- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 15, 2018 at 6:36 pm #212033
Anonymous
GuestAfter months of being in limbo, we have finally started a new chapter of our lives in a new state, new job, and obviously new ward. Now we’re in the precarious position of setting boundaries and expectations in our new ward, but not wanting to give so much information that we regret it. Our bishopric is new from the beginning of the year, and eager to welcome us into the ward and put us to work. Some concerns:
In my temporary ward, my last bishop called me to get to know our family so he could give my son a temple recommend. My son attended mutual the day after we moved in, before we attended church, and there was a temple trip that week and his recommend had just barely expired.
Bishop said, “well, tell me more about you- you sound active, and I see you have a TR” and caught off-guard, I responded, “well, we’re a bit different. But (son) loves temple trips and is a great kid. He is looking forward to YM, etc. “
The “we’re a bit different” comment earned me a trip to the Bishop’s office, after putting him off a few weeks. By this time, we’d been to church a few times and my husband had played church basketball a few times, with his tattoos visible in gym shorts and tshirts. We’d seen people treat us differently- I’d been asked to give prayers, substitute in primary, etc., but husband had been almost shunned in class- no one talked to him, invited him to help with quorum duties, etc. (And he swears he got purposefully fouled more at church ball! Ha!)
Bishop, desperate to help correct the path of a wayward member, asked me to write down a list of my concerns, and I responded “I’m happy with where I’m at and I’m not seeking counsel outside my own study and prayers right now.” Bishop was pretty unhappy, and insisted I write a list of concerns. I responded, “My concerns are not enough to keep me away from church right now, and I am protective of the testimony I have built. I don’t want to share my concerns with anyone outside my husband.” After a few more comments insisting, I said I had to go (4 kids waiting in the car, starving and bored).
Bishop never asked to talk to my husband, never tried to extend a calling to him, never asked him to offer a prayer, etc. But actively pursued me. I felt like the assumption was that my husband was a trouble maker because they could see the evidence of it (tattoos), but maybe I’m making an assumption there as well.
The funny thing is- if it were up to me, is probably have thrown my hands up and walked away by now- it would just be easier than having to navigate and tiptoe. My husband is the one pushing for church, wanting our kids to grow in our faith tradition, wanting to stay. Doctrinally, he has far fewer problems than I do, and the problems he has, he has no interest in exploring.
I’m frustrated that the assumption is made on him being “a fallen husband” and me being the one who can be rescued. We’ve seen it in our past 2 wards and in our new ward as well- I’ve been contacted a dozen times by ward and leadership members, extended a calling, invited to the ward, etc. While husband hasn’t had any contact. We had the HPG stop by when they heard we were unloading our Uhaul and he met 2/3 bishopric. He’s a pleasant, personable guy, he doesn’t give anyone a reason to shy away from him. His contact info is available as much as mine is. It’s just an irritation, but there it is.
Outside of me venting on assumptions, I’d love some input.
I’m trying to find a balance between not sharing too much but not living in the closet. I won’t throw a t-shirt on if I hear a knock at the door to cover my tank top and shoulder tattoo if it happens to be a ward member- but I also won’t wear a sleeveless dress to church. Does that make sense? Not saying anything and just going about my business works, but what about when asked (like in my previous ward) by bishopric or others? How much do I share so that I’m not being duplicitous, but not invite interventions?
Also, on boundaries. We have afternoon church, which for some reason means people want to stop by unannounced on a Sunday morning. I’ve told the primary president and bishopric that we don’t schedule meetings or visits on Sunday because that’s a day we keep for home and family, and that we’re pretty private people and would like phonecalls or texts before someone stops by. PP asked again if she could stop by this morning, saying it would just be for a few minutes to welcome the kids to primary. I appreciate her wanting to welcome our family, but I also feel the need to keep boundaries in place. They seem to be honoring the phonecalls before visits, but I’ve had 2 phonecalls since 9 this morning asking for morning visits and even insisting when I say no. How do you set healthy boundaries on your time and space without being rude?
TL;DR: in a new ward, how do you set boundaries and expectations?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
April 15, 2018 at 8:12 pm #328243Anonymous
GuestNew ward and new starts are great. You’re in a good position to do as you want and set boundaries. I think the thing with your husband being seen as the one “pulling your family away” is kind of an old school traditional view of things because everybody knows women are more spiritual than men. And it’s hogwash. Granted the ink probably doesn’t help but it is what it is. Jesus hung out with sinners, harlots, and publicans – you and your husband are relatively tame in that respect. I might not be shy about pointing to key ward leaders out how judgemental this might be. There is no TR question “Do you have a tattoo?” although there may be something in some handbook – but it’s still not a question.
