Home Page Forums General Discussion Monson in Boot Camp: What is the point of this story?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #211007
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Dare to Stand Alone

    I had this video shown in several classes in church over several weeks (I was kind of floating around the YW, and it seemed that every teacher used it). I’m just wondering, what is the lesson we are supposed to be learning from this video?

    The chief petty officer is depicted as using sort of a sneering tone of voice, but I’m not sure what he says that is so objectionable. Monson says ‘it is inevitable that our faith will be challenged,’ but how was his faith being challenged? He literally says “okay you Mormons, find somewhere to meet.” That’s it. There’s nothing particularly anti-Mormon about the Navy only offering only a Jewish, Catholic, and a Protestant service – especially during the 1940s when the Mormon church was MUCH smaller than it is now.

    My cynical side asks, if there were other Mormons in TSM’s battalion, shouldn’t he have known about it before then? Aren’t we supposed to wear our religion on our sleeve, making fellow Mormons easy to identify? Did he not introduce himself as, “My name is Private Monson, and I’m a Mormon”?

    I actually like the takeaway message that you shouldn’t assume you are the only Mormon in any given group, because there might be others. (More broadly, you shouldn’t assume you are the only righteous person in your battalion. Notice that a LOT of people left when he dismissed the Catholics, the Jews, and the Protestants.) But I think most people watching this video wouldn’t take away that message.

    I’m sure this makes me a horrible person, but I often feel this way about TSM’s stories: they leave me thnking “okay, and?” I’m fairly confident that for this alone, I’ve already been demoted to the Terrestrial Kingdom.

    #314807
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    Today everybody goes to church. Everybody that is, except me. I’m going to relax.

    Truer words… 😆

    #314808
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think one takeaway is don’t compromise who you are because of peer pressure.

    Now on to what rubs me wrong, the subtle communications:

    1) The girl left behind in the theater. She did a good job of radiating shame for staying.

    2) Porn shoulders. I do like the way the girl expresses her disinterest in the dress, “It’s not really me.” It was a nice nonjudgmental way to say no thanks. Then the one friend turns to the other friend and gives her a “get a load of her” look. She just said “It’s not really me.” not “That dress doesn’t meet my standards.” so I’m not sure why the look.

    3) This one really gets me. The guys looking at something on their phone. “You guys shouldn’t be looking at it either.” We can stick to our values without trying to impose them on other people. It might have been porn, it might have been a selfie and the protester believes that taking a picture of someone steals their soul. Bottom line, I like the message of standing for what you believe in, I don’t like the message of shaming others to toe your line.

    I do feel we should respect other people’s standards but does that pendulum swing both ways. Can the CK kids respect the standards of the TK kids? That doesn’t mean they have to participate in activities that don’t meet their standards but maybe it means less policing other people.

    #314809
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    My cynical side asks, if there were other Mormons in TSM’s battalion, shouldn’t he have known about it before then? Aren’t we supposed to wear our religion on our sleeve, making fellow Mormons easy to identify?

    We need Mormon hats for ease of identification! I recommend purple fedoras.

    #314810
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I take it as a reminder message we shouldn’t be too shy to just say who we are and be proud to stand up for it.

    I don’t particularly like wearing it on my sleeve, though, because it can be presumptuous that people care about religion, and that makes things awkward sometimes. It depends on the situation. Yes…I’m a mormon…but I don’t need to go around telling everyone because that is not the most important thing about me. “Hello, I’ll be your waiter tonight…and I’m a mormon.” My guess is that could lead to an experience or two from one or two groups that come to dine and really like it, talk about who they know in Utah, find commonalities and it make a great story in church. And the other 98% of the time it is either weird to patrons or flat out offensive.

    I guess some people like the 2% chance of having a story to tell in Sacrament meeting.

    I guess I’m just not that personality where I’m “in your face” about my religion and beliefs. And because of that, I guess I don’t have great stories to tell all the time. That’s just me.

    Joni wrote:

    I actually like the takeaway message that you shouldn’t assume you are the only Mormon in any given group, because there might be others.

    I agree…and I also don’t assume that just because someone else is mormon that automatically makes them good and trustworthy.

    #314811
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I liked it. The message for me is: haven’t you ever felt alone? Haven’t you ever felt different for what you believe?

    You asked the question:

    Quote:

    My cynical side asks, if there were other Mormons in TSM’s battalion, shouldn’t he have known about it before then? Aren’t we supposed to wear our religion on our sleeve, making fellow Mormons easy to identify? Did he not introduce himself as, “My name is Private Monson, and I’m a Mormon”?

    I was never in the military. My younger brother was in the Marines. As I understand it, there is very little time for socializing. Even less in the first week.

    Here in the Midwest, there are very few Mormon’s in the general population. It’s easy to feel different or strange for our beliefs.

    His message, as I interpret it is: be strong for what you believe. I wouldn’t make it more complicated than that.

    Sometimes the message of this site is: be strong & profess what you believe to the general membership of the LDS church.

    Many of the views we hold here is seen as different or strange because it didn’t come from Leadership.

    We should always follow our own conscience (testimony) before Leadership.

