means a covenant with Jesus Christ where I am promised more salvation? What is sin and what are the consequences of sin?

    #307086
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Heber13 wrote:

    I think it is different than motherhood, but I do think it is easy to say you are fine without the priesthood when you know you can’t have it. I wonder if the prophet said “all worthy people can have the priesthood” if those same women would pass on it.

    It is like motherhood in the sense that men can never be mothers, so we might as well just accept it. It sounds like some of those same women would pass on it and some wouldn’t, but they wouldn’t have an animosity toward you either way.

    #307087
    Anonymous
    Guest

    When I read the piece I thought of Hawkgrrl, she’s being saying for ages that the wording of “Do the women want Priesthood?” makes a big difference. To me this little blurb supports her point. If it came from revelation most would go along. Yeah there would be some adjustments, but in the end it would smooth out.

    To me the best move would be for women to be aligned as we interpret Joseph Smith’s words. Not just giving women the priesthood, but setting up two distinct functioning units. Both of them work egalitarian-ly, but like the endowment session ladies are on one side, men on the other. There would be Presiding officers from both sides with distinct functions, and peoples reproductive abilities would not be considered.

    But again, Salt Lake never calls.

    #307088
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Priesthood is about power structure and politics within the church.

    God doesn’t care if I am ordained or not. I am His child, I can pray for His intervention. God hears his children. Having the priesthood would change nothing about that relationship.

    I cannot imagine God withholding blessings due to someone’s “lack of credentials”.

    Imagine God saying, “Let that one child die, their prayer was said by someone without proper authority”.

    Nope. It doesn’t work that way.

    What difference does a priesthood blessing make? IMO, it formalizes a prayer. By needing a second priesthood holder, it gets extended family or the ward community involved. It is a formal admission of need to the larger community.

    Can God work miracles through a priesthood blessing? Yes. Can he do the same through a mother’s prayer? Yes.

    When I hug my daughter and say a prayer for her safety, is it any different than if I held her hands? Would it be different if I put my hands on her shoulders? Her sides? On her head? Would having been ordained change the power of the prayer? I don’t think so.

    Not giving women the priesthood has culturally made them feel less powerful and less able. It has nothing to do with reality. Our individual relationships with God are as strong as we decide to make them. Our power from God is as strong as we allow it to be.

    Ordination is church power structure. It has little to do with a relationship with God. I like to think that church leaders have worked on both — church power and a powerful relationship with God. There are times when I wonder.

    Now a tangent —

    Something that struck me as funny, I was watching a video of John Dehlin interviewing someone. There was a panel of couples set up to ask questions. These were all couples who has either left the church, or were in full FC. Every question from each couple was asked by the man. Each couple may have religiously left the church, but culturally, they were still entrenched. It was weirdly funny to see people discussing issues they had with the church while acting in very LDS cultural ways.

    #307089
    Anonymous
    Guest

    amateurparent wrote:

    Priesthood is about power structure and politics within the church.

    God doesn’t care if I am ordained or not. I am His child, I can pray for His intervention. God hears his children. Having the priesthood would change nothing about that relationship.

    I cannot imagine God withholding blessings due to someone’s “lack of credentials”.

    Imagine God saying, “Let that one child die, their prayer was said by someone without proper authority”.

    Nope. It doesn’t work that way.

    What difference does a priesthood blessing make? IMO, it formalizes a prayer. By needing a second priesthood holder, it gets extended family or the ward community involved. It is a formal admission of need to the larger community.

    Can God work miracles through a priesthood blessing? Yes. Can he do the same through a mother’s prayer? Yes.

    When I hug my daughter and say a prayer for her safety, is it any different than if I held her hands? Would it be different if I put my hands on her shoulders? Her sides? On her head? Would having been ordained change the power of the prayer? I don’t think so.

    Not giving women the priesthood has culturally made them feel less powerful and less able. It has nothing to do with reality. Our individual relationships with God are as strong as we decide to make them. Our power from God is as strong as we allow it to be.

    Ordination is church power structure. It has little to do with a relationship with God. I like to think that church leaders have worked on both — church power and a powerful relationship with God. There are times when I wonder.

