Home Page › Forums › History and Doctrine Discussions › Adam & Eve / The Fall
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 29, 2014 at 3:23 am #278904
Anonymous
GuestQuote:It appears Adam and Eve were told to multiply before they had bodies and were placed in the garden. Is that important?
I believe so, since I see the entire story as a mythological telling of the pre-existence. That also allows me to position “The Fall” in the pre-existence and eliminate entirely the problem with the statement that there was no death before the Fall.
Finally, the last questions get tricky, since “Adam” is used in at least three ways in the Bible, as a reference to: the first man (helpmeet of the individual Eve), all men and all humans. Similarly, “Eve” is used to mean the first woman (helpmeet of the individual Adam) and all women.
Thus, I personally don’t worry much about the distinctions in your last questions. I just go with whichever usage makes the most sense to me in each situation.
January 29, 2014 at 5:52 pm #278905Anonymous
GuestCurtis wrote:Quote:It appears Adam and Eve were told to multiply before they had bodies and were placed in the garden. Is that important?
I believe so, since I see the entire story as a mythological telling of the pre-existence…
This is an interesting theory – one that I haven’t heard before. I am pondering this.
Curtis wrote:Finally, the last questions get tricky, since “Adam” is used in at least three ways in the Bible, as a reference to: the first man (helpmeet of the individual Eve), all men and all humans. Similarly, “Eve” is used to mean the first woman (helpmeet of the individual Adam) and all women.
Thus, I personally don’t worry much about the distinctions in your last questions. I just go with whichever usage makes the most sense to me in each situation.
I do see how the various usages are important to consider. In the book of Genesis, verses 1:26-27 seem to use “man” and even “him” to refer to all people:
Quote:Let us make
manin our image, after our likeness: and let themhave dominion over…So God created manin his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
In these verses, Adam is alone as one man:
Quote:2:15 And the Lord God took
the man, and put himinto the garden of Eden… 2:16 And the Lord God commanded
the man… 2:18 …It is not good that
the manshould be alone; I will make himan help meet for him. 2:20-21 And
Adamgave names to all…but for Adamthere was not found an help meet for him. And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and heslept: and he took one of hisribs…
In the following verses, Adam and Eve are specifically referred to separately or with plural pronouns:
Quote:2:22-23 And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from
man, made he a woman, and brought herunto the man. And Adamsaid, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: sheshall be called Woman, because shewas taken out of Man. 2:25 And
theywere both naked, the manand hiswife… 3:6-7 …
shetook of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto herhusbandwith her; and hedid eat. And the eyes of themboth were opened, and theyknew that theywere naked; and theysewed fig leaves together, and made themselvesaprons. 3:8 And
theyheard the voice of the Lord… Adamand hiswifehid themselves… 3:9 And the Lord God called unto
Adam, and said unto him3:10 And the Lord God said unto
the woman3:15 I will put enmity between thee and
the woman, and between thy seed and herseed… 3:17 And unto
Adamhe said…
It seems the following verses refer only to the one man Adam:
Quote:3:22-24 And the Lord God said, Behold,
the manis become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest heput forth hishand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever: Therefore the Lord God sent himforth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence hewas taken. So he drove out the man…
However, I can see how there could have been a transition to the usage that refers to the couple, even though it says “he,” “his,” “him,” and “the man.” Obviously, they stayed together. I am probably wasting my time on this🙂 January 29, 2014 at 8:01 pm #278906Anonymous
GuestI made a little table as an image. I took the thoughts from Curtis and expanded on them: 
[img]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-juSX-q2mnxY/UulJYNVrf6I/AAAAAAAAAmE/dVAT2eGyAqY/s1600/rtzsdfzxcvsdf.png [/img] Maybe the story of Adam and Eve really is another way of telling the pre-existence story. It’s interesting that Option A entails following Heavenly Father in the pre-existence and disobeying him in the garden. It makes more sense to use Bruce McConkie’s words: “…our first parents
compliedwith whatever laws were involved so that their bodies would change from their state of paradisiacal immortality…” Of course, Adam and Eve couldn’t multiply and replenish the earth before partaking of the fruit. But were they really
commandedto multiply and replenish the earth? Maybe they were blessed with the ability to multiple but were not commanded to do so:
Quote:Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible:and God said unto them, be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth:
if this is not an express command, as the Jews understand it, for marriage and procreation of children, it seems to be more than a bare permission; at least it is a direction and an advice to what was proper and convenient for the increase of mankind, and for the filling of the earth with inhabitants, which was the end of its being made, Isaiah 45:18. This shows that marriage is an ordinance of God, instituted in paradise, and is honourable; and that procreation is a natural action, and might have been, and may be performed without sin, Keil and Delitzsch Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament:By the blessing in Genesis 1:28, God not only confers upon man
the power to multiply and fill the earth, as upon the beasts in Genesis 1:22, but also gives him dominion over the earth and every beast. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.