Home Page › Forums › General Discussion › Area Seventy Just Drops By?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 28, 2018 at 1:48 am #212115
Anonymous
GuestI walked in to Sacrament Meeting and a whole bunch of Stake President people are sitting on the stand. The entire Bishopric. The Elders. It’s like Ward Conference, but not. Low and Behold, our Area Seventy just dropped in. To our ward only. Why I don’t know. He spoke. The SP spoke. Neither of them long. But Elder Seventy was announced as the Presiding Authority.
I have never had that happen. Our Stake is too new and Stake Presidency is as new as the Stake. Nothing else needed changing.
It was crazy. The first 3 speakers (one youth, the 2 Elders) went off as if it were a normal day. Then a choir hymn and the rest was the SP and Elder Seventy.
Have you ever seen this?
May 28, 2018 at 2:55 am #329291Anonymous
GuestMom3, that had to be an interesting sacrament meeting. So far, that hasn’t happened in my ward, as far as I know. May 28, 2018 at 11:29 am #329292Anonymous
GuestThere could be any number of reasons why. It could be a surprise inspection or he may have found himself in the area. May 28, 2018 at 3:22 pm #329293Anonymous
GuestI’ve heard even the prophet does this occasionally. It isn’t announced beforehand, for various reasons (security, not wanting to attact all the stake membership, etc). Sometimes, they just want to have a normal-ish sacrament meeting. May 28, 2018 at 5:50 pm #329294Anonymous
GuestQuote:Sometimes, they just want to have a normal-ish sacrament meeting.
I thought of the this. But if that was the case, why not just sit in the audience with everyone else?
The minute 3 special leaders are sitting on the stand, the meeting energy changes. Everyone is a little stiffer, the small jokes are forced. Then we all sort of relax when he walks out the door.
The other part that made me laugh, was that it was Memorial Day. A third of our ward was gone. The entire middle 4 rows were empty. I sit in the back and I had clear view all the way to the pulpit.
No matter how you slice it, it wasn’t a normal day.
May 28, 2018 at 6:13 pm #329295Anonymous
Guestmom3 wrote:
Quote:Sometimes, they just want to have a normal-ish sacrament meeting.
I thought of the this. But if that was the case, why not just sit in the audience with everyone else?
It’s against the rules.
It may be one of the many unwritten order of things to have the presiding authority sit on the stand. I’ll try to find an official rule but right away… the person that presides over the meeting has to take the sacrament first, so it helps if that person is on the stand.
Edit (one of many
):
Handbook 2; 18.2 Ward Meetings; First paragraph wrote:The bishop oversees ward meetings. He presides at these meetings unless a member of the stake presidency, an Area Seventy, or a General Authority attends. His counselors may conduct ward meetings and may preside if he is absent. Presiding authorities and visiting high councilors should be invited to sit on the stand. High councilors do not preside when attending ward meetings.
Personally I don’t care about the rule but once you become area seventy you’re probably handbook broke.
Note to the peeps in charge of changing the handbooks: You might want to run a comb through the second paragraph in that section of the handbook.
Quote:If the bishop and his counselors are all absent, the stake president designates who presides at sacrament meeting. Normally he designates the
high priests group leader, but he could authorize another priesthood holder instead. What’s a “high priests group leader”?!?!?!?!?
May 28, 2018 at 7:54 pm #329296Anonymous
GuestOur AA Seventy only lives in our neighboring stake about an hour and a half from our stake center, but he lives on the edge of his stake – for our more northern ward he lives about 35 minutes away and even closer to our littlest branch. That’s not to say he drops in on them, I’m just pointing that our because he has to go to church somewhere, and I think it likely our current SP could be an AA Seventy someday (and would fully sustain him as such, I’m actually not crazy about the current guy). On a regular basis, I don’t think monthly but maybe more often than every other month, the area SPs meet with the AA for the “coordinating council.” This tends to be a day long affair, sometimes Saturday and sometimes Sunday. Much of the training our SP passes along to us comes from those meetings. I think they usually meet in the AA’s home stake because it is actually more central. Anyway, a possibility is that they were having one of these meetings in your area and they were stopping in to have the sacrament. On the other hand, I don’t know that they need a reason to visit. Our AA visited our ward once, but it was announced in advance.
Just a side note, and I’m not disputing anything Nibbler said because I think he’s right. Yesterday I was speaking in the SP’s home ward. I was very surprised to see him sitting in the audience, and even commented about it (that I liked it so I wouldn’t report him and who would I report him to anyway?). Apparently his wife was out of town and he brought his youngest daughter to church and didn’t want her to sit alone or with someone else. He was not announced as presiding and did not take the sacrament first, although it was acknowledged he was present. I think it was a perfect bending of the rules.
May 28, 2018 at 8:02 pm #329297Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:Note to the peeps in charge of changing the handbooks: You might want to run a comb through the second paragraph in that section of the handbook.
Quote:If the bishop and his counselors are all absent, the stake president designates who presides at sacrament meeting. Normally he designates the
high priests group leader, but he could authorize another priesthood holder instead. What’s a “high priests group leader”?!?!?!?!?