So to answer your question, even if my answer is lame and others will do better. Keep doing what you’re doing. You might have to be a little assertive and maybe not answer the door – eventually they’ll get it. You could also be proactive with your bishop and set up an appointment to go and meet him, very nicely setting some boundaries. Leadership roulette plays a part there, but a good one will honor your requests and pass them along to the WC (and you might still risk becoming a project). And sometimes we need to be very assertive as in “I told you before we don’t do Sunday visits and despite your good intentions this really bothers me, so please honor my wishes” or maybe even “I’ve seen people leave the church for less than this.” Honestly I’d ditch the phone call thing – in their minds that means they can still come if they call as opposed to no, they can’t ever come on Sunday.
April 15, 2018 at 10:50 pm #328244Anonymous
GuestI think any time you’re new to a ward it’s natural for a few things to happen, more because you’re new than anything else. 1) It will be hard to work your way in socially (at least it would be for me). You’re entering an environment with established relationships. One where you may be seen an outsider for a while. The extreme example of this would be one of those Utah wards where 75% of the people are all extended family. You’re an outsider invading home turf.

or
2) Lots of people will come up to you asking lots and lots of questions in an effort to get to know more about you.
or some oddball mixture of both.
I’d also anticipate the primary president, the YM/YW president, the EQP, etc. trying to make lots of contact, even in-home contact, because they want people to feel welcomed, especially the youth. There might be a period of time when you’re new where you have to muscle through that stuff until you become old hat and everyone starts taking your presence for granted.

There’s a difference between saying, “I’m doing really well.” vs., “I’m doing really well navigating all of my concerns on my own.”
Adding that “…navigating all of my concerns on my own.” tips the bishop off that there
areconcerns and now he feels an obligation to resolve them (or takes it as a personal challenge). That said, I get the desire to communicate boundaries and it’s hard to do that without letting leaders know where you stand. It’s different for everyone, it’s even different for the same person interacting with different people, but details do tend to invite attention. A quick, “No thanks.” or “We’re fine, thanks for asking.” with absolutely no elaboration given, even when pressed, gives someone less of a toehold to go into fix it mode.
April 15, 2018 at 10:54 pm #328246Anonymous
GuestI try hard to assume the most charitable circumstances possible for people that interact with me. This is for my own personal sanity. I just assume that most people are busy, preoccupied, unaware, and even a little clueless. As for the ward contacting you, my cell phone number is listed for the household contact and I get calls all the time for people wanting to talk to DW. I hardly ever get contacted by church members myself (not that I want to be contacted, usually they want something…
:lolno: ). I assume that part of this can be explained by differences in how the men and women organizations operate in the church. DW gets called at least monthly by the compassionate service leader and the feed the missionaries coordinator – I never get those calls. Actually I do get the call and then they ask for my wife and then I give them her cell phone number.😆 She gets invited to relief society activities. I do not think we have any EQ activities. Even when we have father and sun campout, it is up to you to look at the stake calendar. I have never been personally invitedAs for boundaries, I believe that they are important and healthy. With the church it can be important to understand how you will contribute/ be imposed on by the church and how you will not. It may be helpful even to push for the calling that you would do rather than repeatedly saying no to what you won’t.
I also believe that there is benefit to building on common beliefs. This means that if other people assume that because I am Mormon I believe in XYZ, I will not tell them otherwise. There can be more than one way to Mormon, but people are not going to thank me if I am too flagrant in our differences.
Finally, I have had to accept somewhat of a second class citizenship in the church. I believe that this is the natural consequence of my not being “all in”. I am not in the “inner circle”. I establish boundaries and the church more or less honors those boundaries and a little distance is created. I have come to accept my own “arms length” relationship to the church.
I hope that makes sense and is helpful in some measure.
