Home Page Forums Support How to be authentic but not cause a scene

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #211450
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hi everyone! It’s been a while since I’ve been here (busy with grad school) but I value your views and was hoping to get some ideas on how to move forward in my situation.

    Background/update: I am agnostic with a TBM husband who knows, 2 kids who don’t know, and I live near my parents (mother knows, father doesn’t). I have had some good conversations with my mother who wants to maintain our relationship more than change my mind, and I recently I have had some better conversations with my husband, although mostly he wants to not think about the issues I bring up.

    I am finally going to be leaving Utah! I see this as an opportunity to be more authentic in my participation with the church, since my husband still believes and wants to attend and raise our kids in the church. I’ve stopped wearing garments, which he seems to accept, and I’ve told him I plan to attend church with the family but not hold a calling or go visiting teaching. My parents will be moving with us (they are elderly and I take care of them and they take care of kids while I’m in school/working) and will be in our new ward.

    I would love to get your views on how to balance holding to my decision of being authentic while also not having everyone at church find out I am not believing. My mom insists it would be better to not talk to my dad directly about my views because he would take it as a personal failure and would never be able to understand me. So I’d rather not have him find out from ward members or have my kids find out until I’m ready to talk to them about it (which I plan to do gradually as they get older). Has anyone had success with avoiding callings but not having it become a huge deal? I will be starting a doctorate program so I’m hoping that might be enough of an excuse for the bishop. Any other ideas?

    #321096
    Anonymous
    Guest

    You’re in the right place Journey Girl!! This is exactly what I’ve had to do, although I don’t have Mormon parents to worry about.

    Here are my suggestions.

    1. Let your authenticity be found in what you DO in the church, not in what you say. To be authentic, you don’t have to disagree with principles, speak up about Doctrine you don’t agree with or otherwise broadcast your unorthodox beliefs. But you CAN place boundaries on what you do. Even traditional believers so “no” to things, so just say “no” when there is something you don’t want to do that violates your sense of authenticity. Be polite about it though and give innocuous reasons — not faith/doubt-based ones.

    2. When they ask you to take a calling, don’t be afraid to “coach” the leader on where you would like to serve. Do a scan of all the ways you could serve in the church, and find some things you can do authentically. For me, it’s helping with activities and planning of such, doing a teacher’s council, maybe hosting a youth activity, helping when someone has a legitimate need, and attending some meetings. I also don’t mind participating when someone asks a good question and I can give practical advice. I also donated a live band to an activity.

    I said “no’ to five callings before I got one I liked, and I have done it now for almost a year without incident. I actually enjoy it and had spiritual experiences, even though I’m pretty agnostic about a lot of Mormon things and cultural values. You can still feel spiritual while being unorthodox.

    3. Don’t ever share your doubts directly with anyone. I have a mantra — I am worn out from my church experiences, and decided to focus my life on the pursuit of happiness. So, I tend to focus on those things that make me happy in the church, and let the Bp know what those are. What are those things for you? I quote that happiness is the object and design of our existence, and justify it that way. That is authentic for me.

    4. If asked if you would like to get a temple recommend, express vague hope, “maybe eventually” or something that doesn’t exclude you from the pool someday. Who knows if you will have your own Road to Damascus experience like Paul had, or what life might throw at you to change your mind? Apply mobility theory (from chess). Each move is calculated to preserve your cruising range (options) in the future. Make that the goal of any convo with a priesthood leader or traditional believer — to not cut off your options with statements that can be considered apostate or re-engage at any level you choose in the future.

    5. Be authentic here on StayLDS. It’s therapeutic to say what you really think, unfiltered in this forum. This is where I am authentic, and I don’t need to be authentic in my words at church as a result.

    6. Remember, we are never usually authentic in all places. Do you tell your boss you think their leadership skills are weak? Do you tell your spouse they look fat and ugly lately? Do you tell your kids, bluntly, about their weaknesses? Your neighbor that their hair looks awful? Most people aren’t that honest. Check out Liar Liar with Jim Carey for how funny life would be if we were all truly authentic in what we say to people. Why expect to be that way at church when the LDS way is so dear to the hearts of the people who have sacrificed so much for it? Be tactful, and let being tactful and respectful of others beliefs be your authentic way of expressing yourself. Let that eclipse your desire to express contrarion views about the church, putting a charitable disposition above a disagreeable one.

