Home Page Forums General Discussion Seminary Overhaul

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #212479
    Anonymous
    Guest

    https://www.lds.org/si/seminary/seminary-curriculum-calendar-change?lang=eng

    I haven’t seen this thread started, so here ya go.

    As I am a seminary teacher, I’m not totally sure how I feel about it…other than having the book of scripture feel disjointed during the school year.

    Meaning, upcoming 9th graders in and after 2020 will have missed the first half of the Seminary lessons since the seminary year starts in January. They’ll get around to hearing those lost lessons during the spring of their senior year.

    And some students will miss the OT completely in seminary.

    Simplification?

    In a way, sure.

    Anyone else have thoughts?

    #334624
    Anonymous
    Guest

    First off, I lament how the NT will only receive a half of a year of attention. When school starts back up in the fall they will study the NT until the end of 2019. Students will then transition to the Book of Mormon at the beginning of 2020.

    I know a lot of people derive a lot of meaning out of the BoM but I for one think we fixate on it to an unhealthy degree. In my opinion we already sacrifice the study of other books of scripture at the altar to focus almost exclusively on the BoM. I’m sure that this was an inadvertent casualty of timing and scheduling (then again, maybe not) but this becomes another manifestation of what I’m talking about.

    When was the last time you heard a goal to get the general membership to read the entire NT (or OT, D&C, or PoGP for that matter)? Compare that to the last time there was a goal to read the BoM… or more to the point, when was the last time a few months went by when there wasn’t a goal to read the BoM?

    So that’s point #1. We’re cutting the NT study short and we’re fast tracking study of the BoM. I’m Book of Mormoned out.

    #334625
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Other thoughts:

    I think at least a part of this effort is to coordinate what the kids are learning in seminary and SS.

    1) Won’t the kids get bored with hearing very similar lessons in close proximity to each other? Or are the kids used to it by now because they were already doing that thing where they were focusing on one subject for a whole month before moving on to another subject? At least when classes cover different scriptures/themes there’s some variety.

    I really do worry about this one. I remember some interactions I had with peers shortly before joining the church. I was still young in those days, right at the transition age between YM/YW and the adult program, and I remember hearing a near universal complaint. Church is booooooooring. I couldn’t understand how they’d feel bored. This was the restored gospel, everything was new to me, and I was soaking it up!

    About a decade later (I’m a slow learner apparently) and I was right there with them. Church is booooooooring with a capital BOOOOOOOORING.

    Having canned lessons that are the same year after year was strain enough on youth (and adults) but I fear coordinating efforts to have very similar lessons week after week will accelerate that process.

    The church loses lots of people over difference of opinion, difference in values, laziness, wanting to sin, not having a strong enough testimony… whatever pet reason you have on your list, but IMO being bored with church probably ranks as the number one reason why kids go inactive. The emancipation of adulthood means leaving all those booring meetings behind.

    2) I don’t know how it will work, but I’m assuming it won’t be correlated to the nth degree. Where the kids study lessons during the week in seminary that relate to the lesson they will have in church that Sunday.

    What about kids on a traditional calendar (summers off)? Will they skip the middle of the curriculum in seminary to ensure the lessons line up with what is being covered in SS when school starts back up in the fall? I’m guessing/hoping they won’t try to correlate the schedules.

    #334626
    Anonymous
    Guest

    nibbler wrote:

    I think at least a part of this effort is to coordinate what the kids are learning in seminary and SS.

    1) Won’t the kids get bored with hearing very similar lessons in close proximity to each other?

    Having canned lessons that are the same year after year was strain enough on youth (and adults) but I fear coordinating efforts to have very similar lessons week after week will accelerate that process.

    2) I don’t know how it will work, but I’m assuming it won’t be correlated to the nth degree. Where the kids study lessons during the week in seminary that relate to the lesson they will have in church that Sunday.

    What about kids on a traditional calendar (summers off)? Will they skip the middle of the curriculum in seminary to ensure the lessons line up with what is being covered in SS when school starts back up in the fall? I’m guessing/hoping they won’t try to correlate the schedules.

    Your first comment: that’s exactly the reason for the change.

    Bored kids? Maybe. A friend of mine with a seminary-age student asked me which book of Scripture the student should be studying. Should he study the Book of Mormon since we are to read from that every day? Should he study the doctrine and covenants since that is what they are going over in seminary? Should he study the New Testament with his family since that is what he would be studying in Sunday school?

    In some ways, having one book of study for the entire year across-the-board may be helpful to some. N

    Canned lessons: I don’t know about your Sunday school classes, but mine have become a very exciting place to be. I have actually enjoyed Sunday school this year. There aren’t really canned lessons anymore and those who have prepared during the week, with some incredible insight.

    There will definitely be correlation. I’m quite sure that seminary kids will study the same stuff that their families are studying during the week so that they are prepared to bring those insights home and into their Sunday school classes.

    Traditional schoolers: i’m sure that there will be a set number of seminary lessons, just like there are now so that they can accommodate a regular school year. I expect there to be no difference moving forward. Summer vacation will just be that… time off.

    * it’s that summer vacation that has me wondering how the students will feel when they come back to seminary in a totally new grade, with new classes and pressures, but keep the book of scripture the same for the next few months… and then switch up the entire seminary class direction and a book of scripture over Christmas break.

    I’m thinking logistically as a seminary teacher, I will have to take any decorations down over Christmas break and put new decorations and themed materials up before we meet for seminary again. Not a big deal, but also not totally ideal in my opinion.