April 15, 2018 at 11:51 pm #328245Anonymous
GuestGetting tattoos is one of those few “mormon-standards” that does not keep you from getting a temple recommend. With that in mind, it’s funny that people place such a huge emphasis on it. Maybe it’s because the more apparent the sin, the easier it is to focus on it. On setting boundaries, I think it’s important to be clear and explicit. If those boundaries aren’t respected, it’s one of the few times where it’s okay to get a little mad. Make sure they understand that breaking the boundaries you have set is unacceptable, and you won’t tolerate it. If they show up on Sunday unannounced, kick them out. If they keep pushing, after getting a clear answer, walk away. While I am an advocate of being kind whenever possible, and especially don’t feel it’s right to be rude to a well-intentioned member who didn’t know better, those who have been given clear boundaries should respect those boundaries.
Explicitness is the key. If you give someone wiggle-room, they are going to wiggle. You’re free to give them exactly as much detail as you want, and if they press for details you don’t want to give, stick to your guns. You always have the option of walking away, and don’t have to attend any meeting you don’t want to be a part of.
April 16, 2018 at 4:34 am #328247Anonymous
GuestYou’ve set some good boundaries there so far, and made them known. Keep doing what you’re doing. People will need to be reminded though and it’s not like you can tell the bishop something and everyone in the ward will get it and abide by it. You’ll have to set the boundaries with everyone individually. I’m not a fan of the pop in visit. Even as a former HT i didn’t like to do it. So the Sunday morning thing, of you’ve told people already, just don’t answer there door. They’ll get it eventually, might need a reminder though.
I live in socal, so I don’t get the aversion to tattoos. Maybe it’s just me but I don’t see them as a problem or taboo.
Keep it up!
April 18, 2018 at 4:54 am #328248Anonymous
GuestMy best friend in my ward has a boatload of tattoos. He’s very sensitive about them, but I’ve honestly thought they were pretty cool. Cool enough that I’m considering a few of my own someday. It really is a travesty that we all focus so much on what I call the so-called “visible“ sins. Such as WoW, Sunday activities, and in this case, tatoos. I’ve been in my ward for 15 years, and feel like I’m constantly setting boundaries. I nearly stopped talking to my best buddy from high school for 5 years when he was called to the bishopric in my ward. I always wondered if he was talking to me as my buddy or as a representative of the bishopbric. I recognize this was my problem, not his.
Good luck with your ward transition. I had one of those very awkward visits with a new bishop a few weeks back after putting him off for weeks. It was extremely hard to keep my comments vague and general without them sounding that way. I don’t think I was successful as we were supposed to get a visit from our bishop and SP tonight as part of ward conference. Thankfully we had other commitments and they went elsewhere. The one specific item I mentioned to my bishop was that the first time I hear that I’m on a ward council list is the last time he’ll see me on the list. Oops. Probably tipped my hand on that one.
April 20, 2018 at 12:21 am #328249Anonymous
GuestDarkJedi wrote:
There is no TR question “Do you have a tattoo?” although there may be something in some handbook – but it’s still not a question.
There’s nothing in either handbook, from what I can find. However, True to the Faith is pretty clear: “Latter-day prophets strongly discourage the tattooing of the body.Those who disregard this counsel show a lack of respect for themselves and for God.” There’s also Ensign articles and a page about tattoos and missions. We both have tattoos that we have gotten within the past 6 months or so, and we feel very different about tattoos (obviously) than the church at large. Mainly that they can have cultural, spiritual, and personal meaning and can thoughtfully adorn our bodies rather than defiling them. But we knew when we got them that they would cause raised eyebrows or more. Mine are covered unless I’m in a tank top- which it so happens I was during the 2 separate drop-in visits within the past 3 days- one visit at 9:15 at night, oh dear. So maybe with that we’ll see less stigmatization of my husband, but who knows?
DarkJedi wrote:
Honestly I’d ditch the phone call thing – in their minds that means they can still come if they call as opposed to no, they can’t ever come on Sunday.
I should have been more clear- we don’t do visits on Sunday. If someone would like to visit another day of the week, we would like a phone call beforehand.
I like your idea of talking to the bishop and setting boundaries to be passed on to the WC. That way, anyone in WC (and the people in their stewardship who would be asked to visit us) would know our boundaries, even if they choose not to honor them.
Thanks!
