Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › What impact would this have on your church engagement?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 16, 2016 at 3:27 pm #210999
Anonymous
GuestI would like to know whether the following would increase your engagement at church. Unlike what many of us experience now, when you to to church, you come away with a TON of PRACTICAL advice about how to increase self-discipline, honesty, unity at home, effectiveness in leadership, effectiveness in your work, effectiveness in your relationships with others etcetera. Basically — advice that helps you increase your ability to achieve the object and design of our existence — joy.
I find that so much of what we talk about is conceptual. We talk about the importance of goodness, mercy, forgiveness, but we are very short on practical advice — unless it is the scripture/prayer/family home evening/serve in the church narrative.
For example, I get a ripple of excitement in the classes I teach at church when I lace the lesson with a healthy dose of novel, practical advice from self-help books….examples are below the asterisk line at the end of this post.
So, if you came to church and found there were more practical helpers for you to increase the joy in your life (consistent with gospel principles), would this increase your engagement with church?
*******
1. Increasing self-discipline
a) Commented on how you use the foot-in-the-door technique to encourage self-discipline. For example, I had trouble painting the interior of my house. One day I said to myself “I am just going to collect all the materials I need in one place. that’s it”. After I had them in one place, it seemed easy to start painting, so I started painting. Next thing I knew, the painting job had been started. And once started, it was easy to come back to it. Something I had put off for years, was done in a couple days — simply because I convinced myself all I had to do was collect the materials at first.
b) Someone had a problem teaching their class. The youth came from strong families and thought they knew everything. So, I suggested the teacher starts out her class with a simple quiz on the material for the class, but made really hard. Everyone gets an average of 3/10 on it. Then she teaches the lesson, and does the test again, and everyone gets an average of 8/10. Without saying anything, she showed the value of coming to church and that they DON’T know everything. Another ripple of excitement through the class.
September 16, 2016 at 5:25 pm #314703Anonymous
GuestI would agree with that. I have done that a few times in HPG meeting. I even heard a last minute substitute in GD a few months ago give an impromptu lesson on what her therapist had taught her. It seems like many of these more “practical” lessons could have a thread of some gospel topic put in them without any issue. It seems to be more of, “keep re-reading the same old stuff from 1970 that you have heard tens of times before.”
:yawn: September 16, 2016 at 6:34 pm #314704Anonymous
GuestLookingHard wrote:It seems to be more of, “keep re-reading the same old stuff from 1970 that you have heard tens of times before.”
:yawn: Yup; part of the reason I think everybody should have to go back to Gospel Principles one year in every five, just to break it up a bit and remind them of the stuff they really need to know.
September 16, 2016 at 7:01 pm #314705Anonymous
GuestSD, yes I agree. I find practical lessons more compelling and memorable than talks about doctrine or even feel good talks light on doctrine but which help us feel good about ourselves. Still there is potential to drift into sensitive territory and I think in practical lessons we have to continue to remember that not everything applies to us. My ward and stake have had “how to” type of lessons in some very interesting topics like saving for retirement, getting out of debt, gaining an education without debt, improving your marriage. There have been a couple that went over like a lead balloon: teaching your children modesty (girls = walking porn came up) and disciplining your children (debate ensued about spanking).
September 17, 2016 at 12:25 am #314706Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:I find that so much of what we talk about is conceptual. We talk about the importance of goodness, mercy, forgiveness, but we are very short on practical advice — unless it is the scripture/prayer/family home evening/serve in the church narrative.
I completely agree. I’m not sure how to best address it though.
In thinking on some of the more engaging lessons that I’ve sat in on they were typically when we spent a lot of time answering one question as opposed to spending a lot of time making sure all the material in the manual was covered. Often those long answer periods cover how the principle in question is integrated into our daily lives. It helps us be cognizant of when we may or may not be living a principle and it always helps to spend more time on the “how.” Other members of the class may be reached differently but those are the lessons I enjoy the most.