    Anyway, this has worked with me so far. when I’ve been blunt about what i think about the church, it rarely ends well.

    Would you mind have a few VT families assigned with the understanding you’ll help them when there is a legitimate need? That is another way you can integrate without selling your soul, if you are OK with that…

    I am doing that right now, although I agreed to make a couple visits a month.

    #321097
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think I am in a fairly similar place as you Journey Girl. I have gotten to a place of real peace, but it has been years in the making (and I am not that old!). But there are still ups and downs and tricky situations. I like SD’s advice. I especially agree that it is wise not to tell anyone (at least in your church circle) of your disbelief. That was hard for me at first because I wanted to scream every week at church. But this forum really helped me come to see that being myself doesn’t require sharing my deepest (un)belief with everyone I meet.

    Quote:

    Each move is calculated to preserve your cruising range (options) in the future.


    This is SO important. Part of my belief now is that I leave room that I am totally wrong and it really is all true! So I am trying not to burn any bridges, even as I step back more and more.

    I too have given up my temple recommend (by not renewing it) and have stopped wearing garments most of the time. But as part of my ‘not burning bridges’ theme, I still wear them to Mormony things. I see it as a sign of respect for those who believe and as a sign of commitment to my husband.

    Along those same lines, I still hold a calling (actually a fairly ‘high’ one on a local level). This is how I see it: if I was part of any other club, I would feel the need to pitch in and put in my time. So I do a job at church and do it the way I am comfortable with. Others see me happy, smiling and helping and they don’t assume that my soul needs more saving. Win, win.

    I don’t live in Utah and where I am there are very few Mormons, but several years ago all my friends were Mormon. It made it very hard during my faith transition to feel like everything in my life was Mormon. So I have worked very hard to make other friends and associations and that has helped a lot as I have stepped back from church. But it has also shown me that I really like Mormons! They are my people. So while plenty of things drive me crazy, I can cope with most of it now.

    One last thing. It has really helped to not attend church every week. I usually make it a couple of times a month. And I always have a great excuse–out of town or sick kid or something (and I don’t lie!). But I use every opportunity possible to skip a week and that makes things easier.

    So I guess, to sum it up: I am letting Mormonism into my life where and when it fits. I make it an active choice and don’t feel guilty. But I also don’t feel the need (anymore) to educate others on how crazy Mormonism is :)

    #321098
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I think the best advice here is that you don’t have to carry around a placard stating your beliefs or unbeliefs in order to be authentic. I think we might all be surprised at how many don’t believe it all. And why would we be surprised? Because they’re not carrying around placards, either.

    #321099
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Stayforthedip wrote:

    One last thing. It has really helped to not attend church every week. I usually make it a couple of times a month. And I always have a great excuse–out of town or sick kid or something (and I don’t lie!). But I use every opportunity possible to skip a week and that makes things easier.

    So I guess, to sum it up: I am letting Mormonism into my life where and when it fits. I make it an active choice and don’t feel guilty. But I also don’t feel the need (anymore) to educate others on how crazy Mormonism is :)

    Great advice up here. I too don’t go all the time, but usually 3-5 times a month. Tomorrow I have something that conflicts with church, and I’ve been jacked up all day looking forward to it. My life will be very full when I get home from it, as I’m helping people express their passions, have new experiences. As a result, I feel like I’m being very kind and nurturing in what I’m doing. I love the people I will be with — all non-members, and I can’t wait.

    Why trade that for a church experience that is repetitive and hasn’t changed in 35 years?

    Happiness comes first.

    #321100
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m also an active agnostic, with a TBM spouse, and a child on the way. It’s a tough spot to be in, but I have faith you can do it!

    First, I would explicitly talk to the Bishop and RS president, and explain the situation. I wouldn’t go into much detail, just them them you respect them and their beliefs, and are not antagonistic, but you don’t believe in it, and would like to be exempt from having a calling and VT assignments. The leaders will be as keen as you not to make it into a public display, and will likely comply with your request.

    Being authentic in Church meetings is difficult. There will be many lessons (and many more comments) that you’ll straight up disagree with. A lot of doctrines teeter from “helpful” to “harmful”, depending on the literal truthfulness of the Church. In Church, I take a bit of advice from Kenny Roger’s:

    Quote:

    You’ve got to know when to hold ’em

    Know when to fold ’em

    Know when to walk away

    And know when to run

    In other words, know when to speak up, know when to keep quiet, and know when you’d better leave.