April 20, 2018 at 12:40 am #328250Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:
1) It will be hard to work your way in socially (at least it would be for me).True, but I actually don’t have a need/desire for social activity within the church- that was beaten out of me in my last ward! Even in my in-between ward, I tended to sit by myself and didn’t seek friendships/playdates/etc with those in my ward. I am a friendly person, and don’t shut people down at all in the moment, but I’ve been known to politely turn down dinner invitations in favor of staying home.
nibbler wrote:
I’d also anticipate the primary president, the YM/YW president, the EQP, etc. trying to make lots of contact, even in-home contact, because they want people to feel welcomed, especially the youth.Lots of this already- which is great- it beats being ignored or outcast. I do think that as Mormons, we tend to ignore rules of courtesy because we’re all part of the same club, so you don’t treat the perfect strangers who just moved in as a stranger- why wouldn’t it be okay to drop by at 9:15 unannounced when the house is completely dark on a school night? Lovely people, lovely sentiments, lovely brownies, but still not appropriate, at least to the non-Mormon societal standards- I just can’t see someone dropping by a stranger’s house late at night, even if they were new in the neighborhood- they would make sure they went when it was appropriate, I think.
nibbler wrote:
That said, I get the desire to communicate boundaries and it’s hard to do that without letting leaders know where you stand. It’s different for everyone, it’s even different for the same person interacting with different people, but details do tend to invite attention. A quick, “No thanks.” or “We’re fine, thanks for asking.” with absolutely no elaboration given, even when pressed, gives someone less of a toehold to go into fix it mode.
This is the problem!Information+boundaries=expectations that I at least have input on+intervention
where
boundaries+no information=less intervention+perhaps ill-informed expectations
I’m not sure. Which is the lesser of two weevils?
:angel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4PzpxOj5Cchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4PzpxOj5Cc” class=”bbcode_url”> April 20, 2018 at 1:06 am #328251Anonymous
GuestForgive my multiple posts as replies. I hate typing on my phone, but my computer isn’t as handy to quote with.
Roy wrote:
I try hard to assume the most charitable circumstances possible for people that interact with me. This is for my own personal sanity. I just assume that most people are busy, preoccupied, unaware, and even a little clueless.
I’m trying- it’s difficult when you see behavior that is remarkably different than previous wards (and we’ve been in 2 dozen) repeated in multiple wards. My perception of the possible assumptions towards my husband are bothering me- because the stereotype that is assumed is not at all what is happening with us. I don’t want to be seen as the saintly wife who is standing by her heathen husband. I need to work on (a) giving more benefit of the doubt and (b) just not caring.Roy wrote:
As for boundaries, I believe that they are important and healthy. With the church it can be important to understand how you will contribute/ be imposed on by the church and how you will not. It may be helpful even to push for the calling that you would do rather than repeatedly saying no to what you won’t.
I don’t know what to do about a calling. I was asked over the phone by BP1C if I would accept a Sunday-only calling to partner-teach youth. He told me not to say no over the phone but that I could say yes over the phone. I had tried to tell him no as I had planned on not holding a calling for a while due to mental health stresses, still unpacking, starting a new job, etc. and wanted to find balance first. He called/texted a few days later while I was at work asking for an answer, and I told him I didn’t have one yet. I don’t know what calling I would do right now- the thought gives me anxiety on a number of levels.Roy wrote:
I also believe that there is benefit to building on common beliefs. This means that if other people assume that because I am Mormon I believe in XYZ, I will not tell them otherwise. There can be more than one way to Mormon, but people are not going to thank me if I am too flagrant in our differences.I absolutely agree. At church, I tend to be quiet if I disagree/don’t believe in a statement and contribute on common testimony. The exception is when someone says something that can actually hurt others- such as the RS comments from the SP’s wife that “Those people who have depression can’t even feel the Spirit” and “They keep putting these medications into their bodies that do more harm than good, when they should just pray more and get some exercise.” I speak up (kindly, I hope) on those things because it is actively hurting people we should be loving, and I have the experience and knowledge to back up my statements.
Roy wrote:
Finally, I have had to accept somewhat of a second class citizenship in the church. I believe that this is the natural consequence of my not being “all in”. I am not in the “inner circle”. I establish boundaries and the church more or less honors those boundaries and a little distance is created. I have come to accept my own “arms length” relationship to the church.I hope that makes sense and is helpful in some measure.
I agree and feel the same. I’m alright with 2nd class citizenship, I’d prefer an arms length relationship. I’m not as comfortable with the stigmatization towards my husband and kids because of my not being “all in” (though my husband is in the same boat as me on actions, if not beliefs)
That made sense and was helpful. I so appreciate the reminder to give benefit of the doubt and see through lenses of love instead of judgement, and trying to assume that others are striving for that as well. I needed that.
