Home Page Forums General Discussion Why hold the line on this?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #211526
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It came out earlier this month (even mentioned in BYU’s newspaper) that the LDS business college is now selling caffeinated drinks on campus.

    It just seems really odd that BYU Provo still is holding firm. I was just in Utah and I talked with one of my former scouts and he said just about everyone rolls their eyes at this – they think it is silly. He even said that he worked in the cougar eat and asked the person over the cougar eat why they couldn’t order some caffeinated drinks. Even the manager rolled his eyes and said, “the only thing I am allowed to say is that there isn’t any demand for caffeinated drinks”. My former scout said, “That is a lie! Just go look at what is just off campus – Soadelicious and Swig. They are doing every well and every time he goes in he almost never hears ‘give me the caffeine-free’ on the orders”. He also says that J-Daws often has sales on their drinks and he said it is a bonanza when that happens.

    Maybe some of the folks that make money off BYU prohibiting caffeinated drinks are lobbying those in charge. Or maybe they just give them unlimited refills! :-)

    I can understand why BYU-I would still prohibit them – so they can consider themselves more righteous than the cougars in Provo. But that is a different topic.

    #322241
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Maybe BYU just has to look more righteous than LDS Business College. If that’s the case, we might see BYU selling caffeinated drinks after LDSBC starts selling beer at the cafe.

    #322242
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Who knows? It’s vestigial from when it was culturally against the WoW even if it was never explicitly forbidden. I get the argument about avoiding habit-forming substances – loss of agency and all that if you get addicted – even if I disagree. But some clearly take it way too far.

    This article from 2012 discusses this at BYU too, about halfway down:

    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/1848098

    Quote:


    Part of the confusion stems from LDS church-owned Brigham Young University, which neither sells nor serves caffeinated drinks. But BYU spokeswoman Carri Jenkins explains that is “not a university or church decision, but made by dining services, based on what our customers want.”

    There has not “been a demand for it,” Jenkins said Thursday. “We are constantly evaluating what those needs and desires are.”

    Indeed, fully caffeinated colas are available in the church’s Joseph Smith Memorial Building, and in the Lion House Pantry, next to the faith’s headquarters in downtown Salt Lake City.

    So in 5 years since that article there “still isn’t a demand for it?” Do a student survey and see. That line is complete BS. They are holding out for another reason – someone with decision making capacity still sees caffeine as against the spirit of the WoW and doesn’t want students making that decision for themselves.

    #322243
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My kids who have been to BYU also roll their eyes and the only answer they’ve ever gotten is the no demand lie. They have all gone to the aforementioned places and others (the Subway across the street from the CONE, the gas station on the corner, etc.). There was a guy who started a little business last semester delivering caffeinated sodas on campus. He (and a couple helpers) carried them around in insulated bags and promised delivery in less than a half hour. They were slightly pricey, but not much more than convenience stores.

    #322244
    Anonymous
    Guest

    To be fair, if there are plenty of businesses making good profit off of them near campus, there really isn’t an actual **demand** for them on campus. 😆 😈

    If I owned a business that sold them near campus, I would be praying hard that the policy not change – and, honestly, I personally would rather have the money go to a small business owner than to BYU. It’s a stupid policy, in and of itself (and, to make a statement, I would like to see it change), but, on a practical, business level, I actually don’t mind.

    #322245
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I bet Provo changes first…and Rexburg will hold the line with pride in and of themselves for keeping higher standards. (and eye rolling continues)

    #322246
    Anonymous
    Guest

    There are certain things in LDS culture that are outgrowths of “good ideas”

    Abstaining from coffee is good. Abstaining from caffeine is better.

    Abstaining from gambling is good. Abstaining from face cards is better.

    Covering cleavage is good. Covering shoulders is better.

    Over time people that follow the more restrictive model can be seen as more valiant and those that do not can be seen as less. I remember over 10 years ago being told about a branch president’s wife that brought a 2 liter bottle of coke to a branch pot-luck. I explained to the sharer that coke is actually not against the WoW. They responded that “yes, technically, but shouldn’t the wife of a church leader be a better example of the higher law?”

    (As an aside, there does seem to be an expectation in the church that we are practicing some form of preparatory gospel in order to ease into a more celestial form later on. Those individuals that only do what is required may be seen as half-milers that will not be prepared for the millennium.)

