Home Page Forums History and Doctrine Discussions Mitt Romney’s Underwear

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #206695
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Although I grew up along the Wasatch Front, I was not comfortable talking about garments with folks not of our faith. In polite company, underwear was something was not something you either displayed or talked about. How times have changed, or rather how society has decided discussion of someone’s underwear is fair game. With Mit Romney the likely Republican candidate for president, I enjoyed the following article explaining why religious clothing is not unique to Mormons. It’s really quite educational. Others tired of the “magic underwear” jokes will probably enjoy it.

    Mitt Romney’s Underwear | Bob Lonsberry

    http://www.wham1180.com/pages/boblonsberry.html?article=10037569#.T5S6pFPUVj

    #253321
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I really liked this article too!

    #253322
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Very good article. Thanks for linking to it, dash.

    #253323
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Wow, great article. Bob Lonsberry has has said some controversial things, but he is spot on here.

    #253324
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The Sikhs wear special undershorts too. And the Zoroastrians wear an undershirt.

    #253325
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I hear Jon Stewart make fun of the Jews every night on the Daily Show. Jon is Jew.

    Maybe us Mormons need to lighten up and get over the persecution complex?

    Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2

    #253326
    Anonymous
    Guest

    cwald wrote:

    Maybe us Mormons need to lighten up and get over the persecution complex?


    Freeakin’ A.

    We wear funny underwear. We think we’re gods. I’m looking for additional wives. Actually, we have an open marriage concept, including wife-swapping. (Ok, that was just Joseph and Emma with the Laws.) It’s all pretty amusing when you get down to it.

    Problem is that LDS cannot laugh at these things, because they’re too ‘sacred’. I believe that the church will do a lot better if we can laugh and enjoy the insanity of being human.

    #253327
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Agreed totally. If we lightened up about it, those who focus on it would look like clowns with an axe to grind.

    #253328
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In my view, it’s not well established that the Smiths and Laws were into wife-swapping.

    #253329
    Anonymous
    Guest

    they weren’t. there seems to have been some talk about it, and perhaps even a threat by Emma who might have been tired of all the crap going on. Who knows? And you know? It doesn’t matter to me. It’s simply one of the comical aspects, in my impression in church history.

    #253330
    Anonymous
    Guest

    It may reveal my immature side, but I rather enjoy the South Park episodes that point out some of the silly things about Mormonism (and other religions the same), like missionaries wearing bike helmets, and that whole episode of how happy that mormon family is, even if they are incredibly cheesy and gomer-pyle-ish (…Martin Harris Dum-Dum-Dum-Dum-Dum, Lucy Harris Smart-Smart-Smart-Smart-Smart 😆 )

    Just gotta laugh at ourselves sometimes. We’re quirky people.

    I haven’t heard very many “magic underwear” jokes that are all that funny. 🙄 But I do think it strikes a chord with some folk…as anything temple related is so sacred that it is offensive to talk about. Whatever.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.