- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Dax wrote:
Sleeveless would remove an extra heat inducing layer of clothing and
there are no marks to justify them in the first place.
That is definitely my biggest gripe against garments. I can’t believe how many really attractive shirts and blouses I’ve had to pass up because they’re sleeveless. Since when is showing the top inch and a half of a woman’s shoulder is immodest?Katpzur…women’s shoulders are immodest because lds males have decreed them to be sexual. Then lds women buy into it, teach it to their non-endowed daughters and enforce and police all other lds women around them. That’s not written with malice just why and how these cultural markers for women become “doctrine”.Lds men have a few such as beards and white shirts but women are great at really reaching high in enforcing female conformity. Exactly, you have no idea what a good set of shoulders does for a man!! NOT!!! Too much tradition plays to big a role in these types of issues. A women with a large chest can still show off lots of cleavage with the square neck garment tops, but as long as the shoulder is covered, it’s A-Okay. Common sense needs to play a larger role in these types of decisions. Dax wrote:Sleeveless would remove an extra heat inducing layer of clothing and there are no marks to justify them in the first place.
Garments used to be ankles to wrists, right? I guess that ended when enough people complained. If church HQ were in Louisiana maybe they would have settled on tattoos.
:angel: nibbler wrote:Garments used to be ankles to wrists, right? I guess that ended when enough people complained. If church HQ were in Louisiana maybe they would have settled on tattoos.
:angel: And where would the Duck Dynasty type beards fit into such a scenario?
nibbler wrote:When I filled out the survey I suggested that it might be a good idea to explore making garments out of sweat wicking material. I’m not sure how that might work out as an undershirt but when I was out and about exercising those shirts did wonders.
I’ve worn several different types of technical fabrics as foundation layers, and frankly, most of them ought to be available on the garment menu. There are a lot of advantages to having the right base layer for the weather and the activity, as well as the right fit for your body type.
Huffington Post picked this up and linked my BCC article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/09/mormon-temple-garments-underwear_n_6647856.html?cps=gravity_2687_1237883142063025589Keep
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.