September 18, 2016 at 3:21 pm #314707Anonymous
GuestI agree that this would be helpful. I believe that if the class is on marriage or parenting or finances – then it could be offered outside of the block. Having taken these sorts of classes in and out of an LDS context, I find it interesting that for the LDS every point seems to need to be supported by a quote from a GA. I remember thinking that it would be nicer to have information from financial planners or family therapists. Perhaps results from actual clinical studies on marriage or finances would be helpful. It is strange that we seem to rely on quotes from GA’s to tell us the value of the principle we are reading about.
September 18, 2016 at 7:38 pm #314708Anonymous
GuestI would actually look forward to coming! I very much wish the Church was more focused on practical matters, application, and took the time to think a bit more on how the lessons effect the Church membership. Today we had a lesson on the Pride Cycle in gospel doctrine. It’s the first lesson I’ve ever chosen to walk out on. It infers that those who are rich, whose life is filled with temporal blessings, are the most righteous. It causes us to look down on the poor and needy, and see their struggles as self deserving. And it discourages the poor and the needy. An example of this comes from my wife. We have struggled with infertility in the several years since marriage, and there are so many times when my wife will break down and cry and tell me, “I am such a terrible person. I am a terrible wife. Do you think God is punishing me? Is that why I can’t have children?” Now, this is from the MOST angelic woman I have ever known. She is fully active in the Church, magnifies her calling; she is the most caring, selfless, charitable person I know. And this gospel principle has brought her a lot of heartache.
In fact, I don’t believe the pride cycle is actually a princple taught in the Book of Mormon. A lot of good people in their stories suffered, struggled, and died. I think it is more of a rich man’s interpretation; taking out small sections to justify their wealth and blessings as merited. I would rather have a lesson on compassion or charity. I know I should’ve had more charity today.
September 18, 2016 at 8:23 pm #314709Anonymous
GuestQuote:Dande48 wrote:
It’s the first lesson I’ve ever chosen to walk out on. It infers that those who are rich, whose life is filled with temporal blessings, are the most righteous. It causes us to look down on the poor and needy, and see their struggles as self deserving. And it discourages the poor and the needy. An example of this comes from my wife. We have struggled with infertility in the several years since marriage, and there are so many times when my wife will break down and cry and tell me, “I am such a terrible person. I am a terrible wife. Do you think God is punishing me? Is that why I can’t have children?” Now, this is from the MOST angelic woman I have ever known. She is fully active in the Church, magnifies her calling; she is the most caring, selfless, charitable person I know. And this gospel principle has brought her a lot of heartache.
What a terrible thing for you and your wife to be going through. In church and in life, there is so much talk of rain falling equally on the righteous and the unrighteous. Yet people turn right around and state that random positive events were somehow EARNED. I have no words to fix your pain or balm that will soften the blows that life castes upon you. I wish I could hand you 20 years of experience that would give you more understanding into the idiocy that moves people to speak before thinking. Know that if they had understood the pain they caused, most would’ve chosen to be silent. I wish I could write ALL would choose silence.
Consider the source and be kinder than they deserve. Cyber Hugs heading your direction
September 18, 2016 at 11:01 pm #314710Anonymous
GuestDande I am so very sorry for how this undercurrent of the prosperity gospel has affected you and your wife. I was a believer in this gospel until our third child was stillborn. I honestly believed that we would have a semi-charmed life due to our righteousness…I wanted certainty, safety, and security in an uncertain world… Yes, there are many, many examples of people suffering despite their faithful service. We just do not seem to focus on that or frame it in such a way that it gets equal time to the miraculous “save the day” blessing.
