Home Page Forums Support Doubting Thomas and Doubting Everything

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #210534
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I believe that “Doubting Thomas” gets a bad rap. That doesn’t mean I’m not apprehensive about my current phase on this faith transition…as I feel like I’ve become him but perhaps even worse. I think this line from the Great Gatsby fits me pretty well right now:

    Quote:

    “Well I’ve had a very bad time…and I’m pretty cynical about everything.”

    I think I’m farther off than Thomas…more like closed-off and non-believing.

    I guess I’m in an anger stage, but I don’t feel like this is the right word. I feel like I’ve entered extreme cynicism for everything, if that’s even a phase. There are a lot of songs that I felt have expressed/tapped into my emotions through my fail crisis. I suspect a lot of you have had similar songs. I now have a new one. It’s not very personal. But the song pretty much sums up how I’ve been feeling this week:

    Quote:

    What do I do? What do I do?

    I don’t believe it if I don’t keep proof.

    I don’t believe it if I don’t know you.

    I don’t believe it if it’s on the news or on the internet.

    Throw me in a box with the oxygen off,

    you gave me the key then you locked every lock.

    I was naive and hopeful and lost.

    Now I’m aware and trapped in my thoughts.

    The point is, while on the outside I’ve never been better, internally, I feel like I’m hardening and becoming increasingly cynical of everything…everything meaning, well, everything, haha. I’m not just talking about religion, here. Has this impacted by ability to be kind and loving? Not really, probably to the contrary, actually. I’m kind in spite of it, which I suppose is quite a beautiful victory in itself. However, I worry that this what awaits me for the rest of my life. I might be on the road to atheism…and I know there are some members here who don’t believe in an afterlife. Maybe you can speak some peace to my soul about this. Does anyone else have experience in this “cynical” stage? Did it stick, did you move through it?

    #308853
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I do sometimes have a cynical attitude but don’t necessarily like it. Like other things I have ups and downs, good days and not-so-good days. I generally try to overcome cynicism by focusing on what I do believe but that doesn’t necessarily always work.

    I also agree that Thomas gets a bad rap, and I don;t think cynicism was at all his issue. I think we take one little incident of him expressing his desire to see for himself and label him a doubter. But what about this Thomas? (John 11 NSRV):

    Quote:

    7Then after this he said to the disciples, “Let us go to Judea again.” 8The disciples said to him, “Rabbi, the Jews were just now trying to stone you, and are you going there again?” 9Jesus answered, “Are there not twelve hours of daylight? Those who walk during the day do not stumble, because they see the light of this world. 10But those who walk at night stumble, because the light is not in them.” 11After saying this, he told them, “Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but I am going there to awaken him.” 12The disciples said to him, “Lord, if he has fallen asleep, he will be all right.” 13Jesus, however, had been speaking about his death, but they thought that he was referring merely to sleep. 14Then Jesus told them plainly, “Lazarus is dead. 15For your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him.” 16Thomas, who was called the Twin, said to his fellow disciples, “Let us also go, that we may die with him.

    I’d call him faithful Thomas.

    #308854
    Anonymous
    Guest

    On a side note, all the apostles doubted Mary when she came back and told them Christ had returned from the dead. I think Thomas is singled out because he was the last one to see Him and so Christ was there to reprove him of his doubting, even though all of them doubted initially

    #308855
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I wrote the following on my personal blog back in 2009. I hope it helps somehow:

    “Faith, Doubt, and Enduring Uncertainty” (http://thingsofmysoul.blogspot.com/2009/04/faith-doubt-and-enduring-uncertainty.html)

    I also think Thomas gets a bad rap.

    #308856
    Anonymous
    Guest

    On the subject of “doubting everything”, Renes Descartes may have suggested that, although there is some question if he really meant to doubt “everything” or just pretend to doubt everything so you go through the exercise.

    Quote:

    René Descartes (1596-1650) is an example of a rationalist. According to Descartes, before we can describe the nature of reality (as is done in metaphysics) or say what it means for something to be or exist (which is the focus of ontology), we must first consider what we mean when we say we know what reality, being, or existence is. He suggests that it is pointless to claim that something is real or exists unless we first know how such a claim could be known as a justified true belief. But to say that our beliefs are justified, we have to be able to base them ultimately on a belief that is itself indubitable. Such a belief could then provide a firm foundation on which all subsequent beliefs are grounded and could thus be known as true. This way of thinking about knowledge is called foundationalism.

