Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › Where else is eternal marriage taught?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 2, 2018 at 8:38 pm #211994
Anonymous
GuestI can only think of D&C 132…and even though that section is clunky and convoluted and gives me the creeps, it’s the only place I can find specific teaching about eternal marriage and families. Any other places?
April 2, 2018 at 9:45 pm #327845Anonymous
GuestThe Temple and Patriarchal Blessings. April 2, 2018 at 11:14 pm #327846Anonymous
GuestIf you’re looking for references in the Standard works, I think that’s about it, unless you REALLY want to stretch and imply a few other scriptures. There’s plenty in talks from early Church leaders all the way to the present. But yes, it is pretty sparse for being such an important topic. April 2, 2018 at 11:48 pm #327847Anonymous
Guestdande48 wrote:
If you’re looking for references in the Standard works, I think that’s about it, unless you REALLY want to stretch and imply a few other scriptures. There’s plenty in talks from early Church leaders all the way to the present. But yes, it is pretty sparse for being such an important topic.
That scripture about binding and loosing.
April 3, 2018 at 1:55 pm #327848Anonymous
GuestSamBee wrote:
That scripture about binding and loosing.
Feels like a stretch with strong implications.
April 3, 2018 at 1:57 pm #327849Anonymous
GuestIn lots of people’s hearts, even if their churches and religions don’t teach it directly. That might seem like a cop out at first, but it is a fundamental human desire for people who believe in an afterlife and love their spouses – and, for most, it is expressed as a wish, even though they don’t believe it.
April 3, 2018 at 2:33 pm #327850Anonymous
GuestWell said, Curt. Because it’s such a fundamental desire, I find it troubling that eternal marriage is only promised to the people who were lucky enough to be Mormon and marry in the temple. Y’know, 0.1% of the world’s population plus whatever proportion converts in the spirit world. I mean this whole idea that family ties are magically severed seems a bit far-fetched to me. I see no reason why those relationships wouldn’t continue even if they aren’t official or cross kingdoms of glory boundaries.
And that’s part of why I’m a universalist.
April 4, 2018 at 12:30 pm #327851Anonymous
GuestBeefster wrote:
And that’s part of why I’m a universalist.
Joseph Smith Sr, and Asael Smith were both Universalist. I think many of the ideas, doctrines, and principles got passed on to Joseph Smith Jr when he was restoring the Church. That’s why we insist on EVERYONE being baptized and sealed, post death, whether they want it to or not. I’ve also known a good number of Mormons who believe that even if someone fully rejected the gospel in this life, they’d still probably come around in the next. Heck, Adolf Hitler was baptized, endowed, and sealed post-mortem. #Godwin’sLaw
I’d say the LDS Church is very Universalist; maybe even to the point of bridging mainstream Christianity with Universalism. Also, keep in mind that
. They’d still have to pay their “debt”, but in the end they’d still make it to the Celestial Kingdom.many latter day prophets have taught that all the posterity of righteous would all be savedApril 4, 2018 at 7:11 pm #327852Anonymous
GuestWhat dande48 said. We don’t teach that only those selves in this life get to stay together. We teach that everyone has that chance – and that, ultimately, God has “all eternity” to make things work out in the end.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.