    Well said, AP, and I feel the same. There isn’t much, if any, “Godly authority” in the priesthood IMO, it’s mostly about stuff that only matters to some of us. The gospel is about our individual relationships with God.

    Quote:

    Now a tangent —

    Something that struck me as funny, I was watching a video of John Dehlin interviewing someone. There was a panel of couples set up to ask questions. These were all couples who has either left the church, or were in full FC. Every question from each couple was asked by the man. Each couple may have religiously left the church, but culturally, they were still entrenched. It was weirdly funny to see people discussing issues they had with the church while acting in very LDS cultural ways.

    That is interesting and sad. There are some new training videos out relating to the Sabbath observance stuff. (My SP said this isn’t going away, it’s not a flash in the pan.) He showed us some in a recent training and some of the videos are set up as representative of a council. These mock councils include Apostles, Seventies, and women general leaders. In one of them we watched the leader of the group asked a question and the first commentor was a woman. President stopped the video and asked us if we saw what just happened – a woman sitting in the midst of three apostles and some other GAs was the first to speak. He said if she could do that in the presence of the apostles, no woman in that room should be afraid to do so in the meeting we were in or any other local meeting. :thumbup: (He has told us in the past in stake council that none of the high councilors should speak before the women in the room have had an opportunity to weigh in, no matter the subject.)

    #307090
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Why are women criticized for wanting something that is traditionally male? It’s all just stupid stupid gender dynamics. Outdated binaries. Go back 30 years and the same would have been said for working women. It’s just dumb. But it is also in Mormonism tied up with the idea that we shouldn’t seek honors. Frankly, I dislike the idea of being in the priesthood because it seems like an organization that is hierarchical with a lot of “yes man” requirements. I wouldn’t work for a company like that, so why would I want to work in a church like that? But it’s probably that way because it has no women in it, so including women could influence it to be more of a true committee-based body. That can also be done with or without the priesthood, but only when we quit equating priesthood office with final say in decision making.

    I couldn’t help but think of this song from Free to Be You and Me (when I was thinking about the reaction of those who dislike people wanting something that “belongs” to the other gender.

    Quote:

    When my friend William was five years old

    He wanted a doll, to hug and hold

    “A doll,” said William, “is what I need

    To wash and clean, and dress and feed

    “A Doll to give a bottle to

    And put to bed when day is through

    And any time my doll gets ill

    I’ll take good care of it,” said my friend Bill

    A doll, a doll, William wants a doll

    Don’t be a sissy said his best friend Ed

    Why should a boy want to play with a doll

    Dolls are for girls said his cousin Fred

    Don’t be a jerk, said his older brother

    “I know what to do,” said his father to his mother

    So his father bought him a basketball

    A badminton set, and that’s not all

    A bag of marbles, a baseball glove

    And all the things a boy would love

    And Bill was good at every game

    Enjoyed them all, but all the same

    When Billy’s father praised his skill

    “Can I please have a doll now,” said my friend Bill

    Then William’s grandma arrived one day

    And wanted to know what he liked to play

    And Bill said, “Baseball’s my favorite game

    I like to play, but all the same

    “I’d give my bat and ball and glove

    To have a doll that I could love”

    “How very wise,” his grandma said

    Said Bill, “but everyone says this instead”

    So William’s grandma, as I’ve been told

    Bought William a doll, to hug and hold

    And William’s father began to frown

    But grandma smiled, and calmed him down

    Explaining, William wants a doll

    So when he has a baby someday

    He’ll know how to dress it, put diapers on double

    And gently caress it to bring up a bubble

    And care for his baby as every good father

    Should learn to do

    William has a doll, William has a doll

    ‘Cause someday he is gonna be a father, too

    #307091
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    Hawkgrrrl wrote: ” But it is also in Mormonism tied up with the idea that we shouldn’t seek honors.”

    The typical modesty lecture tells YW that anything that draws attention to themselves is immodest.

    Paint religious scenes, work with pre-schoolers, and teach all the piano lessons you want .. but don’t excel in a technical field, and don’t make “real” money.