    In order to determine whether there is anything we can know with certainty, Descartes says that we first have to doubt everything we know. Such a radical doubt might not seem reasonable, and Descartes certainly does not mean that we really should doubt everything. What he suggests, though, is that in order to see if there is some belief that cannot be doubted, we should temporarily pretend that everything we know is questionable. This pretence is what is called a hypothetical doubt. To make sure that we take the pretence seriously, Descartes suggests that there might be good arguments to think that such doubting is justified (and thus more than simply something we should pretend to do).


    Sometimes we just need an adjustment to our viewpoints, and look at what our foundation is, and rebuild from there. Like layers of the onion, we can peel back the things that maybe we doubt until we find our foundation of what we do believe or choose to believe because it benefits us to do so, and then find that building on that foundation is doable…so we don’t have to resign ourselves to no belief in anything ever.

    Quote:

    If we doubt everything, we also must doubt whether we are truly doubting. But that gets us into an endless regress (doubting that we are really doubting that we are really doubting and so on). So the effort to reach an indubitable principle through doubt is doomed from the outset. The only way to find out that we are correct in doubting is to appeal to a public understanding of what doubt means, and that means assuming that there is a really existing world.

    Link here


    Perhaps this was what Pres Uchtdorf was teaching us when he says

    Quote:

    We must never allow doubt to hold us prisoner and keep us from the divine love, peace, and gifts that come through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.


    I believe that after the pain of being disappointed on prior beliefs, doubts are natural to avoid repeating the actions that led to a painful result. It is part of learning, and shows intelligence.

    “Never doubting anything” is very risky and perhaps weak. “Always doubting everything” is lonely and perhaps cowardly. Believing in things again after a broken relationship is also risky, for obvious reasons.

    The balance of allowing yourself to intelligently doubt with the courage to believe again is the building blocks of our character.

    Doubting Thomas will get a bad rap by those who hold up certainty and faith as the inspiring quality to teach in sunday school.

    The unthinking faithful believer who never questions authority or never doubts teachings will be given a bad rap by those who hold up individualism or deep searches for truth as their inspiring quality.

    Balance doubt and belief.

    #308857
    Anonymous
    Guest

    university wrote:

    There are a lot of songs that I felt have expressed/tapped into my emotions through my fail crisis. I suspect a lot of you have had similar songs.

    A Thousand Suns (whole album) really reached up and grabbed me.

    I know the cynicism. I know the depression. The best way I know of describing it in LDS terms, I underwent a spiritual death. Everything died. My beliefs, all my old hopes and dreams that had given me the strength to face another day, god, everything died. It’s stupid but I remember one night I was out exercising and I allowed myself to explore certain thoughts and I collapsed to the ground. 😯 Feels made me swoon. Feels!

    The story of the resurrection teaches that death precedes a rebirth. It took Jesus three days and from all accounts he was a much better guy than I am so I figured it would take me a while longer. I settled in for the long haul.

    Doctrine and Covenants 29:31-32 wrote:

    For by the power of my Spirit created I them; yea, all things both spiritual and temporal – First spiritual, secondly temporal, which is the beginning of my work; and again, first temporal, and secondly spiritual, which is the last of my work.

    When I though of spiritual rebirth and how long it might take it got me thinking about my physical birth. There was a period where everything was new and I couldn’t express myself. I couldn’t communicate or even understand my needs. People were there to take care of me until I grew into myself and I’m still growing into myself. Maybe that’s what a spiritual rebirth is like. A period where everything is new, a period where it’s hard to express ourselves, where we can’t communicate or even understand our needs. A period where we might need to lean on people to help change our spiritual diapers until we are spiritually potty trained. We can’t rush the spiritual rebirthing process any more than we could rush the process of growing after our physical birth.

    I wouldn’t worry about Thomas. Sometimes I wonder whether Jesus’ interaction with Thomas was really written by some random guy that had an ulterior motive to put skeptics in their place. If Jesus really did have an interaction with a Thomas I wonder what it would be like?

    #308858
    Anonymous
    Guest

    There’s a big difference between skepticism and cynicism, IMO.

    This is a very painful point for my wife and I — for her, belief and faith are ultra-important. If my faith crisis had ended with the Church, I think she could’ve dealt with it pretty easily. But the idea that I might not believe in Jesus really broke her heart. And I completely get it, because I lived the first 35 years of my life in her exact shoes.