    #314812
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Back in the day I often wondered what the point of Elder Monson’s talks were. Seriously, it seems like all he did was tell stories. He did evolve and his more recent talks as president are much better IMO. In fact, I really liked the 5 minute ones last conference! :P

    Some people are just story tellers. There are a couple high councilors in our stake who pretty much do what TSM used to do, tell stories. There are others who never tell stories and tend to expound doctrine. And there are some in between. It’s just differences in style. So from that point of view I can cut story tellers and TSM a break, even if I don’t always get the point.

    A long time ago (in a galaxy far, far away) when I was in the army there were only three recognized religions with services on post: you were either Jewish, Catholic or Protestant. Mormons were considered Protestant, and I don’t think that has changed (correct me if I’m wrong), but they have added Muslims services. Since it wasn’t a long, long, LONG time ago like TSM, maybe it wasn’t as clear to him that Mormons were considered Protestant as far as the US military was concerned. Also, back in those days in the military and in basic training, if you chose not to go to religious services you were given undesirable tasks (because the drill sergeants wanted the free time, which they didn’t get if people stayed behind). As a side note, I was not LDS during basic training, but there were a couple and they went to the Protestant services.

    #314813
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Joni wrote:

    I’ve already been demoted to the Terrestrial Kingdom.


    I like what Robert Kirby said on this topic. He said

    Quote:

    Once you admit your telestial nature, things get so much easier. It’s almost impossible to feel guilty about not measuring up to someone else’s expectation when you no longer have to bother.


    He cracks me up, but I think often he has a more serious point.

    I take from this story from Pres. Monson that you should not bow to peer pressure. This story (along with tons of others) compels me to be honest with others and tell them I don’t believe in the church’s true claims. I shouldn’t bow to the cultural pressures. I am not going to be an a-hole about it, but when pushed I will from now on be politely, but clearly, letting others know that adding that I like to be with members of the church.

    #314814
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I guess my issue is that they seem to be trying to turn a totally innocuous interaction (I don’t think for a second the drill instructor cares what religion Monson or anyone else is) into some sort of tale of persecution. The chief petty officer’s sneering tone of voice makes it seem like we are supposed to identify him as the bad guy. I think if I had been shown this video as a youth, I would have thought, Wow, that’s so unfair that TSM is being persecuted for his religion! I may have even taken it a step farther and seen it as confirmation bias that TSM was somehow foreordained to become prophet.

    The comparison to current real-world events rings a little false for me. “One time my friend showed me porn on his phone” isn’t really the same as “one time my drill instructor asked me what religion I was.” There are plenty of stories of people being persecuted for their beliefs, LDS or not. This really isn’t one of them.

    The first time I heard this story, I was waiting for TSM to finish it. But he never did. What about the other Mormons in his battalion (who also didn’t leave when the Jews, the Catholics, and the Protestants departed)? Were there any Muslims or Hindu or atheists still standing there after the three major religions had been dismissed? (Wouldn’t those atheists have been just as brave as TSM, standing alone for their lack of beliefs?) Did he and the other Mormons decide to go to the Protestant service after all (that’s what I would have done) or go off to their barracks and hold an unauthorized sacrament meeting, or what? Had nobody told TSM ahead of time that they only held religious services for the three major religions?

    Okay, okay, I’m overthinking it again 😆

    #314815
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Part of church is story time. We all make stories as we try to put meaning to things and inspire thinking. Frankly, I get in moods where I get sick of it at times, especially when they seem to be hyperbole or exaggerated for effect…but I try not to be too much of a kill-joy.

    Joni wrote:

    Okay, okay, I’m overthinking it again

    haha…well…over-think it away…that is what we do here…right?

    #314816
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It was an experience that had an impact on him. He wanted to share it, hoping it would have an impact on others.

    It resonates with lots of people.

    It doesn’t resonate with others.

    The point is whatever each of us gets from it – and I think there are plenty of points to get from it, since there are plenty of people to get points from it.

    It’s no different in that regard than the stories we tell here.

    #314817
    Anonymous
    Guest

    LookingHard wrote:

    Once you admit your telestial nature, things get so much easier. It’s almost impossible to feel guilty about not measuring up to someone else’s expectation when you no longer have to bother.

    My bishop told me that tithing is the only commandment where he gets to be perfectly obedient. I had two thoughts. 1) that he must not recognize alternate ways to calculate an honest tithe. 2) That I’m glad that has meaning to him, I’m just not into perfection at the moment.

    Heber13 wrote:

    Part of church is story time. We all make stories as we try to put meaning to things and inspire thinking. Frankly, I get in moods where I get sick of it at times, especially when they seem to be hyperbole or exaggerated for effect…but I try not to be too much of a kill-joy.

    I enjoy the art of telling stories – especially stories based on real events. The important thing is the narrative of the story. If side facts or events distract from the main narrative – they should be cut. If multiple minor characters did important things – it can be hard for the listeners to remember all the different characters – one should consider making an amalgamation character that represents several real people and does all those things necessary to move the story along.

    So in answer to what might have happened after the story ended or what might have happened to any atheists, Muslims, Hindu, or Jehovah’s Witnesses left behind – Those details were not supportive of the story narrative and were left out.

    Incidentally, the JW’s have us beat when it comes to standing alone. Not participating in things as ubiquitous as Halloween or Christmas celebrations can be very lonely.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.