Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Good Artlce on Parental and Married Children Relationships
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 30, 2017 at 11:25 pm #211636
Anonymous
GuestAS I am entering a phase of life where I have been confused about what my responsibilities are to my daughter, who is getting married, I found this article that was highly useful. Written by a Professor of Family Studies at BYU, there was a section that grabbed me: Quote:Adult-to-Adult Relationships
Marrying and leaving the parents’ home requires a fundamental shift in the relationship between children and parents. While parents of young children have a divine mandate to supervise and discipline their children, it is not appropriate for parents to control their adult children. Instead, the hierarchy of supervision and control dissolves so that parents and their adult children are on equal footing. This shift allows parents and adult children to develop relationships that are built on mutual respect and friendship.
How do adult children and their parents create this fundamental shift in their relationship? I learned a key principle in this process several years ago when I was teaching a workshop for married couples in our stake. I taught the workshop three consecutive times as participants rotated among various classes. The first two times I taught the workshop, the primary audience was young couples in their 20s and early 30s. When I taught the principle that relationships between adult children and parents should be nonhierarchical, with parents no longer controlling their children, the members of the class became very enthusiastic. A number of them raised their hand and said, “I want my parents to treat me like an adult, but they won’t.”
The third workshop included a different group of participants. Instead of people in their 20s, the class consisted almost exclusively of middle-aged adults who had adult children of their own. Being in my late 20s myself, I was worried about how the middle-aged parents would respond to the principle that parents should allow their adult children to make their own decisions, become independent, and be treated like adults.
Sure enough, as soon as I started teaching this principle, several hands shot up—just as I had feared. As I called on them, I was somewhat surprised by the first person’s comment. She said, “We would love to treat our married children like adults, but they send us very mixed messages.” She continued: “Just a couple weeks ago, for example, one of our married children said that we needed to treat her and her husband more like adults. She accused us of still treating them like children. My husband and I agreed to treat them more like adults, but the next day they called up and said that they were out of gas and wanted to borrow $20 from us. A few days later they again told us to treat them like adults, but they called that very evening saying that they were hungry and wanted to come over for dinner. We would love to treat our married children like adults, but they won’t act like adults.” After she finished her comments, several other people in the audience expressed similar feelings.
Reciprocity
This story reinforces the principle that relationships between adult children and parents don’t really change until there is reciprocity in the relationship. Relationships develop an equal footing when both people give to each other, but when only one party gives and the other takes, an unequal relationship develops. An adult-to-adult relationship can be established only upon the principle of reciprocity.
When children are young, parents sacrifice considerably by giving to their children. Young children and adolescents, of course, should be appreciative and express love and gratitude to their parents, but most of the nurturing and acts of service flow toward the children. The relationship between adult children and their parents, though, needs to shift toward an adult-to-adult relationship in which children can give back.
One couple was fortunate to have the wife’s parents come to their home for the weekend to help paint the outside of the house. As a sign of appreciation, the young couple took the parents out to dinner. In another family, the adult children got together and planned a surprise birthday party for one of their parents. In both cases, the married children acted like adults by treating their parents like adults, thereby fostering adult-to-adult relationships. These relationships are based on friendship and mutual respect, with each being concerned about the happiness and well-being of the other. Most important, these relationships are satisfying for both the parents and the adult children.
Some married children struggle with the “Santa Claus syndrome,” viewing Mom and Dad as Santa Claus figures who are to shower love and gifts on their children with little expectation of reciprocity. These children are often unable to develop mutually satisfying relationships with their parents.
Of course, most young married couples are unable to match the financial resources of their parents, making them unable to reciprocate on a dollar-to-dollar basis. But the principle of reciprocity isn’t necessarily about the amount of money exchanged, because continued emotional dependence on parents can be just as damaging to a marriage as financial dependence. Rather, reciprocity is based more on mutual acts of service and caring. For example, as adult children have conversations with their parents, they can express interest, ask questions, listen empathetically, and offer encouragement, praise, and support. As adult children nurture friendships with their parents, there comes an emotional reciprocity in the relationship that is largely independent of financial reciprocity.
Do you agree with the principle of emotional reciprocity? To what extend do you think parents should “help” support their children financially after they are married? To what extent does the Church’s self-reliance principles apply in parental-married children relationships?
October 1, 2017 at 2:40 am #323930Anonymous
GuestYou said a key word “emotional” reciprocity. The examples from the story, can I have some gas money or can I come over for dinner, felt more temporal. While reading I knew where they were headed, pretty soon we’re going to get to the part of the story where the adults say “we’d treat you like adults if you start acting like adults.” It was inevitable for the story to get there. But would the parents give occasional gas money or an occasional meal to a peer in need and still view them as adults?
I used the word occasional intentionally. Views may change in cases where there’s a more habitual need.
But you said
emotionalreciprocity. Sometimes pride in a parent can prevent a child from helping a parent with emotional needs. Sometimes parents feel like they have to be the strong one and not show a level of vulnerability that would allow their children to give them emotional support. The good news is that I don’t think there’s a cutoff date. There’s a transition period. If the kids come around for a free meal every once in a while in their 20s, enjoy it I guess, you’ll probably be complaining about how they never visit once you become a grandparent (and by “you” I mean the general you, not you specifically).
So maybe the transition period lasts until your kids are 60, you’re in your late 80s, and you start to get weak and need their help. When they come for your driver’s license and you’re swatting at them with a cane, remember – you’re the child in the relationship now.
October 1, 2017 at 2:07 pm #323931Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:
You said a key word “emotional” reciprocity. The examples from the story, can I have some gas money or can I come over for dinner, felt more temporal.The part that you may be missing is that he said the reciprocal dollar amounts don’t have to be equivalent for emotional reciprocity to take place. But there needs to be some temporal reciprocity for that emotional reciprocity to take place — it just doesn’t have to be equivalent. Kind of like the parable of the widow’s mite.
That makes a lot of sense to me. In non-family relationships, people do kind of keep track of how much they put in and take out when service or “value donated” is given over the long term — particularly when duty is involved. In family relationships, there is still that kind of mental note of what is given and what is taken, but due to the family relationship, there isn’t a need for the amounts to be similar.
That made a lot of sense to me.
It’s as if in bringing over a simple gift, or offering an afternoon of work to parents who give a really big gift or do a significant service for the adult children broadcasts “I am an adult and will say thanks the same way I would to any other adult”.
October 1, 2017 at 9:02 pm #323932Anonymous
GuestI like the article. As a younger unmarried member of the family – I would always be treated to dinner.
Either my folks would pay or an older married sibling would pay for me.
Once I got married, my wife (who had lived independently from her parents for several years at that point) put a stop to that. She felt that the time had come for me to step up and pay my own way.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.