    I have another friend who talked to me about faith and belief. One day, he asked me, “What do you believe??” The underlying implication was that if I didn’t believe something, then “I’d fall for anything”, or however the adage goes. And I thought about it. And if you define faith as “believing in something for which there is no evidence”, then I realized that I simply don’t have faith. It’s just not a part of my makeup. And I don’t see any inherent virtue in it, either. I don’t see how believing in something for which there is no evidence somehow makes me a better person. I don’t think that makes me cynical. Now that I’m allowing my brain to enter these new thought patterns, I’m realizing how insane it is to presume that God would put us here, allow us to be bombarded with 100,000 different “one-true” belief systems, none of which has any verifiable evidence, and that he’s expect us to find the exact right one and then force our minds to believe in it. And all the while, certain of our brains (mine, certainly) have a STRONG disposition against believing in random things. If I could really and genuinely force myself to believe things on demand, I would. My life would be SOOOO much easier. But it’s not.

    I didn’t realize how much faking faith was a drain on my soul. Now, I’m agnostic about most things, and I realize that it’s totally 100% okay. I can live in the moment, and in a way, I feel like I cherish my time and relationships even more. I’m filled with wonder at the magnitude of the universe, at the near 0% chance of my own existence; I’m in awe of the powerful feelings we feel as human beings, and our ability to connect with each other in a way that brings joy and happiness; I love music even more now for it’s ability to express depth and emotion; and in general, I’m filled with more wonder and amazement at how this all works than I was before.

    I hope there’s a God. I hope when I die, I find myself floating through space as a Spirit. I hope that if that’s the case, that I can somehow claw my way through the eternities to being with my amazing family. I hope that God will understand that my pea-brain did the best with what it was given. If God is there, he knows how paltry the evidence of his existence is. He knows how bad the Church looks on paper; and he knows how unreliable feelings are for determining ultimate truth (at least for me). So, I’m hoping that if he’s there, he’ll extend me some mercy.

    Anyhow, sorry… that was all about me. Just be you… eternity is a long time. Learn to live and love life as if there’s no afterlife. If there is no afterlife, you won’t spend a millisecond being sad about it. If there is an afterlife, then HALLE-FREAKING-LUJAH! Don’t be cynical… be a kind, loving, happy, and patient soul.

    #308859
    Anonymous
    Guest

    marty wrote:

    And if you define faith as “believing in something for which there is no evidence”, then I realized that I simply don’t have faith. It’s just not a part of my makeup. And I don’t see any inherent virtue in it, either. I don’t see how believing in something for which there is no evidence somehow makes me a better person. I don’t think that makes me cynical. Now that I’m allowing my brain to enter these new thought patterns, I’m realizing how insane it is to presume that God would put us here, allow us to be bombarded with 100,000 different “one-true” belief systems, none of which has any verifiable evidence, and that he’s expect us to find the exact right one and then force our minds to believe in it. And all the while, certain of our brains (mine, certainly) have a STRONG disposition against believing in random things. If I could really and genuinely force myself to believe things on demand, I would. My life would be SOOOO much easier. But it’s not.

    I didn’t realize how much faking faith was a drain on my soul. Now, I’m agnostic about most things, and I realize that it’s totally 100% okay. I can live in the moment, and in a way, I feel like I cherish my time and relationships even more. I’m filled with wonder at the magnitude of the universe, at the near 0% chance of my own existence; I’m in awe of the powerful feelings we feel as human beings, and our ability to connect with each other in a way that brings joy and happiness; I love music even more now for it’s ability to express depth and emotion; and in general, I’m filled with more wonder and amazement at how this all works than I was before.

    Marty,

    It sounds like you and I think a lot alike. I agree that there is a big difference between skepticism and cynicism. The difference is attitude. I’m definitely skeptical (thus my name here), but I don’t want to be cynical. How do you keep a positive attitude? Does it get easier as your faith transition progresses beyond the anger stage?

    I’ve always sympathized with Thomas and think he gets a bad rap too. Some of us are just not wired to accept things on faith without any evidence. My shelf simply can not hold one more thing to accept on faith that goes against what feels right or true to me.

    How do you and your DW reconcile your skeptical beliefs that break her heart? This is something I really struggle with and it’s hard for DW and I to even talk about.

    Great topic here! I look forward to more discussion.