    We’ve all got plenty to learn from each other, no matter where you stand with the Church. But religious rhetoric leans heavily towards pathos; in church, any contradiction will be viewed as antagonism. If you can’t agree, speaking up won’t do much good. Sometimes, that means taking a step out for fresh air. “I was feeling a bit nauseous”, is as true an excuse as any.

    Best of luck, Journeygirl!

    #321095
    Anonymous
    Guest

    dande48 wrote:


    I’m also an active agnostic, with a TBM spouse, and a child on the way. It’s a tough spot to be in, but I have faith you can do it!

    First, I would explicitly talk to the Bishop and RS president, and explain the situation. I wouldn’t go into much detail, just them them you respect them and their beliefs, and are not antagonistic, but you don’t believe in it, and would like to be exempt from having a calling and VT assignments. The leaders will be as keen as you not to make it into a public display, and will likely comply with your request.

    I have only been proactive once in my life with talking to leaders, and it was only theBishop. And that was a couple months ago when our Bishop kept coming at me over and over and over and over and over again with callings. Eventually he assigned me 20 HT families and I’d had enough — all without my buy in and agreement.

    It was very risky — but my approach was to affirm testimony while disaffirming my commitment to high pressure work in the church at this time. I framed it as exhaustion, and shared some really extreme and damaging experiences I’d had at church — but affirmed that I had kept trudging along in spite of these experiences, working on “testimony alone”. This stopped the requests for activity etceera.

    But I consider myself among the lucky. If you go in there and tell them where you stand on any doctrinal or doubt issues, it’s over. So I would not be proactive in meeting with the leaders. Just put boundaries on what you will and will not do. Only be proactive in pre-empting what they ask you to do if it they come at you with so many callings and requests for work that you can’t stand it any more. The request for a calling here and there doesn’t qualify in my view. For example, I said “no” five times before it got too much with the 20 HT families…

    Also, once, I was asked to speak to the Bishop and he really pressed me to share why I didn’t have a TR or wasn’t more committed to the church. This was with a different Bishop many years ago. I eventually told him after 3 annual visits. And then a member of the SP called me out about the things that bothered me over the pulpit in Stake Conference. He mentioned specifically the things that were bothering me in such close proximity it HAD to have been shared with him by our Bishop. And the SP member looked right at me when he said it. So, share something with the BP, and it’ll go straight to the Stake President and others in the priesthood line. There is no loyalty to you personally — the loyalty is to the chain of command. So consider that when considering being forthright about why you have concerns about the church.

    #321101
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree with SD. There are some very understanding bishops out there but there are also some who are not very understanding at all. Sharing doubts, questions, and unbeliefs is risky with any member, leader or not. I have thought about the quote from The Gambler in the past as well – it’s very applicable to most situations at church, whether you’re talking to a bishop or participating in class.

    #321102
    Anonymous
    Guest

    To those of you who suggest not sharing where you are personally with leaders or other members, may I ask a question? What value and meaning do you feel in belonging to a community where you feel if you were to publicly share your personal perspectives you would be rejected or dismissed? This is where I am and where I am really struggling right now. I too am basically agnostic with TBM spouse and attend to support her. Support of her is also why I haven’t specifically asked to be released but I have come close. I did tell my leaders and they basically know where I’m at and that was important for me to have them know.

    So now I basically look at the church as a club I belong to. But what is hard for me is the thought that if I were to stand up at the pulpit and express honestly and sincerely where I am at and how I got there, that ultimately I would be rejected. So the struggle is, other than support for my spouse, why continue to associate with a community that would reject the authentic self?

    And right now it is a real struggle and I am having a very hard time coming up with reasons for someone like myself who falls more on the side of disbelief to continue. I could continue attending for years, but will that bring me satisfaction and joy? Am I missing out on being part of a different community that would accept me for me? And at the very least, I am so glad I found this online community that fills that need.

    #321103
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Thanks everyone for your responses. I really appreciate your comments.

    SD: I really liked that idea to be authentic in what I do more than just what I say. That seems to be the way I am dealing with it with my dad, if I don’t directly address things with him then he has deniability, but he (likely) won’t call me out on something he may notice on his own. At church I could imagine doing certain roles but probably more informal or temporary things, so that might be a way to set a limit there and be authentic in what I do.

