Home Page Forums General Discussion Demotion from First Presidency?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #327553
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Hey, we can all come up with reasons as to why it was or wasn’t a demotion. :angel:

    #327554
    Anonymous
    Guest

    nibbler wrote:


    Hey, we can all come up with reasons as to why it was or wasn’t a demotion. :angel:

    * He wasn’t next in line.

    * He’s younger.

    Erm, that’s it.

    #327555
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I just thought of a big reason why it wasn’t a demotion:

    It would absolutely SUCK to be one of the Q12. You’ve got the weight of the world, everyone is always watching and scrutinizing everything you say or do… and being in the first presidency makes it even worse. Adding to it, I suspect Uchtdorf might disagree in a few key areas with RMN on how to lead the Church, which would make it even more difficult if he remained in the FP. I like Uchtford enough, that I almost don’t want him to have to deal with that added struggle.

    #327556
    Anonymous
    Guest

    While I was really sad to see Uchtdorf moved back to the Q12, I really didn’t see it as a demotion. Obviously the President of the Church is going to want counselors he “clicks” with. I can’t think of anyone who is more like Nelson than Oaks. They’re like twins separated at birth. Nelson probably just didn’t see himself working with Uchtdorf as easily. He’d want someone who sees things like he does. I think that’s only human. I’m just holding my breath that we will someday see Uchtdorf at the helm. He will be the best thing that ever happened to the Church.

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.