Home Page Forums General Discussion What if we just stopped teaching modesty?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #210766
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’ve seen a comment come up several times in the discussion of the BYU rape problem and cultural factors that may be causing it. A lot of people have said, well of COURSE we don’t want to say that an immodestly dressed woman is asking for rape, but we DO still need to teach modesty. That seems like a reasonable position to take, but just as a thought experiment, what would happen if we stopped teaching modesty, and refrained from making comments on the attire of girls and women?

    Would young women just start walking around naked? No, of course not. Teenage girls have no more desire to appear naked in public than the rest of us. 😮

    Would some young women use that as justification to dress “immodestly”? Yeah, probably. But so what? Is there some sort of dire consequence associated with tank tops? Most Mormons live outside of the Jello Belt, which means that we encounter so-called “immodest” clothing on a daily basis, at least in the summer. And honestly, most of us function just fine. The presence of a sundress or a bikini swimsuit has not once reduced my husband or son to a slavering, incoherent mass!

    Another argument I’ve heard in favor of teaching modesty is ‘well it’s not about how many inches are covered, it’s about dressing appropriately for the situation. After all, you wouldn’t wear your swimsuit to Sacrament meeting.’ This seems reasonable until you get to the underlying assumption: that girls and women have to be told how to cover our bodies. But take a look around a Catholic or Methodist church or whatever: how many women are attending in their swimsuits? I’m gonna go with none.

    It’s not as though the Lord has one single standard of appropriate dress. (If He did, we’d all still be wearing garments that come down to our wrists and ankles.) Modesty is largely cultural and the rules vary wildly according to place and time. I thought about this when I was buying a new swimsuit yesterday. A swimsuit that is considered ‘modest’ in 2016 would have literally gotten me arrested in 1916. And still would today, in some parts of the world. It seems unlikely that God would say, “My rule is that you dress modestly according to the standards of whatever place and time you live in.” After all, He is supposed to be eternal and unchanging, right?

    What I believe would happen if we stopped teaching modesty is this: Some girls and women would wear tank tops and short shorts. Some girls and women, including endowed women, would wear capri pants and cap sleeved shirts. If you have spent any time serving in the Young Women, you will notice that what I just described is exactly what is already happening.

    The Young Women leader in our ward has explicitly told me that she’s not going to talk about modesty with our girls – that she is just happy they are showing up, regardless of how they are dressed. I am profoundly grateful for that.

    #311993
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I don’t think the problem is with teaching modesty per se, I think the problem is how we teach modesty. I think you point that out in your post. The issue is not confined to modesty, there are many things where we don’t follow Joseph Smith’s adage of teaching correct principles and governing ourselves. The church as a whole has moved far from that idea IMO.

    #311994
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    It seems unlikely that God would say, “My rule is that you dress modestly according to the standards of whatever place and time you live in.” After all, He is supposed to be eternal and unchanging, right?

    You know, if that were the rule then god would be unchanging. ;) “Be good within your ability to understand goodness.”

    DarkJedi wrote:

    I don’t think the problem is with teaching modesty per se, I think the problem is how we teach modesty.

    I agree… and I’d add that part of the problem is in how we police modesty.

    Joni wrote:

    The Young Women leader in our ward has explicitly told me that she’s not going to talk about modesty with our girls – that she is just happy they are showing up, regardless of how they are dressed. I am profoundly grateful for that.

    :thumbup:

    #311995
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    The Young Women leader in our ward has explicitly told me that she’s not going to talk about modesty with our girls – that she is just happy they are showing up, regardless of how they are dressed. I am profoundly grateful for that.

    This reminded me of something. A couple weeks ago there was a meeting with a GA and AA that some local leaders (including YW, RS, and Primary leaders) attended (I was not invited). A question was asked about how to teach modesty to new members. The answer from the AA – don’t worry about it and just be glad they’re there. (This is second hand, of course, but from a reliable source.)

    #311996
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think there’s “teaching modesty” – defining it narrowly for everyone and repeatedly cramming it down their throats – and living modestly – showing by example that your outward presentation connects in a meaningful way to your particular values or preferences.

    Girls, boys, everyone, want someone to emulate. If you want them to want knee-length shorts and capped sleeves, then start looking happy and healthy in them yourselves. Stop talking about how other people are wrong. It’s just such a boring turn-off.

