- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 11, 2017 at 5:15 pm #211178
Anonymous
GuestIt occurred to me recently that the Church released a statement of sorts about loving and welcoming refugees…back when the election was still pending. That felt like a very political move on their part.
:problem: Why, then, did they not also release a statement along the lines of “If you affiliate with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or if you sympathize with the precepts of any such group or individual, you need to revoke your recommend.”?
😆 For those who support abortions, gay marriage, illegal immigration (obeying laws of the land, remember?), etc…how can they answer “no” to that question?
And suddenly, I feel like the Church is not the Church I thought it was.
I mean, I’m aware that the Church is not the gospel.
But, now…I don’t know what I feel.
Betrayal isn’t the right word.
Concerned?
Lost?
I feel like they want to fight part of politics, but are now becoming too politically correct.
Like, they don’t want to offend anyone, so they don’t take hard stances.
Like, they are getting too soft and that leaves me (and maybe others) feeling like there isn’t a foundation upon which to stand.
**I don’t usually say “like” this often.

I feel like we are on a slippery slope.
If the Lord accepts everyone and no one does anything wrong…well, isn’t that what we were warned about in the BOM?
There is no moral compass anymore, and maybe I was holding out hope that the Church would provide some stability and guidance, but (at least to me) it feels like they are kowtowing.
Now what?
I’ve heard about members of the church whose shelf breaks and they are left in emotional shambles.
I’ve not had that experience – I weigh things out in my mind before I make decisions, so I’ve not felt “wrecked” but now I feel just a little unstable. Why?
February 11, 2017 at 8:06 pm #317121Anonymous
GuestQuestionAbound wrote:It occurred to me recently that the Church released a statement of sorts about loving and welcoming refugees…back when the election was still pending.
That felt like a very political move on their part.
:problem: Why, then, did they not also release a statement along the lines of “If you affiliate with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or if you sympathize with the precepts of any such group or individual, you need to revoke your recommend.”?
😆 For those who support abortions, gay marriage, illegal immigration (obeying laws of the land, remember?), etc…how can they answer “no” to that question?
The church has been a consistent supporter of immigration for many years and has given it’s backing to measures in the Utah legislature to welcome and protect immigrants. In addition it has spoken out on a number of occasions about the damage to families in the over zealous pursuit of illegal immigrants.As regards the other concerns you raise I believe the church has to be careful about defining something as a moral issue and then taking a line in the sand position on it when other well meaning individuals might see things differently. Always risky putting words in God’s mouth.
February 12, 2017 at 3:59 pm #317122Anonymous
GuestQuestionAbound wrote:For those who support abortions, gay marriage, illegal immigration (obeying laws of the land, remember?), etc…how can they answer “no” to that question?
It’s my understanding that the affiliate question was originally a way of asking someone if they were secretly a polygamist without coming out and saying the word polygamist. I’m not sure what that question means in the 21st century, especially outside of Utah where there’s not a history of secret polygamy.
QuestionAbound wrote:I feel like they want to fight part of politics, but are now becoming too politically correct.
Like, they don’t want to offend anyone, so they don’t take hard stances.
Like, they are getting too soft and that leaves me (and maybe others) feeling like there isn’t a foundation upon which to stand.
**I don’t usually say “like” this often.

Do you have an example of a hard stance you’d like for them to take?
Here’s the church’s more recent statement that came out shortly after the proposed immigration ban:
Quote:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is concerned about the temporal and spiritual welfare of all of God’s children across the earth, with special concern for those who are fleeing physical violence, war and religious persecution. The Church urges all people and governments to cooperate fully in seeking the best solutions to meet human needs and relieve suffering.
I can see how both sides can feel good about that statement. The pro-immigration folks like the call to relieve suffering and feel like letting people seek refuge is the way to do it. The anti-immigration folks like the “best solutions” part and believe that the ban is the current best solution.
I’d prefer the church stay out of politics altogether, I feel that we’re already too political in our
churchmeetings but I understand how it’s not as black and white as that. Politics and religion are intertwined in many ways. I’m not sure how I would react to a church issuing more definitive statements (on either side of the debate). I feel like if the church became more involved in politics it would cause me to reduce my interactions with the church. It’s bad enough as it is. QuestionAbound wrote:I feel like we are on a slippery slope.
If the Lord accepts everyone and no one does anything wrong…well, isn’t that what we were warned about in the BOM?
There is no moral compass anymore, and maybe I was holding out hope that the Church would provide some stability and guidance, but (at least to me) it feels like they are kowtowing.
I’d like to understand your perspective a little more. What kind of stability and guidance do you think the church should give? I know lots of members that would be upset if the church took a certain stand, I know lots of members that would be upset if the church took the opposite stand… but one group is used to being disappointed so you might as well keep the happy people happy.
February 13, 2017 at 2:52 am #317123Anonymous
GuestHonestly, sometimes we overthink things. February 13, 2017 at 11:50 pm #317124Anonymous
GuestI wish the church was bigger into the humanitarian issues of the day. Things like soup kitchens or warming stations. I would also like it if our Mormon experience was somehow helped to connect to and do good for the outside world. Things like micro-loans in Indonesia or digging a well in Uganda. At the moment the Mormon equivalent of this is to check the box that says “humanitarian aid” or “Perpetual Education Fund” on the tithing slip. It is just so disjointed from the end recipient as to make it difficult to get excited. February 14, 2017 at 3:29 pm #317125Anonymous
GuestRoy wrote:I wish the church was bigger into the humanitarian issues of the day. Things like soup kitchens or warming stations. I would also like it if our Mormon experience was somehow helped to connect to and do good for the outside world. Things like micro-loans in Indonesia or digging a well in Uganda. At the moment the Mormon equivalent of this is to check the box that says “humanitarian aid” or “Perpetual Education Fund” on the tithing slip. It is just so disjointed from the end recipient as to make it difficult to get excited.
YES!!! While I like that we can pay towards the Humanitarian Aid or Perpetual Education Funds, I do wonder how the money is used. We just pay into it and hope that it’s doing some good. But, I can go down to the women’s shelter and donate food and clothes, and actually see with my own eyes that it’s helping. It would be nice to hear about some of the success stories that have resulted from Humanitarian Aid and Perpetual Education. If this was done in conference, I could see how it could come across as bragging or patting ones self on the back. But, I think the church could easily put together some ‘success story’ videos and simply release them on lds.org like they did with the essays. Don’t actively push them, but make them available for people to see how those funds are used.
:think: February 14, 2017 at 8:34 pm #317126Anonymous
GuestHC, I agree that the Church keeps a pretty low profile about its efforts world-wide. I’m not actually sure that blaring it from speakers on Temple Square would be any better. I do think a little more discussion would be good, but there is a line that can be crossed and the Church’s approach seems to be to stand nowhere close to the line so as not to cross it inadvertently. I actually think this is a sign that the Church is sincere about its use of funds for good, and following the counsel in this passage from the NT:
Quote:But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you. –Matthew 6:3-4 (NIV)
Here’s an example from a few years ago of what the Church does… according to this report:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/jan/14/haiti-quake-aid-pledges-country-donations#data and this article:
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700009189/Mormon-church-provided-425M-in-Haiti-relief.html The LDS church provided more in disaster relief to Haiti after the 2010 earthquake than the countries of Germany, France, Italy, and Switzerland, combined.
But, the church does far more in non-dollar-amount support for the poor, in the form of education, donated labor from local ward members, and spiritual support. Like many of you, I assume, I know people personally who were sent at the behest of the Church to help in New Orleans after Katrina.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.