April 20, 2018 at 1:25 am #328252Anonymous
Guestdande48 wrote:
Getting tattoos is one of those few “mormon-standards” that does not keep you from getting a temple recommend. With that in mind, it’s funny that people place such a huge emphasis on it. Maybe it’s because the more apparent the sin, the easier it is to focus on it.It is funny. I could write a whole post on that- tattoos on islanders are accepted because they’re a part of the culture, but tattoos are not considered part of our modern culture despite 40% of 19-35 year olds having tattoos. The propaganda that everyone who gets one regrets it, that they’re all ugly and defilement, that someone using their agency and good judgement to get one must be disrespecting themselves and God to get a tattoo, and will be reminded of their regret every day is all pretty frustrating. My tattoos represent my marriage and my place in the universe. I thoughtfully selected an artist and the art itself, and cared for my tattoos carefully so they healed well. I think they’re beautiful, and symbolic, and all-around fantastic. I’m reminded every day of the things they represent. That being said, I do understand the knee-jerk reaction of members towards tattoos, because I used to react the same- but my opinions change long before anything resembling a FC. (My sister, who doesn’t know about my FC but knows about my tattoos, is certain that a tattoo is the first step on the path to apostasy, where I was well-into my FC before I considered one.)
dande48 wrote:
On setting boundaries, I think it’s important to be clear and explicit. If those boundaries aren’t respected, it’s one of the few times where it’s okay to get a little mad. Make sure they understand that breaking the boundaries you have set is unacceptable, and you won’t tolerate it. If they show up on Sunday unannounced, kick them out. If they keep pushing, after getting a clear answer, walk away. While I am an advocate of being kind whenever possible, and especially don’t feel it’s right to be rude to a well-intentioned member who didn’t know better, those who have been given clear boundaries should respect those boundaries.Explicitness is the key. If you give someone wiggle-room, they are going to wiggle. You’re free to give them exactly as much detail as you want, and if they press for details you don’t want to give, stick to your guns. You always have the option of walking away, and don’t have to attend any meeting you don’t want to be a part of.
Turning away unexpected visitors is so hard for me- I’m predisposed to trying not to offend, and I’m a friendly person by nature. I guess if I want boundaries, though, I’m going to have to enforce them even when it’s uncomfortable.
Avoidance is an option- not answering phonecalls, not answering the door, but it’s not something I’ve liked doing unless I’ve had something preventing me from doing so (i.e., taking a shower, being in a meeting, etc.) The past-9pm knock-on-the-door was so startling, we thought certainly there was a wreck just outside or something else was wrong (we live on a busy corner). I don’t have a peep-hole in the door, maybe it’s time to invest!
😆 April 20, 2018 at 1:43 am #328253Anonymous
GuestLDS_Scoutmaster wrote:and it’s not like you can tell the bishop something and everyone in the ward will get it and abide by it. You’ll have to set the boundaries with everyone individually.
True, very true.LDS_Scoutmaster wrote:
I’m not a fan of the pop in visit. Even as a former HT i didn’t like to do it. So the Sunday morning thing, of you’ve told people already, just don’t answer there door. They’ll get it eventually, might need a reminder though.
Sunday morning is probably easy enough to screen calls and visits, but it is more difficult the rest of the week. There’s construction adjacent to our home, we get UPS packages, etc- there are time sensitive issues that require me to answer the door. I work from home some days- I’m not a fan of getting interrupted for a friendly getting-to-know-you chat, while I would welcome it at church.LDS_Scoutmaster wrote:
I live in socal, so I don’t get the aversion to tattoos. Maybe it’s just me but I don’t see them as a problem or taboo.
It’s such a *thing* where we’ve lived- one friend asked me to tell her “why I would feel the need to do that” and kept me at arm’s length for a bit, my dad said “it’s not hard to just not get one, you just don’t get one”, another good friend asked why I felt the need to directly disobey a prophet. My mom would lose it- I have to tell her at some point, I’m sure, as it’s visible in a bathing suit and we swim as a family every so often. Incidentally, she knows about my husband’s and has deemed it ok because he was military, as long he didn’t get more than one. Similar approval towards him from other friends and family who know his background.
But we knew this and chose to get them anyway; I need to remember that.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
April 20, 2018 at 1:46 am #328254Anonymous
GuestRumin8 wrote:It really is a travesty that we all focus so much on what I call the so-called “visible“ sins. Such as WoW, Sunday activities, and in this case, tatoos.