    DoubtingTom wrote:


    They are holding out for another reason – someone with decision making capacity still sees caffeine as against the spirit of the WoW and doesn’t want students making that decision for themselves.

    I think the other part of this is that our young single adults are viewed as something less than full adults. Therefore, they may need tighter and more numerous guardrails to help prevent them from making mistakes.

    #322247
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:

    Abstaining from coffee is good. Abstaining from caffeine is better.

    Abstaining from gambling is good. Abstaining from face cards is better.

    Covering cleavage is good. Covering shoulders is better.


    Good point, Roy. We put up hedges to protect…then hedge the hedges and then the next leader wants more righteousness by hedging the hedged hedges…

    Pretty soon we are so hedged from what we are hedging we can’t remember what the problem was in the first place. But we have the hedges up…so might as well keep them.

    #322248
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My good mother is a saint and means well, but she can be a little too extreme for me. An ordinary discussion eventually turns into a Gospel Doctrine class so I avoid it sometimes. I recently brought a sugar-free Monster energy drink to a dinner at my parennt’s home. I was lectured and practically raked over the coals for consuming such an abomination. I’m fit, eat healthy, 8% bodyfat, workout and pretty much avoid junk food. I brought up the fact that there’s many obese, unhealthy members of the church who are feeding their faces full of junk, sugar, fast food, but I get dinged for drinking an occassional energy drink. Holy crap! The point is this: there’s so many more harmful things a person can put in thier bodies than caffeine.

    #322249
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m sure its a balancing act between keeping their staff happy, their superiors happy, and their customers happy. And keeping God happy. I guess that’s important too.

    My question is, why are maple-bacon donuts still being served at the Cougar Eat? God really needs to update his Word of Wisdom. We’ve got a real health crisis in the Church.

    #322250
    Anonymous
    Guest

    dande48 wrote:


    My question is, why are maple-bacon donuts still being served at the Cougar Eat? God really needs to update his Word of Wisdom. We’ve got a real health crisis in the Church.

    Mmm… those are so good… and so evil. They’re the real forbidden fruit.

    #322251
    Anonymous
    Guest

    UberDan wrote:

    The point is this: there’s so many more harmful things a person can put in thier bodies than caffeine.


    I totally agree. So…if the hedges were really all about health…then they’ve drawn the line in the sand in the wrong place. Or perhaps the line was drawn 100 years ago for what worked then…and it just doesn’t apply to now…it has just become a tradition we hold on to so we can practice obedience to something that has no meaning anymore.

    Not too different than Jewish standards of Kosher, right? The value is having something to be obedient to.

    If the real need is a law of health…we’ve missed the mark.

    Frankly, I don’t want more laws. I want less. I want to live WOW as I see it applies to me. And answer “Yes” in the TR interview, based on what makes sense to me and my God. Energy drinks, soda, tea, fatty foods…and on and on…I don’t want to ask the church to give me a list. I can make my list based on the spirit of the law and my personal ability to see what makes sense to me. Even if others ding me for it…that is about them and how they see what is important about teachings from scripture and prophets…I can find a better way and navigate my religion so it stays relevant to me.

    [also…I wish I had 7% bodyfat. :problem: I wonder if the gates to heaven will only allow passage to those with 10% or below??? nah…we often seem to want such specific measures of being “worthy” enough and want the church to provide them so we feel better about where we are (fear driven commandments)…I’m sure God has a better way to deal with things…I will focus on moderation in all things.]

    #322252
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My theory is this, take it for what it’s worth. When I was at BYU We had a Rodin sculpture exhibit and the members of the church protested “the kiss” as being too explicit for adult college students to see. Politically BYU receives a lot of money from some pretty staunch LDS people who have a lot of influence at the school. I’d wager that if you follow the donors there’s at least a couple of old timers whose large funds would be at risk if they started allowing caffeinated drinks. Usually stuff this weird is financially or politically motivated.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #322253
    Anonymous
    Guest

    A visiting woman came out with the no cola line in Sunday School last week.

    #322254
    Anonymous
    Guest

    bombadil wrote:


    Usually stuff this weird is financially or politically motivated.

    I agree. And often it is the principle of the matter to some…even if the thing itself is silly or weird.

    Is it really integrity to hold the line on something that is meaningless?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 36 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.