    If I had to earn a living singing or playing music, I would starve. I thank God that He has given me other talents.

    #307092
    Anonymous
    Guest

    amateurparent wrote:

    Having the priesthood would change nothing about that relationship.


    Agreed, but you would have more meetings to attend if you are in any priesthood leadership positions.

    amateurparent wrote:


    Now a tangent —

    Something that struck me as funny, I was watching a video of John Dehlin interviewing someone. There was a panel of couples set up to ask questions. These were all couples who has either left the church, or were in full FC. Every question from each couple was asked by the man. Each couple may have religiously left the church, but culturally, they were still entrenched. It was weirdly funny to see people discussing issues they had with the church while acting in very LDS cultural ways.


    I keep hearing people that leave say, “I am still Mormon and I always will be.” That is probably true in many ways – this being one of them.

    #307093
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I also wonder if the reason women say ‘they don’t want the priesthood” is simply because they can’t have it. It’s there way of shutting off the women and priesthood discussion at the source. If they don’t want it, then the women and priesthood issue is not an issue for them…

    #307094
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SilentDawning wrote:

    I also wonder if the reason women say ‘they don’t want the priesthood” is simply because they can’t have it. It’s there way of shutting off the women and priesthood discussion at the source. If they don’t want it, then the women and priesthood issue is not an issue for them…


    Honestly, I think that is a spiritually mature attitude. The idea of not having authority, power and priesthood can be an attack against a woman’s ego. Letting go of your ego to connect with the divine is a common theme among religions and philosophies of all times and places. “So, I can’t have God’s authority, power and priesthood? That’s ok, I don’t need it anyway.” I can’t really criticize that approach.

    amateurparent wrote:

    Quote:

    Hawkgrrrl wrote: ” But it is also in Mormonism tied up with the idea that we shouldn’t seek honors.”

    The typical modesty lecture tells YW that anything that draws attention to themselves is immodest.

    Paint religious scenes, work with pre-schoolers, and teach all the piano lessons you want .. but don’t excel in a technical field, and don’t make “real” money.

    I think it goes back to losing your ego. I don’t think the message is that you shouldn’t be successful, God wants us to succeed. I think the message is that we shouldn’t tie our self worth to our worldly successes, including positions or offices we hold in the church. That’s not a message that’s unique to mormonism. I don’t think it is a copout for a woman to say she doesn’t want the priesthood, and I don’t think it is always the result of a false sense of modesty. I wonder if the whole priesthood discussion isn’t a tool to teach that principle.

    I think the key to this question about women ordination is to ask God if woman can be ordained. I think it is to seek revelation about Heavenly Mother. Does she hold the priesthood? Why? Or why not?

    Some other follow up questions: Could you buy into the idea that men can hold the priesthood and women can’t, yet they are still equal partners? Is it possible for men to have authority and power that women don’t and women be sincerely ok with that?

    I think for a lot of people, the answer is “yes”, for others it is clearly a “no.” So where does that leave us?

    I think it is important to ask why a lot. If we keep asking, “Why can only men have the priesthood? Why can’t women have the priesthood?” How does the church answer these questions? Any good conference talks about this? Or are we left to speculate?

    #307095
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Unknown wrote:

    SilentDawning wrote:

    I also wonder if the reason women say ‘they don’t want the priesthood” is simply because they can’t have it. It’s there way of shutting off the women and priesthood discussion at the source. If they don’t want it, then the women and priesthood issue is not an issue for them…

    unknown wrote:

    Honestly, I think that is a spiritually mature attitude. The idea of not having authority, power and priesthood can be an attack against a woman’s ego. Letting go of your ego to connect with the divine is a common theme among religions and philosophies of all times and places. “So, I can’t have God’s authority, power and priesthood? That’s ok, I don’t need it anyway.” I can’t really criticize that approach.

    I think the approach is very Buddhist. If I understand Buddhism, part of the religion is focused on reducing angst and finding happiness through not wanting anything. Women’s statement that they don’t want the priesthood is application of that principle. Or, simply a way of shutting down conversation. The former approach is mature spirituality, the latter, closed mindedness…

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.