Home Page Forums History and Doctrine Discussions Biblical Literalism

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 16 post (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #317919
    Anonymous
    Guest

    On Own Now wrote:


    Beefster wrote:


    DarkJedi wrote:

    I believe the terms “Adam” and “Eve” are representative of all humans. I don’t believe there was one Adam and one Eve, but they are representative of all humans.

    I agree with this sentiment, especially with regards to the endowment. The endowment story can’t be literally true because it’s blatantly anachronistic. Thus, Adam and Eve are avatars for the men and women in the ceremony.


    I agree in concept, though I make an important distinction. I believe that “Adam” is representative of all humans, male and female, and that “Eve” is a foil (NPC, for you beefster), in the same way that the serpent is a foil in the Genesis story or other characters are in the endowment.

    Love it! The NPC reference totally helped me understand what you meant by foil. Each of us can place ourselves as the hero or our own story. We do not need to shoot for a merely supporting role.

Viewing 16 post (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.