Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › IMPROVING teaching Effectiveness
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 17, 2017 at 2:22 pm #211395
Anonymous
GuestI am contemplating TRYING to measure teaching effectiveness in our Ward, as well as implementing a continuous improvement program. Before anyone shuts down, please listen to it first…. Teaching represents the vast majority of what we do, so it makes sense to measure it. We measure tithing, TR holding, priesthood advancements, baptisms, temple attendance, sacrament meeting attendance, why not measure teaching effectiveness? TSMonson said “when performance is measured, performance improves”. One reason people don’t come to church is they are nor fulfilled by the experience…
One reason I accepted an appointment to the Teachers Council in our Ward was because I feel there is a strong need for improvement in the teaching experience. In a way, I am facilitating the council blind because all I have are the suggestions from the Ward Council about what to address in the TC, and that was all shooting from the hip.
I would like to talk to the teachers first about their feelings about helping me design a way of assessing where we are strong and where we might improve in our teaching effectiveness in our Ward as a whole. I expect there will be some resistance in volunteer, non-graded, gospel teaching contexts as well, but am not sure what that would be — perhaps the “I’m doing this for free so don’t treat me like an employee”. Or maybe even people who have a sense of duty and just want to teach and go home without trying to improve…I get that; if anyone on earth gets that, I do.
So, I would approach this as way the council can help design something that is good for the Ward and good for teachers. Something that will last and have an impact long after they are released from their callings…To describe it as a way of improving ourselves and moving closer to a Zion-like existence. Explain the benefits of improvement. Don’t say I think it’s bad, just that we need to measure for a whole variety of reasons.
I was going to propose a survey into which they give input, and which draws on the principles in the Teaching the Savior’s Way. This survey could be administered anywhere on this continuum:
a) A survey administered by the teacher in their class, with only the results known to the teacher. There is no identifying the teacher on the survey….Only voluntary sharing in Teacher’s Council if the teacher wants, on only those parts they want. The teacher basically gets the feedback for self-improvement and the results never bubble up to the Teachers Council Facilitator or the ward leaders. There is no required self-improvement plan, although one is encouraged.
b) Same as (a) but the teachers are asked to come up with self-Improvement plans they share at the Teacher’s Council.
c) A survey administered as in a) but the results are aggregated at all or some one of these levels
i) the teacher level (in which case the survey identifies the teacher, with their permission)
ii) the youth or adult level
iii) youth SS, adult SS, YW/Aaronic Priesthood, RS/MelchPriesthood level
iii) the ward level (least effective as everything will likely regress toward the mean).
I can start by doing my own survey in Teachers Council to show I too am willing to participate in such a process.
I realize I have left out the primary. I am not a primary guy. I’d rather start with the adult and youth and see how it goes.
After I get the Teachers in the Teacher’s Council on board, I would then present it to the Ward Council, perhaps working through the Ward SS Presidency.
I think a bottom up approach is best, as the reaction of the teachers is the riskiest step. If we can get buy-in there, we are respecting their roles as volunteers and ensuring whatever we recommend is something the teachers will embrace.
I think this will also help convince the leaders above to accept the idea.
Thoughts on this? If you adopt the perspective of a teacher of youth or adults in our church, what kind of measurement and self-improvement plan would be palatable to you, if any? Recognize I am NOT about to treat the teachers like employees, but I want a method that is kind, supportive and appreciative. I want it to also respect their role as volunteers.
Comments welcome.
April 17, 2017 at 6:57 pm #320256Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:Recognize I am NOT about to treat the teachers like employees, but I want a method that is kind, supportive and appreciative. I want it to also respect their role as volunteers.
