Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › Christopher Columbus – Exaggeration of Evil
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 10, 2018 at 8:45 pm #212210
Anonymous
GuestI came across this youtube video: . I was surprised to find it actually changed my mind. Not only that, but it really helped emphasize the dangers of black and white thinking. The point of the video was, yes, by today’s standards, Christopher Columbus was a pretty bad dude. Yes, it’s probably a dumb idea to have a holiday to celebrate him. But he’s not as awful as people make him out to be.In Defense of Columbus; An Exaggerated EvilIn the context of Joseph Smith, people either think he’s next to Jesus in goodness, or the devil incarnate. Same for Jesus. Either He was God, a lunatic, or of the devil. I think we tend to think binary about most people. But when you look at things closer, it all gets a lot more complicated. We like to put things into categories of “good” or “bad”. And in doing so, we emphasize the details which support our position, and diminish or reject the details which do not. It makes things simpler… but it’s not how things really are.
It was a good reminder to me. I hope you enjoy it.
August 10, 2018 at 9:27 pm #330638Anonymous
GuestSpain discovered the Americas at a bad time. They were coming out of the Inquisition, and they exported that and it entrenched itself in their colonies after it had died out in Spain itself. August 13, 2018 at 5:49 pm #330639Anonymous
GuestI like to think of Columbus himself as binary. The Columbus up to and including the Oct 12, 1492 version was an independent, daring, and capable explorer. The Columbus of the post-discovery was a corrupt and violent administrator. Depending on your view, you tend either to see one or the other. The fledgling United States identified strongly with the good-Columbus persona. So much so, that two of our state capitals (Columbus, OH and Columbia, SC) are named for him and even our Nation’s Capital can be found in the District of Columbia. FWIW, Oct 12 wasn’t Columbus’ birthday. It marks the day of discovery. From that standpoint, it has much less to do with Columbus and much more to do with this hugely significant event in world history. Unfortunately, we call it “Columbus Day”.
Also FWIW, in Mexico, the day is observed as “Dia de la Raza” (Day of the Race). It marks the genesis event for the Mestizo People (Indigenous/European). I think this is a much better way to think of it.
Finally, I have often seen Columbus tied to the depopulation of the Americas because of the introduction of European diseases. This is kind of non-nonsensical. The spread of smallpox from Europe to America and syphilis in the reverse direction, as well as all other diseases was an inevitability. The Discovery was going to happen one day, with or without Columbus.
August 13, 2018 at 7:51 pm #330640Anonymous
GuestWell said, OON. I really can’t add to your comment. August 24, 2018 at 1:46 pm #330641Anonymous
GuestDande48, I finally got around to watching the long, but very insightful youtube you posted. I think this is completely relevant for us here, because, as you pointed out, it is easy to see the same demonization approach being thrown at JS, BY, ETB, TSM and our LDS leaders generally. JS did a lot of things I deplore, but he also did a lot of things I admire. I always remind myself that most of his close associates stayed with him, he created something wonderful (though his constant tinkering poisoned some of it), he clearly thought of himself as an oracle of God (I use his JST for the basis of this realization; he worked on it from 1830 until the end), and he ultimately lost his own life for the cause. We commonly judge him from our perch in the 21st century, which is unfair.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.