Home Page Forums General Discussion Veiling Women’s Faces at Burial

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #212427
    Anonymous
    Guest

    A letter came out from the FP saying that it is now optional to veil a woman’s face prior to burial.

    The family should do so if the sister expressed the desire while living.

    Just thought I’d let you all know, in case you had not heard.

    Glad for the change. :clap:

    #333959
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Another big step in a good direction.

    #333960
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I keep hoping eventually they’ll stop telling us altogether what to wear when we’re dead. I still dread the fact that someone in my family will, against my explicit wishes, bury me in temple clothes. I’m sure someone will think “Well, now that he’s on the other side and knows better, surely he will want to be buried in..” NO!

    #333961
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I did not know that the veiling of the face prior to closing the casket was a thing before this change came out.

    Can someone please provide some context? Why did we until recently veil the faces? Was it because women need some sort of covering to present themselves before God? Is it symbolic or do we believe that there is some sort of actual tangible benefit to wearing temple clothes / having the face veiled in death?

    Has anyone complained about this? FMH? How did the leadership know that it might be offensive?

    Thank you!

    #333962
    Anonymous
    Guest

    dande48 wrote:


    I keep hoping eventually they’ll stop telling us altogether what to wear when we’re dead. I still dread the fact that someone in my family will, against my explicit wishes, bury me in temple clothes. I’m sure someone will think “Well, now that he’s on the other side and knows better, surely he will want to be buried in..” NO!

    A bit OT, but I heard a real horror story about a boy who commited suicide, and his parents buried him in his school uniform. Apparently he’d killed himself because he’d been bullied really badly at a private school.

    #333963
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:


    I did not know that the veiling of the face prior to closing the casket was a thing before this change came out.

    Can someone please provide some context? Why did we until recently veil the faces? Was it because women need some sort of covering to present themselves before God? Is it symbolic or do we believe that there is some sort of actual tangible benefit to wearing temple clothes / having the face veiled in death?

    Has anyone complained about this? FMH? How did the leadership know that it might be offensive?

    Thank you!

    It’s best seen in conjunction with the changes in the endowment.

    #333964
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Yeah. I had always thought that it had something to do with the scripture about hair and a “covering” for the woman in 1 Cor. 11:15

    I suppose it could also related to the age old tradition of the bride veiling her face during the wedding ceremony (which has at least been around since OT times)

    Since masonic rituals included no women, I speculate that JS must have taken his inspiration from elsewhere for this segment.

    #333965
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:


    Yeah. I had always thought that it had something to do with the scripture about hair and a “covering” for the woman in 1 Cor. 11:15

    I suppose it could also related to the age old tradition of the bride veiling her face during the wedding ceremony (which has at least been around since OT times)

    Since masonic rituals included no women, I speculate that JS must have taken his inspiration from elsewhere for this segment.

    Sort of. There are Masonic weddings and certainly there was footage of a couple getting married in a lodge on Youtube a few years ago.

    #333966
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I agree, another little step. :thumbup:

    Do you think the veil is on the way out? I’m trying to be careful here, but remember when the change came that people were dressed for initiatory but still wore the shield? Then after a fairly short time the shield was eliminated totally, I assume because it made no sense. If the veil is no longer used, why even have it? (As a side note, I don’t see that the men’s cap serves a purpose either.)

    #333967
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DarkJedi wrote:


    If the veil is no longer used, why even have it? (As a side note, I don’t see that the men’s cap serves a purpose either.)

    The veils are symbolic. Symbols are very difficult to do away with, since they are often left “open for interpretation”. Even though we’ve moved past the original intended meaning behind the veil (the separation of women from God, except through her husband), there’s still the fact that “God included it for a reason, that only the pure and heart can understand”, as well as the personal meaning attached to it by the “pure in heart” (which they don’t share with anyone else because it’s sacred).

    The thing is, symbols don’t have any inherit meaning. We give them meaning.

    #333968
    Anonymous
    Guest

    If veils don’t “veil”, they aren’t veils.

    Just saying.

    For that reason, I could see veils and caps being eliminated in the future. I also could see the caps remaining, since there is a direct connection to Biblical robe descriptions – so I could see the veil remaining in order to avoid one group having uncovered heads and the other group having covered heads. I think it probably will be both or neither. I think the leadership doesn’t want inequality again.

    #333969
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The obvious simplification is a cap without a cord.

    #333970
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Old Timer wrote:


    If veils don’t “veil”, they aren’t veils.

    Just saying.

    It’s a cap with a cape now.

    #333971
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Did we ever really know why there was a veil in place to begin with?

    There is a lot of ideas and theories, but I’ve not seen it written down in a cannonized way before.

    Even here on STLDS there are a lot of ideas, but nothing concrete.

    A lot of the temple stuff reminds me of the story of the monkeys and bananas. You know, the “study” that never happened, but teaches a lesson anyway.

    Monkeys start adopting behavior because they KNOW the consequences. They pass on the behavior without explanation and future generations keep the behavior going without knowing why. “Because it has always been done.” or “It must be important or we wouldn’t have to do it.”

    That’s kind of the mentality that I think we are in.

    #333972
    Anonymous
    Guest

    QuestionAbound wrote:


    Did we ever really know why there was a veil in place to begin with?

    Historically, veils have been a symbol of separation from God. Moses’ veil, the veil of the temple between between the “holy place” and “holy of holies”, etc. In ancient times, it was also used to denote between those women who were married or widows, and those who were “available” (sort of like our wedding rings today). And Paul also mention the importance of women wearing veils in Corinthians 11:4-16. The JKV has a very strangely worded and confusing “translation”. To paraphrase:

    -It’s shameful for a woman to pray or prophesy without a veil.

    -Men shouldn’t veil themselves, because they were made in the image and glory of God, whereas woman was made from man.

    Women veiling themselves and covering their heads was kept as common practice until the last century, mostly because of this scripture.

    Another reason which was historically given is D&C 84: 21-22

    Quote:

    And without the ordinances thereof, and the authority of the priesthood, the power of godliness is not manifest unto men in the flesh; For without this no man can see the face of God, even the Father, and live.

    Since women weren’t given the priesthood, and the temple ordinances were meant to invoke the presence of God, they were required to veil their faces. There was also plenty of early Church doctrine, which in effect stated that women will be resurrected through the priesthood power of their husbands, and can only enter into the Celestial Kingdom through their husbands. More quotes:

    Apostle Charles W. Penrose wrote:

    Every man who overcomes all things and is thereby entitled to inherit all things, receives power to bring up his wife to join him in the possession and enjoyment thereof.

    Apostle Erastus Snow wrote:


    No woman will get into the celestial kingdom, except her husband receives her, if she is worthy to have a husband; and if not, somebody will receive her as a servant. (Journal of Discourses, vol. 5, p. 291)

    H.H. Bancroft wrote:

    All good Mormons are buried in their endowment robes, and the veil worn by the women covers their faces when they are consigned to the grave. In the morning of the resurrection, this veil is to be lifted by the husband; otherwise no woman can see the face of the almighty in the next world. (History of Utah, 1840-1886)

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.