    Still, I may be totally wrong. I hope I am totally wrong. I hope this transition is an amazing thing.

    So…my point is…maybe this change will really be a good thing.

    #334627
    Anonymous
    Guest

    QuestionAbound wrote:


    Canned lessons: I don’t know about your Sunday school classes, but mine have become a very exciting place to be. I have actually enjoyed Sunday school this year. There aren’t really canned lessons anymore and those who have prepared during the week, with some incredible insight.

    Yeah, we’re in very different places or I’m at a very different place in my journey.

    SS feels like going to the dentist. I feel numb and have so much stuff crammed in my mouth that I can’t say anything. Then when the numbness wears off afterwards I feel the pain. Then I get a lollipop to help facilitate a return visit. 🙂 But maybe like a dentist it’s beneficial in the long run.

    #334628
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Nibbler, I am that way with seminary this year. It is D&C and I just can’t any more. It has been bad.

    SS is different this year b/c many members are relating the teachings to our every day lives in a way that they haven’t before. It is good to see them taking an active role in being a student.

    I hope things get better for you!

    #334629
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I’m mixed on it too but I don’t have any more horses (or rats) in the race. Observations:

    1) If this is another move to globalize the church (make things the same everywhere), I get it. Other countries don’t have school years the same as we do, and some really do school years by calendar years.

    2) I kind of like the idea of doing the study the same. I think there was a move to try and synchronize several years ago as well, it just didn’t work because of the Sept. school year thing. I think in some other countries it’s already synced. I can’t say I’ve enjoyed SS more this year, but I can say I’ve enjoyed my individual study more.

    3) Early morning seminary is arcane. It’s time to move into the 21st century and do it online – and there is an actual program in place. My youngest did it online his senior year and he got way more out of it than previous years and he was a more pleasant individual without the sleep deprivation.

    #334630
    Anonymous
    Guest

    My vote, not that anyone cares, is to get rid of seminary all together.

    If they are studying the same scripture as the homestudy and SS study, then give it a rest.

    When I grew up seminary wasn’t a requirement to get into any Church college. Plenty of good kids still went on missions, even if they didn’t do seminary. Let the teenagers sleep. Thousands of studies show sleep deprivation is a huge problem for teens.

    QA – I am glad your SS is good. Mine is more like Nibblers. Relief Society weeks are less so, but Priesthood and SS are old school and painful in my ward. My Bishop hasn’t even been attending either meeting.

    #334631
    Anonymous
    Guest

    mom3 wrote:


    When I grew up seminary wasn’t a requirement to get into any Church college. Plenty of good kids still went on missions, even if they didn’t do seminary. Let the teenagers sleep. Thousands of studies show sleep deprivation is a huge problem for teens.

    This is a good point. This year a YW from our ward who seemed fully qualified for BYU compared to her peers and others from this area who got admitted was not admitted. I was fairly shocked, honestly. She gets good grades, does AP classes, is involved in community service, was a class president in YW, and did school sports and music. BYU does look for “well rounded” kids like that. My kids were pretty much exactly the same as her – and one didn’t really have the grades – and all went to BYU. The difference? She didn’t do seminary. I’ve always been told seminary has a lot of weight for BYU admission, and this case proved that to me.

    But I agree with you Mom – were I prophet for a day I’d dump seminary, especially early morning. I know I already soapboxed for online seminary, but here’s another issue with early morning, and I know this because I’ve been involved with the process for the last few years: It’s very difficult to find someone willing and able to teach it. It is not unusual in our stake to go through 3 or more interviews before finding somebody to do it. At the very least it should be a paid position as it is in Zion.

    #334632
    Anonymous
    Guest

    DarkJedi wrote:


    At the very least it should be a paid position as it is in Zion.

    I lived in southwestern Colorado 13 years ago. Our neighboor was let go as the paid seminary instructor … and then almost immediately called to do the same job for free. This was a very faithful family and they joked about it. What else could they do?

    #334633
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Roy wrote:


    DarkJedi wrote:


    At the very least it should be a paid position as it is in Zion.

    I lived in southwestern Colorado 13 years ago. Our neighboor was let go as the paid seminary instructor … and then almost immediately called to do the same job for free. This was a very faithful family and they joked about it. What else could they do?

    Didn’t that sort of commonly happen to all janitors? “Thanks, but we don’t need you anymore because we have many who are going to do it for free (although nowhere near as well as you).” I guess the difference is that if nobody does the cleaning (which I think is somewhat typical in my ward and I refuse to do it) there aren’t several kids sitting there without a teacher. EM seminary is every freaking day during the school year at 0:dark30 plus an hour or two of prep time daily besides your (often here) regular job – FOR FREE! Meanwhile, your “peers” in Zion are getting paid to do the classes and prep and they just go home at the end of the day (and have summers off!). At least cleaning is only maybe an hour or two sometime during the week once a month or so (we have a 6 week rotation in my ward).

    #334634
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Quote:

    Meanwhile, your “peers” in Zion are getting paid to do the classes and prep and they just go home at the end of the day (and have summers off!). At least cleaning is only maybe an hour or two sometime during the week once a month or so (we have a 6 week rotation in my ward).

    Or the one Brother in your area hired by CES to be the token paid dude. Suddenly he, who was once just your ward friend, is now your boss or overseer, and gets half his mortgage paid, a swanky building outside of the high school, and gets to sleep in, and be the cool hang out place during lunch. While the other 99 of you crawl through 0dark30 with kids who would be served getting sleep and doing an hour of seminary at home each evening and sending you their results.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.