Good point, Nibbler. The HPGL is picked because (I believe scripturally) it needs to be a high priest presiding if one is available. So, if the EQP is an elder he doesn’t qualify unless there is no HP available. I know in our stake if the bishop is absent, especially if the counselors are also absent, a member of the SP comes. Actually, with the apparent gymnastics to retain high priests quorums in the stakes I’m surprised the powers did not already fix the handbook. In modern times that can happen instantaneously.
May 28, 2018 at 9:20 pm #329298Anonymous
GuestQuote:What’s a “high priests group leader
But DJ – there is no “High Priest Group Leader” anymore. So then it should say, “Elder’s Quorum President” – me thinks.
Quote:
On a regular basis, I don’t think monthly but maybe more often than every other month, the area SPs meet with the AA for the “coordinating council.” This tends to be a day long affair, sometimes Saturday and sometimes Sunday. Much of the training our SP passes along to us comes from those meetings. I think they usually meet in the AA’s home stake because it is actually more central. Anyway, a possibility is that they were having one of these meetings in your area and they were stopping in to have the sacrament. On the other hand, I don’t know that they need a reason to visit. Our AA visited our ward once, but it was announced in advance.Possibly. The only funny kink in it, is that my ward doesn’t meet in the Stake Center. We are only 15 min. away, buy still. Double that the SP family meets in a completely different building. So why choose the least likely place to attend. Especially if nothing is really happening. Go with SP to his ward. Sit on that stand. Do your dog and pony show (which was really just telling us how amazing Ministering is going to be) and call it good.
Again, it was just weird. I have been in the church all my life and never had this happen. He seemed chill enough. Party line type guy. Nothing offensive.
May 28, 2018 at 10:16 pm #329299Anonymous
Guestnibbler wrote:Handbook 2; 18.2 Ward Meetings; First paragraph wrote:The bishop oversees ward meetings. He presides at these meetings unless a member of the stake presidency, an Area Seventy, or a General Authority attends. His counselors may conduct ward meetings and may preside if he is absent. Presiding authorities and visiting high councilors should be invited to sit on the stand. High councilors do not preside when attending ward meetings.
First off, it says they should be invited to sit on the stand, not that they must. I’d also say it doesn’t really require that a Seventy or GA preside, only makes it clear that if they wish to it will override the bishop. I mean, what happens if an Apostle is just passing through on his way home from something else and stops in a couple minutes after SM starts? Would they have to have a handoff from the bishop to the GA in the middle of the meeting, even though he just wanted to sneak in for the potluck afterward so he wouldn’t have to buy lunch on the road?
May 28, 2018 at 11:26 pm #329300Anonymous
GuestNightSG wrote:
nibbler wrote:Handbook 2; 18.2 Ward Meetings; First paragraph wrote:The bishop oversees ward meetings. He presides at these meetings unless a member of the stake presidency, an Area Seventy, or a General Authority attends. His counselors may conduct ward meetings and may preside if he is absent. Presiding authorities and visiting high councilors should be invited to sit on the stand. High councilors do not preside when attending ward meetings.
First off, it says they should be invited to sit on the stand, not that they must. I’d also say it doesn’t really require that a Seventy or GA preside, only makes it clear that if they wish to it will override the bishop. I mean, what happens if an Apostle is just passing through on his way home from something else and stops in a couple minutes after SM starts? Would they have to have a handoff from the bishop to the GA in the middle of the meeting, even though he just wanted to sneak in for the potluck afterward so he wouldn’t have to buy lunch on the road?
In the handbooks
shouldis generally interpreted as will or must. I remember our former SP saying once that “should” means they have to unless there is some compelling reason not to. As the handbooks have evolved over the years I have noticed there are fewer shoulds and they have tended to become more direct. May 29, 2018 at 6:55 pm #329301Anonymous
GuestRecently, a member of the Stake Presidency attended our Sacrament Meeting. As such, he was the presiding authority and sat on the stand. Nobody “invited” him to do so. He just did. De facto order of things. *shrug* What I loved is that, after the sacrament, our Bishop left the stand and sat with his wife. He wasn’t presiding or conducting, so he sat with his wife.
I love that man.
May 31, 2018 at 5:02 am #329302Anonymous
GuestOnce when I was bishop I got a call Sunday morning from my SP. He said Elder XXX of the 1st Q70 was visiting the area and wanted to attend a sacrament meeting, and he was coming to my ward! He sat on the stand next to me, and was the concluding speaker in the meeting. He was kind of stuck up, and complained to my SP after that I should not be telling jokes! When I introduced him, I had looked up his Bio and saw he had been a MP in Siberia. So in the introduction I said something to the effect that he got sent to Siberia for a job well done as a Stake President. He told my SP that it was ok for the Prophet to tell jokes, but not me. Every time he speaks in GC I leave the room now! May 31, 2018 at 1:49 pm #329303Anonymous
GuestSheldon wrote:He told my SP that it was ok for the Prophet to tell jokes, but not me.
😆 Maybe his sense of humor is limited to old people saying words that mostly only the youth say.
The prophet said the word ‘tweet’ lolololol. I’d write that down in my journal if I were allowed to have one.
May 31, 2018 at 4:47 pm #329304Anonymous
GuestSent to Siberia… good gravy! -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.