Right? Especially since the visible “sins” are often the least offensive to God, and the judging is far worse. From what I can understand.
Rumin8 wrote:
The one specific item I mentioned to my bishop was that the first time I hear that I’m on a ward council list is the last time he’ll see me on the list. Oops. Probably tipped my hand on that one.Ha! You might have!
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
April 20, 2018 at 1:11 pm #328255Anonymous
GuestBeJoyful wrote:
TL;DR: in a new ward, how do you set boundaries and expectations?
Make it about what you are willing to DO in the church. Not about what you believe, not that you are “a bit different”, not that you need to protect your testimony. All those things are like tip of the icebergs that signal problems beneath. That is why I think the Bp pursued you.
So, if they want you to take a calling, you always have a really good reason. Not a testimony-based or culture-based or doctrinally-based reason, a practical one.
Also, always affirm your testimony of the church to the extent you can when cornered or even occasionally in meetings. Even if it’s the hum of spirituality you have felt at different times, even though now, intellectually you are not much of a believer (this is general advice, not tailored to your state of belief on the spectrum). I can still comment on how I felt the spirit when I asked if I should join the church. I can still comment on how great the church is in providing environments where youth can come together and strengthen their values. Also, I had some good experiences teaching the gospel as a missionary. I can refer to those with integrity even though my overall positivity to the church due to more recent experiences is not what it once was.
BYU is a great achievement both financially, academically, and for helping parents feel their kids will be in a morally safe environment during those sensitive years. I know the culture bugs some, but I was happy to let my daughter get exposed to it if it meant she was going to be free of guys hitting on her sexually all the time, or encouraging alcohol overconsumption etcetera.
What are your affirmations? Share those.
And then keep the concerns to yourself. I find this site is my primary outlet for sharing the balanced view of what I think, without fear of censure so long as it’s not anti-Mormon (and I don’t consider myself anti-Mormon).
If they do press to the point you HAVE to give a reason, your reasons for not serving are based on something other than lack of belief or testimony. And they are reasons the Bp and Ward can’t resolve. Not reasons that require counsel, can be fixed with bread and cookies and visits to the home, but issues that are beyond the scope of our lay ministry or resources. And there are a LOT of problems like that. Always give vague hope of full TR holding or other transformations if you aren’t full-on the textbook “good standing” wagon.
My version of the “unresolvable problem that sets boundaries” is that service in the church affected my health and happiness. Even though I have a testimony, I found myself miserable in it for various reasons. And that I found joy and variety in community service instead. Also, how I was rejected from a job application because I didn’t have any management experience, when I had 20 years of leadership in stake and wards the interviewer didn’t accept as valid. I indicated I needed to get more leadership experience in volunteer BUSINESS contexts for my career, as it was at an impasse. So, I’m still testimony-laden, just directing my service to a different organization FOR THE TIME BEING (vague hope at work).
The BP left me alone after that. He couldn’t solve those problems.
So, he left the meeting thinking “SD has a testimony right now who I guess he isn’t a good fit for service in our church at this time. Keep being nice to him and don’t take him for granted”.
Be active by attending church regularly or semi-regularly, supporting any children and spouses, and be one of those people “with potential” who never blooms. Let the leadership approach you about ordinances for your children. I hold back until they ask ME to do it, so at least I know they are going to let me (probably). This requires patience, but so far it’s worked.
If you seem to want something from the church, it tends to want to extract something from you in return. You want to baptize your son? Pay tithing for a while please! If not tithing, they want information about your situation! You want to ordain your son to a priesthood office? Get a TR! Not always, but I have heard of these things happening due to leadership roulette. People post them on this site.
If the PP wants to come over to welcome to the kids, I would thank her and ask if you can set aside some time at church, or arrange an appointment during the week…When the BP gave me 20 families to HT, I told them no, give me 5, and they did. When they kept extending callings I didn’t want, I kept saying “no” until they came out with something that excited me.
That’s my plan. I think if you can accept that the local Ward is not a place to share your deepest feelings about the church, and that you are simply trying to not rock the boat, it becomes easier. When you feel you want acceptance in the midst of naked unorthodoxy, you’re going to be frustrated — you wont’ get it! You can get it here, though, and I find this site satisfies my need for community, and the church experience satisfies my need to still be a Mormon without necessarily buying into everything.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.