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    #308860
    Anonymous
    Guest

    marty wrote:

    I hope there’s a God. I hope when I die, I find myself floating through space as a Spirit. I hope that if that’s the case, that I can somehow claw my way through the eternities to being with my amazing family. I hope that God will understand that my pea-brain did the best with what it was given. If God is there, he knows how paltry the evidence of his existence is. He knows how bad the Church looks on paper; and he knows how unreliable feelings are for determining ultimate truth (at least for me). So, I’m hoping that if he’s there, he’ll extend me some mercy. Anyhow, sorry… that was all about me. Just be you… eternity is a long time. Learn to live and love life as if there’s no afterlife. If there is no afterlife, you won’t spend a millisecond being sad about it. If there is an afterlife, then HALLE-FREAKING-LUJAH! Don’t be cynical… be a kind, loving, happy, and patient soul.

    Beautiful. Just Beautiful!

    FaithfulSkeptic wrote:

    My shelf simply can not hold one more thing to accept on faith that goes against what feels right or true to me. How do you and your DW reconcile your skeptical beliefs that break her heart? This is something I really struggle with and it’s hard for DW and I to even talk about.

    In regards to Jesus, I love the metaphor of our Heavenly Father condescending to be born as a helpless baby, to experience the trails and vicissitudes of this mortal life, and finally to die horribly in order to fully redeem all of His wayward children. What an awesome depiction of a Father God. That is someone I would gladly worship with songs of joy and praise. Is any of it real and what does any of that have to do with the historical Jesus? I have no idea. “Jesus” for me becomes shorthand for my hope in this type of invested, loving, saving god. I am totally agnostic about a resurrected Jesus with physical body (including a beard and the torturous marks of his death) looking down from heaven.

    I love the idea that the most important personal relationships that we experience in this life will endure in some form beyond this life.

    I hope in faith for things that I have no conclusive evidence for but that do feel “right or true to me”. They resonate with me and help to bring meaning to my life.

    #308861
    Anonymous
    Guest

    university wrote:

    I believe that “Doubting Thomas” gets a bad rap.

    Last night I was reading the Gospel of Thomas and ran across something. There are claims that the Gospel of Thomas is the gospel according to Didymos Judas Thomas, doubting Thomas. Of course any authorship claims should be taken with a grain of salt. Anyway, on to the passage:

    Quote:

    Jesus said to his disciples, “Compare me to something and tell me what I am like.” Simon Peter said to him, “You are like a just messenger.” Matthew said to him, “You are like a wise philosopher.” Thomas said to him, “Teacher, my mouth is utterly unable to say what you are like.”

    Jesus said, “I am not your teacher. Because you have drunk, you have become intoxicated from the bubbling spring that I have tended.”

    And he took him, and withdrew, and spoke three sayings to him. When Thomas came back to his friends they asked him, “What did Jesus say to you?” Thomas said to them, “If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you.”

    From a certain perspective someone could say that Thomas is being elevated above the other apostles. Jesus pulled him aside and now Thomas has some sort of secret knowledge that the others do not possess.

    Here’s where I let my imagination run wild, pure speculation ahead. Was the doubting Thomas narrative (mentioned only in John) an attempt to take some of the wind out of the sails of a growing cult of Thomas? Maybe Thomas was beginning to gain his own following. Didymos Judas Thomas, the twin of Jesus.

    I could also imagine a scenario where the Gospel of Thomas was written by disciples of Thomas to take some of the bite out of the doubting Thomas narrative. For me the timing of when the books were written comes out in the wash but it’s interesting to imagine how things might creep into the narrative as a result of power vacuums.

    I also see ties to gnosticism in the quote from the Gospel of Thomas. A secret knowledge being passed down by Jesus. :think: Maybe Thomas was the patron saint of the gnostics.

    At any rate the story of Thomas appears to be much more complex than a simple “he doubted.” If you feel like you’ve become him then remember that Thomas also got some secret knowledge directly from Jesus that he kept secret from his peers. How might that description fit us? :P

    #308862
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m just thinking of them sitting around drinking, intoxicated, and talking gospel principles. Is that what was happening?

    Regardless, maybe to more to your point, was secret knowledge given to the person who doubts that he might learn? Maybe.

    #308863
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hey university,

    From your previous posts, I think we may be roughly the same age, and in the same boat. So I can’t offer you any promise of any beautiful islands I’ve landed on, but I can commiserate on how rough the seas feel and what living on the ocean has felt like for me.

