- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 26, 2016 at 10:27 pm #211010
Anonymous
GuestSeptember 26, 2016 at 10:38 pm #315019Anonymous
GuestSeptember 27, 2016 at 8:12 pm #315020Anonymous
GuestLookingHard wrote:Sheldon wrote:I think more people would StayLDS is they had bishops that followed the advice found
here at Feminist Mormon Housewives
Indeed.Oh how I wish Church HQ would do a better job training bishops. Not only for the member’s sake, but for the bishop’s (and his family’s) sake.
I know….I am sort of glad I missed that bullet. If it ever came my way, and I felt I had to accept a Bishop’s calling, the way I would lead would be WAY softer than it would have b een 12 years ago. that is for sure.
I do wish we had paid people in positions that interact with members. The leaders have a strong impact on your overall experience if you are buying into the church program (at least, it impacted mine significantly). And when they are just too busy to do anything but keep house, it can really hurt the experience of the members.
At one time, people could point at my comments and cry “Priestcraft! Priestcraft!”, but now that the cat is out of the bag that mission presidents, higher level GA’s and others are paid, I don’t think people can rely on the “no paid ministry” principle. That was a myth for many years, with many members today still believing the people at the top aren’t paid. It’s not true, and with the hours that Bishops and SP’s have to put in, I think it could be justified in principle. Perhaps not in practice, but definitely in principle.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.