    I also liked your suggest in keeping options open. It seems like a safer approach. I am worried about what to do when directly confronted about something, like why I don’t have a recommend. It was good to read your experience with that. I wonder if it would be different for me as a woman though? Since there wouldn’t be that concern on their part of losing a priesthood holder?

    Stayforthedip: I hadn’t thought of making sure to skip some days. I may even plan on at least once a month missing a week! That would likely help a lot.

    Dande48: I think that is great advice to recognize when to hold back versus when to say something. I tend to fall more on the not say anything at all end, but it would be nice to do a gentle push back at times. I think Ray has given good examples on how he does that.

    DoubtingTom: I think I am feeling a lot like you, that’s why I have this desire to be authentic. I get the caution that DarkJedi and SD have given, but it does feel very disappointing to feel like I will have to hide and fake it still to some extent. I think I have hope that as my husband comes along to at least seeing my side of things, then I may have more freedom in skipping weeks or just attending sacrament meeting with the family or something. I feel very stuck right now though, and not satisfied with where things are at.

    #321104
    Anonymous
    Guest

    SD said much of what I would have said. I frame it under the following concepts:

    1) Pick your battles. What do I want more than to be validated (especially knowing that some people/situations may never validate me)? I personally do not pay tithing. Writing large checks to the church would be my breaking point. Because I know that I am relatively inflexible on this issue I may need to be more flexible in other areas.

    2) Consider the audience. I am comfortable presenting myself somewhat differently in different settings.

    3) We are all works in progress. Be careful of declarations that may seem to permanently define you in the minds of others (and limit your future options). For example, I say that I have hope and faith in concepts that I find so beautiful that I long for them to be true…even if I cannot say “I know.” I also leave room for a return to paying tithing in the future.

    I wanted to be permitted to baptize my children (I was) and I still want the ordain my son when the time comes. This has led me to try to act in deliberate ways that are more likely to achieve the desired result.

    DoubtingTom wrote:


    What value and meaning do you feel in belonging to a community where you feel if you were to publicly share your personal perspectives you would be rejected or dismissed?

    There is a big heritage aspect. I want to be included in my son’s priesthood line of authority. I wanted to be the one to baptize my kids because my dad did it for me and I had always imagined myself doing that for my own children.

    There is also the extended family aspect. We live far enough away from family that they are not really involved in the daily minutia but if we missed a major milestone ordinance it would set off red flags. We want our children to be accepted and treated the same as the other cousins and grandchildren. We also do not want the drama and judgment that would come our way as parents.

    DW is a believer. She does not have her eyes closed to a number of the problems that the church has currently or has had in the past. She would not begrudge people for throwing up their hands and walking away if that is what they feel they need to do. Her path is to stick with what she knows, what she feels in a subconscious level. Part of why I do what I do is out of love, respect, and support for her.

    While I wait for my kids to grow up and get their ordinances, we take advantage of the framework, community, and the programs offered. We contribute where and how we are able to make the programs better.

    Finally, I am still a spiritual person and I am still hungry for meaning. There are some aspects and teachings of Mormonism that are wonderful to me. I feel free to explore the universe of ideas but my framework will always have a Mormon bent or Mormon flavor. I may be “out of step” intellectually but the LDS are still my tribe and my people. No matter our differences, there is always more that binds us in common.

    #321105
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DarkJedi wrote:


    Sharing doubts, questions, and unbeliefs is risky with any member, leader or not.

    I agree 100%. The devil is in the details. Just make a simple statement of unbelief, and make it clear what you will and will not do. When pressed on the reason, I once said, “For one, I do not believe it is necessary to correct another’s religious beliefs.” The discussion ended there.

    It is not your duty to meet with those you do not wish to meet. Nor do you need to provide details to those who ask. I got asked eight months back to meet with the SP, after turning down a position in the EQ presidency. I politely declined, stating I would rather be with my family on weeknights. You choose how much of the Church you want in your life.

    DoubtingTom wrote:


    What value and meaning do you feel in belonging to a community where you feel if you were to publicly share your personal perspectives you would be rejected or dismissed? … Other than support for my spouse, why continue to associate with a community that would reject the authentic self?

    And right now it is a real struggle and I am having a very hard time coming up with reasons for someone like myself who falls more on the side of disbelief to continue. I could continue attending for years, but will that bring me satisfaction and joy? Am I missing out on being part of a different community that would accept me for me?