    Another benefit of teaching modesty by example only: the loads of time it will free up in YW to teach the actual gospel.

    #311997
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have told a story in HPG that I heard on a podcast. It was mentioned by the daughter of a GA.

    In a ward a lady was baptized and afterwards they found out her occupation was that of an “exotic dancer.” The ward leadership were really struggling what to do. The GA was called in and asked what they should do. His response was, “Love her. Period. end of story.” She was so proud of her dad. The ward did this and the woman realized this was an issue and soon changed her job to something more “respectable.” I think it is clear that if the bishop would have approached her and told her “you are sinning big time and you have to stop” that there was a risk that she might have been offended or embarrassed and left. Instead they allowed the individual to grow in an environment of love. I bet even members of the ward grew from this also and learned to judge less and love more.

    I wish this would be given as part of someone’s talk in general conference.

    Ann wrote:

    Another benefit of teaching modesty by example only: the loads of time it will free up in YW to actually teach the gospel.


    AMEN!!!

    #311998
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    Another benefit of teaching modesty by example only: the loads of time it will free up in YW to teach the actual gospel.

    Yeah, but it doesn’t take that long to teach the CES-distilled proof-texted gospel. If we wanted to teach the actual gospel, maybe. But it seems we clearly don’t.

    When I was growing up, we didn’t have a FtSOY pamphlet and we didn’t spend time teaching modesty. There might be a dress code for different dances or activities, but there wasn’t this overriding assumption that everyone would dress as if they were already wearing garments when they weren’t. It’s completely out of control. I believe it coincided with the alignment of the church with the religious right, the desire to be seen by churches that hated us as one of them. To me, that’s been the most damaging thing that has happened to the church culture in my lifetime. We’ve gotten completely off track with what makes us unique and compelling.

    #312000
    Anonymous
    Guest

    We don’t teach modesty in the Church – at least not regularly. We teach a dress code. If we actually taught modesty as a comprehensive principle (moderation in all things – including, sometimes, moderation itself), I would be happy.

    #311999
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    The presence of a sundress or a bikini swimsuit has not once reduced my husband or son to a slavering, incoherent mass!

    Poor guys. You should bring them down to Texas some summer where they can see bikinis properly used. :P

    #312001
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Old-Timer wrote:

    We don’t teach modesty in the Church – at least not regularly. We teach a dress code. If we actually taught modesty as a comprehensive principle (moderation in all things – including, sometimes, moderation itself), I would be happy.

    Ain’t that the truth.

    #312002
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    Old-Timer wrote:

    We don’t teach modesty in the Church – at least not regularly. We teach a dress code. If we actually taught modesty as a comprehensive principle (moderation in all things – including, sometimes, moderation itself), I would be happy.

    Ain’t that the truth.

    Hear, hear! When can we teach REAL modesty? The modesty we teach is completely ostentatious. It’s downright immodest!

    #312003
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The modesty discussion dovetails into other areas and can make a mess: dating, relations with others of the opposite sex, relations with those of the same sex, self restraint to the point of virtual self hatred (in some cases–I’m thinking about the idea of modest thoughts and what is and is NOT considered normal or acceptable).

    Scary stuff.

    I like the story above about the exotic dancer and how loving and accepting her brought about the biggest change — without loosing her. Gosh there needs to be move or that.

    #312004
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree with HG and think it just gets out of control and whackadoo.

    THere is so much one-up-ism in the church…stories are told and retold and enhanced and embellished and to get the attention of others is taken to more prudish extremes to express faithfulness…..

    …and then at some point you gotta stop and listen to what is being said and think “Wow…Mormons are weird”.

    So…discussions in the home are needed to balance out zealous stupidity at church.

    Our daughters will respect us more for teaching them proper standards at home, including how to ignore things that don’t sound right at church.

    Less shaming, and more teaching values that uplift and build self-esteem.

    I don’t think the solution is to stop talking about it. Our kids should be taught. I just don’t leave it up tot he church to teach them, because they don’t get it right at church, they get other parent’s perspectives that I don’t always agree with.

    #312005
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Heber13 wrote:

    THere is so much one-up-ism in the church…stories are told and retold and enhanced and embellished and to get the attention of others is taken to more prudish extremes to express faithfulness…..

    And then sometimes you want to go to the other extreme with that line from the church scene in Kingsmen when someone asks why you’re not staying for Priesthood meeting.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.