SD, I think this would be a major key to making this successful. If I had been asked to teach a class, and I found out that I was going to start getting feedback on my teaching, I’d be more than happy to give up that teaching calling. If we could actually request teaching positions, then I think it might be different. We would get more people who actually want to be teaching and might be more open to feedback. But, with our system of being volun’told’ that we’ve been ‘called’ to teach, it gets more difficult. I don’t know many people who actually enjoy their teaching position. So trying to tell them how to improve their approach at doing something they don’t like in the first place, could be a hard sell. This is probably just me, but if I was given feedback from my class about how to improve my teaching, my reaction would be something akin to, “How about you assign somebody else from the class to start teaching from now on. I’d rather be listening, anyway.” Some people are more open to feedback than others, and I’m probably not as open as I should be. So, I could see this varying from person to person, based on their personality, and whether or not they actually enjoy their calling.
April 17, 2017 at 7:57 pm #320257Anonymous
GuestHoly Cow wrote:
SilentDawning wrote:Recognize I am NOT about to treat the teachers like employees, but I want a method that is kind, supportive and appreciative. I want it to also respect their role as volunteers.
SD, I think this would be a major key to making this successful. If I had been asked to teach a class, and I found out that I was going to start getting feedback on my teaching, I’d be more than happy to give up that teaching calling. If we could actually request teaching positions, then I think it might be different. We would get more people who actually want to be teaching and might be more open to feedback. But, with our system of being volun’told’ that we’ve been ‘called’ to teach, it gets more difficult. I don’t know many people who actually enjoy their teaching position. So trying to tell them how to improve their approach at doing something they don’t like in the first place, could be a hard sell. This is probably just me, but if I was given feedback from my class about how to improve my teaching, my reaction would be something akin to, “How about you assign somebody else from the class to start teaching from now on. I’d rather be listening, anyway.” Some people are more open to feedback than others, and I’m probably not as open as I should be. So, I could see this varying from person to person, based on their personality, and whether or not they actually enjoy their calling.
Great feedback – -what if it was just a ward-wide survey that non-teachers fill out about their experience in the second hour and third hour (if they are non-teachers in that class) and then the results were shared in aggregate with the teacheres for the whole ward, split by adult classes, and youth classes only — no specifics on which adult or youth class? Would that be non-threatening?
IF most people think like you do (and I get it, so I’m not criticizing), it means I might as well abandon the idea of measurement driving improvement efforts.
Is that what you would recommend (again, not criticizing or sounding confrontive)?From the sound of it, I would simply be alienating the people who are doing their best, and I don’t want to do that…It also underscores the importance of getting people in there to teach who want to improve at it, and who like it, because they are the only people who will appreciate or want the feedback… Comments welcome from others too so I can see the landscape of how people might react. This is good feedback.
April 17, 2017 at 10:51 pm #320258Anonymous
GuestSilentDawning wrote:
what if it was just a ward-wide survey that non-teachers fill out about their experience in the second hour and third hour (if they are non-teachers in that class) and then the results were shared in aggregate with the teacheres for the whole ward, split by adult classes, and youth classes only — no specifics on which adult or youth class? Would that be non-threatening?
I think this would be a great approach! If I was in a teaching position, I wouldn’t be threatened at all, if the feedback was generalized like this.
I wish every ward had somebody who put as much effort into improving the effectiveness of teaching as you do!
:clap: Especially after sitting through an EQ lesson yesterday that was read word-for-word from the manual.April 17, 2017 at 11:49 pm #320259Anonymous
GuestHoly Cow — thanks for the feedback…I have a follow up question — where is the appropriate place to hold this survey? 1. Would it be appropriate to have it administered online through survey monkey do it through a mass email to the Ward? And also have it on a cell phone? Or would it be better to put it in the program (you know, where the hymns and speakers are) in hard copy, and ask people to fill it out during the meetings and put it in boxes found around the building (Foyers), or even both?
2. Do you think it would be appropriate to have a talk on gospel teaching in Sacrament meeting, or a fifth Sunday, and at the end, dedicate time to the rationale for the survey, the non-identifying nature of the aggregated data, and the overall purpose of the survey? And then ask people to participate? [Even teachers are free in one of the hours, usually, and would take it regarding the class they attend]
Input from you and others on this would be welcome as I think about the possibilities…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.