    I hear ya, Tom. Some days, I feel the same way.

    There are many members of the Church who are genuinely good people, who love you simply because you are a child of God. There are a lot of stories and messages the gospel conveys that are good and inspiring, even if they aren’t literally true. Belonging to a group brings people with the same likes and goals together under mutual comradery; people so different, they’d have nothing to do with one another, if not for the Church. Take this site, for example. We have lovers of Star Wars, Futurama, feminists, Democrats, Republicans… I disagree with 20-25% of all the religious/political statements on here. And yet, we’re brought together under the hopes of “Staying LDS”. That makes you my comrade.

    Will it bring you satisfaction and joy? I can’t say. I think satisfaction and joy come from within, and spread outwards. Folks who say, “I will be happy when…” often never find it.

    #321106
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DoubtingTom wrote:


    To those of you who suggest not sharing where you are personally with leaders or other members, may I ask a question? What value and meaning do you feel in belonging to a community where you feel if you were to publicly share your personal perspectives you would be rejected or dismissed?


    I’m actually struggling with how to word this, but the straightest way is to ask you the same question. If you disagree with or doubt the organization so much, what value do you find in attending? Let’s do a little analogy.

    Let’s say you belong the Spanky and Alfalfa’s He-Man-Woman-Hater’s Club (HMWHC). You joined as soon as you learned about the club, you took the oath, and attended all the meetings and activities. You couldn’t get enough of it, you loved the camaraderie and everything about the club’s beliefs and ideals. As time went on though you became aware of some things that you don’t fully agree with any more. You figure out that not all women are trouble and there are some you’d really like to get closer with. But any relationship with a woman is grounds for your immediate dismissal from the club meaning you won’t be able to attend the tailgate parties, annual pig roast, or Ultimate Frisbee Tournament. Even though you don’t believe it all anymore, it’s still your tribe, they’re still your friends, and there’s nothing better on earth than that pig – so you decide to stick around, keep the women thing to yourself, and join in the activities. Is it your place now to convert others to your way of thinking? (Mother Nature will do that eventually anyway, but we’re just pretending here.) Is it your place to stand up in the next meeting and say “Girls ain’t so bad, try ’em you might like ’em!”? Of course not, it’s their club, their rules, and you agreed to them. If you’re going to stay you need to play by the rules. Does that mean you can’t say something like “Gee guys, Spanky’s Mom sure does make great brownies for desert at the pig roast – that woman sure ain’t so bad!”? Of course you could say that – there might be a couple guys that look at your crossways, but most will likely agree. See where I’m going with this?

    We might not agree with everything that happens at church or everything that the church (or usually more accurately people in the church) teaches, but it’s their club, their rules. It is no more our place to try to change those rules than it is to try to change the rules of the HMWHC or the Catholic or Baptist church down the street. That’s not how it works. We can all have our opinions, but we are not free in many circumstances to share those opinions. Try sharing what a horrible boss you have with his boss or tell the CEO that your company business plan is all wrong and see how far that gets you.

    Quote:

    This is where I am and where I am really struggling right now. I too am basically agnostic with TBM spouse and attend to support her. Support of her is also why I haven’t specifically asked to be released but I have come close. I did tell my leaders and they basically know where I’m at and that was important for me to have them know.

    So now I basically look at the church as a club I belong to. But what is hard for me is the thought that if I were to stand up at the pulpit and express honestly and sincerely where I am at and how I got there, that ultimately I would be rejected. So the struggle is, other than support for my spouse, why continue to associate with a community that would reject the authentic self?

    Good question. Why? If you are a member of the club, you agree to the club’s rules. If you’re just a visitor to the club, you still play by the club’s rules. If you don’t want to play by the rules, don’t go to the club. Again, it’s their club, their rules.

    Quote:

    And right now it is a real struggle and I am having a very hard time coming up with reasons for someone like myself who falls more on the side of disbelief to continue. I could continue attending for years, but will that bring me satisfaction and joy? Am I missing out on being part of a different community that would accept me for me? And at the very least, I am so glad I found this online community that fills that need.

    Again, good question. You said you are going to support your wife. If that’s the goal and purpose, you need to make that your goal and purpose. Your purpose then is not to look for satisfaction and joy except in the satisfaction and joy you get from supporting your wife because you love her. You might be missing out on different kinds of joy or spiritual fulfillment – the only way to know is to go to a different club and find out.