    I’ve been going on roughly 2 years of being “inactive.” First, I had disbelief that I didn’t actually believe things as per usual anymore. That didn’t last long, even though I thought I was fine at the time. Then I slowly started dipping my foot in the “secular” ways: dating an atheist, not going to church, choosing to not wear my garments, eventually trying alcohol and experimenting with …other… things. It’s felt like the ride of my life (so far), and also like a terrible roller coaster that will never end. I’m caught in paradoxes all the time, but am finally starting to pause and try to just sit peacefully in the middle of two extremes. Which is really difficult at times!

    I can relate to your experience of not feeling necessarily angry, but cynical, and gearing up for a life full of atheism. For months and months, I told myself that I wasn’t angry at the Church or any of the members, but that was mostly because I didn’t want to identify as an angry ex Mo. But I’ve found that we can’t run far from ourselves for too long, if even we can at all. Granted, my anger is indeed coming out. But because I was so hell bent on making sure I wasn’t bitter, I’ve learned coping skills to see where I need to own up to responsibility or defect to circumstances beyond any of our control (etc…). I do want to let you know that it’s not bad to be angry and if your anger is expressed as cynicism, then express it. It’s a part of you, for whatever reason, and the more you allow yourself to be a full range of a human being, the quicker you’ll be able to see what’s really you, what you really need in your life to be whole, and what’s outer fluff that you don’t need to pay any attention to.

    All of this is much easier said than done. Like I said, I’m two years deep into my transition, and have only been comfortable expressing my outright disapproval of the Church’s actions for a few months. Thankfully I’m able to do it in a way that validates my inner truth, without invalidating others’ experience and truth, but even that took time and I’m not super great at it still. So take heart, and especially listen to yours.

    #308864
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Good post, DC. Thanks for sharing.

    #308865
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Doubt is one of the most important tools in the progress of humankind. Many great advances in human knowledge came from doubting the status quo.

    Of course doubt it’s self can be a bad thing when people doubt in the face of overwhelming evidence.

    But to doubt when men tell you they are speaking for God is a healthy thing.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #308866
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi StayLDS community:

    I feel like I should apologize. I’m a big time lurker here, although posting for me comes in spurts. So often this community has given me wonderful feedback and I don’t reply. I often have varying reasons for not responding but most often it’s a busy schedule followed by a period when I decide I need to take a step back from associating with the “Mormon world.” However, I always go through and read responses after I’ve posted. Thank you to everyone who provided their thoughts.

    DancingCarrot wrote:

    Hey university,

    From your previous posts, I think we may be roughly the same age, and in the same boat. So I can’t offer you any promise of any beautiful islands I’ve landed on, but I can commiserate on how rough the seas feel and what living on the ocean has felt like for me.

    DancingCarrot,

    I feel the same when I read your posts. It’s nice to at least have someone to commiserate with :)

    DancingCarrot wrote:

    For months and months, I told myself that I wasn’t angry at the Church or any of the members, but that was mostly because I didn’t want to identify as an angry ex Mo. But I’ve found that we can’t run far from ourselves for too long, if even we can at all. Granted, my anger is indeed coming out. But because I was so hell bent on making sure I wasn’t bitter, I’ve learned coping skills to see where I need to own up to responsibility or defect to circumstances beyond any of our control (etc…). I do want to let you know that it’s not bad to be angry and if your anger is expressed as cynicism, then express it. It’s a part of you, for whatever reason, and the more you allow yourself to be a full range of a human being, the quicker you’ll be able to see what’s really you, what you really need in your life to be whole, and what’s outer fluff that you don’t need to pay any attention to.

    While I think I’m out of the “anger stage” right now, I did experience it in the earlier stages of my faith crisis…but it was more of a love-hate thing occurring when I was finally accepting how frustrating “the Church” had become for me. However, it didn’t build up into the cynicism I was feeling at this point when I made this post for a long time. I suppose it took me years to finally boil into the “anger/cynicism” stage that I was in a few months ago. I also have never wanted to be the “anger ex mo” which I think has been mostly a good thing for me in impacting how I behave and how I handle my relationships.

    I can’t say the cynicism is completely gone now, it’s just shifted. I’m definitely in the mourning process and boy, is it excruciating. But the words of encouragement to allow myself to feel the full range of a human being were what I needed to hear. Thank you.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.