September 19, 2016 at 12:03 am #314711Anonymous
GuestI too bought into that part of the prosperity gospel before my FC. I’m sorry you have had to endure this Dande. September 19, 2016 at 12:38 am #314712Anonymous
GuestThanks to each of you for the kind words. I’m sorry if I dragged this post into my own personal problems. I just wished the Church was a little more focused on bringing peace, comfort, and happiness to the membership, you know? “Persuade to do good” and all that. I’m glad I found this group. You are all wonderful people.
September 19, 2016 at 3:36 pm #314713Anonymous
Guestdande48 wrote:In fact, I don’t believe the pride cycle is actually a princple taught in the Book of Mormon. A lot of good people in their stories suffered, struggled, and died.
Assuming the Church still recognizes those other books as something other than ballast for the BoM and D&C, it’s hard to reconcile Job’s suffering with the idea that wealth indicates righteousness. In fact, you’d be hard pressed to find any of the most righteous people in the Bible or BoM who didn’t suffer significant hardships for extended periods.
September 19, 2016 at 6:58 pm #314714Anonymous
GuestQuote:I just wished the Church was a little more focused on bringing peace, comfort, and happiness to the membership, you know?
I think it is critical to realize that the leadership, as a group, really does have that focus – but that people feel those things in radically different ways and from radically different messages. Some get it from Elder Bednar and Pres. Nelson; others get it from Elder Holland; others get it from Pres. Uchtdorf and Elder Renlund; etc. Some get it from Paul, while others get it from John. How some of them try to provide peace, comfort, and happiness might not work for some of us, but they are trying, sincerely, I believe.
As to the issue of wealth, Elder Ballard recently gave a talk in Utah County that openly and directly challenged the wealth accumulation focus in that area of so many members, and he used houses the size of mansions as an explicit example. I think the top leadership is well aware of the manifestations of pride regarding wealth within the Church, and they are tackling it in subtle and obvious ways. I’d like to hear more of it, but I am hearing more of it than I did a decade ago.
Things get all kinds of wonky when we over-apply “the Church” to what often is a significant portion of the members of whom we are aware – and a surprisingly small percent of the talks given by global leaders in General Conference and other formal settings.
October 13, 2017 at 4:22 pm #314715Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:
I would like to know whether the following would increase your engagement at church.Unlike what many of us experience now, when you go to church, you come away with a TON of PRACTICAL advice about how to increase self-discipline, honesty, unity at home, effectiveness in leadership, effectiveness in your work, effectiveness in your relationships with others etc. Basically — advice that helps you increase your ability to achieve the object and design of our existence — joy.
I find that so much of what we talk about is conceptual. We talk about the importance of goodness, mercy, forgiveness, but we are very short on practical advice — unless it is the scripture/prayer/family home evening/serve in the church narrative.
I love it when I have lessons like this. I think it happens less frequently because teachers are not clear and/or listeners are not getting the “your mileage may vary” caveat, so the majority choose the “safe” route.
SilentDawning wrote:
For example, I get a ripple of excitement in the classes I teach at church when I lace the lesson with a healthy dose of novel, practical advice from self-help books….examples are below the asterisk line at the end of this post.So, if you came to church and found there were more practical helpers for you to increase the joy in your life (consistent with gospel principles), would this increase your engagement with church?
When I was asked to teach R.S. I went out of my way to use additional resources as I felt guided to do so. Sometimes it meant less time in the manual and more time discussing a quote from Chieko Okazaki. Another time I ignored most of the General Conference talk and showed the class the “Patterns of Light” videos from Mormon Channel. I must have been doing something right because while I taught R.S. for 4 Sundays in a row the entire time I was a R.S. teacher, the 2nd Counselor in the R.S. Presidency (who was a librarian before she retired) was really, really sad when I was released and called to Primary teacher.
In my current Pathways class, my partner and I are assigned 10 of the Isaiah/2 Nephi chapters – and I came up with an engaging, meaningful activity that should engage all the learners (visual, audio, kinesethetic, with a stab at catching the logical as well). The activity also manages to uphold my integrity in being asked to teach something I am not so sure of.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.