    All that said, I sometimes sort of see myself as an observer at church. Sometimes I find great humor in some of the stuff that goes on, sometimes it makes me angry. Sometimes I pay attention and find peace, joy or satisfaction, and sometimes I find peace, joy and satisfaction by not paying attention and seeking it elsewhere (I am thankful for my tablet/phone). I can’t stand at the pulpit and express all my opinions, but you might be surprised what you can get away with using scripture and GA quotes (without stretching them either). I’ve said I support civil gay marriage in class, making sure to add that I also believe the church has every right not to perform or recognize them (their club, their rules – but their rules don’t apply to other clubs). I can freely talk about grace, about focusing on Christ, about my distaste for doing family history, and myriad other things – all without wearing a sign that says “You’re all full of crap and I don’t believe most of what you say” (which may well be what I’m thinking). In addition to knowing when to hold ’em and fold ’em, you also have to know when (and how) to bluff and when to call. There is a great deal to be said for nuance and speaking Sheepese as a llama. There’s also much to be said for focusing on and talking about what you do believe.

    I don’t see your real issue here as being authenticity, I see it as wanting to leave the club but not daring to (for good reason).

    #321107
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:


    We are all works in progress. Be careful of declarations that may seem to permanently define you in the minds of others (and limit your future options). For example, I say that I have hope and faith in concepts that I find so beautiful that I long for them to be true…even if I cannot say “I know.”

    This is very helpful Roy. I keep forgetting that I am still a work in progress. There is very much a tendency on my part to label myself, and the current label that seems to best apply is agnostic. I have arrived at this current position with a lot of hard work, study, prayer, and I feel that the data, reason, and logic is on my side. But you’re right that even this hard-earned position may not be permanent, even if it feels that way at the time. Also, I really like your thought about longing for concepts that are so beautiful to be true. For me, being the overly logic person that I have always been, ideas being beautiful is not enough for them to be true – there needs to be data in support. But yes, I should continue to think of myself as a work in progress and not try to label myself so definitively that others will assume I am at a permanent spot.

    DarkJedi wrote:


    You said you are going to support your wife. If that’s the goal and purpose, you need to make that your goal and purpose. Your purpose then is not to look for satisfaction and joy except in the satisfaction and joy you get from supporting your wife because you love her.

    Thanks DJ. Actually, if I can even just remember that on a consistent basis, I can find meaning in attendance. I really do love her and want to support her, as my faith transition has been VERY hard on her.

    DarkJedi wrote:


    I don’t see your real issue here as being authenticity, I see it as wanting to leave the club but not daring to (for good reason).

    You could be right. Sometimes I feel so confused about all of this I honestly don’t know what my motivations are. Maybe deep down I just want to throw my hands up and leave it all behind, but the consequences would be too great to be able to do that. Other times, I feel that deep down I want to stay as an open non-literal believer and be welcomed and accepted and continue to enjoy the fellowshipping and social benefits of my membership.

    One thing that I have been thinking lately, and those of you who have had similar thoughts I’d be interested to know how you processed this. But for me, I feel like I never really made a decision to join the “club.” That decision was made for me, and in my adult years I continued because of what I now believe to be deep indoctrination. But now that I have looked critically at the issues and arrived at much different perspectives, I think I never would have joined knowing everything I know now. And with that knowledge there comes the desire to leave. But then I think about all the good things and values I got out of my membership and my mind changes again. It’s all so confusing and difficult! I really admire and even envy those of you who seem to have arrived at a place of peace in your approach to the church. I certainly am not there yet.

    Again (I feel I can’t say this enough) thanks for this community.

    #321108
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I am a convert and I did choose to join the club. One ward I lived in actually did have an annual pig roast. I also attended more than one hangi on my mission, but I digress.

    Even though I chose to join the club, I probably would not choose to join now knowing what I now know. On the other hand, there are lots of things I would do differently if I knew then what I know now. I recognize the experience is different for those who were raised in the church, and it does bug me to some extent that joining the club happens when you’re children, when you really don’t know what the heck you’re getting into, and when you feel (or are led to believe) it’s just part of what you do. In truth the vast majority of converts don’t know what they’re getting into either – that’s partly why retention is such a problem IMO. Faith crisis and faith transition come to both BIC types and convert types.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 31 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.